Check Out Our Shop
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 123

Thread: Marker Duke Review

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    7,221

    Marker Duke Review

    I am happy to report these bindings seem to be all they were hyped to be. I charged pretty hard on them today, hooked a tip on pine tree, did a slight rollver and went down with no release at DIN 14. I weigh in at 200lbs. I have yet to take air as conditions were not good for hucking, but something tells me they'll be fine. These bindings are truely alpine 1st and touring 2nd, so weight weenies need not apply. I tried the touring function and switched it back to alpine with ease, only needing a quick bang on the side to clear out the snow.

    The jury is still out for a day of touring, but the thing I wanted the most is there (strong clamp with no release). I cant believe this is a Marker product.

    Thanks again PTex for making this happen!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Radville
    Posts
    3,328
    The tourability is perfectly fine for all purposes other than super long approaches and even then would be fine so long as the weight doesn't bother you.
    I've got more suits than Liberace, but less than Eastvailhucker.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    8530' MST/200' EST
    Posts
    4,636
    they rule. my only gripe is not having a taller climbing post stock....on the straight up skins it was a little low
    "If we can't bring the mountain to the party, let's bring the PARTY to the MOUNTAIN!"

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Puget Sound
    Posts
    184
    Does it suck to have to step out of them to switch between modes?

    I love that my Fritschis let me switch back and forth without taking my ski off, which is nice in deep snow.

    My shop's Marker rep told us some story about not having your binding switch into touring mode while you were in a descent, but I never had that problem in a busy 6 years of Turnagain Pass use, including some time at Alyeska.

    Thoughts?
    -Thomas

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    8530' MST/200' EST
    Posts
    4,636
    no it dosent suck, cause you have to take skins off anyways......
    "If we can't bring the mountain to the party, let's bring the PARTY to the MOUNTAIN!"

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    4,318
    Quote Originally Posted by Phall View Post
    no it dosent suck, cause you have to take skins off anyways......
    this move is easily mastered... putting them on is another story.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Puget Sound
    Posts
    184
    Quote Originally Posted by Phall View Post
    no it dosent suck, cause you have to take skins off anyways......
    Once you figure it out taking the skins off without removing your skis is very quick and easy.
    -Thomas

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    8530' MST/200' EST
    Posts
    4,636
    alright, but usually after a skin i re apply layers, put my helmet on, gloves, stash skins in pack or jacket, rest fo a sec..so i tend to take my skis off.....oh well,
    "If we can't bring the mountain to the party, let's bring the PARTY to the MOUNTAIN!"

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    7,628
    Quote Originally Posted by AKBckntry View Post
    .

    My shop's Marker rep told us some story about not having your binding switch into touring mode while you were in a descent, but I never had that problem in a busy 6 years of Turnagain Pass use, including some time at Alyeska.

    Thoughts?
    I've had it happen to me on Freerides (insta-tele mode) and have heard of it happening to a few others around these parts as well. it's pretty damn scary and it always made me think twice before dropping into something eXXXtRemE to the M A X ! ! !

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Puget Sound
    Posts
    184
    Quote Originally Posted by Tyrone Shoelaces View Post
    I've had it happen to me on Freerides (insta-tele mode) and have heard of it happening to a few others around these parts as well. it's pretty damn scary and it always made me think twice before dropping into something eXXXtRemE to the M A X ! ! !
    Interesting. I never had it happen to me in 6 years of use, so it made me wonder the first time I mounted a set of Dukes and fussed with them.
    -Thomas

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,788
    There are times I'd love to lock the heel while skinning. Traversing a ridgeline with up and down sections comes to mind. On a downhill if the heel's free you've gotta lean way in the backseat to avoid potential endos when the skins stop gliding == sore calves and toes. Or if it's extra sketchy sometimes you want to sideslip with the peace of mind of a locked heel.

    But the inconvenience of these situations is a minor concern to me. I don't mind taking off the ski to lock down occasionally.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    330
    Quote Originally Posted by AKBckntry View Post
    Does it suck to have to step out of them to switch between modes?

    I love that my Fritschis let me switch back and forth without taking my ski off, which is nice in deep snow.
    These are basically my thoughts as well. For the reason you mentioned, I think Naxo is a better alternative on a powder ski. No post-holing required at the top of a line.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    7,221
    these bindings aren't for the rando touring geeks who do that slick skin removal without taking skis off. what I'd really like to see is them put the skins on without removing the ski.

    I went on a longish tour today and didnt notice any difference in weight or movement from my old Naxo 21's. I was racing Atrain to get first tracks on a line. I figured the switch from touring to alpline was going to slow me down, but it switched over with ease seemingly full of snow. This binding rules!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Huh?
    Posts
    10,908
    Quote Originally Posted by murph View Post
    These are basically my thoughts as well. For the reason you mentioned, I think Naxo is a better alternative on a powder ski. No post-holing required at the top of a line.
    Or you could do what everyone does anyway at the end of a skin in deep snow...

    Stand on one ski while you get the other ready, click into the ready ski, and then get the other one settled. Balance, it's not just for Danielson.

    I got to fondle the Dukes for the first time today, and there was a huge line of droll from my chin to the floor while I was caressing them. I can't wait to get rid of my Freerides.
    "I knew in an instant that the three dollars I had spent on wine would not go to waste."

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    7,221
    oh yeah, I forgot... you know how when you rail on a ski with a Freeride or Naxo and you get that sloppy feeling? Doesn't happen with the Dukes! If you're worried about weight, stop eating so many pancakes!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Huh?
    Posts
    10,908
    ^ The number one reason why I hate my fucking Freerides.
    "I knew in an instant that the three dollars I had spent on wine would not go to waste."

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Wasatch
    Posts
    6,253
    I took my Dukes out for the first time today. I have mostly used Trekkers before and have some limited experience using friends Fritsches and Naxos in the past. It's a little bit inconvenient to adjust the climbing wires, but I typically do not play with mine very much. They toured trouble-free and I was unable to tell the difference between them and a normal alpine binding on the way down.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    O-Town
    Posts
    2,663
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    If you're worried about weight, stop eating so many pancakes!
    "What's this? Blueberries! Oh, oh my G ... oh, that's better than sex!"
    All I know is that I don't know nothin'... and that's fine.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    173
    I tried the Dukes head to head against a Marker 16 yesterday. Both where mounted on
    -08 177cm equally tuned Mantras. Conditions where very hard, but not icy, artificial snow. I thought the solidness and feel for the edge and the ski was actually BETTER with the Duke than with the regular Markers. Even when pushed hard the feeling was still just solid and direct. This is a good downhill bindning even if you compare them with normal alpine bindnings. Nothing even close to the sloppy Naxo or Freerides. This is something totally different. It´s what the Naxos could have been. The only concern was the standing height which is quite high.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yonder
    Posts
    22,528
    Only reason for Fritschi/Naxo is up down up down skins where you lock the heel for a short descent with skins on.
    Otherwise, the superiority outwieghs all incovenience.
    #1 reason = rock solid connection (no more toe wobble)
    #2 reason = hopefully more bomber and tough than fritschis
    #3 reason = no more highway star race stock 3" lift kit (Duke is wayyy lower than fritschi and naxo)
    #4 reason = higher din is now possible

    someday, the #5 reason = swappable base plates (you can now fly with 4-5 pair of skis with one pair of bindings)
    Kill all the telemarkers
    But they’ll put us in jail if we kill all the telemarkers
    Telemarketers! Kill the telemarketers!
    Oh we can do that. We don’t even need a reason

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Redwood City and Alpine Meadows, CA
    Posts
    8,276
    Quote Originally Posted by MnO View Post
    I thought the solidness and feel for the edge and the ski was actually BETTER with the Duke than with the regular Markers.
    Coincidentally, this is the example of "damning with faint praise" in the new revision of Strunk & White.
    not counting days 2016-17

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    330
    Question- how difficult is it to step into the Duke once you've switched it into touring mode?

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    19
    heres my thoughts...

    everyone in my shop seems to be pumped on these things. i haven't actually been on the dukes yet, so maybe i'm completely wrong. by for first impression i'm not feeling it.

    1. taking your skis off to switch between modes - yes, it does lock it into ski mode so you don't get the insta-tele...but then again, i haven't had that problem on the freerides. on another side, when i'm up on the top of a narrow ridgeline or peak, or even on a steep traverse, i'm not going to want to take my skis off. snow can be deep and on something steep there is little room for error.

    2. risers. from what i understand, there is not a high setting. on anything steep, you're going to need that or it'll be extremely uncomfortable. also, how the heck are you supposed to change it's position when it's under your foot?

    3. weight. yeah, whatever though. they're heavy, but sturdy. i don't bitch about getting my gear light as possible, but either way it's not a binding you're going to want for a lot of touring. i would say it's a binding for someone that might do some lift-served touring, or someone who only goes every now and then.

    i would ride fritschis or naxos before the dukes. that's just my thought. who knows, maybe i'll use them and get blown away, but i'm just not feeling it at first glance.
    "We've got a renegade going OB"

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Kootenays
    Posts
    1,516
    1. So you'd rather do the balance trick to get your skins off with your skis on in the same spot?

    2.Same way you do the heel riser on the 7TM tele binding I'd imagine. No high position is kinda sad though.

    3.and...?

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Too Far South
    Posts
    5,269
    I've been pretty damn impressed with mine

    They're not Dynafits but then again Dynafits aren't Dukes either. You wouldn't use a hacksaw to hammer a nail. Dukes were never intended to be used as a slog all day peak-bagging rig, and if you're using them that way then you have to be aware of their limitations in the same way you'd accept some limitations if you brought your Dynafits inbounds.

    I do miss the rip and go ease that I get with Dynafits, but thats why if I'm going to be spending time doing yo-yo laps, or chasing tons of vert I'm probably not bringing my Dukes. But if I'm going to be splitting my time between inbounds and the sidecountry, or doing a one and done tour, I can guarentee that I'm not using dynafits.
    For sure, you have to be lost to find a place that can't be found, elseways everyone would know where it was

Similar Threads

  1. MARKER DUKE UPDATE!!! ( Great news)
    By ptex1 in forum Gear Swap (List View)
    Replies: 145
    Last Post: 12-18-2007, 10:43 PM
  2. Dynafit FR Aero and Marker Duke Review
    By laseranimal in forum Tech Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-16-2007, 09:29 PM
  3. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-13-2007, 01:34 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •