Given that I’ve lived near Oakridge for 8 years, I feel like should be the one answering instead of asking, but my recently and steadily aging eyes have gotten a lot more sensitive to glare the last few years.
So my main problem is midday in a mostly forested trail with broken canopy areas where you have the trail running from dark shadows into bright direct sun patches and back. Trying to maintain flow speeds in these conditions is obviously damn hard and dangerous. I’ve been using cheap (Scott) clear lens goggles year-round for sustained descents for years, but they do nothing for glare reduction in the sunlit pockets. Photochromic doesn’t make sense because you could be in a dark area but the trail ahead of you could have a bright sun patch and you wouldn’t be able to see what’s coming.
I’ve been thinking that a polarizing filter lens with about 40% ish (+/- 10?) VLT lens with some kind of base tint and contrast boost to help better see trail details and overhanging branches would be the best solution for some level of glare reduction when coming up to the sun patches. The Rudy Project website claims that polarizing filters reduce depth perception on trail - is that true? Also may not be an issue if 90% of the trail is inside the canopy and the broken canopy glare patches are the challenge.
My friend said to check out Lab Austere Max Vent Caramel flash lens, which is 40% and no polarizing filter, but I’m not sure if the base tint is what’s best for deep forests? I read Carlh’s review where he said the Caramel lens didn’t have as much trail contrast as the HD Cobalt. I think Lab Austere may have a sale going right now so I’m hoping to get some decent advice ASAP!
Bookmarks