Page 440 of 663 FirstFirst ... 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 ... LastLast
Results 10,976 to 11,000 of 16551

Thread: Ukraine

  1. #10976
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    closer
    Posts
    5,738
    Quote Originally Posted by rideit View Post
    “Onward To Odessa!!!”
    Uh? You know that Ukraine has never lost Odessa? I don't quite understand that joke....
    It's a war of the mind and we're armed to the teeth.

  2. #10977
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Aspen
    Posts
    3,083
    Quote Originally Posted by subtle plague View Post
    Uh? You know that Ukraine has never lost Odessa? I don't quite understand that joke....
    I think it's just a bit of sarcasm referencing Russia's early assumptions and bluster that they'd wipe through the South and easily take Odessa (their prize) in the early stages of the invasion.

  3. #10978
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    closer
    Posts
    5,738
    It was early.... I may have to readjust my sarcasm Meter.
    It's a war of the mind and we're armed to the teeth.

  4. #10979
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    5,567

  5. #10980
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Edge of the Great Basin
    Posts
    5,557
    Quote Originally Posted by subtle plague View Post
    Uh? You know that Ukraine has never lost Odessa? I don't quite understand that joke....
    Donetsk Don’t Tell?


    Srsly tho, the backstory is from a post last August presenting a former CIA analyst named Andrew Bustamante who made an easily verifiable prediction or bet: He argued it's a mathematical certainty Putin will take the South of Ukraine including Odessa all the way to the border of Moldova before winter. At that time myself and others had already made the opposite bet predicting Ukraine would take Kherson before winter.

    So after ötzi suggested putting a note in the calendar to check Bustamente's prediction on December 1st, a brief debate ensued about whether before winter meant before December 21st or before meteorologically winter. The sarcasm stems from the fact it's now apparent Russia will never occupy Odessa, let alone before winter 22'.

  6. #10981
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Geopolis
    Posts
    16,171
    j'ai des grands instants de lucididididididididi

  7. #10982
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Conformist, Complacent State
    Posts
    738
    Poland just hit?
    So the world is filled with tubular entities. Food goes in one end and shit comes out the other. Sperm goes in and babies come out.

  8. #10983
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    21,974
    Russian guidance at its best.

    2 dead.

    NATO will protest. Russia will say oops and pay a small recompense.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  9. #10984
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    关你屁事
    Posts
    9,596
    and Poland will send more arms to Ukraine

  10. #10985
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Edge of the Great Basin
    Posts
    5,557
    Because Russia launched ~100 missiles targeting civilian infrastructure in Ukraine today, it could be Ukrainian air defense missiles gone astray or the remnants of interdicted Russian rockets that inadvertently landed in Poland. Moldova for example lost power because of Russian strikes against Ukraine's power grid.

  11. #10986
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    19,828
    Would an attack by NATO or Poland to destroy the launch source be justified

  12. #10987
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    21,974
    Quote Originally Posted by 4matic View Post
    Would an attack by NATO or Poland to destroy the launch source be justified
    They accidently struck Poland with 2 missiles... we could accidently ship 20 ATACMS to Ukraine... I like that solution better
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  13. #10988
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    5,567
    Quote Originally Posted by MultiVerse View Post
    Because Russia launched ~100 missiles targeting civilian infrastructure in Ukraine today, it could be Ukrainian air defense missiles gone astray or the remnants of interdicted Russian rockets that inadvertently landed in Poland. Moldova for example lost power because of Russian strikes against Ukraine's power grid.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	E2A9EB82-E032-4466-B961-6F4C51D7E954.jpeg 
Views:	77 
Size:	410.6 KB 
ID:	434102

    https://twitter.com/shashj/status/15...hXJZxdoJ1kjCAA

    also

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	600AA1E7-2812-4C1E-A119-B9573FF76C6A.jpeg 
Views:	74 
Size:	489.6 KB 
ID:	434104

    https://twitter.com/shashj/status/15...hXJZxdoJ1kjCAA

  14. #10989
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    21,974
    This is 40 miles from the nearest target and not in a direction UKR would shoot a long range SAM. It was probably not a UKR SAM.

    This crater would be a big crater for a SAM, but about right for a cruise missile.
    https://twitter.com/RepublikaTV/stat...99493132038144
    Missing also is the fragmentation impact patterns characteristic of a SAM warhead (think 20,000 fragments) which are made to kill fragile things like planes and missiles. The impact area damage looks like simple high explosive blast/overpressure from a cruise missile

    For comparison, this is the fragmentation damage to MA17, the Boeing 777 that the Russians shot down with a SAM over Ukraine murdering 298 civilians in 2014.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	_81782551_81782546.jpg 
Views:	81 
Size:	99.4 KB 
ID:	434112
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  15. #10990
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Edge of the Great Basin
    Posts
    5,557
    Yeah it could be first impressions were right all along, errant Russian missiles targeting Ukrainian electrical infrastructure near the Polish border a la earlier Moldova power outages, or even some combination since most reports say two missiles fell on Polish soil.

  16. #10991
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    5,567
    Was it just incredibly bad luck that it hit that truck?

  17. #10992
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    21,974
    ^probably

    NATO forces could have shot down the Russian missiles entering Polish air space....
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  18. #10993
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Before
    Posts
    28,019
    Poland hit

    (edit)
    should have read upthread...
    Last edited by Buster Highmen; 11-15-2022 at 03:39 PM.
    Merde De Glace On the Freak When Ski
    >>>200 cm Black Bamboo Sidewalled DPS Lotus 120 : Best Skis Ever <<<

  19. #10994
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Down In A Hole, Up in the Sky
    Posts
    35,446
    It would be a shame if the Russian power grids somehow went down.
    (Cough\hack/cough)

    You think anyone could pull that off?
    Forum Cross Pollinator, gratuitously strident

  20. #10995
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    valley of the heart's delight
    Posts
    2,479
    Quote Originally Posted by summit View Post
    This is 40 miles from the nearest target and not in a direction UKR would shoot a long range SAM. It was probably not a UKR SAM.

    This crater would be a big crater for a SAM, but about right for a cruise missile.
    https://twitter.com/RepublikaTV/stat...99493132038144
    Missing also is the fragmentation impact patterns characteristic of a SAM warhead (think 20,000 fragments) which are made to kill fragile things like planes and missiles. The impact area damage looks like simple high explosive blast/overpressure from a cruise missile

    For comparison, this is the fragmentation damage to MA17, the Boeing 777 that the Russians shot down with a SAM over Ukraine murdering 298 civilians in 2014.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	_81782551_81782546.jpg 
Views:	81 
Size:	99.4 KB 
ID:	434112
    This hints at the story.

    People need to wake up that Russia is a bad actor, has been a bad actor, and will continue to be a bad actor. It's long past time for consequences. Russia chose to fight this war. Russia chose to fire the missiles. Doesn't matter what anyone else did or didn't do. Doesn't matter who is or isn't in NATO. It's Russia's fault. Russia is a warmonger and threat to peace.

  21. #10996
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    not there
    Posts
    1,558
    Quote Originally Posted by summit View Post
    This is 40 miles from the nearest target and not in a direction UKR would shoot a long range SAM. It was probably not a UKR SAM.

    This crater would be a big crater for a SAM, but about right for a cruise missile.
    https://twitter.com/RepublikaTV/stat...99493132038144
    Missing also is the fragmentation impact patterns characteristic of a SAM warhead (think 20,000 fragments) which are made to kill fragile things like planes and missiles. The impact area damage looks like simple high explosive blast/overpressure from a cruise missile

    For comparison, this is the fragmentation damage to MA17, the Boeing 777 that the Russians shot down with a SAM over Ukraine murdering 298 civilians in 2014.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	_81782551_81782546.jpg 
Views:	81 
Size:	99.4 KB 
ID:	434112
    Lots of scientists died on that plane.

  22. #10997
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The Bull City
    Posts
    14,003
    Surprised Ruskies haven't claimed false flags on the Poland oops..
    Go that way really REALLY fast. If something gets in your way, TURN!

  23. #10998
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    in a freezer in Italy
    Posts
    7,274
    What's NATO's treaty responsibility if a member nation goes to war because of an attack if the initial attack was possibly an accident? Like say in this example if Poland was to officially join team Ukraine

  24. #10999
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Geopolis
    Posts
    16,171
    Quote Originally Posted by ötzi View Post
    What's NATO's treaty responsibility if a member nation goes to war because of an attack if the initial attack was possibly an accident? Like say in this example if Poland was to officially join team Ukraine
    If a NATO member goes to war, other parties of the treaty don't have to. If Poland says Russia attacked them, then I guess everyone would have to go?
    j'ai des grands instants de lucididididididididi

  25. #11000
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    5,567
    Quote Originally Posted by ex-powderbroker View Post
    If a NATO member goes to war, other parties of the treaty don't have to. If Poland says Russia attacked them, then I guess everyone would have to go?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	95D41F1B-F72D-4214-8D5D-A5157A0458EC.jpeg 
Views:	116 
Size:	508.8 KB 
ID:	434133

    But also:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	E3F05DA2-872C-4850-A1C4-111729A1865E.jpeg 
Views:	106 
Size:	822.3 KB 
ID:	434134

    https://twitter.com/phillipspobrien/...05-vWUV4xtjwaw

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •