Results 13,501 to 13,525 of 18222
-
02-13-2021, 06:20 AM #13501
A single bitcoin transaction eats around 740 kilowatt hours. For comparison, VISA can do 100k for 149 kwh. Horrifically wasteful.
-
02-13-2021, 06:42 AM #13502
I don't have enough time or crayons to explain how wrong you are this morning. This article captures the key points.
https://hackernoon.com/the-bitcoin-v...y-8cf194987a50
Also, electricity is not = carbon footprint if we use better energy tech.
Sent from my LM-G710VM using Tapatalk
-
02-13-2021, 07:18 AM #13503
The article stating Bitcoin is a full currency system is your argument? Get out the crayolas. And while you’re at it...go get me a coffee, donut and newspaper with your Bitcoin.
Decisions Decisions
-
02-13-2021, 07:47 AM #13504
Lol, "it won't matter as much if we use green energy, which we will do nothing to require"
The math isn't hard. I can do roughly 500k more transactions in traditional systems for the same electricity cost as bitcoin. That's inefficient as fuck.
Even other cryptos have better energy models than this. Come on man.
-
02-13-2021, 04:05 PM #13505
You can't compare Bitcoin transactions to credit card transactions. That's not apples to apples. The more accurate comparison would be the energy cost of verifying a bitcoin transaction via block chain versus the energy cost of physically transferring dollar bills from one location to another. Think about armored car transport, vault infrastructure, security, and accounting effort. Those all have energy costs associated with them.
Bitcoin is not a replacement for escrow agreements (like a credit card) where a third party receives and distributes money on behalf of the transacting parties. That service will still be needed.
Sent from my LM-G710VM using Tapatalk
-
02-13-2021, 05:28 PM #13506
A comparison of energy costs:
The entire US uses about 4,000 billion kilowatt hours (kWh) or 4,000 terawatt hours (TWh) of electricity a year. US consumers make about $3 trillion worth of cash transactions annually.
The world's entire electricity consumption is about 25,000 TWh. Visa handles about $11 trillion worth of digital payments on 190 billion transactions annually worldwide.
The average energy consumption for a single Bitcoin transaction in 2020 was 741 kilowatt hours (kWh). So the amount of energy it would take for BTC to match Visa's 190 billion transactions is 140,790,000,000,000 kWh or 140,790 TWh.
140,790 TWh > 25,000 TWh > 4,000 TWh.
It would take about 35 times more than the entire amount of electricity the US produces for BTC to match Visa's transactions. It would take about 5-6 times more electricity than the entire world produces for the Bitcoin network to match Visa.
What's an apples to apples comparison when you're talking about those kinds of inefficiencies compared to what currently exists? Are you suggesting Bitcoin should consume many times more power than everything?Last edited by MultiVerse; 02-14-2021 at 12:55 PM.
-
02-13-2021, 05:35 PM #13507
On top of that...visa is facilitating trade, not completely “necessary” by any means but it’s a big plus to the global economy.
Bitcoin is a store of value, one of many, which would not impact life at all if it went away.Decisions Decisions
-
02-13-2021, 09:57 PM #13508
Imagine trying to explain to someone in 1970 how we would have credit card reading computers at every store in the world in 2020. They would say it is impossible because computers cost hundreds of thousands of dollars and they are too big.
Technology improves. Things become more efficient. You can't compare the throughput of a system that has decades of design refinement to one that has only recently been invented.
Decentralized ledgers like Bitcoin have a lot of interesting potential. In the coming years I think we will see digital voting systems using block chain technology and a wide range of other new applications.
We can do better than our existing fiat currency system. The fact that at any given time no one can pin down exactly how much "money" exists as US dollars is a critical design flaw. Society needs a currency measurement standard that doesn't change depending on decisions made by the most recent political appointee.
As I am writing this post there are 18.628 million BTC and there will never be more than 21 million BTC total. More efficient computers will be designed to resolve transactions. Better software integration will be developed.
Sent from my LM-G710VM using Tapatalk
-
02-14-2021, 07:47 AM #13509
-
02-15-2021, 08:38 PM #13510
-
02-16-2021, 06:10 AM #13511OH, MY GAWD! ―John Hillerman Big Billie Eilish fan.
But that's a quibble to what PG posted (at first, anyway, I haven't read his latest book) ―jono
we are not arguing about ski boots or fashionable clothing or spageheti O's which mean nothing in the grand scheme ― XXX-er
-
02-16-2021, 09:09 AM #13512
Take the BTC chatter to the fucking BTC thread!
Got crushed on RIOT CC, ate the lose and rolled them up and out to the 65 strike for next week. Recouped most of the loss and totally fine getting assigned at 65.
Expected a dip from PLTR today contemplating selling puts at 25 strike but premiums are no too juicy. Wouldn't mind owning more at that CB though.
Pow day, so going skiing and leaving the screen behind! Good luck to all today.
-
02-16-2021, 01:38 PM #13513
Take your Blockchain stock chatter there too. RIOT. MSTR - that's just lipstick on that same pig.
In fact, you guys throwing your trades every few hours, why not start your own thread?OH, MY GAWD! ―John Hillerman Big Billie Eilish fan.
But that's a quibble to what PG posted (at first, anyway, I haven't read his latest book) ―jono
we are not arguing about ski boots or fashionable clothing or spageheti O's which mean nothing in the grand scheme ― XXX-er
-
02-16-2021, 03:27 PM #13514
Rolled RIOT 55C expiring this week into 69C expiring Feb 26
PLTR disappointed on guidance today and dropped...it has lockup expiry this week. May drop more.
GME has Congress hearings today and may get some random pump
-
02-16-2021, 03:44 PM #13515
I don't see why Honda wouldn't be a good long term hold. Convince me otherwise.
OH, MY GAWD! ―John Hillerman Big Billie Eilish fan.
But that's a quibble to what PG posted (at first, anyway, I haven't read his latest book) ―jono
we are not arguing about ski boots or fashionable clothing or spageheti O's which mean nothing in the grand scheme ― XXX-er
-
02-16-2021, 04:33 PM #13516Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Southeast New York
- Posts
- 11,827
Dude, this is the big kids sandbox. You should go find another one. The girls are in the one over there <<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>^^^^^^^^^^^\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
-
02-16-2021, 05:26 PM #13517
Oh fuck you guys are different people?
Decisions Decisions
-
02-16-2021, 11:58 PM #13518
Warren sure boosted CVX after hours. It’ll be interesting to see if them or XOM benefit the most from these juiced crude prices. I’m feeling pretty good about my MRO shares, WTI above $60.
As I bought more and more energy I was worried, feeling a lot better now.
-
02-17-2021, 02:47 AM #13519
Ha ha ha. I suppose you are one of the big kids, right? Not sure what you are seeing but it seems to me the girls are in this one here.
Thankfully yes. If it was me, I would have said something seriously stupid or seriously profound.OH, MY GAWD! ―John Hillerman Big Billie Eilish fan.
But that's a quibble to what PG posted (at first, anyway, I haven't read his latest book) ―jono
we are not arguing about ski boots or fashionable clothing or spageheti O's which mean nothing in the grand scheme ― XXX-er
-
02-17-2021, 08:58 AM #13520
Bob i have been DCA XOM. That dividend alone is still attractive. Selling 20 delta covered calls has returned 12% annualized on it too. At least for the foreseeable future I like its chances
-
02-17-2021, 10:18 AM #13521
Palantir has a shitty ownership structure, morally compromised leadership and their tech (from what I've seen) isn't anything special in the marketplace. Despite the general strength of AI stuff, I think their leadership makes the place radioactive for a lot of folks in data science/AI, which will just destroy them over time. Also, aren't they already losing money on what should be highly lucrative gov/major corp contracts?
-
02-17-2021, 12:20 PM #13522
-
02-17-2021, 12:22 PM #13523"We don't beat the reaper by living longer, we beat the reaper by living well and living fully." - Randy Pausch
-
02-17-2021, 12:39 PM #13524
-
02-17-2021, 12:56 PM #13525Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Posts
- 2,878
I bought SKYW a few weeks ago for $38 and change planning to hold for a year. But sold today when it hit $50.25. Figure it’s due for a bit of a correction and I can get back in.
Is Tsla ready for a rebound?
Similar Threads
-
Who voted for Bush/Cheney in '00 or '04?
By Bud Green in forum General Ski / Snowboard DiscussionReplies: 281Last Post: 04-14-2006, 11:44 PM -
Risotto Recipes - What you got?
By skiaholik in forum The Padded RoomReplies: 41Last Post: 03-29-2006, 06:03 PM -
Did American Ski Company get delisted from the stock market?
By Free Range Lobster in forum General Ski / Snowboard DiscussionReplies: 3Last Post: 09-06-2005, 06:13 AM -
Bear Activists Killed and Eaten by Bears in Katmai
By Lane Meyer in forum TGR Forum ArchivesReplies: 30Last Post: 10-09-2003, 08:43 AM
Bookmarks