Page 709 of 729 FirstFirst ... 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 ... LastLast
Results 17,701 to 17,725 of 18222
  1. #17701
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    13,768
    Quote Originally Posted by MultiVerse View Post
    On social media crypto degens and prominent VCs in the space are trying to create a panic among regular people that their deposits are in danger. Absolute bottom feeders.
    Fuck those morans.

  2. #17702
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    10,148
    Quote Originally Posted by MultiVerse View Post
    On social media crypto degens and prominent VCs in the space are trying to create a panic among regular people that their deposits are in danger. Absolute bottom feeders.
    Just caught the opening of todays all-in podcast with Chamath and friends. Those shitweasels are basically saying “we did everything right, the media is trying to scapegoat us but we’re saving the day!”

  3. #17703
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    STL
    Posts
    13,297
    Maybe we’re pinned until Monday.

    Time to start St Pattys day.

  4. #17704
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    19,828
    Quote Originally Posted by Cono Este View Post
    Maybe we’re pinned until Monday.

    Time to start St Pattys day.
    On a quarterly Friday? Both sides of the range at risk.

  5. #17705
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    STL
    Posts
    13,297
    Monday is usually Armageddon after ex. The street whores need to get the crap off their sheets before they let he’ll break loose on the rest of us.

  6. #17706
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    19,828
    Silicon Valley Bros

    “SVB’s home loans were significantly better than those from traditional banks... The loans were $2.5 million to $6 million, with interest rates under 2.6%. Other banks had turned them down or, when given quotes for interest rates, offered over 3%”

  7. #17707
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    STL
    Posts
    13,297
    Quote Originally Posted by 4matic View Post
    Silicon Valley Bros

    “SVB’s home loans were significantly better than those from traditional banks... The loans were $2.5 million to $6 million, with interest rates under 2.6%. Other banks had turned them down or, when given quotes for interest rates, offered over 3%”
    I can imagine all the Atherton homes financed by that place. I was home in December staying with a realtor there and people were already i trouble from borrowing against stocks to buy homes. Some dope had 20mm, bought a 10 mm home, and was now up shit creek. Wouldn’t sell.

    Glad we’re helping those dumb asses. I wish they’d go back to Michigan.

  8. #17708
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    关你屁事
    Posts
    9,601
    UBS in talks to buy CS. Lol, how the Swiss elite jam that shit down the Swiss people

  9. #17709
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    8,287
    Quote Originally Posted by dunfree View Post
    UBS in talks to buy CS. Lol, how the Swiss elite jam that shit down the Swiss people
    Did the Russian money dry up?
    "We don't beat the reaper by living longer, we beat the reaper by living well and living fully." - Randy Pausch

  10. #17710
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    10,148
    Quote Originally Posted by Toadman View Post
    Did the Russian money dry up?
    Russian money? I thought they were still running off nazi gold.

    Meanwhile, FRC falling after hours
    Wedbush analyst calling for $5 a share.
    “A distressed M&A sale could result in minimal, if any, residual value to common equity holders owing to FRC’s significant negative tangible book value after taking into account fair value marks on its loans and securities.”

  11. #17711
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    STL
    Posts
    13,297
    Quote Originally Posted by JimmyCarter View Post
    Russian money? I thought they were still running off nazi gold.

    Meanwhile, FRC falling after hours
    Wedbush analyst calling for $5 a share.
    “A distressed M&A sale could result in minimal, if any, residual value to common equity holders owing to FRC’s significant negative tangible book value after taking into account fair value marks on its loans and securities.”
    That’s my gut feeling 9-12 bucks early next week.

    Great rally yesterday, could have legged into some free verticals if played right. Those option mm’s probably were trading 90’s style. $$$$ wide mkts, big intra day imp vol swing. That rally saved their asses. Vol probably came in a bit, they got to buy some after being short as shit. and got to sell stock and excess deltas. some people are thanking their lucky stars tonight.
    Last edited by Cono Este; 03-17-2023 at 05:44 PM.

  12. #17712
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,021
    Banks. On perceived reality and confidence.

    https://www.netinterest.co/p/contagi...m_medium=email

  13. #17713
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the ham
    Posts
    13,385
    Bill Maher on Signature Bank: That's when you know you're a bad bank, when you run out of imaginary money.

  14. #17714
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    STL
    Posts
    13,297
    When I said 12, I meant sometime this week, not like, today.

  15. #17715
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,021
    Quote Originally Posted by Cono Este View Post
    When I said 12, I meant sometime this week, not like, today.
    Yeah my WAL long gains offsetting FRC losses (with FRC as a yolo bet) not working well for me. The ass pain is getting a bit much.

  16. #17716
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    seatown
    Posts
    4,122
    Quote Originally Posted by Cono Este View Post
    I can imagine all the Atherton homes financed by that place. I was home in December staying with a realtor there and people were already i trouble from borrowing against stocks to buy homes. Some dope had 20mm, bought a 10 mm home, and was now up shit creek. Wouldn’t sell.

    Glad we’re helping those dumb asses. I wish they’d go back to Michigan.
    i sat through a presentation specifically geared at leveraging RSUs for residential leverage. sad reality

  17. #17717
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Behind the Zion Curtain
    Posts
    4,889
    Quote Originally Posted by LeeLau View Post
    Yeah my WAL long gains offsetting FRC losses (with FRC as a yolo bet) not working well for me. The ass pain is getting a bit much.
    I was able to get out of my $20 put this morning when it popped for a few minutes, took $30 profit and was glad! My $34.50 put isn’t looking so good…

  18. #17718
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    STL
    Posts
    13,297
    Quote Originally Posted by shroom View Post
    i sat through a presentation specifically geared at leveraging RSUs for residential leverage. sad reality
    Fuck those people. Using fake money to buy up everything the last 20 yrs. Other people towns. And All to cheat the tax man too. So they thought.

  19. #17719
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    STL
    Posts
    13,297
    Usually I’d say a stock like frc would stay down for the count and all premium will rot on the vine.

    But who knows what stupid bailout they’ll get for being dumb.

  20. #17720
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    your vacation
    Posts
    4,738
    hospitals will all be looking for a bail out by years end
    guess that free market for profit healthcare system isn't working out

  21. #17721
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,021
    Quote Originally Posted by Cono Este View Post
    Usually I’d say a stock like frc would stay down for the count and all premium will rot on the vine.

    But who knows what stupid bailout they’ll get for being dumb.
    I dunno. How were they dumb? Their financials show they were well run. They bought conservative things ; treasuries etc and made loans ( as they should). Their spending isn't outrageous. They treated customers well.

    What they didn't do was hedge their long dated book exposure but now doing a bit more digging i see interest rate swaps were pricy.

    Also, putting on thinking cap; accounting standards wouldn't allow FRC to show hedges as offsetting hold to maturity assets so the hedges would show on the books as a naked negative bet on rates which, in and of itself, would also be susceptible to criticism.

    Basically damned if you, damned if you don't. Which, to me, means many other FIs are open to the same analysis as FRC. Ergo the feds will bailout the entire system.

    Would like to hear other viewpoints. But any thesis which says that big money will protect itself is more likely imo

  22. #17722
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    my own little world
    Posts
    5,869
    Anecdotally: investments that an FI could hold on their balance sheet were few and far between for a while there. Smaller players would swing at a few million of something and get beat by somebody like Chase who swooped in to buy the whole thing.

    I think there was some irrationality around just buying something, anything, to put all that overnight cash to work. There weren’t a lot of other strategies available other than to just hold the cash in overnight, earning next to nothing. The industry did not anticipate rates flying up like they did.

    The heat being heaped on these guys for buying treasuries, of all things, is a little bit absurd. Unrealized losses are due to interest rate environment, not credit issues. Balance sheet is solid there, it’s just not a ready source of liquidity. As long as liquidity in general is managed then these investments are just as good as they were 18 months ago, just not as good as what’s available right now.
    focus.

  23. #17723
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,021
    Quote Originally Posted by Mustonen View Post
    .....
    The heat being heaped on these guys for buying treasuries, of all things, is a little bit absurd. Unrealized losses are due to interest rate environment, not credit issues. Balance sheet is solid there, it’s just not a ready source of liquidity. As long as liquidity in general is managed then these investments are just as good as they were 18 months ago, just not as good as what’s available right now.
    Ditto the heat for mark to mark unrealized losses. In more halcyon times ( ie a month ago), many FIs carried unrealized gains without waving pom poms about them.

    This is a far far cry from the gross negligence of 2008 with the packaged MBS and derivative of derivatives toxic assets.

  24. #17724
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    STL
    Posts
    13,297
    Quote Originally Posted by LeeLau View Post
    I dunno. How were they dumb? Their financials show they were well run. They bought conservative things ; treasuries etc and made loans ( as they should). Their spending isn't outrageous. They treated customers well.

    What they didn't do was hedge their long dated book exposure but now doing a bit more digging i see interest rate swaps were pricy.

    Also, putting on thinking cap; accounting standards wouldn't allow FRC to show hedges as offsetting hold to maturity assets so the hedges would show on the books as a naked negative bet on rates which, in and of itself, would also be susceptible to criticism.

    Basically damned if you, damned if you don't. Which, to me, means many other FIs are open to the same analysis as FRC. Ergo the feds will bailout the entire system.

    Would like to hear other viewpoints. But any thesis which says that big money will protect itself is more likely imo
    Interesting point about the accounting, I dunno about all that stuff.

    I do know, risk is risk. It’s quite simple to identify and manage. Buying long dated treasuries to earn a bigger spread, without hedging it, is simply naked and greedy. To add that treasuries were at a historic high when they did it, thats just plain out a stupid amount of risk. Basically a texas hedge. Long, hedged with even longer. Idiots.

    If I went unhedged for one day, the phone rang. And no matter the loss, you took it or were fired.

  25. #17725
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    STL
    Posts
    13,297
    This is not exclusives to banks. How many of us have had dumb ass partners who can’t respect a business can only grow, safely, so fast? Same lack of respect for risk and what separates professionals from gun slinging morons who ruin everything for everyone.

Similar Threads

  1. Who voted for Bush/Cheney in '00 or '04?
    By Bud Green in forum General Ski / Snowboard Discussion
    Replies: 281
    Last Post: 04-14-2006, 11:44 PM
  2. Risotto Recipes - What you got?
    By skiaholik in forum The Padded Room
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 03-29-2006, 06:03 PM
  3. Did American Ski Company get delisted from the stock market?
    By Free Range Lobster in forum General Ski / Snowboard Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-06-2005, 06:13 AM
  4. Bear Activists Killed and Eaten by Bears in Katmai
    By Lane Meyer in forum TGR Forum Archives
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 10-09-2003, 08:43 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •