Coverage is good as in anything that I would/have skied is fun skiing.
Stability is on you. Not to go Safety Bob but given that we have transitioned into the Persistent Slab problem, one skiers feed back about what they observed yesterday is of limited value.
https://avalanche.state.co.us/
Yesterday afternoon's Forecast Discussion is pretty in depth but tells a good story.If we want to talk about it, as Brigham Young said, "this is the place"Slopes that were safe to travel on or under a week ago may now harbor this new Persistent Slab avalanche problem. You might trigger a slide that only breaks in freshly drifted snow, but given the reactivity of the December 9 layer and its proximity to the surface, most avalanches will fail at this interface. Furthermore, given how weak and shallow the snowpack is overall, slides can easily step down, or gouge, into weak snow near the ground, growing the overall size of the slide. Weaknesses close to the surface can sometimes stabilize, or deteriorate, quickly - only time will tell in this case. For the immediate future, take a conservative approach to your terrain choices; the snowpack is adjusting to a new load and you can trigger avalanches from below and from a distance. Look to wind-sheltered or lower-angle slopes as safer options.
No finger pointing or call out intended. It has been a multi decade challenge to make sure people are aware that 'round here, our feedback loop sucks. The spacial variablity and unknown trigger points our our avalanche problems means that "it felt safe" means you probably don't know what you are talking about and are your own worst enemy.
Bookmarks