Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Making the Bowl Great Again
    Posts
    13,780

    If somebody takes your picture with your camera, who 'owns' the picture?

    Not much explanation needed. I know I have read about this in other places, but I can't recall what the consensus was.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    berkeley
    Posts
    1,623
    The photographer.

    edit: i should read better. hayduke is spot on. i was thinking the subject wanted the photo from the photog's camera. carry on...
    Last edited by smalls; 04-24-2007 at 07:36 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    tashigang
    Posts
    1,564

    its yours if its in your camera

    you are not obligated to give them the camera or its contents

    Hayduke Aug 7,1996 GS-Aug 26 2010
    HunterS March 17 09-Oct 24 14

  4. #4
    bklyn is offline who guards the guardians?
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,764
    The photographer, technically, owns it, though proving it may be difficult under those circumstances.

    Although there are some exceptions, if you are an employee and take the photograph for work. (Like a photographer's assistant, or if you work for a company taking pictures - ie: Sharpshooter, Backcountry ...)

    As a pro, if I use your camera it's a gift to you. Anything that I plan on making money on, now or in the future, is done with my equipment.
    I'm just a simple girl trying to make my way in the universe...
    I come up hard, baby but now I'm cool I didn't make it, sugar playin' by the rules
    If you know your history, then you would know where you coming from, then you wouldn't have to ask me, who the heck do I think I am.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Stuck in perpetual Meh
    Posts
    35,247
    My employer owns my equipment. My employer owns the images I capture with that equipment.

    This was, however, part of my job description when i was hired. There are cases where the equipment owner does not own the image, but that mainly happens with rentals or if there's an understanding of "borrowing" for the benefit of the photog.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    21,976
    Generally unless there is express agreement, intellectual property rights go to the photographer, not the equipment holder.

    Now whether this only prevents the equipment owner from utilizing IP rights or whether it actually requires the equipment holder to surrender physical property to the photographer so that they can fully utilize IP rights is something I do not know.

    For example, Joe takes a shot on Janes camera using Janes film. Jane pays to develop her film. Jane owns the film. Joe has control over what can be done with what is on the film. But does Jane have to give Joe the film?

    I always wondered that one... of course it has never come up.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,021
    Above is correct/ One exception is if you compose the shot - set the setting on the camera and then give it to someone to take the shot - well t hen you own the shot

Similar Threads

  1. camera packs
    By ccwaskier in forum Tech Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-14-2011, 03:58 AM
  2. For Sale: Sharp VL-WD450 Digital Video Camera
    By dipstik in forum Gear Swap (List View)
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-11-2006, 06:08 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-10-2005, 11:24 PM
  4. Sharp VL-Z7U video camera
    By meatdrink9 in forum Tech Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-16-2005, 12:10 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •