Check Out Our Shop
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 36

Thread: Skier Fatality near Red Mountain Pass, CO -- January 7, 2025

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    254

    Skier Fatality near Red Mountain Pass, CO -- January 7, 2025

    Skier fatality today near Red Mountain Pass, CO:

    https://avalanche.state.co.us/report...c-3df89354cfb1


    There was a partial burial not too far away on Jan. 5th:

    https://avalanche.state.co.us/report...6-bf2f41121e1e

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    cb, co
    Posts
    5,261
    Sad to hear. Condolences to friends and family.

    I really wish the CAIC would ditch the afternoon forecast and put it back in the mornings. Or at least update forecasts in the morning when there is new information. They say they do, but I've seen it happen close to never. If you were to read the Red Mountain forecast today, you would have no idea that there was a fatal accident. While the underlying snowpack structure didn't change from their pm forecast, I still think that people might be well served having the knowledge that there was a fatality, perhaps stepping their plans back. I've bitched about it before and my opinion hasn't changed.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,909
    Close proximity remote trigger from potential shallow snowpack area? Couldn't zoom in on pic to really see the detail of where the tracks started and how far across the slope the tracks fanned.

    RIP to the victim, condolences to family and friends.
    Master of mediocrity.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Your Mom's House
    Posts
    8,426
    The victim was a local from Ridgway and volunteer with the Ouray Mountain Rescue Team. He was traveling solo.

    https://www.durangoherald.com/articl...mountain-pass/

    RIP. I'm sure this will hit the local community, and especially his teammates, hard.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    1,480

    Skier Fatality near Red Mountain Pass, CO -- January 7, 2025

    Damn, that’s awful
    SIP
    Fear, Doubt, Disbelief, you have to let it all go. Free your mind!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Montrose, CO
    Posts
    4,764
    That zone is a weird little pocket. The Red Mountain Lodge is right there and as a result, it gets skied quite a bit even in questionable conditions (IMO). There have been a couple close calls in Hollywood (adjacent slope) in the last few seasons. RIP.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    9,470
    Quote Originally Posted by goldenboy View Post
    Sad to hear. Condolences to friends and family.

    I really wish the CAIC would ditch the afternoon forecast and put it back in the mornings. Or at least update forecasts in the morning when there is new information. They say they do, but I've seen it happen close to never. If you were to read the Red Mountain forecast today, you would have no idea that there was a fatal accident. While the underlying snowpack structure didn't change from their pm forecast, I still think that people might be well served having the knowledge that there was a fatality, perhaps stepping their plans back. I've bitched about it before and my opinion hasn't changed.
    I get what you are saying. I like the PM forecast. The forecaster field observations are from that say and then you get the forecast. The AM forecast was coming out about 730 I think which was after many people have planned and departed on their day.

    There was an interested situation earlier in the year where our danger rating went to low on all aspects and elevations on the Friday PM forecast. For sure, people went into "Full Send Mode" because of it.

    But more data in a timely fashion is certainly the objective. Was the incident communicated in an Observation or other social media channel? I have a few minor bitches with the website their days. 1. No really zone weather overview. You get the State Wide Brief and then the point forecast. The point forecast is hard to use on a phone and because the color shading obsurces the map. 2. I wish all info was concentrated on the the website. I don't Facebook, Instagram or generally get my avalanche activity and forecasting info anywhere but the website. I have friends show be observations and commentary from CAIC and I say, "where is that from?".

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    15,652
    From the pic it looks like the skier got just a bit too close to that convex roll and triggered it remotely. The rest of the slope, looker’s left, looks fairly well protected from objective hazard. That could/would catch you by surprise having a slide come in from the side. For people familiar with the area, is that slope cross loaded from SW/W winds?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    9,470
    CAIC forecasters will visit the accident site on January 8, and we'll provide more information when it is available
    It has not been reported as a remote trigger. I've skied the slope plenty of times. I have not toured in the zone this winter. I'll let you marinate on the relevance of cross loading of Persistent Slab Instabilities. I've noticed a trend that people like to use Remote for Triggered from Below. Whether you can avoid avalanche terrain and stay out from the overhead hazard by managing the Alpha Angle is not something I feel comfortable with.

    I'm not out for a fight. Our high, dry and windy snowpack requires some unique strategies. If you want to shoulda woulda coulda about the mistakes made, I respect that.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    15,652
    I guess it wouldn’t be remote trigger on that slope but triggered from the side(below) from cross loading on that convex roll skier’s left


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    228
    Quote Originally Posted by Foggy_Goggles View Post
    It has not been reported as a remote trigger. I've skied the slope plenty of times. I have not toured in the zone this winter. I'll let you marinate on the relevance of cross loading of Persistent Slab Instabilities. I've noticed a trend that people like to use Remote for Triggered from Below. Whether you can avoid avalanche terrain and stay out from the overhead hazard by managing the Alpha Angle is not something I feel comfortable with.

    I'm not out for a fight. Our high, dry and windy snowpack requires some unique strategies. If you want to shoulda woulda coulda about the mistakes made, I respect that.
    Im curious what your definition of remote trigger is?

    I think of it as anything triggered outside of the skier general vicinity (75-100 yards or so).

    I believe you can consider a remote trigger the same as triggered from the bottom of a slope.

    Sent from my Pixel 6a using Tapatalk

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Your Mom's House
    Posts
    8,426
    FWIW the Snow Weather Avalanche Guidelines do not specifically define "remote trigger." Generally I understand "remote trigger" to refer to any trigger that's not directly on the slab whether that be above, below, adjacent, connected, etc.

    Speculating on where exactly the skier triggered the avalanche from at this point is just that, speculation.

    What we can say for sure though is that:
    1) triggering avalanches from below or adjacent slopes is a typical characteristic of persistent slab avalanche problems: https://avalanche.org/avalanche-ency...rsistent-slab/
    2) other avalanches were triggered from below or adjacent slopes in similar terrain recently preceding the accident: https://avalanche.state.co.us/report...6-a259bee12d3d and https://avalanche.state.co.us/report...e-e4c02e39bdb8 (same avalanche)
    3) if you are skiing in the runout of historic avalanche paths you are by definition skiing in avalanche terrain.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    9,470
    Thanks #FlatBrimTundraLift

    I consider Remote being outside of the avalanche path. I've noticed a trend that perhaps Remote is the Black Ice of Avalanche Triggers. As is, "there was nothing I could do, it was a remote".

    So I was just encouraging folks to put a study on the behavior and travel protocols for managing a Persistent Slab Problem. High spatial variability, triggers from below and shallow spots in the the slab (rocks, trees, margins), frequently no observable signs of instability, and so on.

    Its a game of decision making and I encourage talking about it. This is our learning moment. Condolences to the friends, family and community of the deceased.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    SW, CO
    Posts
    1,894

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    228
    Quote Originally Posted by Foggy_Goggles View Post
    Thanks #FlatBrimTundraLift

    I consider Remote being outside of the avalanche path. I've noticed a trend that perhaps Remote is the Black Ice of Avalanche Triggers. As is, "there was nothing I could do, it was a remote".

    So I was just encouraging folks to put a study on the behavior and travel protocols for managing a Persistent Slab Problem. High spatial variability, triggers from below and shallow spots in the the slab (rocks, trees, margins), frequently no observable signs of instability, and so on.

    Its a game of decision making and I encourage talking about it. This is our learning moment. Condolences to the friends, family and community of the deceased.
    https://avalanche.ca/glossary/terms/...ered-avalanche

    According to Avalanche Canada it has nothing to do with being in the path or not, that's why I was confused, you are not using the term the way I am used to hearing it. You can remote trigger an avalanche while standing at the bottom of the same avalanche path.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Fresh Lake City
    Posts
    4,732
    damn that is a brutal read.

    a local skiing solo, found by his spouse after he doesn't call as planned, 6 prior descents on the slope before the avy.

    RIP.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    22,752
    Tragic

    Quote Originally Posted by durangobrad View Post
    https://avalanche.ca/glossary/terms/...ered-avalanche

    According to Avalanche Canada it has nothing to do with being in the path or not, that's why I was confused, you are not using the term the way I am used to hearing it. You can remote trigger an avalanche while standing at the bottom of the same avalanche path.
    Correct
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    cordova,AK
    Posts
    3,790
    My thoughts to family and friends. What a terrible accident. I skied that slope and area this November for my first time. In over 40 years of bc skiing that was the most tracked up slope I have ever skied. There was definitely a sense of familiarity there. Looks like he got a little to close to the toe of the slope and triggered it from the bottom.
    off your knees Louie

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Where the sheets have no stains
    Posts
    23,474
    3rd solo fatality this year?
    I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.

    "Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Fresh Lake City
    Posts
    4,732
    Quote Originally Posted by Bunion 2020 View Post
    3rd solo fatality this year?
    That’s my count and my takeaway as someone who frequently skis in the backcountry solo.

    Hard saying but 2 of 3 were reported to be buried 1ish meter deep, that seems within the realm of a partner rescue…. Just tragic.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    15,652
    A harsh reminder that danger lurks not just above or below but from the sides as well


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    19,722
    Connected terrain is connected.
    Is it radix panax notoginseng? - splat
    This is like hanging yourself but the rope breaks. - DTM
    Dude Listen to mtm. He's a marriage counselor at burning man. - subtle plague

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    22,752
    *posted in wrong thread
    Last edited by summit; 01-15-2025 at 03:09 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    19,722
    That's not my take at all. Seems like they were stacking tracks for 6 laps and just bit off a little too much.
    Is it radix panax notoginseng? - splat
    This is like hanging yourself but the rope breaks. - DTM
    Dude Listen to mtm. He's a marriage counselor at burning man. - subtle plague

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    67
    Quote Originally Posted by MakersTeleMark View Post
    That's not my take at all. Seems like they were stacking tracks for 6 laps and just bit off a little too much.

    I agree wouldn't say they were off route at all. As he stacked tracks he just got closer and closer to the trigger point.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •