Page 990 of 1085 FirstFirst ... 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 ... LastLast
Results 24,726 to 24,750 of 27108
  1. #24726
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    59715
    Posts
    7,503
    Martha is so gilfy.

  2. #24727
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    18,008
    Martha definitely still fucks.

  3. #24728
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Nhampshire
    Posts
    7,778
    I mean, she's an ex-ibanker, of course she's horny for the office. Can't illegally collude on things via recorded mediums.

  4. #24729
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On a genuine ol' fashioned authentic steam powered aereoplane
    Posts
    16,870
    Quote Originally Posted by I Skied Bandini Mountain View Post
    Back in 2012 we were barely able to con a mortgage company into giving us a loan to buy our present home for a ridiculously low price. Not long after I was doing some work in the house of the owner to the company I was then working for, old guy, very successful. We got to talking and he asked how the family was and I told him about buying the house and he was genuinely excited for us and we started chatting about real estate. At one point I made the comment that someone with cash could make a lot of money in residential real estate at that time and his eyes grew big and he nodded "ohhh yeah".

    I wonder if it's going to be like that for commercial RE in a couple few years. My wife says no. I say yes.
    A couple new comm projects here are gonna be in trouble unless they plan to float vacant places for a while. On the other hand median residential is back to gong show multiple offers. I don't have a crystal ball but there was plenty of data to support this happening. A couple of my savvy buyers picked up stuff late 2022 and early the first 1/4 of this year. Stuff with high DOM there were opportunities to put the screws to a desperate seller and get a good price. More buyers have waited though and depending on the price point they are starting to regret that decision.

  5. #24730
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Down In A Hole, Up in the Sky
    Posts
    35,476
    I truly wonder if she and Snoop ever got super high, and just said "hey, wanna fuck?"
    Forum Cross Pollinator, gratuitously strident

  6. #24731
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    10,167
    Quote Originally Posted by rideit View Post
    This heart-warming story has it all.
    Kind of broke, attractive redhead? Check
    Resourceful, tasteful renovation? Check
    Gig worker, including Online Dominatrix? Check


    https://www.cnbc.com/2023/06/03/36-y...ream-home.html
    For home or work?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Image1686170690.768997.jpg 
Views:	111 
Size:	666.4 KB 
ID:	461205

  7. #24732
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    seatown
    Posts
    4,123
    Quote Originally Posted by californiagrown View Post
    RE: converting empty high rise office towers to residential. Was just talking to a big developer/architect that recently looked into doing that in Seattle for one of their buildings- they said it made more financial sense for them to sit on a totally empty building for 5years and bet on office work coming back than it would for them to try and convert large portions of it to residential. So, it doesnt sound like residential renovations will be catching on in the near future. 10-20 years down the road, maybe?
    and you just summarized the value-add of developers

  8. #24733
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,452
    At some point declining office valuations make the conversation numbers work.

    The problem is the pool of potential downtown residents decreases as many are no longer tied to a downtown office 5 days a week.

    Add in downtown multifamily development has been going bonkers for a decade and there’s going to less demand for additional downtown residential.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  9. #24734
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    3,941
    So govt takeover the empty high rises and turn them into low/no-income housing with Wesley snipes as building manager?

  10. #24735
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    seatown
    Posts
    4,123
    i think it’s greedy as fuck and should be taxed to hell.

    the point is we are not lacking land or buildings, just a common goal. so change the players or process.

  11. #24736
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Keep Tacoma Feared
    Posts
    5,309
    Quote Originally Posted by Skistack View Post
    The problem is the pool of potential downtown residents decreases as many are no longer tied to a downtown office 5 days a week.

    Add in downtown multifamily development has been going bonkers for a decade and there’s going to less demand for additional downtown residential.
    I know it is hard for TGR bro bra, who only lives in car centric suburb or Jackson, to imagine, but some people like living downtown even if they don't work there. In places like Seattle there is demand for housing no matter where you put it. And it makes sense to continue to concentrate growth even if we are sitting on our couch in our underwear working from home for the rest of time.

  12. #24737
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,452
    Quote Originally Posted by altasnob View Post
    I know it is hard for TGR bro bra, who only lives in car centric suburb or Jackson, to imagine, but some people like living downtown even if they don't work there. In places like Seattle there is demand for housing no matter where you put it. And it makes sense to continue to concentrate growth even if we are sitting on our couch in our underwear working from home for the rest of time.
    Hey Bro Brah, I actually work in multifamily, so go fuck yourself. What is it that you do exactly?

    Guess what? It’s really fucking expensive to develop downtown multifamily, but high rents and more importantly, future rent growth projections, make the numbers work for investors. Alot of markets have hit peak rents, people just do not have the ability to pay anything higher. So flat rent growth = flat valuations = less investment. Sure you can find markets that will continue to see growth but most will be flat for a while.

    Add in new construction already in the pipeline, and most markets will struggle to absorb new units coming online in the next couple of years. (I’m in Denver and can count a dozen cranes, mostly MF projects, just in the RiNo neighborhood.) So more new units that the market can absorb = decreasing rents = lower valuations = less investment.

    So yeah, you could find an empty office building in a market that’s still projecting strong rent growth and proforma a conversion project that’ll attract investment. But that’s really going to be an anomaly at least for the foreseeable future.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  13. #24738
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Posts
    15,856
    Quote Originally Posted by altasnob View Post
    I know it is hard for TGR bro bra, who only lives in car centric suburb or Jackson, to imagine, but some people like living downtown even if they don't work there.
    I’m glad about that. I just wish there were more. A lot more.

  14. #24739
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Keep Tacoma Feared
    Posts
    5,309
    Quote Originally Posted by Skistack View Post
    Add in new construction already in the pipeline, and most markets will struggle to absorb new units coming online in the next couple of years. (I’m in Denver and can count a dozen cranes, mostly MF projects, just in the RiNo neighborhood.) So more new units that the market can absorb = decreasing rents = lower valuations = less investment.
    I'll believe it when I see it. In my lifetime living in the West, I have never seen a time where we had too much housing. I've also never seen a time when rents go down other than momentary blips and then they just rebound back to where they were and then some. Maybe the greedy developer who wants to make bank thinks there is too much housing becuase their return isn't what they would like. But no markets here struggle to absorb new units. If you build it, they will come. The population in this country is still increasing and they are still moving in droves to places like Seattle and Denver.

    I don't dispute it costs a lot to convert commercial to residential, but lack of demand is not the problem. The problem is the real estate industry in the West has been drunk on profits for the last 40+ years and they may finally have to come back to reality.

  15. #24740
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    5,608
    I’d just like to see dense housing allowed to be built, and with less hoops and lower hurdles to clear. Then if there’s enough demand to cover building costs it gets built.

    My guess is there’s a lot of demand in a lot of areas.

  16. #24741
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    8,297
    The cost to renovate and repurpose office buildings is astronomical. My aunt who worked for some major CRE developers said it is really complicated to just redo the plumbing, electrical for an office building. Let alone all the structural changes that are necessary. Take into account the financing right now is stupid expensive.

    This is just one example of what's going on right now. Tip of the iceberg IMO.

    https://sfstandard.com/business/real...ncisco-hotels/

    Park Hotels and Resorts, a Virginia-based real estate investment firm, said Monday that it had stopped paying back a $725 million loan on its main San Francisco properties and is likely to give two of the largest hotels in the city back to its lender.
    Reay said he’s concerned that the Park Hotels decision could be among the first in a line of dominos to fall in San Francisco’s hotel market.

    He pointed to other signs of trouble, such as the distressed sale of the Huntington Hotel in Nob Hill and financial troubles at the nearby Stanford Court Hotel, which is having trouble paying back its loan.

    In 2016, Hilton San Francisco Union Square and Parc 55 San Francisco were appraised at $1.6 billion, according to CMBS loan documents. Reay said the rubber could meet the road when a lender takes control of the properties and sells them off at a substantial discount.

    “If you have a 50% reduction in value since 2016, if you start to take that across the board on other hotel assets, that’s going to be a major problem,” Reay said, noting that the properties most at risk are larger hotels that cater to business travelers.
    "We don't beat the reaper by living longer, we beat the reaper by living well and living fully." - Randy Pausch

  17. #24742
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    22,004
    What about redoing codes to make it not so prohibitive?

    This no-office downtown-flight low-urban-core-demand is not going to sit well with the portion of political/government/planner/philosopher/academic types who want everyone to move out of their sfh/spacious dwellings in rural/suburbs and into new density/apartments in urban cores so they can give up their cars.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  18. #24743
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Posts
    15,856
    Quote Originally Posted by Toadman View Post
    The cost to renovate and repurpose office buildings is astronomical.
    How does that compare with building a new structure?

  19. #24744
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Keep Tacoma Feared
    Posts
    5,309
    Quote Originally Posted by summit View Post
    This no-office downtown-flight low-urban-core-demand is not going to sit well with the portion of political/government/planner/philosopher/academic types who want everyone to move out of their sfh/spacious dwellings in rural/suburbs and into new density/apartments in urban cores so they can give up their cars.
    That's totally true. But when the downtown urban core decays and so does the tax revenue that comes with it there aren't going to be any roads or services for all the people living out in the sprawling suburbs. You're able to exist in Summit County because of those people living and working in downtown Denver supporting you.

  20. #24745
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    22,004
    Quote Originally Posted by altasnob View Post
    That's totally true. But when the downtown urban core decays and so does the tax revenue that comes with it there aren't going to be any roads or services for all the people living out in the sprawling suburbs. You're able to exist in Summit County because of those people living and working in downtown Denver supporting you.
    The tax revenue isn't going away. It is just going outside the downtown core. Those jobs and companies are still around, they just don't need downtown Denver offices. Some of them even moved here which has plusses and minuses.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  21. #24746
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Keep Tacoma Feared
    Posts
    5,309
    Quote Originally Posted by summit View Post
    The tax revenue isn't going away. It is just going outside the downtown core. Those jobs and companies are still around, they just don't need downtown Denver offices.
    No civilization in earth's history has excelled without thriving urban cores. The reason companies move to a place like Seattle is because of things like a large airport and port that allows getting people and stuff from Asia easier, a world class public computer science program (UW), a high concentration of tech companies making poaching talent easy. I don't think America can thrive and be competitive with the rest of the world if we are all sitting in our underwear on our couch in Jackson.

  22. #24747
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    2,800
    Well on the bright side there sure are a lot of used converted sprinter vans and the like hitting the market. Three with for sale signs in my neighborhood, plus two of them for sale across from the post office. Makes me smile.

  23. #24748
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    7,635
    Quote Originally Posted by californiagrown View Post
    So govt takeover the empty high rises and turn them into low/no-income housing with Wesley snipes as building manager?
    Lol!

  24. #24749
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    8,297
    Quote Originally Posted by Meadow Skipper View Post
    How does that compare with building a new structure?
    Where's the land in urban downtown to build that new structure?
    "We don't beat the reaper by living longer, we beat the reaper by living well and living fully." - Randy Pausch

  25. #24750
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    1,492

    Real Estate Crash thread

    Somehow Canada is managing to turn vacant office towers into residential. Then again they’ve been able to figure out universal health care and gun regulations.

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calga...tial-1.6816052
    Last edited by Flounder; 06-08-2023 at 11:21 AM. Reason: Spelling, gun regulation, not fun regulation.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •