Originally Posted by
skuff
My reading comprehension sucks but I didn't see anything in the article about a pit getting dug, just a mention of the group leader pushing a ski pole into the snow
Yeah because you don't dig pits in Europe. That's what the slf does for us.
The problem here is the typical lower risk high consequence deep pwl layer thing. And guides should act accordingly. That's why there is an investigation.
So no cliffs below, ski one by one and so on.
The 40 degree thing per se is not a problem in avie danger 2. You can get munter reduction down to below 1 in that scenario.
It's really interesting that everybody focuses on the stomping and the Pole. We do that but it's not what people usually base decisions on. It's if that feels weird / or more dangerous we don't go. You wouldn't make a go decision on that. you normally do that with the Reduction method. Guides tend to push it a bit if the avie level feels onnthe safe side, which it should never be with a pwl. New snow, surface slabs...sure you can see and navigate that.
So basically the guide made two mistakes. Terrain Management/ Tour planning and 4 people on slope.
Edit: the Tour planning is actually ok in avie 2, just not with a pwl.
Edit: the Standard wellhorn approach is flat but exposed. The peak is very serious alpinism. So the pic indicates they wanted to ski a rather boring but dangerous approach below the North face.
Strange Tour planning. And you can't really ski it from the top so I don't know why they actually Toured there?
Last edited by subtle plague; 04-23-2024 at 10:34 AM.
It's a war of the mind and we're armed to the teeth.
Bookmarks