Good vid here-
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VOUrxU...ByaWRnZQ%3D%3D
Good vid here-
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VOUrxU...ByaWRnZQ%3D%3D
Instead of trying to fit in a sexy new boot which looked really cool but didnt remotely fit my foot I went with a boot that fit out of the box, fortunately it was the Mercury & Vulcan on which I did some big tours with no mods except a pwrwrap
the Ridge looks cool, i trust Hoji to make something incredible, what I don't trust is Dynafit bringing it to market as Hoji gave it to them,
but I sure hope I'm wrong
Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know
You can see his proto version here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps5EIBoCFKE
For Sale:
If you're in the Northeast and would like to borrow some Jigarex Plates I have:
Rossi/Look plates
Salomon Warden 13 plates
Marker Kingpin Plates
From trying the Ridge on at the show and owning zero G, I would say the Ridge has a way better walk mode. Bigger range with much less resistance, especially backwards.
The ridge was too big for me but I would say the Zero G is more progressive in flex.
Skied the Ridges on Saturday. With putting the much thicker and stiffer Intuitions in them the walk mode is definitely worsened. Unfortunately the forward range of motion is now worse than my Zero Gs, I could definitely feel that on steep skin tracks. Rearward range of motion is still better than Zero Gs. Put then stock liners back in to test today in the house, and the range of motion is soooo much better. So if the Ridge fits you with the stock liner in (which it definitely does not for me, but pretty much no AT boot fits me without putting a thicker liner in it) awesome range of motion, at least for a boot of this stiffness. Speaking of stiffness, these feel similarly stiff to my Zero Gs (which have been skied a few hundred days), but less progressive. I'm still thinking about it, but right now, for me I don't see any advantage of this boot compared to the Zero G, so will likely be selling a pair of size 26 Ridges with one day of use on the shells and none on the liners. Ugh.
Park City/SLC. Not 100% sure yet, but yes most likely..
Man, I think I’m gonna have to size up to the 27 in the ridge otherwise I’d be all over that.
Cut a walk mode into your intuitions. It works like a charm and is super easy. Doesn’t affect the durability in any meaningful way.
They are the Intuition Tour Tongue liners, so already have a walk mode cut out. It seems its just like the bulk of having more liner, I need all the extra liner for my foot, but the cuff is pretty bulky so I can only get the cuff velco strap set at number 1 (it goes up to 6), I think that might be impeding things. Maybe I should have cranked down on that when molding the liners.
So more OCD-ing with the boots... Took an old pair of beat up but higher volume liners and put them in the Ridges, and they limited the touring ROM a fair amount as well. Then I home molded those liners and cranked down on the cuff and middle buckles. Afterwards, big improvement in ROM. So, maybe I'll remold my 1 day old Intuition Tour Tongues and do the same with them. These things are seriously stiff though, I do wish they were more progressive like the zero Gs. I'll also say that in actual use in the field the Hoji Lock was kind of challenging to push down into ski mode. I'm sure I just need to get the hang of it a bit, but I could see that in a really awkward/exposed transition spot it might feel challenging.
I'm referring to my hoji free boots, do it might be different.
Anyway, the idea is to loosen the top, either buckle or Velcro. It's really hard to go into ski mode with them tight, regardless what dynafit says
Sent from my moto g 5G using Tapatalk
It's weird that you have less forward ROM in the Ridge with an Intuition Tour Pro than the Zero G ... I'm assuming you also used an Intuition in the Zero G? I guess I'm struggling to understand your experience with how liners affect the ROM of both boots. Can you elaborate, or am I just confused?
"Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers
photos
I actually think the forward ROM of the Zero G is pretty good, especially with the buckles all the way loosened, any my Zero Gs have different cuff buckles on them with longer touring latches which makes it even better. Its the rearward ROM of the Zero G that is not great in my opinion. Anyways... with the really bulky cuff off the current liner I have in the Ridge it just wont let them flex much, its not really the liner, its like the liner gets bound up within the shell. I think I just need to compress the liner cuff a bit with remolding and it will help quite a bit, as it did in my experiment with the old liner.
With the floating tongue design, do you skin with the middle buckle closed or open? Sorry if that's obvious to everyone, but it's not clear to me.
I had assumed you'd leave the middle buckle open while touring (like you do with all upper/cuff buckles), because I had (incorrectly) assumed the BOA on the lower/clog governs the floating tongue volume. But that cripple creek video shows how the volume taken up by the floating tongue design is based on the closure of the middle buckle. So it seems like you'd have to close the middle cuff buckle to lock your ankle/heel down while skinning. But does closing the middle buckle kill the ROM for touring?
I care less about what Dynafit says and what people actually do when touring. Like I know Dynafit markets the Hoji lock as a "set and forget" type thing where you don't adjust the power strap for touring or skiing ... but many people loosen the strap on long skins to improve the ROM and then tighten for ski down.
"Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers
photos
From what I recall, the boa clamps down on your foot and the middle buckle pulls the tongue back. So, with the middle buckle undone, the tongue is floating and gives you more walk mode ROM. When they say floating tongue, it is floating fore and aft.
Bookmarks