Check Out Our Shop
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 148

Thread: New Marker touring binding

  1. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    retired
    Posts
    12,456
    so the f12 is lighter than the fritschi/naxos of the world, and will undoubtably ski significantly better. why will these not be popular? because it take 20 seconds to click out, switch modes, and click in? OMG!!! i switch modes 43 times per tour!!! DEAL BREAKER!!! [/liz lemon]
    go for rob

    www.dpsskis.com

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    MT
    Posts
    4,021
    That would be sweet if they have the same hole pattern as the duke. Is square tail around?

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Glenwood Springs
    Posts
    886
    From what I can see in the 2nd picture the climbing bar looks redesigned

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    T-town, CO. USA
    Posts
    2,098
    I can't wait until Salomon gets into the AT binding market. They are making AT boots now... We can dream can't we?
    Leave No Turn Unstoned!

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    22,932
    Quote Originally Posted by marshalolson View Post
    OMG!!! i switch modes 43 times per tour!!! DEAL BREAKER!!! [/liz lemon]
    You can't have this binding anyways. You'll break the plastic just by looking at it
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Between here and the river
    Posts
    213
    Yes, same hole pattern as a Duke/Baron.

    Yes, new climbing bar.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Vallee Teton
    Posts
    2,729
    Cool....

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    North Vancouver
    Posts
    1,251
    Quote Originally Posted by squaretail View Post
    Yes, same hole pattern as a Duke/Baron.

    Yes, new climbing bar.
    Damn, and 1760 grams per pair...next thing you're going to tell us is Marker's built a little delta into it...

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Ice Coast
    Posts
    945
    Quote Originally Posted by jm2e View Post
    I think a whole lot of chicks and light dudes who don't hit giant airs would be interested in this binder.
    I think that's most likely why Marker made it.
    Lighter male here who doesn't do a lot of air, very interested in the 12 version for touring. And look: How many here have personally had failures with plastic while touring, as opposed to dropping 20 footers or forcing your binding with your boot because you can't get it in? If the latter, then stay with metal, all good. Better, agitate for a 9 pound all steel setup with a 24 DIN. If not, unclear modern plastic is that much different in performance, just less weight and less cool.

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Glenwood Springs
    Posts
    886
    Can you tell us more about the redisgned climbing bar? Different height? Easier to actuate? etc...

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The Kootenays
    Posts
    1,304
    1760g, DIN 12, and I don't give a shit about the ski/tour mode switching. I would swap my barons for these in a hearbeat.

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    sfbay
    Posts
    2,179
    Please oh please I hope they fixed the AFD problems! something tells me no, because it looks exactly the same from that photo. On the plus side, it looks like it will be interchangable if it is any better.

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    ColoRADo
    Posts
    5,957
    I like the futuristic molded plastic aerodynamic look...

    I think it is a good entry for them, but not for me. I don't do many huge airs (15ft is good a lot for me), but I am heavy and have zero finesse at all, hence the Duke
    You should have been here yesterday!

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the ham
    Posts
    14,082
    squaretail,

    One size fits all, or are there still going to be small/large versions?

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    36
    The F12 looks perfect!

    Not being able to quickly switch b/n ski/tour mode is a minor inconvenience to me. I've broken a few of the plastic pieces on my Duke, but they've been warranteed, and overall I'm very happy with them. I just bent the main rails underfoot on my new nx22s after less then 4 days. I'd really like something lighter than the Duke for multi-day trips, and there's no way i'm taking my 280-lbs of self/gear near any small metal pins.

    How do I get a proto this spring?

  16. #41
    Hugh Conway Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by trees4me View Post
    there's no way i'm taking my 280-lbs of self/gear near any small metal pins.
    they'll break less than the plastic bits.

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    SF, CA
    Posts
    838
    If the F12 is a lower, stiffer, lighter version of a Fritschi, I'm in.

    Switching modes without removed skis is irrelevant to me. I tour on dynafits and almost anytime I switch modes, I take the skis off to remove or mount skins. I can't mount skins with the skis on, so popping out of ski mode is useless to me. Sure, I can remove skins without taking skis off, but it's awkward and can't be more than 15 seconds faster unless you are incapable of stepping in and out of a step-in binding.

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    219
    Quote Originally Posted by knumbskull View Post
    Can you tell us more about the redisgned climbing bar? Different height? Easier to actuate? etc...
    Yes please!

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Between here and the river
    Posts
    213
    Climbing bar is lighter (obviously) and much easier to manipulate than the Duke. 2 positions...7 degrees and 13 degrees.

    Yes, 2 sizes, SM and L.

    Different AFD than Duke.

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by squaretail View Post
    Climbing bar is lighter (obviously) and much easier to manipulate than the Duke. 2 positions...7 degrees and 13 degrees.

    Yes, 2 sizes, SM and L.

    Different AFD than Duke.
    Sickness.

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Eburg
    Posts
    13,239
    Quote Originally Posted by trees4me View Post
    . . . there's no way i'm taking my 280-lbs of self/gear near any small metal pins.
    I do. I range from 238 - 255 lbs. buck naked, often >280 lbs. with multi-day pack. Dynafit Comforts have held up very well. One heel pin sheared off after est. 60 days of skiing and a few broken volcanoes (no adverse affect on performance). Otherwise, no problems w/ >120 days (40% lift skiing) on Comforts and FT12's. Note that I'm pretty good about care and feeding, e.g., snugging down screws, lubing, adjusting, etc., and I don't huck.

    A spare heel weighs a few ounces and can be quickly changed out in the field.

    It's nice to see more AT binder options on the market. But I'll need some persuading before abandoning my Dynafits.

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    36
    Big Steve - Thanks, that's really good to get a decent review from a big guy! I don't really huck with a heavy pack on, but 10-15' isn't out of the question. I also find that combat skiing to snowline in hard snow conditions is what seems to put the most stress on my AT gear. It's in those situations where I want a binding with a good release mechanism and reasonable DIN (I usually run about 12).

    The dukes have been good (except the AFD and climbing bar-bent), so I'll probably try the F12. Hopefully Marker has figured out a better AFD design by now...

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Eburg
    Posts
    13,239
    Quote Originally Posted by trees4me View Post
    I also find that combat skiing to snowline in hard snow conditions is what seems to put the most stress on my AT gear.
    I would generally agree with this observation. Frozen tree bombs, frozen avy debris, tree banging, etc. are tough on any AT binding, of course. Dynafit lack of elasticity (great for control, but little energy dissipation) does not help that. But they are amazingly tough binders, tougher than FR's, IME. And so lightweight and efficient. Dynafit is the pound-for-pound champion of the AT binding world, for sure.

    I'm certain that my heel pin failure was a fatigue failure after thousands of bam-bam-bam cycles. The sheared pin was on my spring touring skis (King Salmon), which get way more firm condition abuse and are also stiffer than my other AT rigs. I have more days on my mid-winter rig (Shamans w/Comforts) w/ no failures (other than a few broken volcanoes -- no big deal), but they don't get banged around on firm stuff all that much. Only a few days so far on my 'tweener rig (AP's w/ FT12's).

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    569
    Marker updated the site. Details and pictures at:

    http://www.marker-tour.com/
    "Life's not a bitch. Life's a beautiful woman. You only call her a bitch 'cause she won't let you get that pussy." - Aesop

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    @Cassidy on Reckoning
    Posts
    873
    Still has the 34 mm stand height that the dukes and barons have. <<sigh>>
    The greatest benefit of the dynafits IMO isn't the weight, but that it puts me near the ski. (OK, the weight rocks too.)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •