Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: Help me choose a ski for tight trees...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    61

    Help me choose a ski for tight trees...

    Please help me choose the right skis. In the past few years ive used:
    170 Solomon scream limited: 114-80-108
    169 05-06 K2 public enemy: 118/85/109
    176 05-06 dynastar big trouble: 124/92/114

    I am 5'7" 155 #'s. I ski in Colorado mostly. I ski everything from open bowls, moguls, tight trees, and techy steeps but very little park. I really need a ski that perfoms well in relatively dense trees with lots of tight turns in mostly soft or powder conditions. Tree skiing is my love and specialty, i like to get way back there where others dont venture and ski stuff that others dont consider skiiable. The screams seemed pretty good, pretty turny with good sidecut but maybe not enough float for variable snow conditions. The public enemy's were better than the screams but maybe a little too straight, the big troubles were the worst, harder to turn and less maneuverable than either. Guess i dont care about going fast and carving big turns in powder, I care more for quick turning, high maneuverability, and decent float. Im shopping for new skis, what else should I try?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Denver, gorgeous!
    Posts
    786
    The PE's were too straight? Not sure how to handle that, they are extra super turny to me.

    Best tight tree ski I've ever been on is the Praxis pow. Effortless tree skiing in almost any soft snow. I'm sure there are other suggestions out there, but I think they are a hoot. Downside is surviving the hard snow back to the lift.
    SLOWER TRAFFIC
    KEEP RIGHT
    http://shifter102.blogspot.com/

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    227
    If you can try a reverse side-cut reverse camber ski then you might find your answer. Otherwise there are plenty of traditional-ish skis with rockers that will give a nimble ride. Since you are in CO you may want to look to demo Icelantic.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    The Other Side
    Posts
    782
    The JJs are amazing in super tight Vermont hardwood bushwacking adventures. I just think about changing directions and they go. I ski the 185, and I am the same weight as you give or a take a few pounds and a couple inches taller, don't fear the length, you will love them especially when it's wide open.

    As well Core Shot did a sweet review of the Icelantic Shamans, which also apparently kill it in tight trees.

    http://tetongravity.com/forums/showthread.php?t=102149

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    The Other Side
    Posts
    782
    Quote Originally Posted by Magnus_CA View Post
    If you can try a reverse side-cut reverse camber ski then you might find your answer. Otherwise there are plenty of traditional-ish skis with rockers that will give a nimble ride. Since you are in CO you may want to look to demo Icelantic.
    I think we just said the exact same thing

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    6,770
    I know I sound like a broken record posting this, but at 5'9" / 160lbs 179cm Pontoons and 175cm Sumo's absolutely rule in tight trees... Go Sumo (mounted at -3) if you want more versatility, Pontoon if your pow is usually light and you're rarely on groomers.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Looking down
    Posts
    50,490
    If you live in CO., you don't know tight trees. But, if you're really into tight, try the Phantom Crystal Ships. I've still haven't tried them, but the small Icelantics are also probably very good.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Conway, NH and Bristol, RI
    Posts
    117
    if you liked the sallys try out a czar. it may be a bit fatter then the other skis you used but it skis well just about anywhere. if you looking for something in similar widths to the skis you listed try out some sally lords. they are nice as well, however a bit stiffer then the limiteds.

    agreed that west coasters or rockies skiers dont know shit about tight trees
    just slayin it on the groomers

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    B'ham
    Posts
    316
    Pick up a pair of Spatulas. I love them in the trees at Baker and they handle most conditions (other than ice and super hard pack) really well. They are really turning and can be picked up pretty damn CHEAP. Also they are pretty bomber so hitting little tree nubs and such doesn't matter to much. R/R skis are not difficult to ski either (well from my experience I never had any trouble other than diggin an edge while being lazy on cat tracks and my ski taking off in weird directions).

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    6,770
    Plenty of west coasters learned to ski in the east, lol. It's worth moving.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    LCC
    Posts
    291
    Hellbents work well. Praxis Pow too. It may be hard to find a Spatula (ebay?), but I do see them around.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    11,326
    Praxis Pow is the ultimate tree ride, but it's a bit of a one trick pony. The BD Megawatt is just as good and can rip the whole mountain. The BD does not slide the way the Praxis does but it's incredibly quick. The more you pressure the ski the more the radius tightens. So much so that you actually need to be careful not to drive it too hard or it'll come around so fast you'll high side. I've been on them for two pow days now and am completely sold.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    132
    check out the Scott Missions. Bought a pair from TD this year b/c the price was just too good. I'm thinking these might have been my best purchase in a long time. Only have 6 days on them right now, but they absolutely killed the trees of siberia at Schweitzer in all conditions. Great float with 90 underfoot and something like 130 up front.
    I haven't heard a lot of chatter about these sticks on TGR, but it is only a matter of time once more people start riding them.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    200
    One of the best tree ski's I have tried is Line Prophet 100's. They have a lot of sidecut which you seem to want and they handle of variety of conditions well. For really deep powder they could be a little wider, but really good all around ski. Lots of reviews on them here.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    2,453
    Anybody that says Praxis Pow is a one trick pony is selling them short IMO.

    If you are implying they are a soft snow only ski, then yes, i would agree with you. If you are implying that they are only good at tree skiing in soft snow I totally disagree. They rule just about any kind of BC snow conditions besides boilerplate. They are a bit harder to stomp biggish airs on but once you learn to stay centered and wide (emphasis on the wide part...) they are charger skis....

    I do think they are limited in bounds...there are better options.

    Back to the topic...I think a Salomon Czar or EHP 179 would be a great option for you since it seems like you ski between the ropes most of the time...

    Just watch Tabke ski them...

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    3,609
    praxis kill it on bigger lines in deep snow, so much float, and enough tip that you can really drive the front of the ski, even when its way deep
    ‎Preserving farness, nearness presences nearness in nearing that farness

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Denver, gorgeous!
    Posts
    786
    Quote Originally Posted by truth View Post
    So much so that you actually need to be careful not to drive it too hard or it'll come around so fast you'll high side.
    I'd just like to point out that this property is the shittiest part of skiing traditional shapes in pow, IMO. If you hate this feeling too, beg, borrow, or demo a reverse/reverse ski. One trick or not, it's REALLY fun.
    SLOWER TRAFFIC
    KEEP RIGHT
    http://shifter102.blogspot.com/

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Midgaard
    Posts
    2,883
    Reverse/reverse = the right tool for this job. My Lotus 138s kill trees.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,282
    My mavens were purchased for trees. They rule too.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Stowe
    Posts
    4,432
    Quote Originally Posted by afox View Post
    Please help me choose the right skis. In the past few years ive used:
    170 Solomon scream limited: 114-80-108
    169 05-06 K2 public enemy: 118/85/109
    176 05-06 dynastar big trouble: 124/92/114

    I am 5'7" 155 #'s. I ski in Colorado mostly. I ski everything from open bowls, moguls, tight trees, and techy steeps but very little park. I really need a ski that perfoms well in relatively dense trees with lots of tight turns in mostly soft or powder conditions. Tree skiing is my love and specialty, i like to get way back there where others dont venture and ski stuff that others dont consider skiiable. The screams seemed pretty good, pretty turny with good sidecut but maybe not enough float for variable snow conditions. The public enemy's were better than the screams but maybe a little too straight, the big troubles were the worst, harder to turn and less maneuverable than either. Guess i dont care about going fast and carving big turns in powder, I care more for quick turning, high maneuverability, and decent float. Im shopping for new skis, what else should I try?

    for skied out trees I use the PE as well, but to straight? I actually like this ski because its turny, light and nimble.....

    if there is powder though

    Praxis Powder are the way to go, they will be the fastest things you can possiable ski in the tree. Pontoons would also be great.

    other skis that are kinda of in between are

    Hellbents
    Thugs(what I use IMO one of the best convential cambered ski out there for powder)
    Sumos
    Mavens

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Eburg
    Posts
    13,239
    Icelantic Shaman

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    189
    +1 for Shaman

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    26
    S/H Rossignol 7S in a 203 or 207....










    ...you got a problem with that? At least it'll be over quick...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •