Check Out Our Shop
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 148

Thread: New Marker touring binding

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    810

    New Marker touring binding

    Not sure if its been talked about yet, but marker does have a lighter touring binding out this fall. Look like it is made to compete more with Fritchi freeride. DIN of 10. Still have to take it off to switch modes
    Not sure who would use it, but some might dig it.

    crappy phone photo:

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5
    I hadn't seen that yet... does it still weigh in something like a brick?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Fish
    Posts
    4,848
    Ive also heard of something with more metal than the duke.
    a positive attitude will not solve all of your problems, but it may annoy enough people to make it worth the effort

    Formerly Rludes025

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    SJSU
    Posts
    480
    A sexy brick at least.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    22,954
    I predict it will be very successful amongst those with a marker proform and not much beyond that

    Seriously, Marker could have engineered it so that the flipping switch was behind the binding heel with a lock. Then they'd have a competitor.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,069
    yeah I say the marker rep at Bear with them...mehhhhhhhhh
    agree with above...but I really just realized how much plastic is on the duke....
    Quote Originally Posted by leroy jenkins View Post
    Do you have one of those gay ass stickers on your car? If so, I'll bet money youre an uptight passive aggressive fucktard that hates anyone different than them, yet loves to pay lip service to 'tolerance'.

    People with coexist stickers are ALMOST as bad as tele skiers, although there is some overlap.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The Kootenays
    Posts
    1,304
    If this was significantly lighter than the Duke/Baron but just as stiff, I'd buy it. I have no major issues with the ski/tour mode switch.

  8. #8
    Hugh Conway Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Summit View Post
    Seriously, Marker could have engineered it so that the flipping switch was behind the binding heel with a lock. Then they'd have a competitor.
    x10. And then introduce that same function in a Duke/Baron

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    utar
    Posts
    2,741
    I for one would like a lighter version of the Duke/Baron. I wonder if it will keep me in like the Duke?
    Quote Originally Posted by SpinalTap View Post
    I'm really troubled by whatever pictures the Don had to search through to arrive at that one...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    sfbay
    Posts
    2,179
    looks like the same shitty AFD, but perhaps an updated heel piece - maybe one that doesn't tear up boots quite as bad?

    I'd say: fix the AFD, fix the fore-aft slop in the mode switch rivet, fix the climbing post shortness, ship it!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    France/BE
    Posts
    31
    This is very disappointing. I expected something new and original, cmon, they even launched a teaser site for it.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    T-town, CO. USA
    Posts
    2,098
    That thing looks even worse! The heel looks like the same crappy one-piece design that is on their lower-end alpine models. Same AFD, same touring switch. How is this better?
    Leave No Turn Unstoned!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The Kootenays
    Posts
    1,304
    Quote Originally Posted by Summit View Post
    Marker could have engineered it so that the flipping switch was behind the binding heel with a lock.
    Given how the switch works/what it does (ie. move the whole binding fore and aft) wouldn't that mean lengthening the binding and therefore making it even heavier?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,933
    Quote Originally Posted by DropCliffsNotBombs View Post
    That thing looks even worse! The heel looks like the same crappy one-piece design that is on their lower-end alpine models. Same AFD, same touring switch. How is this better?
    i don't think its meant to be "better" i would guess it's meant to be a "womans" model or some such thing...
    hence the craptastic heel on what looks like the existing chassis...
    what's orange and looks good on hippies?
    fire

    rails are for trains
    If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for problems caused by the government I'd be a rich fat film maker in a baseball hat.

    www.theguideshut.ca

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Treading Water
    Posts
    7,140
    I think a whole lot of chicks and light dudes who don't hit giant airs would be interested in this binder.
    I think that's most likely why Marker made it.
    If someone started a thread here about the virtues of DIN10 bindings they would get flamed pretty hard, but I'm pretty sure they sell boat loads of them.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    MT
    Posts
    4,021
    Quote Originally Posted by srsosbso View Post
    Given how the switch works/what it does (ie. move the whole binding fore and aft) wouldn't that mean lengthening the binding and therefore making it even heavier?
    Not necessarily heavier, but definitely longer. That is why marker chose not to put the switch behind the heelpiece. They wanted to create an AT binding that didnt create a giant dead zone on the ski. If you look at the footprint compared to a fritschi/naxo, it makes sense. That said it is definitely a drawback as well as a feature.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Between here and the river
    Posts
    213
    Hi folks...as some have noted, the Tour 10 won't be for everyone. We know that.

    This is not a Duke 'Lite.' It is a new binding for more pure touring use than the Duke or Baron were ever intended for. It has new toe and heel designs...and while the baseplate looks like the Duke/Baron, there are some important differences there as well. It is 1685g, way lighter than a Duke or Baron.

    Regarding the location of the switch, we based our decision on the overall impact on ski flex and hence performance. When you see how little this binding affects the ski compared to comparable bindings, I think you will see what I am talking about.

    As far as we know now, it will be the lightest step in/out, releasable, touring binding available.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Near Perimetr.
    Posts
    3,857
    Quote Originally Posted by Summit View Post
    I predict it will be very successful amongst those with a marker proform and not much beyond that
    Yep.. Around here the baron/duke is about as popular as free blowjobs...

    Quote Originally Posted by single View Post
    Not necessarily heavier, but definitely longer. That is why marker chose not to put the switch behind the heelpiece. They wanted to create an AT binding that didnt create a giant dead zone on the ski.
    Dingding.

    Obviously,the switch is a bitch if you have to do a lot of yo-yoing.But it is not like dynafit is not suffering the same thing.But hopefully they have fixed the afd failures.

    The floggings will continue until morale improves.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    22,954
    I can flip my FT12 into tour without taking off my skis. I can put them into ski mode.

    My NX22s do the same.

    This is why I don't own Marker AT shit. You don't have to lengthen the deadspot either because you wouldn't have to anchor the switch to the ski behind the heel piece more than a 2cm. It would NOT be a hard redesign.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Droppin' in ten!
    Posts
    1,118
    Yo Summit, just outta curiosity, do you ever not just bitch and moan about touring gear?

    You bitched and moaned about the Fritschi's and their slop.

    You bitched and moaned about the Dukes and Barons.

    Is there any touring setup you don't bitch about?

    I kid...kinda.
    Quote Originally Posted by splat View Post
    It's the same argument for prostitution. There's a lot of people in this world who won't be getting laid unless they pay big bucks or fuck an artificial life form. No amount of consolation, pity or comiserating is going to change that reality.
    Slaughter is the best medicine.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    22,954
    I bitched about Naxos exploding too!

    Haven't bitched about my Dynafits yet

    If nobody bitches, then the companies will get the idea their shit doesn't need improvement
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    3
    there is an F 12 as well, 1760g


  23. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    753
    Anyone know if it fits in the same hole patterns as duke/barons?

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    203
    that thing is hideous. But i will wait till more is really known about it before judging beyond that

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    CB!
    Posts
    2,974
    Hells yeah I would buy the F12. 1.8 lbs/ski, vs Dynafit FT12 at 1.2 lbs/ski.

    I don't like how dynafits ski. Toe is too stiff (no elastic travel) and heel is too floppy. Plus I don't trust them to release properly, I've never come out of a Dynafit when I thought I should have, just when I wished I hadn't.

    Gonna get some and put 'em on a spring touring ski, I love it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •