Results 1 to 25 of 361
-
10-21-2017, 02:52 PM #1
What is the Toyota/Lexus Bike Equivalent?
What is the Toyota/Lexus full-suspension bike equivalent? Build quality and reliability above all. Maybe it's not the lightest and maybe it doesn't come with the latest tech. That's fine. Which bike will last 20 years?
-
10-21-2017, 04:28 PM #2
Why would somebody put a guarantee on a bike. Hmm. Very interesting.
There is something to be said for the lifetime warranty. But Hyundai had (maybe has) a 10 year warranty where Toyota/Lexus have much smaller warranties and still make the superior product.
-
10-21-2017, 04:43 PM #3
What is the Toyota/Lexus Bike Equivalent?
20 years for a bike? What kind of bike, and what do you use it for? How much do you use it? From my experience with bikes, there is enough evolution in brakes drivetrain and wheels that planning on updating more frequently might be worthwhile components can be replaced and or upgraded as long as there are not compatibility issues. Mountain bikes depreciate the first few years pretty steeply. You could get a couple years old bike with good tech and components for a decent value.
I like Santa Cruz, they have a good reputation for customer satisfaction. And their design, production and customer feedback seem to work well. Don’t think you could go with any of the bigger established companies. Giant, Trek, Specialized, Cannondale and may more.
-
10-21-2017, 04:44 PM #4Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Southeast New York
- Posts
- 11,827
-
10-21-2017, 07:15 PM #5
I read this as there is not enough difference between bike brands to identify a superior product. Is that right? Are there are no brands with the reputation for being built better than others? Seems true from recent looking. Like the bike market is a flood of barely distinguishable brands/models/tiers/styles/options that are almost all manufactured by the same overseas facilities. Like finding a reason to buy one brand over the other is an exercise in futility because they're almost the same product.
My current bike is 20 years old and in great shape but it's been ridden intermittently. The same will likely happen with the next. I'm not bombing downhills or putting in 50 mile rides every week or even every month.
The Giant warranty is good to know and I appreciate the shout out on Santa Cruz customer service because that seems at least as important as the bike given the nearly indistinguishable designs and features. Thanks.
-
10-21-2017, 07:35 PM #6
You need a simple aluminum hardtail. It will likely last you 20 years of intermittent riding.
-
10-21-2017, 07:37 PM #7
Hardtail is out of the question.
-
10-21-2017, 07:38 PM #8Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- northern BC
- Posts
- 31,060
I got a 31 yr old Marin i still ride around town and to the bar but I question whether you really want to be riding around a 20 yr old bike
unless of course you are drunk?Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know
-
10-21-2017, 07:39 PM #9
Let's not get hung up on the 20 year time point. That was meant to speak to the build quality of the bike only.
-
10-21-2017, 07:43 PM #10
Reliability and planned obsolescence wise, that is true. Mostly because all the parts that wear out are made by companies other than the 'brand'.
Design wise, some brands *might* stand the test of time a little better than others, but most riders self-validate, so many grains of salt are required.
For the casual rider, it's hard to beat Giant (and maybe Specialized) for bang/buck.
-
10-21-2017, 07:50 PM #11
Soft tail Moots?
Can't really compare a car to a bike this way. Bikes have a lot fewer parts, all of which are cheaper and easier to replace than on a car. Lots of weird proprietary shit in the bike industry that may not be available 5/10/15 years later. Much smaller production on bicycle lines than most cars, so finding replacement parts for that weird proprietary shit gets harder later.
Bikes cost so much less than cars that you're probably just better off buying a replacement bike every 5 years and not worrying about a 20-year worthy bike.
-
10-21-2017, 07:59 PM #12
-
10-21-2017, 09:49 PM #13Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- northern BC
- Posts
- 31,060
IME what you want is a bike you can ride down mainstreet no hands while semi piste
the marin bear valley makes you feel like a rock star when you are stiing up ther with yer hands in the pocket scoping out the milfs ... who think you are fucking idiot but whatever eh
cuz you are just lookin to impress that one who digs the dangerous kindLee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know
-
10-21-2017, 11:26 PM #14
Turner
But Ellen kicks ass - if she had a beard it would be much more haggard. -Jer
-
10-22-2017, 10:11 AM #15
No. That's equivalent to saying that any selection of skis with roughly the same length are more or less the same. Sure the differences might be hard to see for a beginner, but they're significant.
That said, for what you want, go to a bike shop you like and buy the big-brand closeout deal that fits you best. 20 years of casual use is optimistic, but not impossible.
-
10-22-2017, 10:46 AM #16
Shifting industry standards impact a bikes lifespan if you want it to last 20 years. As others have said, drive train evolution effects this a bit, but more recent developments like shifting headset and axel standards play a bigger role IMO.
That said, I would consider Santa Cruz and Turner to be the Lexus equivalent relative to Giant as the Toyota. Both of the afore mentioned brands make a great product and employ sophisticated suspension design, however you will also pay more for them relative to an equivalent Giant, which IMO gives nothing up in suspension performance.
Scale of economy, Giant is the largest manufacture in the World, they can afford a big R&D budget, they own all of their own manufacturing, and they have much greater leverage in negotiating with component suppliers like SRAM and Shimano.
Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums
-
10-22-2017, 12:20 PM #17Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- northern BC
- Posts
- 31,060
Giant is so big they make bikes for other brands that get badged & stickered with whatever the brand wants
And they can build them better/faster than America or anywhere else in the world cuz all the best welders work there, all the best people work there building more bikes than anybody else since the 80's
the profit margins on a Giant are big too while a Santa Cruz or Yeti not so much and you gotta pay your mechanic to put them together
whereas you just take a Giant out of the boxLee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know
-
10-22-2017, 12:32 PM #18
don't think production volume is the sole or even a major reason. Millions of bike frames produced a year.
it's more bikes are like consumer electronics consumers plan on tossing it in 5 years so they don't care if the components won't be supported in 5 years. So the large manufacturers leverage things for cost cutting and other crap, if they want to. the mongoose for sale at TarMart is from the same parent company (Dorel Sports) as a Cannondale
-
10-22-2017, 04:08 PM #19
There's a reason Dave Weagle ended up in a legal battle with Giant: maestro is essentially the same as dw-link.
Just like Specialized/Scott/Norco/Turner/Ellsworth all using Horst links yet each giving it a different name.
Yep. And why Mazdaratti should just go to the giant store.
-
10-22-2017, 04:27 PM #20
I'll be a contrary voice: I'm not a huge fan of the giants. They're cheap, and the build quality shows that.
If I wanted a bike that'd last a long time, it'd be a Turner or a Devinci. Overbuilt frames and good warranties. Specialized, Santa Cruz, and Trek are all too light to hold up well over time.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
-
10-22-2017, 05:10 PM #21
-
10-22-2017, 06:54 PM #22
Moots is on the short list. I need more travel than the YBB provides so it would have to be used. Which is fine if the bike is in great shape.
Hah. Pedal-powered booze cruise with no-hands. Steeze factor = elevated.
Great analogy. Planned obsolescence. Which is too bad.
And even ski facilities. Doesn't Elan manufacture skis for a lot of the boutique brands? Skis that are probably based off the trace of an existing ski.
The more I look, the more the bit on marketing and branding rings true.
I think everyone would agree there were some less than desirable designs.
Turner is a familiar name but a) the website shows carbon bikes only which seems weird for a company that was kind of known for polished aluminum frames and b) who the hell owns and makes the bikes? Wiki says SAPA assumed manufacturing for Turner in 2003. SAPA stopped producing bicycles in 2011 but another company, Zen, took over the SAPA manufacturing facility the same year. Zen closed shop in 2016. I mean, are Turner bikes being produced in the same facility as every other bike at this point? Looking through the FAQ section of Turner's website suggests a big change for the company sometime around 2016.
-
10-22-2017, 08:43 PM #23Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- northern BC
- Posts
- 31,060
they all break if you work hard enough at it or get the rong bike for the jawb
I don't know what you ride but the odds are really good it was made IN the giant factory by some of my yellow bretheren
edit: besides my Marin the milf magnet ( did I mention I dig alliteration ) I got a 13 yr old prophet that has nothing wrong with it but the tech of a new bike 29er /1x/tubeless/dropper seat/yada is superiour
so do you really want to be riding a 20 yr old mtnbike??Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know
-
10-22-2017, 08:50 PM #24
-
10-22-2017, 08:56 PM #25
I'd give that nod to Diamondback right now. Their new Release frame is very well reviewed and the build kit on the Release 3 is completely nuts for the price. Pike RC3, X1, etc. level parts front to back for $2500. I think a Trance or Reign with a similar build is at least $4000.
Bookmarks