Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
04-24-2007, 07:09 PM #1
If somebody takes your picture with your camera, who 'owns' the picture?
Not much explanation needed. I know I have read about this in other places, but I can't recall what the consensus was.
-
04-24-2007, 07:12 PM #2
The photographer.
edit: i should read better. hayduke is spot on. i was thinking the subject wanted the photo from the photog's camera. carry on...Last edited by smalls; 04-24-2007 at 07:36 PM.
-
04-24-2007, 07:21 PM #3
its yours if its in your camera
you are not obligated to give them the camera or its contents
Hayduke Aug 7,1996 GS-Aug 26 2010
HunterS March 17 09-Oct 24 14
-
04-24-2007, 07:32 PM #4who guards the guardians?
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 5,764
The photographer, technically, owns it, though proving it may be difficult under those circumstances.
Although there are some exceptions, if you are an employee and take the photograph for work. (Like a photographer's assistant, or if you work for a company taking pictures - ie: Sharpshooter, Backcountry ...)
As a pro, if I use your camera it's a gift to you. Anything that I plan on making money on, now or in the future, is done with my equipment.I'm just a simple girl trying to make my way in the universe...
I come up hard, baby but now I'm cool I didn't make it, sugar playin' by the rules
If you know your history, then you would know where you coming from, then you wouldn't have to ask me, who the heck do I think I am.
-
04-25-2007, 09:16 AM #5
My employer owns my equipment. My employer owns the images I capture with that equipment.
This was, however, part of my job description when i was hired. There are cases where the equipment owner does not own the image, but that mainly happens with rentals or if there's an understanding of "borrowing" for the benefit of the photog.
-
04-25-2007, 09:37 AM #6
Generally unless there is express agreement, intellectual property rights go to the photographer, not the equipment holder.
Now whether this only prevents the equipment owner from utilizing IP rights or whether it actually requires the equipment holder to surrender physical property to the photographer so that they can fully utilize IP rights is something I do not know.
For example, Joe takes a shot on Janes camera using Janes film. Jane pays to develop her film. Jane owns the film. Joe has control over what can be done with what is on the film. But does Jane have to give Joe the film?
I always wondered that one... of course it has never come up.Originally Posted by blurred
-
04-25-2007, 09:44 AM #7
Above is correct/ One exception is if you compose the shot - set the setting on the camera and then give it to someone to take the shot - well t hen you own the shot
Similar Threads
-
camera packs
By ccwaskier in forum Tech TalkReplies: 2Last Post: 11-14-2011, 03:58 AM -
For Sale: Sharp VL-WD450 Digital Video Camera
By dipstik in forum Gear Swap (List View)Replies: 11Last Post: 01-11-2006, 06:08 PM -
Using a PVR as a helmet camera recorder: The experiment
By Red Baron in forum Tech TalkReplies: 2Last Post: 10-10-2005, 11:24 PM -
Sharp VL-Z7U video camera
By meatdrink9 in forum Tech TalkReplies: 3Last Post: 04-16-2005, 12:10 PM
Bookmarks