Results 1 to 25 of 69
-
01-25-2024, 07:55 PM #1
Tecnica ZeroG Tour Pro 2024 touring boot
Probably deserves a dedicated thread. There's enough fans and curiosity ( me included)
ISPO info.
https://www.ispo.com/en/promotion/is...g-tour-pro?amp
Product specs:
Flex: 130
Last: 99 mm
Size: 22.0 - 30.5 MP
Weight: 1.290 g
Color: orange
RRP: €850.00
Release date: September 2024
Also here's the preliminary write up from Blister
https://blisterreview.com/ski-boot-r...o-g-tour-boots
Some pics for now till I get proper weights etc
1290g is the touted weight for 26.5
Last is 99mm
Put questions here.
-liner any good?
-fixed the pivot cuff wear issue?
- toe box still fit lots of people?
Edit. Pics are from a friend. Getting sample next week and will put up moreLast edited by LeeLau; 01-26-2024 at 12:12 AM.
-
01-25-2024, 08:02 PM #2
Curious on this boot vs the Dynafit Ridge Pro for my next.
-
01-25-2024, 09:11 PM #3Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
- SW CO
- Posts
- 5,613
^^Same. Will also be curious how the Backland XTD stacks up.
My guess is the Ridge Pro will walk better but won’t ski like a 4 buckle overlap boot.
-
01-25-2024, 10:53 PM #4
You’ve both read my mind. Hoping one of these new crop of boots can offer me a bit better heel hold while accommodating my instep.
-
01-25-2024, 11:32 PM #5Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Posts
- 835
I’m curious about the cuff pivot, as it looks from the exterior like the Cochise cuff pivot, and those ones oval easily (I got about 50 days out of mine before they were completely shot).
Hopefully it’s just the exterior looks that are similar.
-
01-25-2024, 11:56 PM #6
My main question is what did they skimp on to come up with the huge weight savings vs. the current iteration? Hopefully not the liner again. Guess I'll wait and see
-
01-26-2024, 12:13 AM #7Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Posts
- 22
Hopefully they didn’t change the fit too much. It’s always easier to make a small boot bigger than a big boot smaller.
-
01-26-2024, 07:55 AM #8
These are 3D printed?
watch out for snakes
-
01-26-2024, 08:23 AM #9
Generally interested in fit changes. Previous didn't quite work for me fit wise, hopin this one will
-
01-26-2024, 09:30 AM #10Anxious desk jockey
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Location
- Fairhaven
- Posts
- 263
I thought this was a mountain biking boot...what's the best clipless pedal option?
If this boot walks better than the Backland XTD I'll be shocked but that will be a good thing. My bet would be on a ROM closer to the Hawx XTD but with a weight lighter than the Backland XTD. If it actually hits 130 flex index then it's probably like a brick wall.
-
02-16-2024, 07:49 PM #11
-
02-16-2024, 07:55 PM #12
-
02-16-2024, 07:59 PM #13
-
02-16-2024, 08:42 PM #14Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Livingston, MT
- Posts
- 1,854
Good stuff, thanks LeeLau!! Curious to hear more once you get them out on snow!
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
-
02-16-2024, 08:46 PM #15
Some notes re fit compared to the older boot and in isolation without yet cooking the liner
The toebox feels like the touted 99mm last. It is a polyamide so should hold a punch as well as the previous rev ZGTP. While it's not a narrow toebox it's not the cavern that is a Dynafit. I'd say it's a touch wider than the Atomic Hawx Ultra for example.
The ankle hold and the heel hold feel tighter and more clamped down than the previous rev ZGTP. It feels narrow enough that my flat foot and medium volume ankles may need a punch as well as a liner cook. Without yet having it on snow I'd suspect this will provide improved ski performance.
Noticeably there's a removable boot board which well help for fitting. It's not a cardboard facsimile of the previous rev which had a habit of breaking when removed.
The liner itself looks quite promising. It's got a supportive tongue and feels like it actually has substance, something that you'd find hard pressed to say about the previous rev ZGTP. The stock footbed isn't anything to shout home about but perhaps that's for weight considerations and easily replaced
-
02-16-2024, 09:04 PM #16
Some other random notes follow
The shell looks highly sculpted. It looks like Tecnica has tried really hard to save weight
The boot has a nicely aggressive Vibram ISO9523 sole
The walk mode still looks suitably beefy; somewhat like the older ZGTP
As with the older ZGTP there's a flip chip allowing forward lean to be changed from 12 to 13 degrees. It comes stock in steeper mode and is still a pain to change (same strippable Phillips screws) so don't bother unless you want to get an aftermarket mod to get significantly more lean.
The cuff pivots look changed and I'll try to confirm if that's the case. The older ZGTP cuff pivots would develop wear after 30-50 days resulting in ankle slop so hopefully that's been addressedLast edited by LeeLau; 02-20-2024 at 11:29 AM.
-
02-16-2024, 09:04 PM #17King potato
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- BC
- Posts
- 1,968
Thanks lee!
Is there more forward lean compared to the OG?
-
02-16-2024, 09:18 PM #18
-
02-16-2024, 10:13 PM #19
-
02-16-2024, 11:13 PM #20
No flip chip… screws are there just so the mechanism can be easily replaced. Best locktite known to man for a reason! You don’t want those falling out when you’re a long ways from home. Everyone wants everything screw removable until they don’t..
No canting that I’m aware of
Forward lean has been increased
Cuff pivots are similar to that of the latest Cochise… Metal pivoting around metal instead of metal pivoting around grilamid which caused ovaling over time and hence “slop”
-
02-17-2024, 07:06 AM #21Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2018
- Posts
- 222
This is the comparison test I’m most excited about. Sounds like the new ZGTP is 50 g lighter than the older one?
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
-
02-17-2024, 08:25 AM #22u
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Summit Park UT
- Posts
- 1,109
Can you feel the increased touring ROM? They say the buckles are changed, what’s different?
-
02-17-2024, 09:41 AM #23
Excited for this boot. How is the fit over the top of the foot? More instep room? Hopefully the screws to adjust the forward lean are made out of some harder steel this time.
-
02-17-2024, 10:35 AM #2410 out of 10
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Squaw, CA-Girdwood, AK
- Posts
- 277
Hey guys, I got some time in the new one as well.
As Wasatch stated, there is no adjustment for the forward lean. It is now a boot with 14* forward lean.
Instep is 1mm higher, IMO it takes away the aggressive "shark bite" instep pressure where the instep would bend into the upper cuff. Makes it a lot easier to get on as well.
Toe box is "modern" like a Cochise/Mach 1....longer toe area in the 1st and 2nd met heads, and most important, sixth toe area is shaped like a foot, not a Kleenex box.
Range of motion went 55* to 60*. It is very apparent in how much more the cuff moves forward, especially when skinning at an incline. Huge difference. You can drive your knee over the front of the binding now, where the old one would "block out" because of the cuff.
Heel/Ankle feel a bit snugger, and liner is good. We have been making the ZG liners stiffer and heavier the last couple of years and the new one continues this trend. Most important is the tongue is thick and stiff for this weight of boot.
We will also have an aftermarket liner available called the Mission Control...heaver and stiffer, think a Cochise liner blended with the new ZG liner. Nice option if you want this for a travel boot, sled skiing, or weight is not as important.
Definitely lighter, and skis really well if not better. The dual blended cuff adds a more progressive flex..les "on and off" when engaging the cuff. Always amazed how well this light of a boot can drive really light BC skis as well as heavier resort based skis.
Hope this helps!"He thinks the carpet pissers did this?"
-
02-17-2024, 10:52 AM #25User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Ogden
- Posts
- 9,435
Bookmarks