Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,183

    Binding jigs -- wide ski adapter brackets?

    Anyone have a source for jig adapter brackets to fit wider skis? I remember seeing this mentioned awhile back, but I've never seen these brackets. Apparently some ski binding company makes them to fit the clamps on jigs to effectively widen them.

    Another option, in case anyone has a source for these: some sort of sturdy metal bracket that I could weld to the jig arms, shaped like this:

    _l
    l

    What would also work would be a bracket in an "H" shape, and I could just cut off the extra bits. Any ideas? I've looked through Home Depot, didn't find any inspiration there.
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Wet Coast
    Posts
    738
    Ive used both options and find the home-built extension much better.Unless you find adapters specifically made for your jig (these are tyrolia adapters on the solly jig)the arms splay out and are hard to align.I used aluminum for the other adapter and bolted them to the arms.
    You should be able to get any sheet metal shop with a brake to bend a piece of plate steel to the shape you need pretty cheaply.Youve still got to be careful with your alignment as the jig sits high above the ski and its easy to start your holes off by a bunch.
    If you cant find anything i think ive got a bunch of that aluminum bracket left i can cut up and send you fer the shipping cost.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,183
    Did you find a bracket that fit the general shape you needed, or did you have a shop bend some metal for you? (if you found a pre-made bracket -- what was it for?)

    Thanks for the offer on the brackets -- I may take you up on that.
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Ski-attle
    Posts
    4,217
    Those tyrolia things suck balls. The plastic (more like rubber) is super soft and flexy. They inspire zero confidence. That metal rig looks $, however.
    ROBOTS ARE EATING MY FACE.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,191
    Quote Originally Posted by bossass View Post
    That metal rig looks $, however.
    Second that! I have the same Sallie jig and have thought about taking a similar approach. I've been worried about bending the brakets in a less than precise manner and having the mount be off a few mm's (it seems like ti would be easy to screw it up). Dig the way you made it work.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Wet Coast
    Posts
    738
    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    I've been worried about bending the brakets in a less than precise manner and having the mount be off a few mm's (it seems like ti would be easy to screw it up).
    If you bend a strip of metal then cut individual arms of it then it wont matter if your off a few mm's as theyll all be the same.I found the aluminum brackets i used already bent like that at a local metal recycler.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    YetiMan
    Posts
    13,370
    Thread bump.

    Curious if there is a current state-of-the-art on widening a narrow jig.

    Note: I have homemade brackets on one already, but they're ghetto, and I'm hoping there's something better out there.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    8,427
    I have both and ghetto is not much worse. best thing is to get an actual wide jig, but you knew that.
    Quote Originally Posted by Foggy_Goggles View Post
    If I lived in WA, Oft would be my realtor. Seriously.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    A LSD Steakhouse somewhere in the Wasatch
    Posts
    13,235
    Quote Originally Posted by ill-advised strategy View Post
    Thread bump.

    Curious if there is a current state-of-the-art on widening a narrow jig.

    Note: I have homemade brackets on one already, but they're ghetto, and I'm hoping there's something better out there.
    along with yurz bag o random binder screws I haz both marker and tyrolia extenders for u
    as my jig stash is all pretty fat now
    ski ya soons bro
    "When the child was a child it waited patiently for the first snow and it still does"- Van "The Man" Morrison
    "I find I have already had my reward, in the doing of the thing" - Buzz Holmstrom
    "THIS IS WHAT WE DO"-AML -ski on in eternal peace
    "I have posted in here but haven't read it carefully with my trusty PoliAsshat antenna on."-DipshitDanno

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    SkiTalk.com
    Posts
    3,369
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0162.jpg 
Views:	23 
Size:	1.65 MB 
ID:	270868Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0163.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	2.05 MB 
ID:	270869Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0164.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	1.36 MB 
ID:	270870Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0169.JPG 
Views:	34 
Size:	877.6 KB 
ID:	270871

    I did these years ago and they still do the trick.
    Click. Point. Chute.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    YetiMan
    Posts
    13,370
    Lol, I have the same driver jig with virtually the same hardware.

    Just checking with the community to see if something else had emerged over the years.

    Phil: I have a FT/flexon question for you:
    In the current tongue vernacular (6,8,10,12)...what were the old 9.9 flexons? What were my original FT bumblebee pros? They weren’t marked, so I’m just guaging these by hand.

    I ask because I got some “classics” and they’re unskiably soft. (Put 12 tongues on them now, so no longer a problem, but curiosity bugs me...)I feel like the old standard out of the box tongues weren’t anywhere near the 12s I just got, but they weren’t the 6 flex either....8 maybe? 10? Does that specific knowledge exist outside of just educated guesswork?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    SkiTalk.com
    Posts
    3,369
    Quote Originally Posted by ill-advised strategy View Post
    Lol, I have the same driver jig with virtually the same hardware.

    Just checking with the community to see if something else had emerged over the years.

    Phil: I have a FT/flexon question for you:
    In the current tongue vernacular (6,8,10,12)...what were the old 9.9 flexons? What were my original FT bumblebee pros? They weren’t marked, so I’m just guaging these by hand.

    I ask because I got some “classics” and they’re unskiably soft. (Put 12 tongues on them now, so no longer a problem, but curiosity bugs me...)I feel like the old standard out of the box tongues weren’t anywhere near the 12s I just got, but they weren’t the 6 flex either....8 maybe? 10? Does that specific knowledge exist outside of just educated guesswork?
    I would say that they were about an 8 on the current scale.
    Click. Point. Chute.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 92
    Last Post: 07-15-2011, 08:29 PM
  2. Another f***ing wide binding question
    By Ginger in forum Tech Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 11-16-2006, 04:27 PM
  3. Looking for a wide Look binding brake
    By Thunder_Foot in forum Gear Swap (List View)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-28-2006, 02:11 PM
  4. Gauging Interest - Binding Jigs?
    By Jonathan S. in forum Gear Swap (List View)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-10-2006, 11:19 PM
  5. MSA: binding jigs available in Reno
    By El Chupacabra in forum Tech Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-27-2006, 08:36 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •