Results 251 to 275 of 451
-
11-12-2017, 02:46 PM #251
-
11-12-2017, 02:47 PM #252
-
11-12-2017, 02:51 PM #253
Not in a very long time until a few hours ago. When I saw a male tell a female to "fuck off" and "go suck a dick!" because the female challenged the male.
Life is not lift served.
-
11-12-2017, 02:52 PM #254
-
11-12-2017, 02:57 PM #255
Sad.
Life is not lift served.
-
11-12-2017, 02:59 PM #256
-
11-12-2017, 03:06 PM #257
No. Groups of people like you exist all over the internet. It is sad that you think it a defense. But it doesnt matter. What matters is TGR Corp's policy on providing a platform for exactly what you highlighted.
Life is not lift served.
-
11-12-2017, 03:28 PM #258
Im sorry.
I must've missed the part where you have to participate here."I don't pretend to have all the answers, and I think there's something to be said for that" -One For The Road
Brain dead and made of money.
-
11-12-2017, 03:53 PM #259
You're not in Kansas anymore. The times, they are a chaingin.
A few people feel the rain. Most people just get wet.
-
11-12-2017, 05:36 PM #260features a sintered base
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Impossible to knowl--I use an iPhone
- Posts
- 13,143
Seriously, you need to fuck off. I'm not even going to bother asking you to justify what you just stated (your lie), because you have consistently been dishonest in your replies. I understand you have some sort of baggage in something related to this (I never followed your soap opera so not sure what it is), but to blatantly lie about what I've said is pretty douchey.
I can also see that, as I mentioned, you really wanted to discuss getting rid any thread depicting what you deem to be sexually suggestive--which is fine, and a legitimate topic (as I said), but you are incapable of anything but disingenuous discourse. You may have issues in your past that deserve sympathy, but you are not exempted from being responsible for what you post.[quote][//quote]
-
11-12-2017, 05:39 PM #261
heil men and their dicks!
-
11-12-2017, 05:45 PM #262observing free range rude
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Location
- below the Broads Fork Twins
- Posts
- 5,772
I hate sexism, therefore I superimpose sexist beliefs on non-sexist women for sport. Because that's what modern activism is about.
-
11-12-2017, 05:46 PM #263
I am only here to post in this impotent thread one thought.
The world is full of assholes. Roughly 50 % are male.
-
11-12-2017, 05:48 PM #264
-
11-12-2017, 05:51 PM #265features a sintered base
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Impossible to knowl--I use an iPhone
- Posts
- 13,143
Revelatory facts.
[quote][//quote]
-
11-12-2017, 06:13 PM #266
-
11-12-2017, 06:21 PM #267
-
11-12-2017, 11:43 PM #268
Good spot on 60 minutes (for those of you who don't know, it is a news show that only old people watch) tonight about Ally Reisman and the sexual abuse of US gymnasts by a doctor, and by the management of us gymnastics who allowed him to treat athletes in their hotel rooms without a chaperone.
-
11-13-2017, 12:18 AM #269
At least half of my good friends are women. Almost all of them have stories of abuse/harassment/rape. I have a few people on my “if I get cancer and am about to die, here’s who I kill first” list. Abuse and exploitation of women strikes a chord with me.
Mtngirl, I’m with you, and I’m a bit dismayed at how many guys on this forum fall so fucking far on the wrong side of this issue.
-
11-13-2017, 05:18 AM #270
Not everyone did ignore Weinstein. Did you ignore him? Or was he just a person you never met and had no reason to know about at all?
If your point is that anything like the Ullr thread should be policed for an appearance of non-consent (or some other definable moderation) then some specific party has to enforce that because the nature of NSFW tagging is that only some people see the content at all. If your point is that there should be no NSFW threads then that speaks to a broader question: is it better to organize things so that everyone knows what to click on (or not) and thus allow people to choose what they want to see, or is it better to try to suppress the proliferation of NSFW images and/or topics? The latter seems a little less feasible at this point, but obviously there's a spectrum of answers and maybe you've got a better one to offer than the status quo. My point is, specific ideas for what to change are quite different from painting the "community" with a broad brush without suggesting and defending a specific response. It's harder and it's dry and boring since you might have to get into just what's wrong with NSFW images and topics, but it's a worthwhile discussion with a chance to improve things, whereas the blame game is conventiently self-contained.
-
11-13-2017, 05:46 AM #271
.
-
11-13-2017, 07:40 AM #272Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- The Land of Subdued Excitement
- Posts
- 5,437
-
11-13-2017, 07:44 AM #273Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- The Land of Subdued Excitement
- Posts
- 5,437
Is it really that hard to understand putting the benefit of doubt with the woman in the naked picture that may have not given consent and may be harmed by the picture rather than the men seeking amusement and enjoyment from her potential exploitation?
There is porn all over the internet. You want it here, in that thread. Even if causes someone harm.
This is pretty much the definition of rape culture.
-
11-13-2017, 08:14 AM #274
So you're saying you did ignore Weinstein? I'm saying ignoring something requires at least some level of knowledge. I knew zero about this until the story broke and I don't call that ignoring it any more than I would say I ignore the dramatic events in the lives of plankton I've never met.
I specifically asked you what kind of discussion you want to have and you respond in 3 stages, finally ramping it up to claiming I want something in a thread I don't even read. As I noted above, the blame game is conveniently self-contained. It's convenient for everyone who disagrees with your point because it allows them to be distracted by bullshit instead of facing reality. Every time you play into that you make the status quo a little more your fault. Quit acting like you're incapable of reasonable discussion. That's nonsense, and it's reminiscent of the excuses offered for porn or other addictions. Perhaps because going back to the same overused tracks in the brain for familiar stimulus is similar, whether that's drama, sex or otherwise. It's still a choice, even if it's difficult.
-
11-13-2017, 08:28 AM #275
I'll try this again: I'm saying you have not yet given a clear definition of the rules you would like to see TGR or its moderators implement. (I hope it's not really that hard to understand why it's necessary to have clearly defined rules, but if that's your issue please say so.) If you can see the value of not simply leaving it up to whims and such then I would like to see what you would lay out for those rules. That's not an argument, it's a question.
Bookmarks