Page 575 of 729 FirstFirst ... 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 ... LastLast
Results 14,351 to 14,375 of 18222
  1. #14351
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    7,933
    Quote Originally Posted by Timberridge View Post
    Que?

    You and Benny sound like two broken down old guys at a bar. Then glademaster walks in and somehow by comparison you both are Tony Robbins.
    Plenty of people go to state school and do just fine and live perfectly happy lives, but only on maybe a polo forum would there be more obtuse people that would try and justify having 1.1 million liquid investable assets at 40 as normal.
    Live Free or Die

  2. #14352
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    17,757
    You both need to go for a bike ride.

    500 people in the whole world? C'mon man.
    "timberridge is terminally vapid" -- a fortune cookie in Yueyang

  3. #14353
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The Mayonnaisium
    Posts
    10,497
    Quote Originally Posted by Benny Profane View Post
    No. Just not as lucky.
    That's partly the point. It's the success paradox. It's the working stiff's version of Carlin's drivers analogy. Everyone more successful than you had it fall in their lap and everyone less successful is lazy.

  4. #14354
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    7,933
    Come on man, don't dig your hole deeper. There are only so many fortune 500 companies. And of those, there are maybe a handful of people who went to Eastern Iowa State (or equivalent) and rose to VP by 40 years old.

    That was the example, and it is ludicrous.
    Live Free or Die

  5. #14355
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,021
    Quote Originally Posted by BobMc View Post
    Back to the stonk market... CLB was downgraded and price target lowered yesterday, sold a July 16 CC @45 for $3.25/per this morning. Up $105 on it already, gonna let it ride and be assigned or not. It's only paying a dividend of .04 annually, been wanting to move that into something higher yielding.
    XOM will likely raise its dividend. My conviction remains high. Adding to core holdings by selling June 65P

  6. #14356
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    关你屁事
    Posts
    9,596
    Quote Originally Posted by californiagrown View Post
    and No ONE cares where you went to school when applying for that second job.
    demonstrably untrue.


    it’s the 1.1 million in liquid assets with high cost lifestyle additions (children) that’s the rub

  7. #14357
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    17,757
    Don't let Benny suck you in to his black hole of negativity.
    "timberridge is terminally vapid" -- a fortune cookie in Yueyang

  8. #14358
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Looking down
    Posts
    50,491
    Yup. Think happy thoughts, and get rich!

  9. #14359
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Looking down
    Posts
    50,491
    Quote Originally Posted by dunfree View Post
    demonstrably untrue.


    it’s the 1.1 million in liquid assets with high cost lifestyle additions (children) that’s the rub
    Yeah, I didn't even go near that one. Kids. The most comfortable Boomers I know we're both working DINKs.

  10. #14360
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    3,934
    Quote Originally Posted by dunfree View Post
    demonstrably untrue.


    it’s the 1.1 million in liquid assets with high cost lifestyle additions (children) that’s the rub
    the first part was admittedly hyperbole. The point was that the name on your diploma gives exponentially diminishing returns the further out from your graduation date that you get. Its job performance that becomes important (yes exceptions exist).

    I dont think anyone was arguing that todd's situation was super common or the expected normal. Just that its not outrageous, or unobtainable if you play your cards over 20+ years intelligently, with discipline, and manage to avoid some bad luck along the way you could have 1.1mil in total investable assets. It doesnt take an ivy league degree or rich parents, and it sucks that is the kneejerk assumption. Financial success is a lot more possible than i feel like many of my liberal compatriots (and paradoxically the MAGA contingent) believe these days. Too much woe is me and blame-game, not enough competitive fire to succeed (as a general observation, not to say that some structural issues do not exist).

  11. #14361
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    7,933
    Someone should tell Yale their degree just isn't what it used to be.

    While I agree there is a lot of woe is me negatively and that does not help, you at least need to set realistic goals to achieve / state. Work hard and play your cards right and sure you will be comfortable, but 1.1 liquid is a whole hell of a lot more than comfortable at 40 years old.

    The Todd example without help from home or blind luck is .1% territory and if you don't know that you clearly didn't work for it.
    Live Free or Die

  12. #14362
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Looking down
    Posts
    50,491
    Quote Originally Posted by californiagrown View Post
    the first part was admittedly hyperbole. The point was that the name on your diploma gives exponentially diminishing returns the further out from your graduation date that you get. Its job performance that becomes important (yes exceptions exist).

    I dont think anyone was arguing that todd's situation was super common or the expected normal. Just that its not outrageous, or unobtainable if you play your cards over 20+ years intelligently, with discipline, and manage to avoid some bad luck along the way you could have 1.1mil in total investable assets. It doesnt take an ivy league degree or rich parents, and it sucks that is the kneejerk assumption. Financial success is a lot more possible than i feel like many of my liberal compatriots (and paradoxically the MAGA contingent) believe these days. Too much woe is me and blame-game, not enough competitive fire to succeed (as a general observation, not to say that some structural issues do not exist).
    In other words, don't ski.

  13. #14363
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Squaw valley
    Posts
    4,667
    I don't get why people go for a business undergraduate degree.

    Real case. Boston, degree in business, got a material job out of college for 53ka year.

    Engineering degree, 80k first job of of college.

    Is it because a business degree is easier?

    Sent from my Redmi Note 8 Pro using Tapatalk

  14. #14364
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    closer
    Posts
    5,740

    Or maybe Todd chucked a few grand into GME back in July and cashed out in April?
    Or maybe todd is exceptionally skilled at cocksucking while not being addicted to hard drugs. Et Voila!
    It's a war of the mind and we're armed to the teeth.

  15. #14365
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    13,767
    Quote Originally Posted by rod9301 View Post
    Is it because a business degree is easier?
    Probably. Engineering wasn't even on my radar when i went to uni in '89. As in it never crossed my mind, from what I recall.

  16. #14366
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    Posts
    1,337
    Quote Originally Posted by rod9301 View Post
    I don't get why people go for a business undergraduate degree.

    Real case. Boston, degree in business, got a material job out of college for 53ka year.

    Engineering degree, 80k first job of of college.

    Is it because a business degree is easier?

    Sent from my Redmi Note 8 Pro using Tapatalk
    Most people going for a business degree couldn't pass the "easier" engineering class. Heck...plenty of engineering students can't either....which is why they are "weed out" classes. I bet a lot of them switch to business.

  17. #14367
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    824
    Well, regardless, it's a funny meme.

  18. #14368
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    3,934
    Quote Originally Posted by AdironRider View Post
    Someone should tell Yale their degree just isn't what it used to be.

    While I agree there is a lot of woe is me negatively and that does not help, you at least need to set realistic goals to achieve / state. Work hard and play your cards right and sure you will be comfortable, but 1.1 liquid is a whole hell of a lot more than comfortable at 40 years old.

    The Todd example without help from home or blind luck is .1% territory and if you don't know that you clearly didn't work for it.
    IDK, todd looks mid 40s, with a wife about the same age. Is 500k in investable assets for todd alone more realistic for you? Because that is what is being said here- folks just keep glossing over the fact his wife was considered an equal financial contributor in all these examples (the horror!).

    Also, the top 1% has a networth of 4.4mil. So, owning 1.1 "liquid" and lets say another 300k in RE equity, puts todd and wife around one third of what it would take to be in the 1% in their mid 40s. Again, not that outrageous, and certainly not close to 0.1% territory by any metric (he'd have to be earning around 2mil/yr to qualify based on income fyi).

  19. #14369
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    3,934
    Quote Originally Posted by rod9301 View Post
    I don't get why people go for a business undergraduate degree.

    Real case. Boston, degree in business, got a material job out of college for 53ka year.

    Engineering degree, 80k first job of of college.

    Is it because a business degree is easier?

    Sent from my Redmi Note 8 Pro using Tapatalk
    I got an engineering degree, and didnt start making 80k till my 4th year in the industry after switching companies and talking my way into a position i was way underqualified for haha. We certainly do not hire graduates even close to 80k/yr here in the seattle area. You might want to specify which type of engineering youre talking about though haha. But yes, the dropouts from the first year of engineering undergrad either go to business or construction mgmt IME.

  20. #14370
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    on the banks of Fish Creek
    Posts
    7,556
    todd is an imposter…

  21. #14371
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    Posts
    1,337
    Quote Originally Posted by californiagrown View Post
    I got an engineering degree, and didnt start making 80k till my 4th year in the industry after switching companies and talking my way into a position i was way underqualified for haha. We certainly do not hire graduates even close to 80k/yr here in the seattle area. You might want to specify which type of engineering youre talking about haha. But yes, the dropouts from the first year of engineering undergrad either go to business or construction mgmt IME.
    If you are an EE I can confirm $80K to $100K for a BS/MS out of school at any major company. More if you are a PhD or in the bay area or working FB/GOOG/APPL especially in bonus stock perks.

    Could be more lately with job crunch...last I was in the know was 3-4 yrs ago.

  22. #14372
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Valley
    Posts
    446
    Haha, the Boomers are back to discuss how realistic a fucking meme is. Show me where Todd hurt you by theoretically having 1.1MM in passive etfs...

  23. #14373
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    3,934
    Quote Originally Posted by sirbumpsalot View Post
    If you are an EE I can confirm $80K to $100K for a BS/MS out of school at any major company. More if you are a PhD or in the bay area or working FB/GOOG/APPL especially in bonus stock perks.

    Could be more lately with job crunch...last I was in the know was 3-4 yrs ago.
    Take two steps down the engineering intelligence ladder and you will arrive at my discipline, and its lowly pay scale haha.

  24. #14374
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    Posts
    1,337
    Quote Originally Posted by californiagrown View Post
    Take two steps down the engineering intelligence ladder and you will arrive at my discipline, and its lowly pay scale haha.
    Civil/Manufacturing Eng?

  25. #14375
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    7,933
    Quote Originally Posted by californiagrown View Post
    IDK, todd looks mid 40s, with a wife about the same age. Is 500k in investable assets for todd alone more realistic for you? Because that is what is being said here- folks just keep glossing over the fact his wife was considered an equal financial contributor in all these examples (the horror!).

    Also, the top 1% has a networth of 4.4mil. So, owning 1.1 "liquid" and lets say another 300k in RE equity, puts todd and wife around one third of what it would take to be in the 1% in their mid 40s. Again, not that outrageous, and certainly not close to 0.1% territory by any metric (he'd have to be earning around 2mil/yr to qualify based on income fyi).
    And the top 1% of net worth individuals has an average age of? Hint, its almost 70.

    Dude it is 100% outrageous to expect that as any sort of reality for 99.9% of people by 40 years old. Over half the country can't make it 3 weeks between paychecks at any age let alone 40.
    Live Free or Die

Similar Threads

  1. Who voted for Bush/Cheney in '00 or '04?
    By Bud Green in forum General Ski / Snowboard Discussion
    Replies: 281
    Last Post: 04-14-2006, 11:44 PM
  2. Risotto Recipes - What you got?
    By skiaholik in forum The Padded Room
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 03-29-2006, 06:03 PM
  3. Did American Ski Company get delisted from the stock market?
    By Free Range Lobster in forum General Ski / Snowboard Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-06-2005, 06:13 AM
  4. Bear Activists Killed and Eaten by Bears in Katmai
    By Lane Meyer in forum TGR Forum Archives
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 10-09-2003, 08:43 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •