Results 176 to 200 of 910
Thread: Water.....
-
08-18-2022, 11:32 AM #176
Interesting project that is moving forward for funding
https://www.fema.gov/case-study/kern-county-california
-
08-18-2022, 11:43 AM #177
-
08-18-2022, 12:00 PM #178click here
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- valley of the heart's delight
- Posts
- 2,479
Paradoxically, using less water likely makes your water rates rise. Water itself is free, it falls from the sky. Your water bill pays for the infrastructure to deliver it, most of which is fixed costs independent of usage. Paying the fixed costs finances the system. If you use less, the rate charged must rise to balance the books.
All those dams and pipelines cost the same. The same bond payments are due every year. About the same maintenance is required. If everyone uses less, the system needs the same money. The obvious fix is your bill must rise.
Don't get me started on our politics of auctioning public goods to private interests. We've lost sight of providing common goods shared by everyone. The Enlightenment grows darker every day.
-
08-18-2022, 12:08 PM #179Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 2,734
-
08-18-2022, 12:21 PM #180click here
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- valley of the heart's delight
- Posts
- 2,479
"restore an over-drafted aquifer." I wonder how that works in a state with no groundwater pumping regulations. Did they get a special carve-out to stop the over-drafters from over-drafting? Seems that is a requirement to make this work. First step should be removing the freeloaders.
-
08-18-2022, 12:36 PM #181Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 2,734
I ran a focus group with some farmers in the Pendleton area about water rights years ago. They didn't quite bring the pitchforks into the room, but some of them really wanted to. At one point, someone in the room with some hydrology background said "why aren't there any programs to pay us to run our sprinklers in the winter, flood the fields, and recharge the aquifer?" I was like "Good question!" Any dentists around here know the answer?
-
08-18-2022, 12:53 PM #182Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2021
- Posts
- 2,882
-
08-18-2022, 01:32 PM #183
How is it that killing cows and bulls and eating them uses more water than keeping them alive and cycling water through them to drink milk? It would seem to me that the milk industry uses a lot of water too, if not more than the beef industry..
Go that way really REALLY fast. If something gets in your way, TURN!
-
08-18-2022, 01:33 PM #184
-
08-18-2022, 01:39 PM #185
-
08-18-2022, 01:57 PM #186click here
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- valley of the heart's delight
- Posts
- 2,479
-
08-18-2022, 02:08 PM #187Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2021
- Posts
- 2,882
Ha, sounds crazy now.
https://www.nytimes.com/1987/04/11/u...salt-lake.html
-
08-18-2022, 02:15 PM #188
NFW, macs are at the best nut bar none. Unrivaled buttery deliciousness. If they were less expensive they'd be the only nut I eat.
Only consumptive/irrigation uses, though. Water that goes down your drain just ends up in the GSL. If you live anywhere in the GSL watershed I'd go so far as to argue that long showers, leaving faucets running, and other forms of "wasting" water down your drain is actually a form of environmental activism.
-
08-18-2022, 02:17 PM #189
-
08-18-2022, 02:19 PM #190User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Ogden
- Posts
- 9,158
-
08-18-2022, 02:44 PM #191
GSL volume at the 1963 low, which is basically where we are right now (https://geology.utah.gov/popular/gen...e/#toggle-id-7): 8,585,000 ac-ft
GSL historical avg. volume: 15,390,000 ac-ft
Difference: 6,805,000 ac-ft
Flow rate of an avg. 3/4-inch garden hose: 23 gal/min
Gallons per ac-ft: 325,851
6,805,000 ac-ft x 325,851 gal/ac-ft / 23 gal/min / 60 min/hr / 24 hr/day / 365 days/yr = 183,427 years, without accounting for evaporative losses
-
08-18-2022, 03:20 PM #192
-
08-18-2022, 03:42 PM #193User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Ogden
- Posts
- 9,158
-
08-18-2022, 03:43 PM #194
Water.....
It’s even more complicated depending on the type of geological formations that the valley is composed of. The porosity of the natural recharge area’s of the aquifer may be very different than the area being irrigated. If there is more impermeable rock or hard pan layers in the lower valley, infiltration may be more lateral than vertical, meaning most of that winter irrigation will just find its way back to the river before first entering the aquifer.
Much easier to deplete an aquifer than it is to recharge one. It’s a huge consideration when planning resource extraction in our mountain here as denuding the forest cover above the early spring melt line has huge implications to snowpack accumulation and rate of melt, impacting both surface and groundwater flows for many kilometres downslope. Some synchronization with the lower elevation snowpacks is OK, but too much and look out!
https://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/pubs/d...57/WP57-02.pdf
-
08-18-2022, 03:49 PM #195User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Ogden
- Posts
- 9,158
Water.....
I know in the Teton Valley of Idaho they have had a plan to recharge aquifers the past two years. I’ve read details, but I still have a limited understanding. From what I gather, they have opened all of the gates and canals earlier than the normal watering season, at the start of the spring runoff, and they flood every field that they can and let that soak in. The article was pretty fascinating as it told how much water seeps into the ground from a typical stream bed or unlined canal along each square foot. It’s way more than I would’ve guessed.
Edit: Some details, but not the in depth article I remember: https://www.tetonwater.org/wp-conten...harge-FAQs.pdf
-
08-18-2022, 04:10 PM #196Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 2,734
Yeah, that particular suggestion was to use river water, not ground water. Plenty of river water in the winter, of course, but they don't irrigate anything at that time of year.
-
08-18-2022, 04:20 PM #197I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.
"Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"
-
08-18-2022, 04:21 PM #198
Just running things through my head here, so do forgive me….how would not allowing California to export Ag products outside of North America force Americans to endure higher food prices? Are you connecting that things we get from non-NA foreign countries would go up in price when we shutoff the food pipeline from California?
I never said to stop them from growing stuff…just to stop the exports outside of North America, control high water items going to Canada and Mexico…then generally reduce water use/irrigated land proportionately. If anything, food grown in CA would become cheaper for Americans as we would only be bidding against ourselves, Canada and Mexico for the almonds.
Not saying this will actually work…but what is the argument for exporting crops grown in the CO River Basin to foreign countries?
As for beef…might be time to shift where the majority of beef comes from as well as reduce. Put some damn cows in Mississippi or Louisiana.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums"We had nice 3 days in your autonomous mountain realm last weekend." - Tom from Austria (the Rax ski guy)
-
08-18-2022, 04:25 PM #199
Water.....
Also…I do love sushi and avocados and almonds in the granola, but we need a big shift in eating habits in this country. Half the people are fat as fuck and frankly, I can survive without strawberries in the winter.
As for lettuce…we have an indoor hydroponic thingy that we can grow our own lettuce in the winter…just need home solar to be more affordable/available. Push that instead of electric vehicles filled with toxic batteries.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums"We had nice 3 days in your autonomous mountain realm last weekend." - Tom from Austria (the Rax ski guy)
-
08-18-2022, 04:53 PM #200
who puts sushi and avocados in granola?
Bookmarks