I wouldn't cuz if I would I would get completely fucker about the MP.

dps do you mind posting the pics of colored 138's?

Thanks.

Absolutely agree with CK. The best topsheet designs evaaah!

A question to dps or anyone in the know. What is the reason you changed the last year's model. It seemed to be close to perfect so why change?

Why you need those Obsethed's?

195 KURO/190 Fat-Ypus A-Lotta

Quoted for truth =)

Yeah, your right! But this is more a kinda discussion on the MP rather than explanation.

Neither do I, but it sounds pretty reasonable. Thanks.

No idea?

When I look at a pair of Lotus 138 compared to any other Reverse ski one thing draws my attention - mounting point. The problem with it is that it looks far back than normal leaving a very long tip...

Get the new K2 Sidestash in 188 - 139-108-127, 5/15 tip rocker. Should be a good one ski quiver.
The other option is 187 dynastar XXL - way better then your current ski in powder, equally good at...

I am absolutely sure you'll be more than happy on them on any big powder day. But they SUCK so much on hard bumps.

The only thing that bothers me now is the stiffness. Ive seen some reviews stating that the skis are stiffer then iM 103. Not sure whether this is true or not due to all those stupid...

http://www.dynastar.com/us#/products/da9r801-legend-big-dump-
Forrest's POV Dynastar Big Dump Test on Vimeo

WOW and WOW those should be sick!

Thanks everyone!

Xavier why is it more maneuverable? Does it have a rocker?

So, I own a pair of 187 Dynastar Legend Pro XXL which I absolutely love for everything but the deepest powder.
I want to add one more pair of skis for the deepest bottomless days which should be...

I guess it is enough to know that Rocker 3 is a fucken lot of rocker.
See Evil E's review for comments and pictures.

I don't say Lhasa is a handful. It is just really long at 196.

So TOP3 seems like that:

193 Head im103 -are you sure?
194 B-Squads
192 Garbones

Hey everybody!
From the following skis which one is the most demanding/hard to ski:

195 Line Mothership
194 Rossi B-Squad
196 Lhasa Pow
194 Legend Pro XXL
197 Katana
193 Faction Thirteen...

Does anybody have a rocker pic on the Toons?

Depending on your pocket depth the answer is
either 192 DPS Lotus 138 or 195 Praxis Powderboard.

Also a kick ass deal here on PB in 185

What's your current quiver? Do you plan to tour/heliski? How fast does your resort get tracked out? Do you prefer to carve your turns in powder or slarve/pivot? How tall and heavy you are?


But...

Just go for the BG, they 're same as JJ's but on steroids.

Half-twin methinks

Why do you need an 120-130 mm waisted ski? If you are going to heliski in Alaska then I can understand your desire but for everything else 113 mm Wrenegade should be spot on.

Also try out the...

When your helmet stinks it is time to replace your helmet.
Well, actually it all depends on your money and aesthetics. I'd do this after some 150-200 days of skiing just for the sake of renovation.

Height doesn't mean a fuck. Weight does mean. And the whole thing means you should eat some fuckin' food.
I guess for an average ski price you could get ~200 burgers which is what you must do!

If I were you and had to choose btw. these 2 skis the answer would be 120's w/o a doubt. But I do not charge.
For the sheer charging get the 195 Motherships - just looking at them in the store made...

I would much prefer going together so that I could learn from the maggots. May be one day...:rolleyes2

I have Lhasa's and they will definitely make a quiver overlap with the 120's. Finally I can just go with what I have.

I foresee a HUGEON3PHYPE this coming season. Good luck, folks!

Good idea, but those seem to encourage only a very fast riding. And I'm not one of those bad-ass skiers who will ski 60mph down an Alaska face.

If only Scott could make a softer, more user...

I've been told the MW were totally designed based on the Lotus 120 idea.
But they are quite a bit wider than the 120s. Hence more float, right?
As for the windblown, as far as I understand this...

Sick comparison - Lotus 138 Rocker1(0?) vs Rocker 3 (red topsheet) by Atlas Q. Powmonger:

http://www.tetongravity.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=152809&highlight=lotus

Now the sweet spot for me will finally be on traditional!

Bring both.

I'd recommend the Lhasa Pow's and PP or just the Lhasas.

http://www.radiobrennt.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/big_tits.jpg - and tits they are.

I'd never do this. It's too dangerous.

This ski is tits for Baker!
And we do not know what you mean by high speed but you definitely won't want to ski it over 40mph, IMO.

Yeah, he is the mang!

I talked to Rob and trust him 100%. I believe he's one of the most intelligent and professional guys out there. He is also very nice to the clients.
I'd just love to know other opinions as well.

Hello everybody! I'm asking your advice because you are such gearheads.
I'm torn between these two skis for my trip to Alaska and I'd like to hear your thoughts and opinions on them.

Stoked on Darkside!

You made my day, dude!

And hell, get the Lhasa Pow's for the deeper days. You won't regret!

Get the 179's - they should be sick. Get the softer version for more versatility.
What do you actually want to know? They carve and slarve hardpack, zipperline bumps and tight spots, stomp...

I'd go with 164 or even 154.
But the best thing is this for sure:
http://www.curtissportconnection.com/images/Snow_Blades/blades_snow_blades_77.jpg