Page 293 of 729 FirstFirst ... 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 ... LastLast
Results 7,301 to 7,325 of 18222
  1. #7301
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Golden, Colorado
    Posts
    5,871
    Quote Originally Posted by 4matic View Post
    Here is your mix. You’re buying large cap international off a lot with a strong dollar. I like it for the long term. Dollar is doomed as single reserve:

    Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Investor Shares54.30%

    Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Investor Shares35.60%

    Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund Investor Shares**7.00%

    Vanguard Total International bond 3.100%


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    FWIW the Developed Markets fund has lower fees and exposes you to international markets also.

  2. #7302
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    19,828
    Quote Originally Posted by Lindahl View Post
    FWIW the Developed Markets fund has lower fees and exposes you to international markets also.
    No EM in that one. Tencent and Alibaba for example.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  3. #7303
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Golden, Colorado
    Posts
    5,871

    Is the stock market going to tank?

    Quote Originally Posted by 4matic View Post
    No EM in that one. Tencent and Alibaba for example.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    The gains are pretty comparable, regardless? Just invest in those companies directly if you want exposure to specific companies?

  4. #7304
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Where the sheets have no stains
    Posts
    22,166
    Try not to attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetence. It seems like we're in a period of expanding volatility, increasing uncertainty, historically significant political risk and deteriorating macro data (mostly ex-US now, but increasing in the US as well). So velocity or the speed of change in data is going up and the direction is down with a lot of variance. Every industry that's affected will see uneconomic firms under pressure. Depending on how many fail it'll determine how far down we go.
    Spot on, I was being more than a little facetious.

    OTOH, if you could influence the markets with just a few words and had someone acting in your behalf how much $$$ could you make? I would say the upside is without limit.

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...gtype=Homepage

  5. #7305
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    19,828
    Another lower high. Need 2600 or so to hold.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  6. #7306
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    19,828
    The wealth affect


  7. #7307
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    19,828
    FANG stocks vulnerable to big declines from here.

    NFLX has a H&S top forming on the hourly chart.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  8. #7308
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    New Haven Line heading north
    Posts
    2,944
    PG&E. Ooof. Lotsa big names gonna take a beating with this one.

    Even the bottom feeders gonna get wrecked over the past week.
    Charlie, here comes the deuce. And when you speak of me, speak well.

  9. #7309
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    19,828
    PCG has doubled off its low. An expensive option at this point.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  10. #7310
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    New Haven Line heading north
    Posts
    2,944
    Quote Originally Posted by 4matic View Post
    PCG has doubled off its low. An expensive option at this point.
    They are filing for bankruptcy tomorrow.
    Charlie, here comes the deuce. And when you speak of me, speak well.

  11. #7311
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,306
    It's a good thing for them to do, right? Their liabilities are potentially catastrophic, so they need to protect themselves somehow. They got the go-ahead to get financing for operations tonight, it's gonna be business as usual at least for a while I believe.

  12. #7312
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Tech Bro Central
    Posts
    3,246
    advice for stock pickers: buy the one that will go up, and if it doesn't, don't have bought it.

  13. #7313
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    19,828
    Quote Originally Posted by Stu Gotz View Post
    They are filing for bankruptcy tomorrow.
    Up 16% today.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  14. #7314
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    21,976
    Quote Originally Posted by 4matic View Post
    The wealth affect

    can you help me interp?
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  15. #7315
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,230
    Quote Originally Posted by The Suit View Post
    advice for stock pickers: buy the one that will go up, and if it doesn't, don't have bought it.
    Buy low sell high! Duh.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  16. #7316
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,306
    Nobody seems to believe Lockheed about the whole fusion thing, but they did have a key patent issued last year and the Skunk Works has had some notable successes in the past. If they get it to work it will be the most valuable company on the planet, seems like it might be worth buying a few shares on a flyer.

  17. #7317
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    19,828
    Quote Originally Posted by Summit View Post
    can you help me interp?
    Asset ownership is at record high relative to GDP growth historically. If asset prices fall then households will will not feel as well off and will likely spend less. It's called the wealth affect and is the reason asset prices are critical to continued growth at this time.

    The economy is good right now so it is being boosted by non-asset rich households but if you get a combination of falling asset prices and an increase in unemployment it will be a difficult recovery. That is why the fed needed to get rates back up. So they have some ammunition when that happens.

  18. #7318
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    21,976
    Quote Originally Posted by 4matic View Post
    Asset ownership is at record high relative to GDP growth historically. If asset prices fall then households will will not feel as well off and will likely spend less. It's called the wealth affect and is the reason asset prices are critical to continued growth at this time.

    The economy is good right now so it is being boosted by non-asset rich households but if you get a combination of falling asset prices and an increase in unemployment it will be a difficult recovery. That is why the fed needed to get rates back up. So they have some ammunition when that happens.
    Thank you!

    So is this vulnerability likely to be realized? I would assume the Fed must think it likely if it is preparing for the possibility with rate increases beyond what it might otherwise do in order to have dropping rates as a defense?
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  19. #7319
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    19,828
    Likely I’d estimate. Inevitable. Has to be.:



    Continued sturdy consumer spending is critical to the ongoing strength of the U.S. economic expansion, and this study suggests that the wealth effect is critical to the consumer.
    Given that households’ stock holdings and housing wealth have increased by over $25 trillion since the start of the economic expansion, a near doubling in wealth,
    the wealth effect has lifted real consumer spending by over $600 billion during this economic expansion. An impressive ap- proximately one-fourth of the increase in consumer spending during the expansion is due to the wealth effect

    The wealth effect’s contribution to over- all GDP growth has thus been significant. Real GDP has expanded at close to a 2.2% per year pace during the eight years of the recovery. Of this growth, almost half a per- centage point per year is due to the wealth effect alone, according to our analysis. That is, without the positive wealth effect, real GDP growth during this expansion would have been a paltry 1.7% per annum.

    https://www.moodysanalytics.com/-/me...lth-effect.pdf


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  20. #7320
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,230
    There are no wealth affects.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  21. #7321
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    21,976
    Quote Originally Posted by 4matic View Post
    Likely I’d estimate. Inevitable. Has to be.:



    Continued sturdy consumer spending is critical to the ongoing strength of the U.S. economic expansion, and this study suggests that the wealth effect is critical to the consumer.
    Given that households’ stock holdings and housing wealth have increased by over $25 trillion since the start of the economic expansion, a near doubling in wealth,
    the wealth effect has lifted real consumer spending by over $600 billion during this economic expansion. An impressive ap- proximately one-fourth of the increase in consumer spending during the expansion is due to the wealth effect

    The wealth effect’s contribution to over- all GDP growth has thus been significant. Real GDP has expanded at close to a 2.2% per year pace during the eight years of the recovery. Of this growth, almost half a per- centage point per year is due to the wealth effect alone, according to our analysis. That is, without the positive wealth effect, real GDP growth during this expansion would have been a paltry 1.7% per annum.

    https://www.moodysanalytics.com/-/me...lth-effect.pdf


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Hmmm... how do you play with that knowledge in hand?
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  22. #7322
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    19,828

    Is the stock market going to tank?

    Quote Originally Posted by Summit View Post
    Hmmm... how do you play with that knowledge in hand?
    The takeaway is to expect lower returns from assets.

    Define your time frame and risk tolerance. My risk tolerance is low.
    Last edited by 4matic; 01-29-2019 at 05:13 PM.

  23. #7323
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Paper St. Soap Co.
    Posts
    3,325
    Oct 25, 2017:
    Quote Originally Posted by 406 View Post
    Tempted to get back in the game and buy some CMG at the 52 week low...if jack in the box can recover, seems like chipotle could.
    Quote Originally Posted by digitaldeath View Post
    ya, i wouldnt seems incredibly over valued
    Quote Originally Posted by Mazderati View Post
    Chipotle has definitely slipped the last few years. Panera is another. The same PE firm that owns KK recently bought out Panera so maybe it gets revitalized before it goes to shit.
    Quote Originally Posted by JimmyCarter View Post
    I wouldnt buy it anywhere north of $200 at this point. Growth appears dead.
    Quote Originally Posted by iceman View Post
    Went in a Chipotle the other day for the first time in over a year (I was starving and my other option was 7-11). Store was dirty. Needed to be swept. Tables dirty. Bathroom dirty. Doors and sneeze guards smudged and dirty. If there was a place that could benefit from appearing clean it's Chipotle. Clearly they don't get it or don't care. Very limited sample size obviously but I'd keep my money in my pocket on that one.
    I should not have listened to you guys, I could have doubled my money and almost covered the cost of a new mountain bike!
    Attachment 269343

  24. #7324
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Loveland, Chair 9.
    Posts
    4,908
    Quote Originally Posted by Bromontane View Post
    Seems to me we're witnessing the 2nd phase of a dysfunctional global equity selloff. Worldwide it started in Jan 18, US started formally in Oct 18. If you can maintain sanity & your overall net worth for the next 36 months I say you're doing extremely well. Now's a time to reduce exposure to markets, payoff debt, optimize cash flows, & manage expectations.
    bold statement considering the market just cleared it's last level of resistence and may go for new ATHs. it certainly looked like that last year but all the fedsters seem to have decided to keep the game going
    TGR forums cannot handle SkiCougar !

  25. #7325
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    New Haven Line heading north
    Posts
    2,944
    Quote Originally Posted by Bromontane View Post
    Seems to me we're witnessing the 2nd phase of a dysfunctional global equity selloff. Worldwide it started in Jan 18, US started formally in Oct 18. If you can maintain sanity & your overall net worth for the next 36 months I say you're doing extremely well. Now's a time to reduce exposure to markets, payoff debt, optimize cash flows, & manage expectations.
    I just read today that 7 million+ Americans are more than 3 months delinquent on their car payments. A record.

    Things are not copacetic.
    Charlie, here comes the deuce. And when you speak of me, speak well.

Similar Threads

  1. Who voted for Bush/Cheney in '00 or '04?
    By Bud Green in forum General Ski / Snowboard Discussion
    Replies: 281
    Last Post: 04-14-2006, 11:44 PM
  2. Risotto Recipes - What you got?
    By skiaholik in forum The Padded Room
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 03-29-2006, 06:03 PM
  3. Did American Ski Company get delisted from the stock market?
    By Free Range Lobster in forum General Ski / Snowboard Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-06-2005, 06:13 AM
  4. Bear Activists Killed and Eaten by Bears in Katmai
    By Lane Meyer in forum TGR Forum Archives
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 10-09-2003, 08:43 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •