Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 36
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Salida, CO
    Posts
    198

    More back sweep mtn handle bar

    I'm looking at the SQ Lab mountain bike handle bar with either a 12 or 16 degree back sweep to ease some hand and wrist pain. Current bar is a One Up with 8 degree back sweep. Going with more will in effect shorten the reach/hand position relative to the seat, which may mean a longer stem. Does anyone have experience with increasing back sweep? Did you change your stem length? How do you like more back sweep?
    Sawatch is French for scratchy.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    BC to CO
    Posts
    4,864
    That much sweep is going to make a big adjustment to your effective reach.
    Like 15mm difference with the 12* and 25mm with the 16*

    Here,s a geometry calc site that allows you to input bar sweep and every thing else from grip length to chamois thickness….

    https://madscientistmtb.com/bike-geometry-compare/

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    14,601

    More back sweep mtn handle bar

    Quote Originally Posted by natebob View Post
    I'm looking at the SQ Lab mountain bike handle bar with either a 12 or 16 degree back sweep to ease some hand and wrist pain. Current bar is a One Up with 8 degree back sweep. Going with more will in effect shorten the reach/hand position relative to the seat, which may mean a longer stem. Does anyone have experience with increasing back sweep? Did you change your stem length? How do you like more back sweep?
    Do it. Don’t change your stem until you spend time on your bike with the new bars. More sweep is more ergonomic and you might like being a bit more upright, it’ll take pressure off your hand and the sweep will help with your wrist issues.

    I use Jones Hbars on my mtb and would never go back to a straighter bar. Try the new bars so they are tilted down a little


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Banff
    Posts
    22,210
    9-12 for mnt bike for me works well. I leave the stem alone, but lenghten after a ride or if needed

    only change one thing at a time


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    30,879
    Back in the day I bought 3 different bars with 3 different sweeps, just trying them in my shop sitting on the bike without permenantly instaling them, i supose I didnt feel much difference cuz i took them all back

    in the past I have changed stems to deal with reach by getting the bars higher & closer and i know i feel that

    a large 5.5 yeti definalty felt long so I got the medium and its perfect, medium bullit is also perfect right off the show room floor the new geo feels good so i didnt change anything

    YMMV
    Last edited by XXX-er; 06-11-2022 at 12:30 PM.
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    14,601
    Quote Originally Posted by XXX-er View Post
    Back in the day I bought 3 different bars with 3 different sweeps, just trying them in my shop sitting on the bike without permenantly instaling them, i supose I didnt feel much difference cuz i took them all back

    in the past I have changed stems to deal with reach by getting the bars higher & closer and i know i feel that

    a large 5.5 yeti definalty felt long so I got the medium and its perfect, medium bullit is also perfect right off the show room floor the new geo feels good so i didnt change anything

    YMMV
    This is very pertinent information


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    in the trench
    Posts
    15,690
    16 seems like a lot of sweep. Narrow shoulder width can be more ergo with more sweep but 16 still seems like overkill.
    Id never buy a bar to lengthen or shorten reach. If the added sweep works for you i adjust to the preferred reach after you found your bar with a reach adjust headset or maybe 3-5 mm on/off a stem

    Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Salida, CO
    Posts
    198
    Quote Originally Posted by Dee Hubbs View Post
    That much sweep is going to make a big adjustment to your effective reach.
    Like 15mm difference with the 12* and 25mm with the 16*

    Here,s a geometry calc site that allows you to input bar sweep and every thing else from grip length to chamois thickness….

    https://madscientistmtb.com/bike-geometry-compare/
    Whoa, that is some next level bike geeking right there. Thanks, I'll have fun playing around with that.
    Sawatch is French for scratchy.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Salida, CO
    Posts
    198
    Quote Originally Posted by grinch View Post
    16 seems like a lot of sweep. Narrow shoulder width can be more ergo with more sweep but 16 still seems like overkill.
    Id never buy a bar to lengthen or shorten reach. If the added sweep works for you i adjust to the preferred reach after you found your bar with a reach adjust headset or maybe 3-5 mm on/off a stem

    Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app
    Agreed, 16 does seem like a lot. I'm not wanting to change bar to adjust reach, just get my wrists at a better angle. If I like it I'll probably get a longer stem to maintain the same reach I have now.
    Sawatch is French for scratchy.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    in the trench
    Posts
    15,690
    Quote Originally Posted by natebob View Post
    Agreed, 16 does seem like a lot. I'm not wanting to change bar to adjust reach, just get my wrists at a better angle. If I like it I'll probably get a longer stem to maintain the same reach I have now.
    Makes sense. Just thought of another possible factor. They talk about the scottish ews riders style of tucking their elbows in riding through the tight trees they have. Maybe its possible more sweep would help for someone with that style. Personal preference is always a factor

    Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    30,879
    I have wide shoulders so maybe I don't notice sweep or width for that matter cuz I took a grip off when I was wrenching and I'm running 800mm, but I do notice reach
    Last edited by XXX-er; 06-11-2022 at 03:00 PM.
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    14,601
    Quote Originally Posted by grinch View Post
    Makes sense. Just thought of another possible factor. They talk about the scottish ews riders style of tucking their elbows in riding through the tight trees they have. Maybe its possible more sweep would help for someone with that style. Personal preference is always a factor

    Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app
    The current style of riding with your elbows out like wings isn’t ergonomic at all. You also have more power and stability with your arms closer to your torso


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Salida, CO
    Posts
    198
    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn View Post
    The current style of riding with your elbows out like wings isn’t ergonomic at all. You also have more power and stability with your arms closer to your torso


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    I think the current elbows out style is partly a result of bars being too straight. A bar with less back sweep seems to encourage elbows out. Maybe the wider bar trend has contributed to this style too.
    Sawatch is French for scratchy.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    30,879
    not ever body is down with that riding position but i like it, in attack position/ elbows out/ weight over the front wheel
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    14,601
    Quote Originally Posted by natebob View Post
    I think the current elbows out style is partly a result of bars being too straight. A bar with less back sweep seems to encourage elbows out. Maybe the wider bar trend has contributed to this style too.
    Bingo


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    in the trench
    Posts
    15,690
    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn View Post
    The current style of riding with your elbows out like wings isn’t ergonomic at all. You also have more power and stability with your arms closer to your torso


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    I thought itd be the opposite. Like bench press. Easier to press more weight with open grip than closed grip. Too wide you lose arm travel for eating up big holes. Should get the most arm absorption possible if grips are set at shoulder width. I like a little wider than shoulder width for a wider platform but not too wide that i cant soke up trail hits where i need a lot of arm bend

    Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    14,601
    Quote Originally Posted by grinch View Post
    I thought itd be the opposite. Like bench press. Easier to press more weight with open grip than closed grip. Too wide you lose arm travel for eating up big holes. Should get the most arm absorption possible if grips are set at shoulder width. I like a little wider than shoulder width for a wider platform but not too wide that i cant soke up trail hits where i need a lot of arm bend

    Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app
    You just agreed with me. Closer to the body equals shoulder width. Think of it this way, is it easier to do a push up with your arms way out to the side or shoulder width?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    in the trench
    Posts
    15,690
    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn View Post
    You just agreed with me. Closer to the body equals shoulder width. Think of it this way, is it easier to do a push up with your arms way out to the side or shoulder width?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Yes youre right we're getting at the same point it seems. Wider grip helps with keeping the bar straight. Its a balance between eating up holes straight on , where shoulder width allows the most arm flexion, and a bit wider to keep from controlling the steering. Slower speeds the wider bar probably has more benefits. Pinned through deep holes a wide bar still helps but arm flexion has to be factored more

    Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Washoe Valley
    Posts
    361
    I've upgraded the bar/stem on my pedal bike from the stock Santa Cruz low rise(780)/55 stem to the PNW Range bar which is 800x35rise/10sweep/35x0stem. The bar is a 31.8. This setup has made a huge change and benefit for me as well as my wife who converted to same. Better hand position, softer bar, taller and wider.

    As far as what I think re bar width, bent elbows and being more upright, bent elbows do two things; bent elbows open chest up for easier breathing and slows steering down so turning is a combo of body position, lean and not turning the bar. WTBS, I have friends who are going to shorter 150 rise bar and seem to do better doing technical SB's and rocks......

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    14,601
    Better breathing with elbows out? Laughing my ass off. Link to study showing this?

    Turning has always been about body position, lean and not turning the bar. It’s how bicycles work and what makes them amazing.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    in the trench
    Posts
    15,690
    I think he and i meant addition leverage so the bars dont get torn out of your hands. Ruts and corners can do that.

    Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    14,601
    Quote Originally Posted by grinch View Post
    I think he and i meant addition leverage so the bars dont get torn out of your hands. Ruts and corners can do that.

    Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app

    Really? It’s not a 750 dual sport. You think 50-100mm makes a significant difference on a bicycle? The increased power of keeping your limbs closer to your body would be far greater than any advantage a longer bar would provide.

    What other sports gain a power advantage by having your limbs farther away from your core? Roughly shoulder width is optimal, arms or legs.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,123
    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn View Post
    You think 50-100mm makes a significant difference on a bicycle?
    You think it doesn't?
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    14,601
    Quote Originally Posted by El Chupacabra View Post
    You think it doesn't?
    No. Caveat, once you get much past shoulder width. Beyond perceived leverage advantage why do you think it does?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    in the trench
    Posts
    15,690
    Gonna fire up the ine hitter, pound a few laps on the eeb and find out. We all should.

    Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •