Check Out Our Shop
Page 11 of 39 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... LastLast
Results 251 to 275 of 951

Thread: Wasatch Conditions 09-10

  1. #251
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by mc_roon View Post
    me
    this was the funnies staged slash turn rock hit photo shoots I have ever seen. Nice work gentlemen...

  2. #252
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    6,255
    Got out for a dawn patrol Thursday, very good skiing and fun snow. When I made this turn, my partner felt the entire slope collapse and saw a crack shoot across the entire slope. No bueno. We got really lucky on this one.

    I'm so hardcore, I'm gnarcore.

  3. #253
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    in the brew room
    Posts
    2,396
    dp this morning in upper lcc. dropped a small cornice on east facing with no results. east facing trees were fast and creamy. south facing was super silky. will prob be baked by tomorrow?

  4. #254
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Two Thousand Leagues
    Posts
    1,014
    Quote Originally Posted by TeleThor View Post
    Good to hear. N-facing?
    One cornice on N-facing, one ENE.

  5. #255
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Not Philly
    Posts
    4,476
    Posted in the thread bitching about the conditions in the Wasatch:

    if you look at the ensemble forecasts for the PNA/AO and NAO you see a change in the current values for each of the models sometime after the middle of next week. This indicates that conditions favor the detoriation of the current ridge. While it is unclear whether a trough or zonal pattern will develop, the chance of snowfall increases significanly in as you move towards the last 10 days of jan.
    The GFS ensembles support this solution as the majority show increased precipitation in beginning with the 18-22 time frame and then larger scale systems from the 24th onward. The 500mb height forecast is similar and while there is considerable spread timing of systems the GFS has been holding steady with decreased heights in the 270hr to 384hr time frame.

    The Euro has been fairly consistent also with the depiction of decreased heights in this range.

    Two issues to be aware of for the wasatch:
    1. Systems splitting with a large core of pacific energy diverging south to the AZ/NM/So. Colo. area. Very possible in this el nino set up
    2. Cut off low. The death of Utah snow. If a low were to cut off and linger just off the cali coast as is possible in these patterns that would be bad. I don't see it happening but it's possible for sure.

    One other interesting note:

    I wrote this fall that is ENSO winter was very similar to the ENSO events of 2006-2007 and 2004-2005. Jan. 2007 was Alta's worst month in the last five years. (Feb was really good and march too). I lost the data for jan. 05.


    Just wanted to throw this in:

    HPC (NWS long range weather arm) seems to agree that in the 8-14 day range we'll see a noticable change in the orientation of the Pac. Jet

    Via HPC:
    THIS SUGGESTS TEMPERATURE AND PRECIPITATION
    PATTERNS OVER THE CONUS WILL BE QUITE SIMILAR BETWEEN THE TWO PERIODS. THE MODELS SUGGEST THAT 500-HPA HEIGHTS WILL AVERAGE CONSIDERABLY LOWER OVER MOST
    OF THE WEST COAST OF THE CONUS THAN IN THE 6-10 DAY PERIOD. THIS INDICATES THAT THE STRONG PACIFIC JET IS FORECAST TO PROGRESS EASTWARD BETWEEN THE 6-10 AND 8-14 DAY PERIOD. IT IS STILL A BIT EARLY TO PREDICT THE STRENGTH AND ORIENTATION OF THE PACIFIC JET AS IT IMPACTS THE WEST COAST. MOST MODELS PREDICT THE JET WILL MAINLY IMPACT CENTRAL CALIFORNIA AND THE CENTRAL GREAT
    BASIN. HOWEVER, STRONG EL NINO CONDITIONS ARE CURRENTLY OBSERVED, WHICH FAVORS A SOUTHWARD DISPLACEMENT OF THE JET, SO THE PROBABILITY OF ABOVE MEDIAN PRECIPITATION IS ELEVATED SLIGHTLY FARTHER SOUTH OF THE AREA MOST TOOLS INDICATE. TEMPERATURES IN CALIFORNIA EASTWARD TO THE CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN ROCKY MOUNTAINS ARE UNCERTIAN SINCE THEY ALSO DEPEND ON THE ORIENTATION OF THE PACIFIC JET. NEAR NORMAL TEMPERATURES APPEAR MOST LIKELY AT THIS TIME, HOWEVER THE CHANCES OF BELOW NORMAL TEMPERATURES INCREASE MARKEDLY IF THE JET SETS UP FARTHER SOUTH THAN MODELS CURRENTLY INDICATE.
    Last edited by lionelhutz; 01-08-2010 at 03:15 PM.

  6. #256
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Two Thousand Leagues
    Posts
    1,014
    lionelhutz- where's that discussion from?

  7. #257
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Not Philly
    Posts
    4,476
    The first part before the NWS is from my dome.
    The NWS part is from:
    http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/product...ay/fxus06.html
    it comes out at 3pm EST every day but weekends.

    Additional medium range products are available here via the HPC discussions:
    http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/html/discuss.shtml
    A premilinary discussion covering D 1-3 usually comes out overnight (EST) and the Longer range up to D-7 comes out early morning (EST). The get revised into final forecasts but nothign changes.

    I've wanted to expand my utarded weather knowledge recently so I might be throwing some weather forecasts up here to see how I do. I've worked up my Northeast (mainly NY/VT) knowledge pretty well and since I love the LCC/BCC i'd like to get better at forecasting there.

  8. #258
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Cottonwood heights
    Posts
    123
    I skid the South Face of Mount Superior today from the peak. First descent of the season. It felt solid.. Some wind loading on the peak, but manageable. Snow off the top variable, wind hammered in spots. Middle apron was money. Sick Run.

  9. #259
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Cottonwood heights
    Posts
    123

  10. #260
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    on the mountian
    Posts
    1,408
    ^shoulda skied it off the summit.

  11. #261
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Cottonwood heights
    Posts
    123
    very summit does not go yet

  12. #262
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Was UT, AK, now MT
    Posts
    14,568
    Quote Originally Posted by cravenmoorehed View Post
    very summit does not go yet
    Then it wasn't a "first descent of the year".

  13. #263
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Cottonwood heights
    Posts
    123
    We skid off the summit down the ridge and dropped in a little lower then the top. If you want to get technical, whatever, still a bad ass run.

  14. #264
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Was UT, AK, now MT
    Posts
    14,568
    Quote Originally Posted by cravenmoorehed View Post
    We skid off the summit down the ridge and dropped in a little lower then the top. If you want to get technical, whatever, still a bad ass run.
    I could really care less. I was just jabbing you a little.

  15. #265
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    LCC
    Posts
    326
    Been skiing NW-W faces the last couple days. From around 8.5-11,000'. Snowpack isn't very interesting. Except everywhere I dig, I always find these on the bottom:





    Still good turns to be found. Just ask Boissal...



  16. #266
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    478
    Anyone hit Meadows today? calling for 40 and sun tomorrow...could be a spring day!? (Without the winter snowfall)

    It will start snowing Tuesday...I'm heading back to Chicago until the following Tuesday. Everyone enjoy the POW and post lots of pics.

  17. #267
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Not Philly
    Posts
    4,476
    I think you'll all see some mild precip the middle of the upcoming week and then as you head into the 20-22nd time frame a trough will dig in the west. As storm roll into cali, plenty of energy will spread into the trough and bring precip to the great basin. Now it's far too early to talk amts but numerous impulses will be spreading through the west. Coupled with the trough you have to like the potential for these impulses to steadily raise the snow depth.

  18. #268
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Was UT, AK, now MT
    Posts
    14,568
    Wind crust, powder, facets. Variable conditions on high elevation east aspects and lower elevations as well today, but fun anyway.



  19. #269
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Ogden
    Posts
    9,806
    I found variable like TH. The best turns were mid elevation, SW facing. I wanted to climb some rock and we did but we realized that getting back down on the rime covered rocks was going to be interesting so we didn't get the peak. If you need a character building experience the exit out Broads Fork is a good start. Good day.

    feeling small:


    a few good turns:

  20. #270
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Was UT, AK, now MT
    Posts
    14,568
    Quote Originally Posted by the Mad View Post
    ^^Do we get a full TR with that one?
    No, but I'll leave you with this.



  21. #271
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Two Thousand Leagues
    Posts
    1,014
    To the guys who Bear Grylls'ed it up in Twin Peaks Wilderness in Mill B South on Fri night: THIS SUCKS.


    I appreciate simple shelters and snow camping, but this is a sorry job. Felling trees, especially live ones to build a shelter that's too tall to ever hold body heat and then defoliating other trees to keep your ass off the snow is sad. Temps went went down to what? 20 degrees on Fri night? Was that really necessary? Dont worry, I used my sandwich bag to carry out your cigarette butts and I'll use that shitload of p-cord you tied those trunks together with for something useful. "If you dont know a knot, tie a lot..."

  22. #272
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SLC burbs
    Posts
    4,429
    Holy shit that must have taken some work... They could have found 6 different ways to the car in the time it took them to put that monstrosity together.
    Too bad they weren't trampled by a moose in the middle of their gnar gnar adventure night.

  23. #273
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sandy, Utah
    Posts
    14,408
    Quote Originally Posted by The Gnarwhale View Post
    To the guys who Bear Grylls'ed it up in Twin Peaks Wilderness in Mill B South on Fri night: THIS SUCKS.


    I appreciate simple shelters and snow camping, but this is a sorry job. Felling trees, especially live ones to build a shelter that's too tall to ever hold body heat and then defoliating other trees to keep your ass off the snow is sad. Temps went went down to what? 20 degrees on Fri night? Was that really necessary? Dont worry, I used my sandwich bag to carry out your cigarette butts and I'll use that shitload of p-cord you tied those trunks together with for something useful. "If you dont know a knot, tie a lot..."
    Wow yeah thats pretty fucking lame right there....glad you picked up after them...jesus a winter sleeping bag and a vapor barrier wouldve been enough this weekend....thats almost bigger than my house.

  24. #274
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by The Gnarwhale View Post
    To the guys who Bear Grylls'ed it up in Twin Peaks Wilderness in Mill B South on Fri night: THIS SUCKS.


    Dont worry, I used my sandwich bag to carry out your cigarette butts and I'll use that shitload of p-cord you tied those trunks together with for something useful. "If you dont know a knot, tie a lot..."
    You didn't need to do that. The butts would disappear into the woods come spring. The cans from our pork and beans might not though. Maybe you should have grabbed them. They were buried in about the same spot we buried our shit , 20 yards or so uphill from the shelter.

    You didn't happen to see a camouflage poncho around there anywhere, did you? My buddy Stan got kind of wasted and went running up the hill to go sled on his poncho. He came back, but the poncho didn't.

    Sorry you didn't like our shelter. I thought it was awesome.

  25. #275
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Not Philly
    Posts
    4,476
    Still on track for development of western trough and increased precip for 2nd half of january.
    Long story short:
    Moist energy will head into the great basin wed-thurs. NWS says it splits but model data doesn't exaclty confirm that. 700mb rh values are high as upper level energy passes over great basin after the weakly split front passes on wed. This should allow for a longer duration precip event and may negate the splitting front.
    After that days 6-10 see stronger energy impacting Cali and then spreading moisture west into the entire sw.
    From then on it appears the west will remain much more active with above normal precip from the Nor Cal/NV/UT border southward.

    NWS: ABOVE-MEDIAN PRECIPITATION AMOUNTS ARE MOST LIKELY FOR THE GULF AND SOUTHERN
    ATLANTIC COASTS DUE TO AN EXPECTED ENHANCED LOW LATITUDE JET. THE GFS AND
    CANADIAN MODELS CONTINUE TO SUGGEST ENHANCED CHANCES OF ABOVE-MEDIAN
    PRECIPITATION AMOUNTS NEAR THE UPPER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY. ABOVE MEDIAN
    PRECIPITATION AMOUNTS ARE FAVORED ALONG THE WEST COAST FROM OREGON SOUTHWARD,
    AND INLAND THROUGH THE GREAT BASIN AND MUCH OF THE SOUTHWEST. THE CHANCES FOR
    ABOVE MEDIAN PRECIPITATION AMOUNTS ARE ESPECIALLY ELEVATED IN SOUTHERN
    CALIFORNIA.

    d 8-14:
    THE MODEL FORECASTS FOR THE WEEK-2 PERIOD ARE VERY SIMILAR TO THE 6-10 DAY MEAN
    SO THE TEMPERATURE AND PRECIPITATION PATTERNS OVER THE CONUS ARE ALSO SIMILAR.
    THE MODELS SUGGEST THAT 500-HPA HEIGHTS WILL AVERAGE LOWER OVER MOST OF THE
    WESTERN CONUS THAN IN THE 6-10 DAY PERIOD. THIS INDICATES THAT THE STRONG
    PACIFIC JET IS FORECAST TO PROGRESS EASTWARD BETWEEN THE 6-10 AND 8-14 DAY
    PERIOD, RESULTING IN ENHANCED CHANCES OF ABOVE MEDIAN PRECIPITATION OVER MUCH
    OF THE CONUS.

    And while I'm not a huge believer in analog weather forecasting, I think this bears some considertion. The analog precip patters for the 8-14 day period based on current and forecasted condtions:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •