Results 3,926 to 3,950 of 5880
Thread: The Quiver Pic Rerun Thread
-
11-11-2017, 11:06 AM #3926
-
11-11-2017, 11:08 AM #3927
-
11-11-2017, 11:15 AM #3928Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- Tahoe
- Posts
- 3,097
-
11-11-2017, 11:29 AM #3929
-
11-11-2017, 11:38 AM #3930Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- Tahoe
- Posts
- 3,097
315mm
184-188 true length, full camber, 18m radius.
I have some shreditor 92s and monster 98s that I have to try before I make any new purchases.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
-
11-11-2017, 11:55 AM #3931
-
11-11-2017, 11:59 AM #3932Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- Tahoe
- Posts
- 3,097
My 108s carve ice like nothing I have ever been on. I cant even imagine how good the 98s are on firm.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
-
11-11-2017, 12:10 PM #3933
-
11-11-2017, 12:15 PM #3934Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- Tahoe
- Posts
- 3,097
^^^ That’s my next ski .
I need another year of practice before I am good enough for the Rax
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
-
11-11-2017, 06:59 PM #3935
-
11-12-2017, 02:43 AM #3936
After demoing both the 93/100's I was planning on buying one or the other until I demoed the Wren 98. Ended up with a 189 Wren 98 for my directional daily driver. The Enforcer's were definitely fun and were to be able to hold their own, but just didn't compare to how much better the Wren's handled the same terrain.
By the way, glad to see my BG Veneer Tours getting around...!
-
11-12-2017, 03:08 PM #3937Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- Tahoe
- Posts
- 3,097
Wrens are a little more damp/stable, while being just as “fun”??
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
-
11-12-2017, 06:17 PM #3938
More fun.
Despite the Enforcer's much tighter radius at 18.5m in the 185 compared to the 189 Wren 98's radius of 24.8m, the Wren felt livelier and yes, more damp/stable. The Wren definitely has more tip and tail rocker than the Enforcer, which only added to the "fun" listed in the last statement.
They just plain outperformed the Enforcers in every manner, in my heavily ON3P biased opinion.
-
11-15-2017, 04:20 PM #3939
-
11-16-2017, 05:20 PM #3940
-
11-16-2017, 05:21 PM #3941
That's a killer quiver.
-
11-21-2017, 11:53 AM #3942
Have a few more on the way but here's where things are at. Hiding in the background are the 202 Lotus 138 pures.
-
11-21-2017, 12:32 PM #3943
-
11-21-2017, 06:54 PM #3944
-
11-21-2017, 06:56 PM #3945
L138's in hiding like a dirty secret
-
11-21-2017, 07:05 PM #3946
-
11-21-2017, 07:31 PM #3947Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- Tahoe
- Posts
- 3,097
I didnt realize DPS still makes a 197cm Lotus 120!?! I kinda want, but too much overlap with Supergoats..
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
-
11-21-2017, 07:38 PM #3948
-
11-21-2017, 07:44 PM #3949Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- Tahoe
- Posts
- 3,097
That’s pretty much where I am at. 202 138 or nothing..
138 will overlap less with C&Ds. Now I just gotta find a pair.
Do DPS measure short, or true to size? Are there different variations in the 138 core, like hybrid or pure or whatever? Any different flex patterns?
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
-
11-21-2017, 07:51 PM #3950
I dunno, they look longer than my 192 Big Dumps.
Flex/Construction, etc, yes, search jong. They made a few different batches of them. Mine are pures. I would suggest the same, more differentiation from your C&Ds. To me this is a perfect pow tool for the once every 3-5 year type days where it's waist deep, so I'm not concerned about chop and slop performance.
Bookmarks