Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 35
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Golden
    Posts
    6,383

    Hardtail build help....

    So for next season I really, really, really want a hardtail. My bike gives me all types of shit, the chain won't stop slapping no matter what i do, etc. 3 inches of travel doesn't feel worth it. The bike will be mainly for XC riding although id like to be able to beat it up urban style if I ever stop being such a gaper. I'd like to build up somewhat light 25-35 pounds, and want it to be geared toward trail/XC riding more so than anything else. If it's frame only hopefully under 5-600 bucks. Could the more bike savvy hook me up with some suggestions?

    My thoughts
    Azonic Steelhead (stupid cheap, but maybe not light enough/trail style enough?)
    Evil Sovereign/DOC/
    Atomlab Trailpimp
    Banshee Morphine
    Banshe Scirocco (think this may be best for me?)

    Also, is there anyway to get any of these bikes already built up, or you would just have to get lucky someone selling a used?

    Thanks for the help...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Bellingham
    Posts
    1,234
    every single frame that you listed except for maybe the scirocco would pretty much suck as a mainly xc bike. I would look at the santa cruz chameleon, cove stiffee, one of the hardtail freeride norco's (torrent/rampage), an older (early 2000's) kona chute/roast, or something along those lines. if you build it smart, you should be able to keep it around 30 lbs, and have it as an all around bike. I would look for a 5" fork like a fox vanilla or a manitou sherman flick for the front, and then go with something no heavier than the sun rhino lites xl for the wheelset. also, a 2.5 front /2.3 rear tire combo works well.

    fyi, my hardtail is a 2001 kona roast with an oldschool dj 1 on the front before they got heavy, plus trailpimps which should be replaced with the rhino lites one of these days. it is around 32 pounds, and could be just under 30 if i had more money. It also rips the xc stuff around here perfectly, and would climb fine if the wheels were lighter and it wasn't a 15" frame
    smoke crack and worship satan

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    the Quagmire
    Posts
    4,222
    My thoughts on a few (I know nothing about the Sovereign or Trail Pimp):

    Azonic Steelhead - my friend rides a single speed Steelhead XC quite a bit, I bet it will be too small for you to ride XC comfortably

    Evil Sovereign/DOC/ - again, being big, I don't think a DOC would be good for you XC wise. Never seen a Sovereign

    Banshee Morphine - This is a tank, not a XC bike

    Banshe Scirocco - you can buy big Banshees, don't know anyone who owns the bike

    edit - WC has the same opinions, but is faster...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Golden
    Posts
    6,383
    Quote Originally Posted by White Chocolate
    every single frame that you listed except for maybe the scirocco would pretty much suck as a mainly xc bike. I would look at the santa cruz chameleon, cove stiffee, one of the hardtail freeride norco's (torrent/rampage), an older (early 2000's) kona chute/roast, or something along those lines.
    Thanks WC, shows how much I know . I really like the Scirocco though...

    Crash - Hook me up with some suggestions, you know my steeze

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    North Vancouver
    Posts
    6,457
    WC is right on the money.

    I grabbed a Brodie frame for this same type of abuse early this season. Slapped a 5 inch Z1 on the front rhyno lites and nice light kevlar bead 2.4 conti tires (can't recall the name of them). It's a 1x9 set up in order to inflict pain on the climbs, gotta build the legs for ski season. Super fun bike to rip the singletrack and not have to worry about it breaking on any of the small local stunts or jumps.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    retired
    Posts
    12,465
    z- ride my xl steelhead and decide for yourself if it is too small.
    you have 2" on me, and i put a 50mm stem on it. run 100mm and you will be set.
    stupid cheap, and super bomber. 6lb frame. fuggin sick.

    also, i had an old kona roast/chute. those are sweet and cheap as well.
    you can only fit skinny (ie 2.3) tires in the rear though, which sucks on those super rigid alu frames.

    go for a slightly heavier, way more burly, way better riding, steel frame for sure.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Shadynasty's Jazz Club
    Posts
    10,248
    If you can afford it, I'd say go for the Sovereign. The angles are just about right for trail riding, but it's short and low enough to be a great urban/freeride machine. The TT on the large is plenty long for climbing, and it has adjustable chainstays so you can shorten it for play, and lengthen it for XC type stuff. Just plan on running an uber long seatpost cause with a 15" seat tube, you're gonna need all you can get.

    The guys at Evil claim to run them as dedicated trail bikes. I've been drooling over them since they were in the prototype phase, and eventually I'm gonna build one up as a do-it-all hardtail machine.
    Remind me. We'll send him a red cap and a Speedo.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Golden
    Posts
    6,383
    Quote Originally Posted by bagtagley
    If you can afford it, I'd say go for the Sovereign. The angles are just about right for trail riding, but it's short and low enough to be a great urban/freeride machine. The TT on the large is plenty long for climbing, and it has adjustable chainstays so you can shorten it for play, and lengthen it for XC type stuff. Just plan on running an uber long seatpost cause with a 15" seat tube, you're gonna need all you can get.

    The guys at Evil claim to run them as dedicated trail bikes. I've been drooling over them since they were in the prototype phase, and eventually I'm gonna build one up as a do-it-all hardtail machine.
    Yeah the Sovereign sure is pretty, but could i build up to about 30lbs?

    I think im in love with the Scirocco, 20 or 22in frame, seems like it would be perfect.....

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Golden
    Posts
    6,383
    Ok. change of plans. I want this. Any objections to this as a mainly XC bike?



    Surly Instigator.

    20", Marshal that should work right?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Tawho Citti
    Posts
    1,531
    Quote Originally Posted by Z
    Ok. change of plans. I want this. Any objections to this as a mainly XC bike?



    Surly Instigator.

    20", Marshal that should work right?
    A nice frame at a nice price, but it is the piggiest of the pigs, 7lbs. in the 20" size. Santa Cruz Chameleon is a great way to go, I've owned 2.
    It's heartbreaking to see a chick who's too anorexic.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Golden
    Posts
    6,383
    Quote Originally Posted by Darkside
    A nice frame at a nice price, but it is the piggiest of the pigs, 7lbs. in the 20" size. Santa Cruz Chameleon is a great way to go, I've owned 2.
    Yeah i like the Chameleon. I think I may have it narrowed down.

    I think I may be sold on the steel though. Whats a pound or two anyways?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    SLC / Snowbird
    Posts
    1,148
    Quote Originally Posted by Z
    I'd like to build up somewhat light 25-35 pounds, and want it to be geared toward trail/XC riding more so than anything else.
    Bwahahahahahaha!!!

    (gasp!!!!)

    Shit that's funny. I ride a hardtail, two in fact, and that's all I ride. So do a few buddies of mine. But 25-35 pounds? For a trail bike? Are you serious? 20-23 lbs is a XC trail bike, sub 20 if you're really core...anything over 25 is just a tank. If you're looking for a trail bike, go light, if you're looking for a DJ bike, get a separate bike.

    The whole idea of a hardtail trail bike is to go light and go fast.
    [This Space For Rent]

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    slums of park city
    Posts
    1,172
    Quote Originally Posted by SkiingBear
    20-23 lbs is a XC trail bike, sub 20 if you're really core...anything over 25 is just a tank.
    I'm curious what XC bikes you have in mind that are anywhere near under 20 pounds that aren't $6,000. The best Sugar Team Issues and RM Element Races are about 22-24, and those are $4,000 racing bikes (retail). My XC rig that I race on is a RM Instinct and is pretty light at 25.5. 25-30 is still very much in the XC trail bike range.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Shadynasty's Jazz Club
    Posts
    10,248
    Quote Originally Posted by SkiingBear
    anything over 25 is just a tank. If you're looking for a trail bike, go light, if you're looking for a DJ bike, get a separate bike.

    The whole idea of a hardtail trail bike is to go light and go fast.
    Anything under 25 pounds is a featherweight XC racer. Unless you're racing XC, shooting for the 27-32 pound range is perfectly reasonable...and sensible if you want tough and reliable. One of the real advantages of a hardtail is that you can build a bike that's tough enough for freeride and light enough for trail riding.

    Go light is the idea behind a hardtail XC bike. Go fun and Go fast is the idea of a hardtail trail bike.

    Z, the Chameleon is a great all arounder, but one thing I learned from owning that bike is that aluminum, gussets and square chain stays make for a very rough ride. You're on the right track looking at steel.
    Remind me. We'll send him a red cap and a Speedo.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Golden
    Posts
    6,383
    Quote Originally Posted by bagtagley
    Z, the Chameleon is a great all arounder, but one thing I learned from owning that bike is that aluminum, gussets and square chain stays make for a very rough ride. You're on the right track looking at steel.
    Yeah, it seems that's the concensus on aluminum to people ive talked too. I'll suck up the pound or two. I think my mind is made on the Instigator...

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    yo momma's
    Posts
    723
    Cove stiffee gets my vote. I have had one for 3 years. A buddy just got the new one (dead sexy in a beauty pink). I have raced on it, DJ'd, dropped up to 8ft (I am 210lbs) with questionable tranny's and done urban with absolutely no probs. You can stick a 2.5 rear tire on the old frames which gives enough squish to take the edge off the al ride. The geometry is absolutely perfect as a comprimise between freeride and XC. A vanilla 125 makes this a great biek for years to come

    The chameleon is my second choice but it is more expensive and you wait longer. Strength wise...I think it is a toss up but I would give the edge to the cove. Durability was more of an concern than weight for me (height and weight make it so).

    Edit: ok, surly it is. I have heard nothing but good things from friends who have ridden them. Nice bike, great company. Have a blast.
    Recently overheard: "Hey Ralph, what were you drinking that time that you set your face on fire?"

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    retired
    Posts
    12,465
    fuck dude, you're a big guy, deal with the extra pound (30 vs 31 = not big)
    if my fat ass can ride a 37lb hardtail trailbike, so can your skinny ass.

    surly rocks.
    go for it.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Golden
    Posts
    6,383
    Quote Originally Posted by marshalolson
    if my fat ass can ride a 37lb hardtail trailbike, so can your skinny ass.
    Are you threatening me?

    P.S. Check tommorow if you have a sec what the frame would cost through you guys. Found a sweet deal online but i've never heard of the company.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    retired
    Posts
    12,465
    let me know what you can get it for, and i'll let you know if we can match/beat it...

    edit: or tell you how good of a deal it is, and that you should go for it.
    Last edited by marshalolson; 10-25-2005 at 08:27 PM.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Golden
    Posts
    6,383
    Quote Originally Posted by marshalolson
    let me know what you can get it for, and i'll let you know if we can match/beat it...
    three fitty

    Never heard of that company however, anyone know em?

    Style me out with the yellow, and ill love you long time.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    retired
    Posts
    12,465
    dude, i can for sure beat that. call me at the store/swing by tomorrow.
    pm sent w/ digits

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Bellingham
    Posts
    1,234
    Quote Originally Posted by SkiingBear


    The whole idea of a hardtail trail bike is to go light and go fast.

    your ideas are stupid for the rest of us that enjoy all aspects of riding. of course, i have never understood the joyless roadie mentality that so many xc riders have.
    smoke crack and worship satan

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Ut
    Posts
    1,563
    Quote Originally Posted by Long Duck Dong
    I'm curious what XC bikes you have in mind that are anywhere near under 20 pounds that aren't $6,000. The best Sugar Team Issues and RM Element Races are about 22-24, and those are $4,000 racing bikes (retail). My XC rig that I race on is a RM Instinct and is pretty light at 25.5. 25-30 is still very much in the XC trail bike range.
    HARDTAILs. Not FS bikes with pivots. I'll bet you a Fuel is lighter than a sugar or element, but a bike like a sub22(now enlightenment), a ti, or good steel frame can be that light. Oh yeah, and reynolds just came out with 953

    Skiing bear. Stop cruising weightweenies.com

    Z- my friend has and instigator and loves it dearly, he rides xc/fr on it but also has a chameleon for straight up xc. Go with the surly.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Peach Pantsuit
    Posts
    1,053
    Another thought, while you're looking at Surlys, is to consider the Karate Monkey 29er. I rode one most of this year and loved it. I've always been down with the steel hardtail. Mine is a 20", built for durability, not weight, and tips the scales at 30#.

    You've got a couple inches on me, and I've never been as comfy on a bike as I am now. Not every shop stocks 29er parts, but there are plenty of options in Boulder/Denver.

    You're welcome to spin on mine if you want. And there are always used frames and full builds for sale at www.mtbr.com

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Powpow New Guinea
    Posts
    2,981
    Quote Originally Posted by SkiingBear
    Bwahahahahahaha!!!

    (gasp!!!!)

    Shit that's funny. I ride a hardtail, two in fact, and that's all I ride. So do a few buddies of mine. But 25-35 pounds? For a trail bike? Are you serious? 20-23 lbs is a XC trail bike, sub 20 if you're really core...anything over 25 is just a tank. If you're looking for a trail bike, go light, if you're looking for a DJ bike, get a separate bike.

    The whole idea of a hardtail trail bike is to go light and go fast.
    Have you actually put them on a scale? My XC race bike weighted in at 25#, my road bike weighted in at 21#, actual weights. The only thing my XC race bike had on it that I wouldn't race with was the 2.3 tires I use for everyday riding, doubt I'd lose a pound or more dropping to my 2.1 race tires.

    Z, shame you missed veloswap, you could have walked out of there with a sweet ride for little money.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •