Results 76 to 100 of 221
Thread: Davenport=denied
-
05-02-2007, 01:36 PM #76
It's NOT ok for Dav to use human powered access to wilderness, but it IS ok for our government to allow HELICOPTER AND CYANIDE BOMBS IN WILDERNESS TO KILL COYOTES TO HELP RANCHERS WHO HAVE GRAZING PERMITS, AND SPENDING YOUR TAX DOLLARS DOING SO.
STUPID! They are so hypocritical it makes me sick.
-
05-02-2007, 01:36 PM #77
this is no different than if you built a house and the applied for the building permit after the house is built. one would think the law & order types would understand this sort of thing.
-
05-02-2007, 01:37 PM #78
-
05-02-2007, 01:37 PM #79
aaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiigggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggghhhhh hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhtttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttt
<450
-
05-02-2007, 01:40 PM #80
-
05-02-2007, 01:40 PM #81
-
05-02-2007, 01:40 PM #82
-
05-02-2007, 01:40 PM #83Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- in ewe
- Posts
- 1,285
You people can't see the forest or the trees.
Nobody is arguing that Dav failed to follow stupid overly burdensome red tape.
But this is a skiing and snowboarding website and we should be defending Dav because he did something cool and because he is one of us.
The feds have bigger fish to fry right now.
-
05-02-2007, 01:42 PM #84
-
05-02-2007, 01:43 PM #85
COCKROACHES
-
05-02-2007, 01:45 PM #86
-
05-02-2007, 01:46 PM #87
No?
Gee, I'm really sorry, I must have read that in some other thread. There's so many, you know and it's so easy to confuse agendas with facts.
But this is a skiing and snowboarding website and we should be defending Dav because he did something cool and because he is one of us.
The feds have bigger fish to fry right now.Merde De Glace On the Freak When Ski
>>>200 cm Black Bamboo Sidewalled DPS Lotus 120 : Best Skis Ever <<<
-
05-02-2007, 01:47 PM #88
SSD is a totally bitchin' Lawyer.
-
05-02-2007, 01:48 PM #89
-
05-02-2007, 01:48 PM #90
-
05-02-2007, 01:55 PM #91
Last edited by Toadman; 05-02-2007 at 01:57 PM.
"We don't beat the reaper by living longer, we beat the reaper by living well and living fully." - Randy Pausch
-
05-02-2007, 01:58 PM #92
-
05-02-2007, 02:09 PM #93
Lone Star, I've got to say that in this instance you are way, way off base. Yes, many areas are loved to death, IN THE SUMMER. The number of people willing and able (expensive gear, ability to use it, fitness level, lack of avalanche savvy, etc) to go into remote wilderness areas to climb and ski a peak in snow season is very small. It's pretty obvious that I have been skiing 14ers with regularity this winter. I don't remember seeing anyone outside my own party on more than a couple of them. I've rarely even seen tracks outside of the peaks that are close to Denver and have easy access, none of which are in a wilderness area. From what I've seen, many of the peaks in question see less than a dozen people all winter long. From another website, Mr Davenport reported seeing a whopping total of 4 people on the 54 peaks he skied. How the birds and the bears navigate through the piles of used shit tickets, I'll never know
-
05-02-2007, 02:26 PM #94
-
05-02-2007, 02:47 PM #95Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Posts
- 8,887
-
05-02-2007, 02:49 PM #96
-
05-02-2007, 02:59 PM #97features a sintered base
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Impossible to knowl--I use an iPhone
- Posts
- 13,150
There is an assumption being made here, which looks correct, that Dav (or whoever did the filming) intended this as a commercial venture. If he didn't (or could claim he didn't) initially film for commercial purposes (and didn't use a tripod?? What an idiotic criteria) then he should be fine regardless of what they say.
Now if his sponsors set aside money specifically to film, and we know they had commercial ends in mind, it would change things, but that isn't the only way to understand the situation. I wouldn't necessarily assume he had a contract that stipulated filming this for commercial purposes (but that may have been the case, who knows).[quote][//quote]
-
05-02-2007, 03:03 PM #98Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- in ewe
- Posts
- 1,285
CJ you're a tool.
Get a life dude, 7,000 posts and it's the same inane drivel all the time from you.
I caught your "deadbeat state" comment the other day and let it slide.
So you're saying when all the ski resorts close we shouldn't be allowed access to our public lands, I'm confused.
Do you ever ski, or are you here 24/7.
-
05-02-2007, 03:10 PM #99
-
05-02-2007, 03:20 PM #100
How many of these peaks are in wilderness areas? I'm curious which ones won't make the cut now.
Bookmarks