Steal ur face. You need to rethink your career goals. FBI profiler. Nice work!
Last edited by Lostintime; 12-09-2024 at 02:24 PM. Reason: Screwed up
Old Ted conducted a nearly 20-year long reign of terror from a shack in Montana with no electricity or running water and was only caught because his brother dropped a dime on him. This guy gets caught in under a week at a McDonalds. I guess it's true that Gen Z is soft.
Well at least it wasn't Starbucks
Now we know for sure: Eating at McDonalds is bad for your health.
The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there.
Valid counterpoint
Originally Posted by blurred
Let's withhold ranking until we see this guy's manifesto. 35,000 words on a manual typewriter sets a pretty high bar.
Manifesto forthcoming, both of these dudes still trail mightily to clubhouse leader the zodiac who is a clear one-one.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
swing your fucking sword.
Well, it appears the gun discourse was bullshit with the actual answer being “3d printed guns suck”
He is wrong. There are lots of places in the world where political violence is routine. It's a nightmare. There needs to be unbreakable fundamental condemnation of political and vigilante violence. The alternative is societal collapse. His actions should be condemned openly without qualification. He deserves a fair trial with competent legal representation and zero sympathy
Was this political violence? If an internal insurance policy to falsely deny care as a programmed initial response results in you or your family member losing life/limb, should the only punishment be in the civil courts as part of a lawsuit? What if the insurance companies make a policy of rejecting coverage for life/limbsaving care without due dilligence to investigate the claim... who is to blame, and should that person/those people be held to justice in civil or criminal court? Maybe the powerful people making these decisions need to face some real blowback from time to time to help ensure good faith, instead of just some fines.
The health insurance industry should be fiduciary (in the sense of everything being done in the patient/policy holders best interest), and if someone is found to not be upholding their fiduciary responsibility, they should be subject to criminal prosecution for harming or killing people (assault, manslaughter, etc). As i said before, if health insurance denied my kid lifesaving care because of a programmed algorithm, instead of actually investigating... id have a tough time not justifying what this Luigi fellow did. See Denzel in "John Q".
Yes, political and vigilante violence. Go read his Ted Kaczynski review in the post above. Assassinating someone over abstract ideas is not the act of an ordered mind. Something people should keep in mind when trying to map the horrible act of someone going through a mental health crisis onto a political cause
He is not wrong. Where we disagree with Td and Luigi, is that WE dont think we are yet at the point where discourse and dialogue has failed and violence is the only solution left.
We likely dont disagree that there does in fact come a time where violence is the only viable solution left.
In this context, yes. In this context it's people who are no different than those who ordered thousands of beheadings during the French Revolution. Thankfully they don't have the power to do what they want.
And for all its faults the American health system provides a higher level of care than most other health care systems.
We're getting into "Catch -22" territory.
Bookmarks