Page 7 of 15 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 175 of 357
  1. #151
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Middle of Norway.
    Posts
    2,795
    Quote Originally Posted by waxoff View Post
    Glad you got yours, Swede!

    support the raddest project going: http://heritagelabskis.com

  2. #152
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,318
    Quote Originally Posted by waxoff View Post
    Brakeless! Bold move

    Go get em Phishy! Excited to hear what you think with a few more laps

  3. #153
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Middle of Norway.
    Posts
    2,795
    Quote Originally Posted by Marshal Olson View Post
    Brakeless! Bold move

    Go get em Phishy! Excited to hear what you think with a few more laps
    Not bold when willing to commit tib/fib at alarming speeds and din 16!

    support the raddest project going: http://heritagelabskis.com

  4. #154
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Bodenseekreis
    Posts
    923
    Quote Originally Posted by Marshal Olson View Post
    Brakeless! Bold move

    Go get em Phishy! Excited to hear what you think with a few more laps
    Gotta stare at 'em some time before drilling before deciding where to...

  5. #155
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Middle of Norway.
    Posts
    2,795
    Quote Originally Posted by waxoff View Post
    Gotta stare at 'em some time before drilling before deciding where to...
    -11(83cm from tail),of course. For the 187s, that is.

    support the raddest project going: http://heritagelabskis.com

  6. #156
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Bodenseekreis
    Posts
    923
    ^^could very well be, as tails feels a wee bit softer than expected. Initially thought -11.5--12. Lemme dwell summore...

  7. #157
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    1,947
    Quote Originally Posted by arild View Post
    -11(83cm from tail),of course. For the 187s, that is.

    support the raddest project going: http://heritagelabskis.com
    I’m going to bite the bullet for all at -9.5, then back to -11 if it doesnt work out

  8. #158
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,318
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_pretzel View Post
    I’m going to bit the bullet for all at -9.5, then back to -11 if it doesnt work out
    That is as far forward as would probably make sense, but with the right skier and boot (ie skiing Rens at -5.5 or -6) I think it should ride well.... very curious to hear how you get on with it.

  9. #159
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Middle of Norway.
    Posts
    2,795
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_pretzel View Post
    I’m going to bite the bullet for all at -9.5, then back to -11 if it doesnt work out
    I think with the combo of your preferences otherwise in skis, the sidecut and profile, you'll be just fine, S!

    support the raddest project going: http://heritagelabskis.com

  10. #160
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On a genuine ol' fashioned authentic steam powered aereoplane
    Posts
    16,857
    Found some tougher conditions on the mountain today. Been so spoiled since day one with nothing but cold powder so the slabby/recycled/grabby stuff today was a bit of a challenge. We didn't get up on the summit but got into some steeps on HW. The FL113 is definitely at home on the steeper stuff. Took me a minute to trust that these can just kinda be pointed through any suspicious snow. So far happy with -11.5 but if I had another pair I might mount them at -10.5 just to see.

    All in all they can whip around real easily and are pretty confidence inspiring. Really hoping to get back up there tomorrow and ski some chalk off the summit in full sun where I can actually let them run. I couldn't really see shit on the shady stuff today.


  11. #161
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Middle of Norway.
    Posts
    2,795
    Thanks for the viddy! Besides the visibility, looked like fun snow!

    support the raddest project going: http://heritagelabskis.com

  12. #162
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    14,723
    Quote Originally Posted by Whiteroom_Guardian View Post
    Found some tougher conditions on the mountain today. Been so spoiled since day one with nothing but cold powder so the slabby/recycled/grabby stuff today was a bit of a challenge. We didn't get up on the summit but got into some steeps on HW. The FL113 is definitely at home on the steeper stuff. Took me a minute to trust that these can just kinda be pointed through any suspicious snow. So far happy with -11.5 but if I had another pair I might mount them at -10.5 just to see.

    All in all they can whip around real easily and are pretty confidence inspiring. Really hoping to get back up there tomorrow and ski some chalk off the summit in full sun where I can actually let them run. I couldn't really see shit on the shady stuff today.

    Looks like conditions more suited to the r99. I forgot that you were from Jersey


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  13. #163
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On a genuine ol' fashioned authentic steam powered aereoplane
    Posts
    16,857

  14. #164
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    1,947
    This is the stoke we want! Thanks WG!

  15. #165
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On a genuine ol' fashioned authentic steam powered aereoplane
    Posts
    16,857
    Was able to lap the tram today and really let these bad boys run. Just awesome in alpine chalk. Lively for quick/jump turns in the narrow stuff like the cooler.

  16. #166
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,318
    Hey all with time on the FL113 so far, I am Curious how people are liking how the ski is tune.

    On my end, the snow the past week has gotten pretty grabby and scratchy, so I ended up adding a touch of base edge bevel under foot so the ski with drift a little more cleanly.

    Curious if that is a change I should make to subsequent skis, or if it’s more that I am only at about 75% skiing coming from injury… and if folks are happy as-is…

  17. #167
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Middle of Norway.
    Posts
    2,795
    BOOM!

    support the raddest project going: http://heritagelabskis.com

  18. #168
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    1,947
    Baller!

    That decides it, gold on the 187s, forza on the 194s

  19. #169
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Middle of Norway.
    Posts
    2,795
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_pretzel View Post
    Baller!

    That decides it, gold on the 187s, forza on the 194s
    Saving my golds for the R87s, turned out my wife likes the forza look better. Just keeping the peace!

    support the raddest project going: http://heritagelabskis.com

  20. #170
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On a genuine ol' fashioned authentic steam powered aereoplane
    Posts
    16,857
    Fuck around and find out. The 113s saw some untracked and had to go. What I found out is that there was soft heavier pow with hard avy debris underneath. Gonna have to go back and rebate with a little better skiing, but we got it done.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	xchute2.jpg 
Views:	147 
Size:	1.16 MB 
ID:	446530

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	xchute3.jpg 
Views:	157 
Size:	1.54 MB 
ID:	446531


    Quote Originally Posted by Marshal Olson View Post
    Hey all with time on the FL113 so far, I am Curious how people are liking how the ski is tune.

    On my end, the snow the past week has gotten pretty grabby and scratchy, so I ended up adding a touch of base edge bevel under foot so the ski with drift a little more cleanly.

    Curious if that is a change I should make to subsequent skis, or if it’s more that I am only at about 75% skiing coming from injury… and if folks are happy as-is…
    Ok so I don't know shit about tuning really. I just wax when needed. Definitely some grabby/dense/soft-over-hard this week here as well and wondering if I should de-tune somewhat as well to get more drift?

  21. #171
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,318
    Right on!
    going to play with some stuff on the skis today and report back.

  22. #172
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    7,909
    Quote Originally Posted by Whiteroom_Guardian View Post

    Ok so I don't know shit about tuning really. I just wax when needed. Definitely some grabby/dense/soft-over-hard this week here as well and wondering if I should de-tune somewhat as well to get more drift?
    Yo M... IMHO it's very much worth knowing just a little about detuning to make skis work how they're intended, especially with a long low rocker ski like the 113 that doesn't really have defined contact points. You need to be able to use subtle edge pressure to feather the drift, rather than just let em on/off grab. I'll defer to Marshal of course but my recc would be a progressive detune... dull af at tips/tails, blending to sharp underfoot. Not hard to do w/ file and stones/diamond. Maybe start small and gradually dull em back as you see fit.

    Skis that are sharp all the way out make me insane.

  23. #173
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,318
    Quote Originally Posted by Norseman View Post
    Yo M... IMHO it's very much worth knowing just a little about detuning to make skis work how they're intended, especially with a long low rocker ski like the 113 that doesn't really have defined contact points. You need to be able to use subtle edge pressure to feather the drift, rather than just let em on/off grab. I'll defer to Marshal of course but my recc would be a progressive detune... dull af at tips/tails, blending to sharp underfoot. Not hard to do w/ file and stones/diamond. Maybe start small and gradually dull em back as you see fit.

    Skis that are sharp all the way out make me insane.
    Hey man, so I definately agree with this generally (and that is how they are prepped out of the box) -> so the logic of a little more is a great point.

    I pose the question as I am at like 75% skiing ability while coming back from an injury, so I love how these behave when pushing hard on them, but when skiing passively (since at 75%, not that I normally would), the ski doesn't drift quite as much as I would like... but I am wondering that has anything to do with the ski, or likely, its just me skiing slower than normal and not putting enough energy into it.

    With the long low rocker with near reverse profile underfoot, I don't think I want to detune the tips that much further, since they don't really make contact on windboard at shallow edge angles, and I am feeling a little drag underfoot rather than tips/tails catching. But again, I am still stuck on me skiing like a wuss vs. anything with the ski. Just trying to get out my own echo chamber in my head!!!

    I will report back, mainly so that if anyone else is experiencing this with the FL113, they can make a small change or two. And if nobody is... then color me stoked!

  24. #174
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    7,909
    Maybe just too sharp still underfoot?

    Doubt it's geo related

  25. #175
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Middle of Norway.
    Posts
    2,795
    Family picture!

    Sorry, but the lifts are closed this week due to rain (!) , so my first hope to get a feel for the tune is Saturday.

    I doubt there are any geometry reasons for unwillingness to slarve, but then I might be biased, just a touch.

    support the raddest project going: http://heritagelabskis.com

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •