Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 56
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA
    Posts
    612
    I'm apparently out of touch with the TGR crowd and still loving 12X underfoot. Great for the great days. Force you to earn it on the so-so ones.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Portland by way of Bozeman
    Posts
    4,279
    Faves? No. Those are 116 and 112 underfoot.

    Though I do regularly ski 104, 106, and 108mm waisted skis when it's variable.

    I think it's more a function of when people can actually ski vs what ski they actually want to ski. A maggot wisely once told me that we buy skis for the snow we want, not the snow we have. Hence the 20-year proliferation of fat skis. That comes crashing into reality when your trip or ski day doesn't line up with the skis you want to ski, so you grab some 10x waisted ski and run that.

    Also, think snow. I'd rather ski my 112 or 116 waisted skis.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    5,722
    Quote Originally Posted by SoVT Joey View Post
    Ya. The Corvus.
    Seconded. Corvus.

    But…skinnier for low tide and fatter for big days is more fun if you can swing it…

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    between campus and church
    Posts
    9,973
    Have you considered the Rax?

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Your Mom's House
    Posts
    8,309
    Quote Originally Posted by Peruvian View Post
    Have you considered the Rax?
    I don't ski steep enough mountains for Raxing

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Not Brooklyn
    Posts
    8,358
    I love all my children... errr.... skis.
    Last edited by I've seen black diamonds!; 12-10-2021 at 10:06 AM.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The Bull City
    Posts
    14,003
    Correction, "everyone above 6,000' elevation". Everywhere else except Bohemia and far northern Vermont you're just as well of on lunch trays as you are on anything over 90mm underfoot 95% of the time..
    Go that way really REALLY fast. If something gets in your way, TURN!

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,444
    Gotta say I think 98 is my sweet spot for day in day out.

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Bellevue
    Posts
    7,449
    Quote Originally Posted by SumJongGuy View Post
    Correction, "everyone above 6,000' elevation". Everywhere else except Bohemia and far northern Vermont you're just as well of on lunch trays as you are on anything over 90mm underfoot 95% of the time..
    This is wrong.
    Quote Originally Posted by beer30 View Post
    Gotta say I think 98 is my sweet spot for day in day out.
    Just to avoid messing up the average I'll chime in. 116 for 75-90% of my days.

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    343
    Sounds like we need a thread asking for everyones favorite 116mm ski....oh wait..

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Fish
    Posts
    4,754
    It depends, are talking in Park City?
    a positive attitude will not solve all of your problems, but it may annoy enough people to make it worth the effort

    Formerly Rludes025

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,064
    Totally.
    My favourite 10X ski just happens to measure out @ 120 uf!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PXL_20210419_184820870.jpg 
Views:	145 
Size:	1.99 MB 
ID:	396317

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1
    Favourite depends on the conditions, but the first ski in the bag has been 108mm for about 10 years now. Originally it was the 2011/12 Bacon with the white top sheet and since 2017 it’s been a 108 Folsom Completo

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Aspen, CO
    Posts
    319

    Is everyone’s favorite ski 10x underfoot now?

    108 mm underfoot is not necessarily the favorite but definitely the most versatile size, narrow enough to bite on hard pack and not too unwieldy in bumps but wide enough to float when you find a pow stash and can push around mank. Perfect daily drivers, mine are Katana K108 and Corvus. Favorites are the 115-125mm skis, probably because they get the powder days…


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Geopolis
    Posts
    16,184
    i was on 108mm for about ten years, i just sized down to 94 which worked out very well for icy night skiing so far.
    j'ai des grands instants de lucididididididididi

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    354
    105-108 "does it all" better than anything else, but personally I find that category boring. On groomers/chalk/bumps I'd rather be on something under 100mm for the more precise feel, and if there is enough fresh snow to warrant a 108, then its probably worth jumping up to a 112-115. I ski 96mm when it hasn't snowed, and 112mm if it has snowed. My favorite skis remain my 124mm Cease and Desists, but mainly because they see the most epic conditions (three untracked runs in 2+ feet of fresh today and holy shit there is nothing better). All that being said, there is a reason my touring sticks are 106mm wide, and it is because they work well in nearly every condition.

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    SnoqWA
    Posts
    2,625
    98-99 here. Weight has something to do with it... I'm 160 lb. I used to go more in the 105-110 range but have learned that I appreciate the quicker response of 9x sticks on days without fresh, and really don't mind sinking in a little more on pow days. (I do reach for renegades on big dumps).

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Missoula, MT
    Posts
    22,488
    Well, we're gonna see how 114 does with my R11. Hope I can use it often once the big rocks get covered up.
    No longer stuck.

    Quote Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn View Post
    Just an uneducated guess.

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    1,465

    Is everyone’s favorite ski 10x underfoot now?

    Praxis Concept .
    Fear, Doubt, Disbelief, you have to let it all go. Free your mind!

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The Loops for now
    Posts
    246
    I got rid of a pair of Pinnacle 105s in favour of a consigner store pair of ex-Wiegele Automatics (117?) as my one ski quiver. Easiest ski to ski anything and always have fun. Good with the kids, the wife, the nephew and his chargey-sendy buddies.

    Looking out for a 110 Enforcer though.

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    2,627
    I just sold an outdated pair of non-rockered 122 mm Liberty Double Helix since I was tired of keeping them around for the two days a year it was barely worth having them in Colorado.

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Vail, CO
    Posts
    171
    I'm not into 104 - 109mm skis at all. Too skinny for deep days and too fat to lay a nice turn down when it's not a pow day. They skid too much. That being said, 96-101 seems to be a nice sweet spot for an everyday ski out West. I guess if you had to get just one pair of skis for the season, that might make more sense. But if you have more than one pair, I just don't dig that waist width category.

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    346
    ^this guy nailed my thoughts exactly


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Danby
    Posts
    2,404
    Quote Originally Posted by angler99 View Post
    I'm not into 104 - 109mm skis at all. Too skinny for deep days and too fat to lay a nice turn down when it's not a pow day. They skid too much. That being said, 96-101 seems to be a nice sweet spot for an everyday ski out West. I guess if you had to get just one pair of skis for the season, that might make more sense. But if you have more than one pair, I just don't dig that waist width category.

    waist has nothing to do with railing turns. I know there is a 118mm that will lay turns just like a World Cup gs ski. It just has to do with construction. I have a floppy noodle and a stiff as a board rocket and they are 108 and 107.

    skidding turns is just technique.

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    11,001
    Quote Originally Posted by angler99 View Post
    I'm not into 104 - 109mm skis at all. Too skinny for deep days and too fat to lay a nice turn down when it's not a pow day. They skid too much. That being said, 96-101 seems to be a nice sweet spot for an everyday ski out West. I guess if you had to get just one pair of skis for the season, that might make more sense. But if you have more than one pair, I just don't dig that waist width category.
    Quote Originally Posted by SoVT Joey View Post
    waist has nothing to do with railing turns. I know there is a 118mm that will lay turns just like a World Cup gs ski. It just has to do with construction. I have a floppy noodle and a stiff as a board rocket and they are 108 and 107.

    skidding turns is just technique.
    I’ve seen dudes lay it down on 108-120s.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •