Page 10 of 37 FirstFirst ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... LastLast
Results 226 to 250 of 907
  1. #226
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    89
    By “new”, I mean since ~2019. It seems like the vast majority of Volkl skis have been revised since 2019 to include a 3D radius side cut.

    Last Volkl skis that I skied were the 2017 Mantras and BMT 108s, both of which were full rocker and single radius.

  2. #227
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Saudi Arabia
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by Karl_H View Post
    By “new”, I mean since ~2019. It seems like the vast majority of Volkl skis have been revised since 2019 to include a 3D radius side cut.

    Last Volkl skis that I skied were the 2017 Mantras and BMT 108s, both of which were full rocker and single radius.
    I have the K108, M102, M6, and the new Kendo. I’ve used all of them on steep, hard snow traverses without incident or problematic edging problems.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  3. #228
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Danby
    Posts
    2,395
    Quote Originally Posted by Karl_H View Post
    How are folks liking the “new” Volkl 3D radius side cuts for skiing the steep and not-so-deep?

    I have had some bad experiences in the past with multiple-radius skis not tracking in parallel, when skiing across the fall line. However, it was only a major issue on steeper slopes when my downhill foot was weighting the middle of the ski and my uphill foot was weighting the back of the ski.

    I am currently considering the Blaze 86 or 94 for a spring couloir ski, however I am thinking that 3D radius side cut may not be ideal for that application.

    Don’t ski with that much weight on your uphill foot would probably be a start.

  4. #229
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    5,687
    Quote Originally Posted by Karl_H View Post
    I am currently considering the Blaze 86 or 94 for a spring couloir ski, however I am thinking that 3D radius side cut may not be ideal for that application.
    The blaze would be a perfect application for that use in my opinion.

    A long effective edge available to you but not hooky or punishing.

    Sent from my SM-A536W using Tapatalk
    Goal: ski in the 2018/19 season

  5. #230
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    247
    And don’t size down.

  6. #231
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,746
    Anyone have any experience on a 2014-2015 Kendo?

    I blew up my Fischer Motive 86's on Saturday and found a pair of lightly used Kendo's locally for $150 (CAD).

    I'm thinking they will be a good place holder until I can sort out what I want next.

    The only hitch is that the bindings are mounted for a size bigger so I may be 0.5 forward, they are the 184s.

  7. #232
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rossland BC
    Posts
    1,880
    Quote Originally Posted by The Tortoise View Post
    Anyone have any experience on a 2014-2015 Kendo?

    I blew up my Fischer Motive 86's on Saturday and found a pair of lightly used Kendo's locally for $150 (CAD).

    I'm thinking they will be a good place holder until I can sort out what I want next.

    The only hitch is that the bindings are mounted for a size bigger so I may be 0.5 forward, they are the 184s.
    They’re traditionally shaped 89 under foot Volkls with a full layer of metal. They tweak them every now and then, but you know what you’re getting. For $150, just buy them, give them a proper tune, and ski them. 0.5cm forward means nothing on such a rearward mount.

  8. #233
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    554
    Did a remount to my M102 191 cms. They were forward of the rec line(most rearward line) by 12mm. I knew immediately on day one that I should of just stuck with the rec line. So after about 1/2 a dozen days of use went for the remount to the rec line. The way to go for me. 6' and 215lbs. ymmv. Truly amazing skis for sure.

  9. #234
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Lake Wallenpaupack, PA
    Posts
    2,206

    All Things Volkl Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    Love to hear your impressions. Love my M6’s on piste. Can only imagine how good those will be!
    Having a good time on these Kendos here in NEPA during this crap winter…have been skiing them on 100% man made gun powder.

    These have a real smoothness to them. Lots of different turn shapes/really holds a nice long edge but can also have a nice pop into the next short turn…Very easy to ski…I am glad I got them/ I will probably ski them more than intended.

    Despite my Moment 2 ski quiver…..I guess I am still a “Volkl guy”.

  10. #235
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    342
    Just here to remind everyone that the M102 is a ridiculously good ski.

  11. #236
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,746
    Quote Originally Posted by kootenayskier View Post
    They’re traditionally shaped 89 under foot Volkls with a full layer of metal. They tweak them every now and then, but you know what you’re getting. For $150, just buy them, give them a proper tune, and ski them. 0.5cm forward means nothing on such a rearward mount.
    They ended up coming with a good tune on them, with STH 13 bindings.

    The mount is 0.75 cm forward, hopefully it's not an issue.

    For $150, it seemed hard to go wrong. They are replacing a pair of Motive 86's that I liked in soft snow but never really loved on anything firm.

  12. #237
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rossland BC
    Posts
    1,880
    Quote Originally Posted by The Tortoise View Post
    They ended up coming with a good tune on them, with STH 13 bindings.

    The mount is 0.75 cm forward, hopefully it's not an issue.

    For $150, it seemed hard to go wrong. They are replacing a pair of Motive 86's that I liked in soft snow but never really loved on anything firm.
    A steal at that price. Enjoy.

  13. #238
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    247
    Quote Originally Posted by ASP View Post
    Just here to remind everyone that the M102 is a ridiculously good ski.
    I can confirm that the newest version is ridiculously good too. Spent two days on it and was surprised how much more energy and forgiveness it had even at lower speeds - much more dynamic ski, jumping around tight moguls etc. great in soft snow and firm conditions. I like it more than the older version. Didn’t notice a drop off in stability at higher speeds but I didn’t push it quite as hard as I’ve pushed the older version quite yet.

  14. #239
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Down on Electric Avenue
    Posts
    4,435
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	m102.jpg 
Views:	112 
Size:	1.16 MB 
ID:	445919

    .

  15. #240
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Down on Electric Avenue
    Posts
    4,435
    I finally got the new M102's mounted and got healthy enough to go out and roll them for the past 3 days.

    Some impressions:
    I went out planning on sticking to groomers early, still smooth and easy before the peeps get moving, trying to not jack a recent nerve issue in my back.
    Contrary to the initial plan, I immediately go faster than I want, quite comfortably. It's just that they were so easy right outta the gates that I kinda let em go. 55 mph on their first run.

    They are interesting in that they feel like a full on GS ski, but they handle fairly nimbly. Matter of fact, I'm thinking nimbleness and agility may be a highlight of this ski.

    If I'm right, it may be the droid I've been looking for.
    A big mountain charger that doesn't trade down in performance for a bit more catlike personality.

    So i'm banging around fast on the cord and carving like a sonofagun. The sharp edges are a treat. I detuned the T&T's hard, but a truebar just before snow showed edge high rails fore and aft, nbd.

    Arcing the shit outta the cord and turning up the speed until the daily average was pert high.
    Booking everywhere, as piles shaped, they blast everything.
    Maybe a tad of deflection at mach offa bumps but damp and predictable response. It's not gonna pull you off in some rando direction easily.

    A coupla inadvertant bump launches offered a smooth airtime and easy confident land n go's.
    This ski breeds confidence if you push it. Although I've only had it feel wonky a coupla times going unpushy...

    And therein lies what I think/hope may be its secret, it has reined in some of the tougher aspects of a true GS er.
    I'm finding that this ski can pivot amazingly and the ability to alter that pivot radius almost instantaneously is most excellent.

    On the smooth you can be in a 30m turn and change it to 16 in one arc then let them push back out into a 40m accelerator like it's nothing.

    But off piste is where this ski really seems to shine for me.
    Crudbusting has a kinda unique feel in that I'm standing on a dimensionally perfect platform and very well self centering.
    Like that bounce offa the diving board when you nail the bounce and have a perfect boing!
    I find myself in that position 95% of the time on these.

    Slowing down for big carvy bumps is maybe the magic moment tho.
    If ya pick a bigger line, maybe a 3 bump spread, you can let them manhandle the ripple while staying in control of the carve.
    They will pivot offa the high point sooooooooo easily, I'm finding it rather uncanny, tbh.
    Maybe it's the lighter tip and tail, but for a 191, them floppers go from side to side damn quickly.
    I was talked up into the M102 from my first choice, the M6, which I had demoed last spring.
    Having zero fucking regrets about thaaaat decision.



    I was trying to ski a 1on/1off schedule to rehab the back nerves.
    3 days in a row and I don't wanna take a day off.

    I'm amazed these skis aren't beating me up more. They let me finesse my way outta trouble, rather than wrestling my way out.

  16. #241
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    5,687
    ^^^ Nice!

    Regarding a little edge high at the tips and tails... I have actually noticed that on every new pair of volkls I've bought in the last couple of years (4 pairs).

    I just reset the edge bevels to 1 degree in those areas... part of why I even noticed this very minor amount of edge high is because my 1 degree bevel file doesn't do anything under foot but it does file some edge down at the extremities.

    There's probably still a small void area of the base in those areas but I've noticed no grabbing on any of those pairs.

    Sent from my SM-A536W using Tapatalk
    Goal: ski in the 2018/19 season

  17. #242
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    1,947
    Anyone ski the revolt 114 yet?

  18. #243
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Whistler, BC
    Posts
    1,496
    Or the new Katana V-werx?!

    Sent from my Pixel 6a using Tapatalk

  19. #244
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Maine Coast
    Posts
    4,713
    What changed with the Katana vwerks?

  20. #245
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,302
    Quote Originally Posted by rob stokes View Post
    Or the new Katana V-werx?!
    I just say SkiTalk's presentation of Völkl 23/24 lineup, and it did not look like the KVW had changed at all. If it did then I could not tell from afar, nor had its dimensions changed. So it seems most likely that it returns unchanged for 23/24

  21. #246
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Whistler, BC
    Posts
    1,496
    Apparently it's been tweeked with some taper. There's talk about it on some gear previews I've seen.

    Sent from my Pixel 6a using Tapatalk

  22. #247
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Whistler, BC
    Posts
    1,496
    Just looked up that ski essentials video. They don't talk about the v-werx at all but the tip shape is slightly different, and it's lost the skin hole as well.

    Sent from my Pixel 6a using Tapatalk

  23. #248
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,302
    they seem to have replaced the hole with the current notch up front. Is the tip rocker made less abrupt? I honestly can't tell any massive differences - will be interesting to see them in the flesh.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Skjermbilde 2023-02-04 kl. 20.09.56.jpg 
Views:	85 
Size:	161.9 KB 
ID:	446081Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Skjermbilde 2023-02-04 kl. 20.09.08.jpg 
Views:	90 
Size:	194.6 KB 
ID:	446082Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Skjermbilde 2023-02-04 kl. 20.08.52.jpg 
Views:	92 
Size:	296.8 KB 
ID:	446083

    Sorry that I did not post a link to said video - I do find that most of their videos do possess a rather high cringe factor. I much prefer SkiEssentials' videos, even if their advice wrt touring equipment is woefully inadaquate and seem pretty devoid of knowledge based on actual backcountry touring

  24. #249
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,181
    Quote Originally Posted by Djongo Unchained View Post
    I finally got the new M102's mounted and got healthy enough to go out and roll them for the past 3 days.

    I was trying to ski a 1on/1off schedule to rehab the back nerves.
    3 days in a row and I don't wanna take a day off.

    I'm amazed these skis aren't beating me up more. They let me finesse my way outta trouble, rather than wrestling my way out.
    Glad you are enjoying the M102 and appreciate your thoughts on the newer version. The M102/K108 dampen out so much of the “harshness” in most conditions. They help my bad knee go the distance. Glad you are seeing similar effects.

    It’s a bit amusing that this ski has been around since 2019 but gets so overlooked. I feel like there are lots of people who would enjoy a ski like this, but are a bit intimidated by the “Mantra” reputation.
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  25. #250
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    1,178
    I guess I have a problem.
    Picked up some minty 22/23 M102 in 191 to compare them back to back with K108. If I like M102 enough to keep, KVM might be repurposed for resort pow skiClick image for larger version. 

Name:	PXL_20230204_212312577.MP.jpg 
Views:	146 
Size:	78.0 KB 
ID:	446091

    Sent from my Pixel 7 Pro using Tapatalk

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •