Results 1 to 21 of 21
Thread: best RAW photo program?
-
04-01-2007, 05:48 PM #1
best RAW photo program?
I just got back from the KW comp and now I have a bunch of .NEF images that I can't deal with! Oops.
I've been thinking of springing for Lightroom or Aperture but I'm unsure which one to go for. I currently use iPhoto and Photochop CS to deal with all my images but I'm definitely no pro when it comes to image tweaking.
Any helpful hints (besides Astropax's workflow!!! ) and pros/cons of Lightroom and Aperture are most appreciated.
Edit: Oh yeah, if it makes any difference I'm shooting a Nikon D200 and using a iBook w/ 1.25gb of RAMPutting the "core" in corporate, one turn at a time.
Metalmücil 2010 - 2013 "Go Home" album is now a free download
The Bonin Petrels
-
04-01-2007, 10:21 PM #2
I have been using Capture nx. I have no experience with the other programs you mentioned(have had good luck with ufraw and Gimp) but after scouring many photo websites it seems that the consensus is that it's the best for raw conversion. The program itself is slow but very intuitive and easy to use, activation codes are easy to find if you want to go the nefarious route.
-
04-01-2007, 10:26 PM #3pura vida
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- The bottom of LCC
- Posts
- 5,750
I use Pshop and the Camera Raw plugin. It's always worked fine for me but the only thing I've compared it to is gimp/ufraw and I seemed to get better pics out of Pshop.
-
04-01-2007, 10:28 PM #4Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Posts
- 8,887
Try downloading the Adobe beta of Photoshop CS3 (free, for now....) with the improved camera raw - it's sweet. Bridge is dramatically faster now as well. Now to get the $400 for the upgrade :cry:
Lightrooms actually affordable.Elvis has left the building
-
04-02-2007, 04:24 AM #5
Lightroom...
BTW. Hop, don't cha qualify for educational license (you did work for the Uni, didn't cha). So Lightroom is like 99 bucks. And the smaller Creative Suite 3 is like ~200 and not considerably more than Photoshop CS3 (again educational license).Originally Posted by RootSkier
-
04-02-2007, 07:58 AM #6
I use CS2 for RAW images. I thought the converter came with CS as well. If not just download the plug in. I think Photoshop is about as good as you can get.
-
04-02-2007, 11:43 AM #7
FYI, you can download Adobe Lightroom for free, try it for 30 days and then decide it you want to purchase/acquire a Reg key.
-
04-02-2007, 09:07 PM #8
Capture One Pro.
The only thing worse than the feeling that you are going to die is the realization that you probably won't.
-
04-02-2007, 11:33 PM #9Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Posts
- 8,887
Elvis has left the building
-
04-03-2007, 08:58 PM #10Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 106
lightroom
educational superstore.com if you have a child in school. If you are a child in school 99 too. It is great for 99% of exposure and sharpening. I have a copy of cs2 and it exports directly to that. I am going to use iphoto only forBU after processing to email out also. Oh and did I say it is EASY to use.
-
04-09-2007, 02:39 PM #11
I have both Lightroom and Aperture on my system.
Since you have a mac, Aperture is hands down the best. It has the best keywording system, integrates better with the mac OS (I.E. one click for email export (austomatically resizes and ads copyright etc etc) It can be set up to automatically download any photos that are emailed to you from peeps you know)
In fact there is only one issue with Aperture: IT will not Export your raw files with Meta-data as it never touches your Raws.
BTW Hippy I might have a copy of it floating around.........
-
04-10-2007, 08:08 AM #12
I'm getting a macbook in about a month, right before I graduate to cash in on the student discount, and Aperture will be packaged with it. However, I also have the opportunity to purchase CS.3 for $187 as a student. I've loved working with CS.2, but would it be redundant to run both Aperture and PS? I ask because I haven't used Aperture yet and am not sure if there is a significant difference in capabilities between the two.
I'm thinking it's worth it to pick up cs3, just because I can get it so cheap, but if it's pretty much an overlap, I'll save the extra money.
-
04-10-2007, 08:20 AM #13
-
04-10-2007, 08:23 AM #14
I would say that Lightroom does a hell of a lot more than categorize your photos. It has great organization capability, but is also a pretty damn good one stop .RAW converter/ photo editer. I would say it is all the best photo processing features of CS2, without the need for an advanced degree in graphic design.
-
04-10-2007, 08:50 AM #15
-
04-29-2007, 01:04 PM #16click click boom
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Posts
- 11,329
I'm a diehard Lightroom fan. (mac user)
-
04-29-2007, 07:38 PM #17
I sense that a lot of photographers are thinking this way right now, and must have the marketing people at both Apple and Adobe thinking hard as to how to satisfy this view of the software world in a few years.
But it's wrong. If you are a serious photographer, learn Photoshop. It is the industry standard, and will continue to be for some time. It is not just for "designers", but used by top retouchers and color correctors around the world. Maybe some day it will be integrated with Lightroom in one program, but 'til then, use it.
-
04-29-2007, 09:38 PM #18click click boom
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Posts
- 11,329
Agreed 100%. Lightroom is only a really nice way to prep images for Photoshop. If I only had one or the other to use the only choice would be Photoshop. That said, Lightroom cuts the amount of work I do on any given image by 75%. It's a much better place to do any exposure and color correcting but it can not produce high quality finished images.
-
04-29-2007, 09:50 PM #19Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Posts
- 8,887
-
05-04-2007, 02:17 PM #20
Send me a PM i have one that works really well and I can send it to you. It moves alot quicker than lightroom and has most of the same options.
-
05-10-2007, 09:51 PM #21
with aperture, your system better be beefy. i'm running a dual-core g5 2.0 with a 256meg video card and 4 gigs of ram and there're still times when it has some hiccups. when i was fooling around with lightroom when it was still in beta last year on my old 12" powerbook, i saw no latency whatsoever - adjustments were applied very quickly, memory footprint was minimal, and it was just in general a very streamlined, snappy program.
but i already have about 12000 images invested in aperture and i'm an ornery fella who's opposed to change, so i'm sticking with aperture. for all its faults, it's still a very good program.Last edited by The Jackamo; 05-10-2007 at 10:06 PM.
"...And my quarter is ruined. My business lost about 200K in revenue.
On a positive note, I did save some money on car insurance by staying with GEICO..."
Similar Threads
-
Thursday's Joke - The Best Weight Loss Program
By WWCD in forum The Padded RoomReplies: 1Last Post: 06-17-2006, 07:29 PM -
Snowboard trade in Program
By snwbdrhoon in forum Gear Swap (List View)Replies: 0Last Post: 09-07-2005, 10:09 AM -
looking for a free photo editing program
By ZGnzo in forum Tech TalkReplies: 3Last Post: 08-16-2005, 01:20 PM -
Ski Industry Execs, our saviors or out of touch?
By Foggy_Goggles in forum General Ski / Snowboard DiscussionReplies: 169Last Post: 06-06-2005, 12:28 AM -
Goodbye Recreation Fee Demonstration Program
By char in forum TGR Forum ArchivesReplies: 19Last Post: 02-24-2004, 08:27 PM
Bookmarks