Check Out Our Shop
Page 4 of 14 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 348

Thread: Anybody get on the Line Blade Optic skis yet?

  1. #76
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    7,124
    Quote Originally Posted by SirVicSmasher View Post
    I find it hard to believe anyone could say the 114 is easy to maneuver at low speeds.
    Quite the opposite is true. Ski likes to go fast and fast only.

    Sent from my SM-G981U using Tapatalk
    But compared to a Blackops specifically? BO is less tapered, less rockered, and stiffer.

  2. #77
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,352

    Anybody get on the Line Blade Optic skis yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by mr_pretzel View Post
    I’d say that’s true for the 186 vs BO118, however they have pretty different feels. The Blade optic feels like a looser rustler that lets you slarve the turn more versus finish the carve, the BO118 is fully in the freestyle/playful charger category and is less fussy about perfect technique and better for slarving and surfing around.

    IE if you don’t like center mounted jib skis the blade optic gives you some play, but is also more traditional in the stances and styles that it accepts.
    They compared the 186 114, so you’re probably right. I really like the idea of a looser Rustler 11, so I went with the 186.

    SVS - you’re on the 192’s, right?


    Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  3. #78
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    197
    Thanks for the feedback guys. The backops has always intrigued me, I liked the og bibby when I had it and am considering a heavier wide ski that isn’t too demanding. I’m hearing that the optic 114 isn’t that ski?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  4. #79
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    2,088
    Quote Originally Posted by pembyguy View Post
    Thanks for the feedback guys. The backops has always intrigued me, I liked the og bibby when I had it and am considering a heavier wide ski that isn’t too demanding. I’m hearing that the optic 114 isn’t that ski?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    The 186 optic 114 is easier to ski than the 190 bibby.

  5. #80
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    2,735
    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    They compared the 186 114, so you’re probably right. I really like the idea of a looser Rustler 11, so I went with the 186.

    SVS - you’re on the 192’s, right?


    Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums
    Correct.

    Sent from my SM-G981U using Tapatalk

  6. #81
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    North Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,009

    Anybody get on the Line Blade Optic skis yet?

    Got the 104s mounted. Should get out on them a few times before the lifts close. They feel heavy for a 104. Looking forward to getting on these and will report back.

    Mounted on rec (-6.8cm). Pics of tip/tail splay below:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1829.JPG 
Views:	173 
Size:	211.5 KB 
ID:	455443
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1826.JPG 
Views:	155 
Size:	147.9 KB 
ID:	455444
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1827.JPG 
Views:	123 
Size:	254.8 KB 
ID:	455445
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1824.JPG 
Views:	137 
Size:	198.5 KB 
ID:	455446
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1830.JPG 
Views:	129 
Size:	231.4 KB 
ID:	455447
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1828.JPG 
Views:	130 
Size:	244.4 KB 
ID:	455448


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Last edited by kc_7777; 12-20-2023 at 09:19 AM.
    _________________________________________________
    I love big dumps.

  7. #82
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,352
    Quote Originally Posted by kc_7777 View Post

    Got the 104s mounted.

    Mounted on rec (-6.8cm).
    Looks like your account may have been hacked.

    You said you mounted on the line…

    In all seriousness, though...the rocker profile looks great on those. I'm tempted to try a 185 or 190, but split on sizing and already bought too many skis from Corbett's.
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  8. #83
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vacationland
    Posts
    6,178
    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    Looks like your account may have been hacked.

    You said you mounted on the line…
    That’s what I read


    Sent from the Utility Muffin Research Kitchen

  9. #84
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    North Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,009

    Anybody get on the Line Blade Optic skis yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    Looks like your account may have been hacked.

    You said you mounted on the line…

    In all seriousness, though...the rocker profile looks great on those. I'm tempted to try a 185 or 190, but split on sizing and already bought too many skis from Corbett's.
    Haha.

    Current quiver……8 of 10 are on the line….and the other 2 are only at +1cm.

    What is going on!

    I too like the looks and weight of these Optics.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Last edited by kc_7777; 04-12-2023 at 08:44 PM.
    _________________________________________________
    I love big dumps.

  10. #85
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,352
    I really want some 104 insights. I have my 184 K108 for days when it's variable and 192 MFree for the uber soft and deep days when I'll be off trail 90% of the time. But I need something a little more easygoing then those two that doesn't completely fall apart. The 186 Unleashed I picked up this winter is close, but I would prefer a looser ski with some backbone. My use case is skiing off trail with my 15-yo who's getting into freeriding but he's not a hard charger. My Enforcer 104 feels a bit too on piste oriented and not really loose despite the ample tail rocker.

    I know...first world gear geek problems...
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  11. #86
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    North Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,009
    I’ll compare to E104 and UL108 this weekend for ya.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    _________________________________________________
    I love big dumps.

  12. #87
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Philly, PA
    Posts
    1,870
    Quote Originally Posted by kc_7777 View Post
    I’ll compare to E104 and UL108 this weekend for ya.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Nice! Looking at those two and the Unleashed 108 as possible mid quiver of 3 skis . Maybe a Rustler 10 also but I've heard it doesn't hold up in crud or w speed as much

  13. #88
    Join Date
    Dec 2022
    Posts
    113
    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    I really want some 104 insights. I have my 184 K108 for days when it's variable and 192 MFree for the uber soft and deep days when I'll be off trail 90% of the time. But I need something a little more easygoing then those two that doesn't completely fall apart. The 186 Unleashed I picked up this winter is close, but I would prefer a looser ski with some backbone. My use case is skiing off trail with my 15-yo who's getting into freeriding but he's not a hard charger. My Enforcer 104 feels a bit too on piste oriented and not really loose despite the ample tail rocker.

    I know...first world gear geek problems...
    You been on the Hotshots yet?
    Silly easy to ski at any speed.
    Size up.

  14. #89
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    North Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,009

    Anybody get on the Line Blade Optic skis yet?

    I’ve come very close to buying 183 cm Hotshots many times…..

    Just got to Whistler. Having a few frosty IPAs to get me ready to test the Optic 104s tomorrow…..

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1912.JPG 
Views:	125 
Size:	157.0 KB 
ID:	455815

    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    _________________________________________________
    I love big dumps.

  15. #90
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    North Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,009

    Anybody get on the Line Blade Optic skis yet?

    Mini review of the 2023 Line Blade Optic 104 after 1 day. Will add more later after a few more days.

    Me: 5’7” (170 cm), 170 lbs, ski Whistler and Pow Highway 50+ days a year.

    Conditions: mixed bag at Whistler. Some new snow from a few days ago, packed pow, sketchy visibility, ice and soft slush. Spent the day lapping Harmony and Red Chair. Peak was a white out.

    Mount: I’m right on the Optic’s rec (-6.8cm). The rec mount feels like it’s on the perfect spot on this ski. Far enough back to fly over stuff. But it’s not -11cm. It’s f’ing perfect.

    Length: the 178cm Optic measures exact same when side by side with a 179cm Nordica Enforcer 104 Free. It’s a 179cm.

    My take…after 1 day.

    It’s like Line went and made a ski just for me. It’s got pretty significant tip and tail rocker, so it skis easy in tight spots and in bumps. But it’s damp feeling and very solid at speed. Motors over and through soft chop/crud. And it holds an decent edge when you lay it over and carve on groomers. But you can also slarve the tails, which is so useful. Floated me fine in 6” of fresh.

    Note the Optic 104 weight feels pretty similar to the Enforcer 104. Feels solid on your feet. The gas pedal metal construction is very damp. With the Optic you get good edge grip when on groomers but with a pretty loose ride off trail and in softer snow. I didn’t really find anything that the Optic 104 does not do…and I think it’s a better overall ski than the both the E104 and the UL108. The Optic is looser (better) in the tails than the UL108.

    Not sure what more to say here other than it is a very very useful ski. Capable. Fun. Forgiving. Burly. Comfortable and easy from the first turn. Never once did it feel out of place whatever the snow conditions, whatever the terrain or your speed (does well at slow speeds and at mach speeds).

    Some rocker pics of the Optic 104:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1922.JPG 
Views:	138 
Size:	238.2 KB 
ID:	455890
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1923.JPG 
Views:	143 
Size:	245.6 KB 
ID:	455891
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1924.JPG 
Views:	131 
Size:	277.3 KB 
ID:	455892
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1917.JPG 
Views:	124 
Size:	238.1 KB 
ID:	455894

    Here is a family Optic pic…a bonus is that the 104 graphic is different but is close enough to the 114 graphic that my skier wife didn’t even realize I was on new skis today.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1926.JPG 
Views:	134 
Size:	264.9 KB 
ID:	455893

    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Last edited by kc_7777; 04-15-2023 at 09:51 PM.
    _________________________________________________
    I love big dumps.

  16. #91
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Alta
    Posts
    3,228
    Tricking the wife is a super bonus. I was really hoping my skis from Corbetts would show up when the lady is at work. But looks like it’ll be the opposite. Show up when I’m at work and she’s at home. Your review sounds positive.

  17. #92
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,352

    Anybody get on the Line Blade Optic skis yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by kc_7777 View Post

    My take…after 1 day.

    It’s like Line went and made a ski just for me. It’s got pretty significant tip and tail rocker, so it skis easy in tight spots and in bumps. But it’s damp feeling and very solid at speed. Motors over and through soft chop/crud. And it holds an decent edge when you lay it over and carve on groomers. But you can also slarve the tails, which is so useful. Floated me fine in 6” of fresh.

    Note the Optic 104 weight feels pretty similar to the Enforcer 104. Feels solid on your feet. The gas pedal metal construction is very damp. With the Optic you get good edge grip when on groomers but with a pretty loose ride off trail and in softer snow. I didn’t really find anything that the Optic 104 does not do…and I think it’s a better overall ski than the both the E104 and the UL108. The Optic is looser (better) in the tails than the UL108.

    Not sure what more to say here other than it is a very very useful ski. Capable. Fun. Forgiving. Burly. Comfortable and easy from the first turn. Never once did it feel out of place whatever the snow conditions, whatever the terrain or your speed (does well at slow speeds and at mach speeds).
    Some great info there, KC! I especially appreciate the comparisons to the UL108 and E104.

    I only skied my E104’s once this season and opted for the less damp but more agile UL108 for those in between storm cycles but not relegated to the groomers days. Something that is a tad more damp than the UL108 with better suspension and a looser tail (when needed) is what I’m honing in on. Sounds like the Blade Optic 104 is getting really close.

    Now to figure out length. My UL108 is a 186 and feels perfect. My E104 is a 191. I like the larger radius you get on that ski when moving from the 186 to 191, but it’s not as fun/easy off trail.

    I’m thinking the 185 Optic 104 should be plenty but I’m 200-lbs and I don’t want to over power it. Maybe I just drop 10-15-lbs this summer like my wife nags name about and I solve the problem! [emoji6]

    Thanks again for the mini-review.




    Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums
    Last edited by Bandit Man; 04-16-2023 at 01:36 PM.
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  18. #93
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    North Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,009

    Anybody get on the Line Blade Optic skis yet?

    Sleeper April pow day at Whistler yesterday!

    The Optic 104s slashed and carved the pow so well that I didn’t ski down to my truck for my Hojis. That’s saying something.

    Bonus was how well they skied the slushy mank down to Creekside at the end of the day.

    Very very happy with the 104s. Like a funner Enforcer 104.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EF630472-0D0F-471B-B63E-3FDA8F4BFEF3.jpg 
Views:	129 
Size:	239.0 KB 
ID:	456123




    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Last edited by kc_7777; 11-23-2023 at 11:05 PM.
    _________________________________________________
    I love big dumps.

  19. #94
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,352
    Quote Originally Posted by kc_7777 View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EF630472-0D0F-471B-B63E-3FDA8F4BFEF3.jpg 
Views:	129 
Size:	239.0 KB 
ID:	456123

    Sleeper April pow day at Whistler yesterday. The Optic 104s slashed and carved the pow so well that I didn’t ski down to my truck for my Hojis. That’s saying something.

    Bonus was how well they skied the slushy mank down to Creekside at the end of the day.

    Very happy with the 104s.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Nice! And I’m jealous.

    Thoughts on length? How does the 104 feel length-wise compared to equivalent length E104 Free or UL108? I like the idea of the 185 to keep it playful for trees and tight spaces.
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  20. #95
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    North Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,009

    Anybody get on the Line Blade Optic skis yet?

    The 178cm Optic measures just a tad longer than a 179cm E104.

    I was -6.30 (+2.5cm) cm on the 179 E104 and was -6.0cm on the 180 Unleashed 108.

    The “179” Optic (at its rec of -6.8cm) feels/skis a bit longer than my 179cm E104 and feels a bit shorter than the 180 UL108. I think the Optic tail shape is perfect. The tail rocker works, as the tails release when you want them too...…whereas the tails of the 180cm Unleashed could be a bit more loose IMO?

    I’d go 185cm Optic 104. Blister says the 185 straight pulls at 184.4. It’ll measure/feel like a 186cm I bet.

    This ski is so good in tight sketch. So you don’t want to over length. I haven’t once felt mine are too short.

    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Last edited by kc_7777; 11-23-2023 at 11:09 PM.
    _________________________________________________
    I love big dumps.

  21. #96
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    559
    Man this ski sounds so good, i would love to try it!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  22. #97
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    1,254
    Pretty much by accident I bought Blade Optic 96 in 184. Very responsive in the morning refrozen groomers and tons of fun once things warm up. Great carver but I could fairly easily overpower those short soft tips, they don't like to be stepped on. Great in bumps and generally I hate bumps. Very balanced in the air. I see them as the perfect dad's pair when skiing with kids and family. They reward active style with small to medium turns. It definitely got my interest that I'll be ordering 104 in 190.

    Sent from my Pixel 7 Pro using Tapatalk

  23. #98
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Philly, PA
    Posts
    1,870
    Keep hearing about softer tips and tails ,stiffer underfoot w these skis. For those of us 200lbs ish, would the tips be overpowered or is there enough heft to make this work. Not looking for a firm crud charger , but could the tips here hold up at speed for bigger people?

    Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

  24. #99
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    1,254
    Quote Originally Posted by Duffman View Post
    Keep hearing about softer tips and tails ,stiffer underfoot w these skis. For those of us 200lbs ish, would the tips be overpowered or is there enough heft to make this work. Not looking for a firm crud charger , but could the tips here hold up at speed for bigger people?

    Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
    Haven't personally tried 104 or 114, but based on Blisters comparison and some feedback here, Blade Optic adds stiffness as the waist width and length increase. So out of 3 metal laminated, 96 in short length will be the softest where 114 in 192cm will be the heaviest and stiffest .

    Sent from my Pixel 7 Pro using Tapatalk

  25. #100
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Alta
    Posts
    3,228
    The 190s I ordered arrive tomorrow. I did go to evo slc and flexed a pair they had there. They didn’t feel soft to me at all, had a very nice round flex. Sometimes I really disagree with blister on their flex ratings. I also have some mindbender 108ti, that blister says have a very soft tip. I don’t find them to be very soft at all but rather a bit stiffer than middle of the road. Only thing I’m worried about with the optic is will it be damp enough. People say the mindbender is damp and I couldn’t disagree more and I’m pretty sure they’re made in the same factory. I plan to mount them tomorrow night and ski them Thursday, as long as my golf game after skiing tomorrow doesn’t devolve into a boys night of drinking. Based on hand flexing and eye balling I have very high expectations for these skis. The flex of the 114s seemed very similar and I’d be interested in those if I didn’t have 10 pairs of pow skis. The shape of both seem really nice smooth lines and nothing too abrupt.


    Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •