Return of the R/R - Heritage Lab 132 - Dedicated Thread

[banzai]

Pulled the trigger on 190 FR132. Plan is to go full marmite yolo with pit viper casts on them.

[riff]

...

Attachment 445023

It randomly occurs to me, after the last couple of years have you considered changing your username to Norseperson to be more inclusive?

Finger mustache

Sometimes I think I’m funny early in the morning but I’m probably just annoying.

Dead sexy skis- makes it hard to resist one of the remaining pairs….


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[hoarhey]

I thought I saw two weights posted so far in this thread for 190 C132’s

One was 1949g or 101 g under spec

Spec weight target is 2050 g for 190 C132

The other from Norseman which shows 2050g or bang on

100 g out of 2050 g isn’t bad, 5%

Do I have that right?


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[Marshal Olson]

I thought I saw two weights posted so far in this thread for 190 C132’s

One was 1949g or 101 g under spec

Spec weight target is 2050 g for 190 C132

The other from Norseman which shows 2050g or bang on

100 g out of 2050 g isn’t bad, 5%

Do I have that right?


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Sorry for the lack of clarity. I have not updated all of the specs on the website (only posted the production weights online in these threads). The production weights are:

1950g @ 190cm
2050g @ 200cm

I will get the site all updated with final spec during the rest of the week.

[hoarhey]

Cool. Thanks for clarifying


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[otto parts]

I thought I saw two weights posted so far in this thread for 190 C132’s

One was 1949g or 101 g under spec

Spec weight target is 2050 g for 190 C132

The other from Norseman which shows 2050g or bang on

100 g out of 2050 g isn’t bad, 5%

Do I have that right?


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Sorry should have specified
the scale showing 2050 was for one of my 202s

they are sexy beasts for sure.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[Norseman]

yeh I haven't posted weights... yet!

I'm at like 2220g *mounted* for the 190cm c132

these are light for the size and stiffness. So stoked. Hope I get to fkn use them soon... cmon snow

[hoarhey]

yeh I haven't posted weights... yet!

I'm at like 2220g *mounted* for the 190cm c132

these are light for the size and stiffness. So stoked. Hope I get to fkn use them soon... cmon snow

Ok, that was otto’s pair of 202’s then…



Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[riff]

Thank god the 190’s are sold out…pondering may now conclude


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[hoarhey]

C132’s incoming.
delivery scheduled for manana


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[m5d5cb]

Wow those top sheets both turned out incredible! Standing by for some ride reports.

[Marshal Olson]

Thank god the 190’s are sold out…pondering may now conclude

You can snag Evil E's pair if he doesn't get off the fence and pull the trigger

[lucknau]

Thank god the 190’s are sold out…pondering may now conclude


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

You can snag Evil E's pair if he doesn't get off the fence and pull the trigger

I do believe the gauntlet has been thrown down.


:::::@:::::

[hoarhey]

My 190 C132’s arrived today and the great hand finishing on edges and bases is awesome.

Thanks Marshal

Mine came in a hair under spec weight at 1914 and 1915 g.

Tight!



Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[alude]

Binding question: I have some dynafit speed binding that I was thinking of putting on the C132 for 50/50 resort/touring use. I use dynafit radical on my other touring skis and they work well for me. All my skis are mounted on inserts so that I can easily swap bindings/skis if something break during a trip. Any reason I shouldn't use the dynafit speed on the C132? They seem a bit small for such a big ski... should I consider another binding?

[Marshal Olson]

Binding question: I have some dynafit speed binding that I was thinking of putting on the C132 for 50/50 resort/touring use. I use dynafit radical on my other touring skis and they work well for me. All my skis are mounted on inserts so that I can easily swap bindings/skis if something break during a trip. Any reason I shouldn't use the dynafit speed on the C132? They seem a bit small for such a big ski... should I consider another binding?

Hi! Just to confirm, are speaking about the traditional Dynafit Speed Radical (which I would recommend a thick toe shim with), or the newer TLT Speed binding (which should be good in its standard form)?

cheers!

[alude]

I have the Dynafit TLT Speed Radical Bindings. These guys: https://www.mec.ca/en/product/5025-5...dical-bindings

[GoSlowGoFar]

I have the Dynafit TLT Speed Radical Bindings. These guys: https://www.mec.ca/en/product/5025-5...dical-bindings

I would shim the toes on them, but those would definitely not be my first choice for skiing at the resort.

[otto parts]

Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[Marshal Olson]

Red is the fastest color

[SkiLyft]

Scwwwwwingg



Stoke


Loving this look



Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[GoSlowGoFar]

Mounted up, looking like Tahoe will provide Sat night/Sun so the maiden voyage is right around the corner. Stoked.

[pfluffenmeister]

Loving this look

WOOF !!!

[SkiLyft]

Comparisons.
189 BG - 193 SG - C132



Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[phatty]

Comparisons.
189 BG - 193 SG - C132



Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Love the Pit Viper Pivots!