Page 291 of 729 FirstFirst ... 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 ... LastLast
Results 7,251 to 7,275 of 18222
  1. #7251
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,306
    Quote Originally Posted by tbssux View Post
    If you break down CT voters by income, you'd likely find wealthier CT voters going for Trump, lower income voters going for Hillary.
    It's definitely not that simple in CT, the numbers are out there but a quick look suggests the opposite of what you say may be true.

    Lots of data here but more focused on trends than raw results: https://trendct.org/2016/11/15/what-...t-connecticut/

    Clinton won Greenwich and Fairfield county: https://www.nytimes.com/elections/20...ts/connecticut

    "you'd likely find" is weak sauce. The data is available.

  2. #7252
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    195
    Quote Originally Posted by iceman View Post

    "you'd likely find" is weak sauce. The data is available.
    Nothing drives me more crazy than a speculative comment based on opinion and zero fact. It's the reason we are in this mess in the first place. Everybody thinks they know the answer because their intuition says it's right.

    American people need to take some accountability and stop blaming the political figures we have made into idols.



    Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using TGR Forums mobile app

  3. #7253
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    498
    Quote Originally Posted by Cdubmpdx View Post
    Nothing drives me more crazy than a speculative comment based on opinion and zero fact. It's the reason we are in this mess in the first place. Everybody thinks they know the answer because their intuition says it's right.

    American people need to take some accountability and stop blaming the political figures we have made into idols.



    Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using TGR Forums mobile app
    Here is the data:
    https://www.statista.com/statistics/...ons-by-income/

    Nationally, top four brackets went for Trump. Bottom two brackets went for Hillary. Overall point remains: wealthy who voted for Trump for tax cuts and are getting hit in the markets are reaping their just rewards right now (CT anomalies aside).

  4. #7254
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Looking down
    Posts
    50,491
    You sound like your mind is set on this matter, but, I'll try one more time. You're basing your argument on exit polls, which are not as solid or "fact based" as the actual electoral results. I mean, has anyone ever come up to you and asked you how you voted on election day? (You did vote, did you?) They're about as reliable as phone surveys. Small samples. The final results on election night were pretty clear , and even in some red states, the wealthier cities and counties went blue, generally speaking, and the poorer rural areas went red. Sure, plenty of the upper middle class to the rich voted Trump, but, c'mon , that wasn't and isn't his base.

  5. #7255
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    STL
    Posts
    13,297
    Wrong thread jongs


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  6. #7256
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    At the beach
    Posts
    19,161
    BTFD you guyz. The President has said it is bargain time for stockz.
    Quote Originally Posted by leroy jenkins View Post
    I think you'd have an easier time understanding people if you remembered that 80% of them are fucking morons.
    That is why I like dogs, more than most people.

  7. #7257
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Looking down
    Posts
    50,491
    Holy shit, the market is really going south with him saying that.

  8. #7258
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    At the beach
    Posts
    19,161
    Quote Originally Posted by Benny Profane View Post
    Holy shit, the market is really going south with him saying that.
    I am confused by your comment Benny. DOW up 500 at the moment. Is it TPPT buying up all the Stokz?
    Quote Originally Posted by leroy jenkins View Post
    I think you'd have an easier time understanding people if you remembered that 80% of them are fucking morons.
    That is why I like dogs, more than most people.

  9. #7259
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    3,342
    Quote Originally Posted by Toadman View Post
    China definitely has a social issue with the ratio of men to women. They have relaxed the one child policy. But it has created an issue over the past decades with the favoring of a male child over a female child. That seems to be held in check by the communist gov't.

    When it comes to infrastructure, well the USA screwed the pooch with that one. The US lags big time when it comes to logistics efficiencies, Our ports? I don't think you have any clue in regards to how bad the US measures on through put with the modern ports in Europe and Asia. I spent 27 years of my career dealing with the bullshit that is the US port and rail infrastructure. I'll give you the short version; the US is waaay behind. ILA and ILWU unions have neutered attempts at getting a more efficient system. Class 1 railroads have done little in the way of upgrading their networks. Sure, Buffett has snagged a oligopoly class 1 BNSF company. He was smart. He knew he could get good returns with an inefficient company like the BNSF, because there isn't much competition. Our wonderful FTC and DOT hosed the US business community with the mergers of BN and SF along with the UP and SP.

    China does have issues. I met with a economics analyst from Hong Kong a few weeks back, and he advised us of some of the internal issues that Xi is dealing with. GDP in China is fundamentally built on 3 pillars. Middle class spending, which is restrained now based on Trump's trade war. #2 asset growth. That's been curtailed also due to Trump's trade war. And 3rd RE appreciation. That has stalled. So, China too is seeing it's economic growth threatened. Over 500 companies that are affiliated with the auto industry have been allowed to fail by the Communist Chinese gov't. Xi si going to back communist gov't industries and companies Xi has also locked down on capital out flows. There are numerous Chinese owned factories that have opened up in 3rd world SE Asian countries. Xi has basically told those companies they have to make it on their own merits, and there will be no RMB (Yuan) allowed to flow out of China to support this companies.

    Anyone who has been to mainland China lately will see the conspicuous consumption. That's being curtailed The emerging middle class are not too happy with the wealth of the connected show casing that wealth. I can say from my last trip to Shanghai how different it is from several years ago. The communist ideology can't coexist with capitalism. Xi will have to figure out how to do that tap dance for China to grow without social unrest in the future.

    As for the stock market. I have no idea what the future holds. We have a very unpredictable POTUS in the WH.
    I know ILA and ILWU came to an agreement with the Port of Seattle where for every job that is replaced by automation, a job must be created to support that automation. Now saying that. US ports longshoremen are way behind their Asian counterparts. I think that’s mostly based on the union contracts (as a member of a sub-branch of ILWU I’ll also call them out and say their worth ethic is lacking compared to their Asian counterparts).

    The infrastructure issue, from a merchant marine standpoint, is due to lack of use and demand for better systems. The US does not have the demand on the systems China does so we have been able to get by with what we have. Does our infrastructure need serious upgrading to be sustainable for the next 10/50/100 years, yes, but it works.

    If we were to triple (or quadruple) the population of the US, then we would need high speed trains, upgrades to the rail system, same with highways and ports, but we don’t, so what we have works. China supplies the world with material goods, and to move the people and goods around the country, the had to build better infrastructure.

    Unless there is a major change in world economics, the money and support for major advancements in US infrastructure probably won’t be there for a long time.

  10. #7260
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    STL
    Posts
    13,297
    I remember all those fancy new highways when I toured China, only there were people in horse and cart going the wrong way.

    Fuck that place.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  11. #7261
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    1,866
    China also just built most of their infrastructure in the last what 20 years? It makes total sense that it is modern and ours is outdated, because we built alot of ours a long time ago.

    We just aren't investing in maintaining or upgrading that infrastructure.

  12. #7262
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    8,297
    Quote Originally Posted by skibrd View Post
    I know ILA and ILWU came to an agreement with the Port of Seattle where for every job that is replaced by automation, a job must be created to support that automation. Now saying that. US ports longshoremen are way behind their Asian counterparts. I think that’s mostly based on the union contracts (as a member of a sub-branch of ILWU I’ll also call them out and say their worth ethic is lacking compared to their Asian counterparts).

    The infrastructure issue, from a merchant marine standpoint, is due to lack of use and demand for better systems. The US does not have the demand on the systems China does so we have been able to get by with what we have. Does our infrastructure need serious upgrading to be sustainable for the next 10/50/100 years, yes, but it works.

    If we were to triple (or quadruple) the population of the US, then we would need high speed trains, upgrades to the rail system, same with highways and ports, but we don’t, so what we have works. China supplies the world with material goods, and to move the people and goods around the country, the had to build better infrastructure.
    Not sure where to start. True PoS came to an agreement that one current inefficient, obsolete ILWU job gets removed to create another ILWU job for the automation that other ports like Rotterdam and Singapore and several other ports in Asia and Europe automated over a decade ago. Just look at the ILWU tools down at T6 in PDX. Those SOB's shot themselves in both feet for their stupidity. They still get paid for doing virtually nothing. I dealt with the ILWU on a first hand basis. I left because I couldn't handle the lack of accountability and the stress of dealing with 40 something and 50 somethings making more than me, with better benefits, yet bitched about the work. (I digress!)

    Talk to the truckers who sit in line for hours to get 1 cntr or drop off a cntr. Tell me it works. Sorry, I don't think you know what you are talking about. The ports are maxed out on space, and they aren't meant to be a storage yard, but they have one ripple in the supply chain, vsl bunching from a storm, same goes for the RR's and they are screwed for days on end trying to service the trains and vsls.

    The RR's need to continue double tracking choke points, and at least they have been able to make strides in computerized set ups for better tracking of train schedules. Getting by with what we have is a woeful excuse. The current mentality of the US Federal gov't is don't fix it until it breaks. A little PM (preventive maint.) now and again might do wonders.

    I guess some people drive their cars until they break down on the road, and others spend the money to maintain them and get 20 years and 250k out of them. The mindset of the US Politicians seem to be of the former mindset.

    I guess in the end, you are correct in saying that their isn't support for capital spending on infrastructure. If it ain't broke, wait 'til it does, then spend as little as possible to get it limping along again.
    "We don't beat the reaper by living longer, we beat the reaper by living well and living fully." - Randy Pausch

  13. #7263
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The Bull City
    Posts
    14,003
    Quote Originally Posted by Toadman View Post
    I guess some people drive their cars until they break down on the road, and others spend the money to maintain them and get 20 years and 250k out of them. The mindset of the US Politicians seem to be of the former mindset.

    I guess in the end, you are correct in saying that their isn't support for capital spending on infrastructure. If it ain't broke, wait 'til it does, then spend as little as possible to get it limping along again.
    "Patch and Pray"
    Go that way really REALLY fast. If something gets in your way, TURN!

  14. #7264
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    On Vacation for the Duration
    Posts
    14,373
    Always remember when you saw the commercials of Domino's fixing the roads. Business will do what we can be convinced that government can't. At a profit for a profit.
    A few people feel the rain. Most people just get wet.

  15. #7265
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    498
    Quote Originally Posted by Benny Profane View Post
    You sound like your mind is set on this matter, but, I'll try one more time. You're basing your argument on exit polls, which are not as solid or "fact based" as the actual electoral results. I mean, has anyone ever come up to you and asked you how you voted on election day? (You did vote, did you?) They're about as reliable as phone surveys. Small samples. The final results on election night were pretty clear , and even in some red states, the wealthier cities and counties went blue, generally speaking, and the poorer rural areas went red. Sure, plenty of the upper middle class to the rich voted Trump, but, c'mon , that wasn't and isn't his base.
    Exit polls would actually further the point. Would wealthy/educated people (especially women) want to admit they voted for Trump?

    The data don't lie. And urban areas went blue due to a lot demograhoic groups besides wealthy voters. Wealthy folks wanted tax cuts (and some also wanted tariffs and de regulation) and voted against long term growth. It's going to be a very interesting 2019.

  16. #7266
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    19,829
    8% range in the stock futures today.

  17. #7267
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    STL
    Posts
    13,297
    Quote Originally Posted by 4matic View Post
    8% range in the stock futures today.
    Amazing. Vix barely came in


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  18. #7268
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Looking down
    Posts
    50,491
    This is pretty pathetic, especially considering that it's pretty much directly related to the tax cut. Death convulsions of capitalism.

    https://slate.com/business/2018/12/a...ent-chart.html

    Sent from my Pixel 2 using TGR Forums mobile app

  19. #7269
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Loveland, Chair 9.
    Posts
    4,911
    Quote Originally Posted by liv2ski View Post
    BTFD you guyz. The President has said it is bargain time for stockz.
    for the short term yes, longer term no. it went straight down and hit the 20% line on the s+p and bounced into now a reflexive rally imo. the fib retracement levels are 2515, 2585 and 2615. personally, i'm hoping it makes 2615 to be able to short the mkt again.

    it's more the fed with rates and QT and earnings projections lowered than trump sending things south, although the trade talk doesn't help him; but given the usa fed and ecb have no intentions of letting up for at least 2 more months, to see it go 20-25% down from the top is more likely than a reversal much over 2600.
    TGR forums cannot handle SkiCougar !

  20. #7270
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Where the sheets have no stains
    Posts
    22,180
    Quote Originally Posted by Benny Profane View Post
    This is pretty pathetic, especially considering that it's pretty much directly related to the tax cut. Death convulsions of capitalism.

    https://slate.com/business/2018/12/a...ent-chart.html

    Sent from my Pixel 2 using TGR Forums mobile app
    Thanks, that made me smile.

  21. #7271
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    19,829
    Test of the breakdown and resistance at 2530. Looks pretty good.

  22. #7272
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    STL
    Posts
    13,297

    Is the stock market going to tank?

    Quote Originally Posted by 4matic View Post
    Test of the breakdown and resistance at 2530. Looks pretty good.
    Marking yr end.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  23. #7273
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    19,829
    I sold some BOND today to raise a little cash. Looks like a day early...

    These moves in currency and rates tonight are remarkable.

    Currency always leads.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  24. #7274
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    New Haven Line heading north
    Posts
    2,944
    Apple just pre announced an abysmal 4Q.

    FAANG giveth, and FAANG taketh away.
    Charlie, here comes the deuce. And when you speak of me, speak well.

  25. #7275
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    2,577
    Quote Originally Posted by Canesfootball View Post
    These guys have a great handle on what is going on globally and how the banking system works.
    https://www.alhambrapartners.com/commentaryanalysis/

    When guys like Drunkenmiller are saying the market is only going to return 0 to 5% per year for the next 5+ years you need to pay attention. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/video...nterview-video
    Appreciate the info/post. Watched the whole interview

Similar Threads

  1. Who voted for Bush/Cheney in '00 or '04?
    By Bud Green in forum General Ski / Snowboard Discussion
    Replies: 281
    Last Post: 04-14-2006, 11:44 PM
  2. Risotto Recipes - What you got?
    By skiaholik in forum The Padded Room
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 03-29-2006, 06:03 PM
  3. Did American Ski Company get delisted from the stock market?
    By Free Range Lobster in forum General Ski / Snowboard Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-06-2005, 06:13 AM
  4. Bear Activists Killed and Eaten by Bears in Katmai
    By Lane Meyer in forum TGR Forum Archives
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 10-09-2003, 08:43 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •