All Things Volkl Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Benneke10
    Registered User
    • Aug 2020
    • 2634

    #121
    PSA: 191 full rocker mantras for sale in slc https://www.facebook.com/marketplace...2111112l%22%7D

    Comment

    • Djongo Unchained
      Turnin' and Burnin'
      • Nov 2017
      • 5289

      #122
      Originally posted by Bandit Man
      Strong move. Like many have shared in the M102 thread, consider going forward of the rear (recommended) line on the 191, unless you are a big guy.

      Hmmmm, interesting.

      I'm around 5'10" and between 205 and 220 in a season. Charging the firm on these up to maybe 4-10" of fresh.
      As a FOG, I never come off the reco line. Doubt I'd do that. I put a ski through it's flexing paces so I tend to steer clear of boards with multi mounts. Try to keep it to one set, so testing out fore/aft placement has rarely appealed to me.
      Not set in stone tho...
      Last edited by Djongo Unchained; 10-31-2022, 01:15 PM. Reason: So fuckin' stoked!

      Comment

      • Bandit Man
        Believe
        • Oct 2003
        • 5379

        #123
        All Things Volkl Thread

        Originally posted by Djongo Unchained
        Hmmmm, interesting.

        I'm around 5'10" and between 205 and 220 in a season. Charging the firm on these up to maybe 4-10" of fresh.
        As a FOG, I never come off the reco line. Doubt I'd do that. I put a ski through it's flexing paces so I tend to steer clear of boards with multi mounts. Try to keep it to one set, so testing out fore/aft placement has rarely appealed to me.
        Not set in stone tho...
        Keep in mind that I also have a 295-mm BSL, which may also be a factor. Mounted on the line, the 191 M102 feels like I cannot get forward enough to really get that ski to bend into a turn the way I like. First ski in a long while that felt really long in the shovel. Coincidentally, I also have a 191 K108. It has a wider shovel, but isn’t a challenging to get to bend into a turn. Same Warden 13 demos on both skis. Go figure.


        Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums
        In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

        Comment

        • naedward81
          Registered User
          • Apr 2006
          • 823

          #124
          Just heard that Revolt 114 is coming. Eder was on the Blister Review podcast and mentioned it, 114mm waist, directional charger. Got my rep to confirm. Must have been what the pics last winter of Mac and Eder were testing.

          Comment

          • Djongo Unchained
            Turnin' and Burnin'
            • Nov 2017
            • 5289

            #125
            @bandit - yeah, my bsl is 326 so that may well be a factor. I prefer to ski the shovel but use the tails pretty extensively.
            I kinda felt the k108 hand flexed pretty damn stiff but expect the m102 to be a classic big mountain charger. Volkl has a long history of building skis popular with the jh locals. As stiff or more than most gs models imo.

            Comment

            • Shorty_J
              Registered User
              • Oct 2008
              • 5803

              #126
              Originally posted by naedward81
              Just heard that Revolt 114 is coming. Eder was on the Blister Review podcast and mentioned it, 114mm waist, directional charger. Got my rep to confirm. Must have been what the pics last winter of Mac and Eder were testing.
              I wouldn't call the revolt line "directional" at all... is the 114 going to have a more traditional mount point? Because the rest of the revolt line is very progressive on recommended mount point.

              Sent from my SM-A536W using Tapatalk
              Goal: ski in the 2018/19 season

              Comment

              • kc_7777
                Registered User
                • Dec 2011
                • 2038

                #127
                All Things Volkl Thread

                Originally posted by Shorty_J
                I wouldn't call the revolt line "directional" at all... is the 114 going to have a more traditional mount point? Because the rest of the revolt line is very progressive on recommended mount point.

                Sent from my SM-A536W using Tapatalk
                Ya I heard the reference to the 114 in the Eder Blister podcast. Wondering about that “directional” comment as well. The Revolt 104 and 121 getting mounted soon. Going -2cm on the 180cm 104 (-3.75cm) and -1cm on the 184cm 121 (-3.75cm). It would surprise me if a Revolt 114 was way further back than say -6cm? If so, why call it a Revolt.

                Here’s hoping it’s a 181cm at -5cm!

                Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
                _________________________________________________
                I love big dumps.

                Comment

                • naedward81
                  Registered User
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 823

                  #128
                  Originally posted by kc_7777
                  Ya I heard the reference to the 114 in the Eder Blister podcast. Wondering about that “directional” comment as well. The Revolt 104 and 121 getting mounted soon. Going -2cm on the 180cm 104 (-3.75cm) and -1cm on the 184cm 121 (-3.75cm). It would surprise me if a Revolt 114 was way further back than say -6cm? If so, why call it a Revolt.

                  Here’s hoping it’s a 181cm at -5cm!

                  Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
                  That’s what I am hoping for.

                  I mounted my Revolt 121s -2.5 from rec. They skied awesome from that.

                  Comment

                  • Shorty_J
                    Registered User
                    • Oct 2008
                    • 5803

                    #129
                    Am I crazy or are the rocker lines deeper in the mantra/secret than the katana?

                    I bought my wife some secret 102 and I was just staring at them next to my katana and I swear the secret has more rocker. Less taper, similar camber, stiffer, but more rocker in the narrower ski... which is a little surprising.

                    Sent from my SM-A536W using Tapatalk
                    Goal: ski in the 2018/19 season

                    Comment

                    • Name Redacted
                      Registered User
                      • Oct 2007
                      • 13741

                      #130
                      M6 vs Mantra 102 for daily driver in CO? Rarely ski groomers, mostly tight trees and bumps and billygoating. Have other skis for deeper pow.

                      Comment

                      • Djongo Unchained
                        Turnin' and Burnin'
                        • Nov 2017
                        • 5289

                        #131
                        I skied the M6 last season for 4 days in Andermatt. I loved it but felt it only had one weak spot, I wanted it to go faster.
                        So I bought a pair of M102's as I feel they're gonna be a tad more stable at speed.
                        The M6 in a 184 would be my go to for what you're talking about.
                        I demo'd the 191 and feel that would be overkill in the tight spots. YMMV

                        Comment

                        • J. Barron DeJong
                          Registered User
                          • Jun 2020
                          • 8156

                          #132
                          Originally posted by Shorty_J
                          Am I crazy or are the rocker lines deeper in the mantra/secret than the katana?

                          I bought my wife some secret 102 and I was just staring at them next to my katana and I swear the secret has more rocker. Less taper, similar camber, stiffer, but more rocker in the narrower ski... which is a little surprising.

                          Sent from my SM-A536W using Tapatalk
                          Sooth Ski measurements say Katana has deeper rocker lines than M6 Mantra in 184s.

                          Comment

                          • Benneke10
                            Registered User
                            • Aug 2020
                            • 2634

                            #133
                            Originally posted by Name Redacted
                            M6 vs Mantra 102 for daily driver in CO? Rarely ski groomers, mostly tight trees and bumps and billygoating. Have other skis for deeper pow.
                            I only demoed both for a couple runs apiece, but I feel like the M6 would be better for your purposes. The M102 felt a little more locked in and it was stiffer so a bit more of a handful in very tight spots. In my opinion you should consider fully rockered Volkls (M4 Mantra, 100eight, V-Werks Katana, old Katanas).

                            Comment

                            • Sylvan
                              Registered User
                              • Aug 2021
                              • 192

                              #134
                              Thought these were worth sharing. Was in the middle of trying to convince the wife last night that full price VWerks Katanas were a long term value decision (thanks for the idea Benneke!), when these popped up on Marketplace. Minty 2015 (?) 191s for $500 CDN. Gentleman said his father skied them 3 times, and honestly, had he cleaned the rust off the edges from storage, he could have convinced me they'd never seen snow. Gonna pull the Jesters and mount a Duke PT 12 for Spearhead slack duty. Christmas came early.



                              Surprised (in a very good way) at how little splay these have. These tick all the boxes (traditional mount, 2000ish grams, 190ish length, 25m+ R), but been afraid of going reverse. No more. Amped to get on these. Thanks all for the assist.

                              Edit to add: 189.5 straight pull, bump @ -14, 2042/2054 grams, 25.9m R stated.

                              Last edited by Sylvan; 11-15-2022, 12:49 PM.

                              Comment

                              • Name Redacted
                                Registered User
                                • Oct 2007
                                • 13741

                                #135
                                Originally posted by Djongo Unchained
                                I skied the M6 last season for 4 days in Andermatt. I loved it but felt it only had one weak spot, I wanted it to go faster.
                                So I bought a pair of M102's as I feel they're gonna be a tad more stable at speed.
                                The M6 in a 184 would be my go to for what you're talking about.
                                I demo'd the 191 and feel that would be overkill in the tight spots. YMMV
                                Nice, thanks for the input guys. I'm 6'2" and 190lbs, but I was 220 the last few seasons. Never had a hard time flexing skis, but that might be different now with my new found skinniness. I don't expect it to be a problem though. haha.

                                Lately I've been on some 4frnt MSP99s that are OK, but I never loved them till I beat them up a bit. Definitely want something a little burlier in the flex category. My other skis are ON3P BGs.

                                I guess I can't go wrong either way though.

                                Comment

                                Working...