Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 157
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    monument
    Posts
    6,928
    Gah!!!

    Have comp R87s on the way.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,219

    … and now… we wait…


    :::::@:::::

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    9,981
    Noice! Did you mount them back or?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,219
    Quote Originally Posted by 2FUNKY View Post
    Noice! Did you mount them back or?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Oh, I put it at -12.5. I’ll give it a shot and move em forward a cm or two if it feels weird. The tail’s so stiff, I think the mount will work fine for what I’ve got in mind for them. Knees to skis all day long.


    :::::@:::::

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,319
    Really excited for the first wave deliveries to get on snow this weekend! IMO... I would say -12.5 as "full charge" mount, and maybe -11.5 for touch more versatility. But I don't know that many people would enjoy going more forward than -11...

    And great news that the rest of the comp ski shipment have finally been located and sorted with the shipping carrier, and hoping for them to arrive to me / ship to everyone next week (finally!)

    Once that occurs, I will update this thread with all the specifics on each Comp build ski as well!

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    shadow of HS butte
    Posts
    6,430
    Great news Marshal! Can't fucking wait to take these for a rip and upload my thoughts.

    Very eager to hear from you folks skiing them this weekend regarding mount point.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    9,981
    I’m on the line, -11.5 and they full charge without waiver there. Curious to hear the thoughts of peeps who go -12.5 with locked down heels.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,219
    Hoji method, if you buy into it, kind of makes my mount point moot. My BSL is 335mm, which would put my BCL ~1.5cm back from your (I think) 306mm BSL for a similar experience. I kind of buy into the method, so I usually mount on the line with the feeling that it makes for a proportionally forward mount compared to the typical BSLs of the developers or testers. I’ll giver a go, though, and share if it turns out I’m full of shite.


    :::::@:::::

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    9,981
    Damn dude, 335! You’re socks must be huge! Lol
    Yeah, you’re probably right there.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,219

    Heritage Lab R99 Comp review

    Chewed up all the powder on Mt Hood today with my bigass C132s, so tomorrow’s R99 day. I feel like I’m going to the playground to show off a new toy.


    :::::@:::::

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,219

    Heritage Lab R99 Comp review

    Me: 6’8” 190lbs, 29.5 boot, been skiing for around 40 years

    Skis: 188cm R99 Comp, mounted at -12.5 cm for 335mm BSL, no detune

    Conditions: 20 deg F, 10/10 groom, 27” of shredded, sun and wind affected fresh snow off piste at Mt Hood Meadows

    I started the day with a quick feeler run on the bunny lift, to shake off the slop I’ve acquired from skiing upright on decambered and reverse cambered skis for the whole season. Took a minute to get the forward stance back, and stop getting locked into turns. Knees to skis, my friends, knees to skis! All the lifts were running so I took a chair to the top of the area.

    Off piste
    First run was on a wind affected, sastrugi riddled bowl with no tracks. The “powder” was set up enough that I could lay trenches all the way down the 35 degree face, carefully avoiding bigger, but punchable sastrugi, and though it was technical for me in that I was still having to actively work to keep a forward stance, the skis cut through the set up, variable surface like a knife through butter.

    The next ridge opened up into some relatively untracked, not wind affected, but heavy powder, and I definitely found myself having to keep my speed up, bounce and unweight turns, to stay in the game. Slowing down, meant submarining and stopping. What I would expect from a skinny (for me) ski with camber and not much rocker. It was good. I would like to try them out in deeper, fresher, softer snow, just to see how it goes.

    The runout to Heather Canyon right now is all traverse tracks and little rollers that will rattle your fillings out. Not my favorite, but it was fine, and 100x nicer on these than it was yesterday on the C132. Skied a mogul or 50, which threw me off my game a bit. I ended up just straight-lining and absorbing the path of least resistance. Will try again with feeling during slush bump season.

    I skied a couple of steep, really chopped up bowls for shits and giggles, and was no match for the weight and consistency of the snow, had to slow down, muscle up, and resort to billy goating down. Probably not my ski of choice for that terrain (YMMV), but man can they hold an edge. I hit more than a few patches of partially iced over sun crust and they calmed my panic right down with unshakable stability. Just don’t let your legs get the best of you and the skis will do the rest.

    I skied no trees. I didn’t want to unconsciously lean back, lock into a turn, and eat tree.

    On piste
    Leg weary from the terrain, I decided to do some groomer hot laps on the upper mountain, and I concur that here they absolutely shine. Super comfortable and rock solid at speed, and easy as hell to shut down. This is what I was looking for in this ski, and now I can thin the herd a little (goodbye, 194cm Kastle M98, and Dynastar LP105), because the quiver slot is filled.

    Being unnaturally tall, I try to get the longest skis I can find, to meet the demands of my high center of gravity. Although these are on the short end of my acceptable range (they’re my shortest skis), the longer effective edge, greater stiffness, and the ski shape check all the boxes. I wouldn’t go any further forward on the mount, personally, but maybe take that with a grain of salt, if you’re not built like a treant.

    Looking forward to spring skiing at mach looney on the Palmer glacier.


    :::::@:::::

  12. #37
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    20,245
    As a fellow tall skier, thx for the write-up!
    Pow in open bowls was heavy/dense yesterday. Jax served up deeper & more powdery turns (tho the lift itself was the slowdown, not the crowds). abmag ftw.

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Southside of heaven
    Posts
    3,233
    Fuck. Do I need a pair of Comps instead of AM after all?

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    130
    Chiming in to say that being tempted toward comps had prompted me to pull a nearly forgotten pair of motherships off the wall and throw bindings on them. Loving the AMs but it's been a while since I've had a true charger on my feet...

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    14,731
    Quote Originally Posted by GBB View Post
    Fuck. Do I need a pair of Comps instead of AM after all?
    I guess it depends on if you want something more versatile. I haven’t been on the comps I switched my order to the AM. They have a very high speed limit but aren’t a handful in tighter situations. It sounds like the AM isn’t as much of a bottom feeder as the Comp in powder and likely easier in funky grabby snow. Pretty manageable in bumps if you stay on top of them. You don’t have to stay over the tips, you can ski more upright if you want. Hard crust and groomer performance is very good.

    If you just want a ski for rage skiing on groomers and crud the Comp is probably is probably what you want.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,219

    Heritage Lab R99 Comp review

    ^ this tracks… for me, anyway.


    :::::@:::::

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    7,910
    first few runs on the comps today... unfortunately kids became ill so had to bail early...

    I enjoyed the AM version and would ski them if I wanted to slow down a bit, but THESE are the droids. The maple metal sandwich is the shit. The cushion for the pushin. Quiet, powerful, precise. It's double the ski of the AM flavor. Strong vibes of im102/supermojo, which I spent probably 200 days on... but with an updated tip and carveable radius that makes it easier to ski and floatier while being stiffer. A modern shit-kicker.

    lucknau, I think you're insane for skiing these without detuning. I did what I'd call a standard blend ~15cm in from the tail and ~20 from the tip, plus a couple diamond swipes along the whole length, and may do a touch more next time out, but was happy with how the skis behaved in a bunch of conditions. Chalk and cold buff to boot top pow to sun-baked-refrozen steeps to groom, all predictable and fast af. Could shut em down when needed and they were very much more manageable than I expected given the stiffness. No detune sounds scary.

    Bravo Marshal, these are sweet.
    Last edited by Norseman; 03-27-2023 at 08:58 AM.

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    9,981
    Nice reviews doods!
    I too am tweaking my detune Norse. Thanks for your detune points as mine was looking to be similar.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    7,910
    ... and I'll post some more thoughtful comments as I get more miles on these bad muthas. My hot take above is pretty useless.

    - edited to clarify that it's my words - not Funky's - that are lame

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    9,981
    Quote Originally Posted by Norseman View Post
    ... and I'll post some more thoughtful comments as I get more miles on these bad muthas. The hot take above is pretty useless.
    I was hoping to ski them this weekend again but had to ski pow instead….


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,319
    Well, the 185 R120 Comp (2550g) and 180 R99 Comp (2200g) both arrived... Holy F they both turned out sweet.

    Still waiting for 3 more boxes (more 188 R99, 182 R87, 175 R87)... and still battling with FedEx to figure out what is delivery timing. sigh.

    Boycott Fedex Forever.



    (edited for typo)
    Last edited by Marshal Olson; 03-27-2023 at 02:09 PM.

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    5,581
    Quote Originally Posted by Marshal Olson View Post
    Well, the 185 R120 Comp (2550g) and 180 R99 Comp (2200g) both arrived... Holy F they both turned out sweet.

    Still waiting for 3 more boxes (more 188 R99, 182 R99, 175 R99)... and still battling with FedEx to figure out what is delivery timing. sigh.

    Boycott Fedex Forever.
    Assume that should be 182 R87, not 99?

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,319
    correct! good catch. will update.

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    monument
    Posts
    6,928
    Quote Originally Posted by Marshal Olson View Post
    correct! good catch. will update.
    Phew!

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    The greatest N. New Mexico resort in Colorado
    Posts
    2,189
    I haven't been through all 40+ pages of the Heritage Labs thread to find out, but can we get a direct flex comparison for the 188 R99 Comp? "Stiff" and "very stiff" only put it in a ball park, and I need ca. 2010 historical data because I'm old now. Are we talking B Squad or Titan Pro?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •