Meathelmet; ever considered on3p C&D? I've been having tons of fun on them this season, I ski all over western Norway --> thight trees to be expected. I have the first season 191s, and they claim that the new 193s are better in every way.
I find them stable as well as easy to throw around, works just fine on icy patches, makes landings easy, all over a great ski. For reference, I'm about 10cm / 10 kg bigger than you, pretty average skier.
Well with fattyish charger in mind id say the 190 is the way to go. I am myself 180 and 87 kg. On the 190 I got only 2 days last january. They, I would say, feel bigger though not so big that they would be in the catgory with the LP Xxls. Beware of the mounting point. I do not know what would be recomended for the 190, but I would in general go a bit behind the usual recomnded mounting advice as the skis seem more directed mountingwise towards BC jibb. So go with 190 if your not mainly bushwacking. You'll be content!
....and one more thing. The Redeemer 180 feel shorter and have 10 cm less platform underneath. This would probably translate to less stability at speed and will make for less edgegrip on the groomers.
[QUOTE=Meathelmet;3537457]
Soo : Loooking for a charger that still would slarve & smoove, something like a fat explosiv with a twin and rocker.
[/QUOTE
that is pretty much what it is, charger ski with speed dependent power steering
Redeemers in 190 is IMHO a very nice two quiver ski (touring/steeps and lift served).. Lots of fun on hardpack once you figure the things out, you have grip and because of the torsional stability and stiffness you can go silly fast ( 55mph+) without problems. Skis great in crap snow. Most of the time if feels and performs like a ''normal'' big mouontain ski that just transforms into a easy version when you need it. Reallyreaalyreallly love them..
I would go for the 190 personally (i'm waay lighter)
Bookmarks