Results 101 to 125 of 202
Thread: San Juans - the Nose
-
02-04-2021, 02:13 PM #101Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 12,675
And those decisions have far less margin for error in the Continental snowpack found around Colorado for entire seasons. Not taking anything away from the danger of avalanches in other areas, it just gets really old here in CO when most seasons have some kind of shitty snowpack and you lose many friends because of it.
-
02-04-2021, 02:19 PM #102
-
02-04-2021, 02:40 PM #103
-
02-04-2021, 03:43 PM #104
Continuing down the road that this discussion is trending will only lead to MMQBing and bad shit may be said at a difficult time for people who are hurting.
Hoping to "get away" with bad decisions is a symptom of flaws in the decision making process.
RE: that graph, Colorado also has the largest population of all those States and some of the easiest access to consequential avalanche terrain as well as a much longer history of people and avalanches interacting.
I would also add that it would seem that most folks who reside and recreate in CO know that you guys can have a tricky Continental snow pack and they still keep trying to apply their hopes and goals to that snow pack rather than making adjustments in their behavior.
Anyway, shitty deal all the way around.I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.
"Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"
-
02-04-2021, 03:57 PM #105
The graph means absolute zilch unless just backcountry rec and it's per days skied.
powdork.com - new and improved, with 20% more dork.
-
02-04-2021, 04:18 PM #106
-
02-04-2021, 04:23 PM #107
San Juans - the Nose
“We” used to try to follow a rule where the general chat room was for grieving an incident and there would be a thread about the incident in the slide room for discussing/analyzing, respectfully.
Saw there’s another’s avi and missing person in east vail. Mentioning here because it may affect same community.
-
02-04-2021, 04:31 PM #108
RE E Vail, Awwww fuck.
So fucking sad to hear.I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.
"Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"
-
02-04-2021, 04:54 PM #109
-
02-04-2021, 05:00 PM #110
-
02-04-2021, 05:05 PM #111
confirmed death in east vail
powdork.com - new and improved, with 20% more dork.
-
02-04-2021, 05:12 PM #112
-
02-04-2021, 05:24 PM #113
-
02-04-2021, 05:34 PM #114
Fuck.
Given the state of the snowpack, AND the conditions that we're currently living under (the stress, isolation, uncertainty, restrictions, unemployment, political insanity/hatred, etc.) we should consider that most of us are at an increased risk of dying in an avalanche this year.
Everything is harder right now. It's harder to get work done. Harder to be a husband and a father. Harder to be empathetic to people you disagree with. Harder to stay sober. Harder to give a fuck some days. I strongly suspect that we collectively have a diminished capacity to make good decisions, including decisions about where to ski and where not to ski.
It's easy (and tempting) to read these reports and think "I wouldn't make that mistake." But if I ask myself, "When have I let my guard down in avy terrain and gotten away with it" I have no trouble thinking of examples. Same if I ask, "when have my partners pointed out important details (snowpack, weather, terrain) that I overlooked?"
We are intermittently rational creatures with incomplete understandings of what drives our behavior. We are all capable of unwittingly acting against our best interests and better judgement. Especially now. Take it easy out there.
-
02-04-2021, 05:37 PM #115Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 12,675
-
02-04-2021, 05:38 PM #116
In both cases the terrain trap was (at least partially) avoidable. In the Sheep Creek case, they could have crossed the creek. In the recent accident, they could have turned left and skinned back to the ridge (and toward the hut) instead of turning right under the larger, steeper face.
-
02-04-2021, 05:46 PM #117
-
02-04-2021, 06:01 PM #118
Seems like if they stayed high they could have traversed without even skinning up onto the adjacent south face the road and hut are on. But I wasn't there. Don't know what their thinking was but there are obviously all kinds of dynamics at play there.
Feeling for the partners and survivors and all those that knew the deceased.
A very close friend spent a harrowing three days on this recovery. On top of the other two in December. These aren't' her first but they add up and she's been profoundly affected by these two events.There's nothing better than sliding down snow, and flying through the air
-
02-04-2021, 06:08 PM #119
Some excellent observations.
I think when the report is out a lot of people will say how could the group have done XXXX.
And if they are honest with themselves they will say, "fuck that could have been me".I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.
"Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"
-
02-04-2021, 06:23 PM #120
Brutal. +++Vibes+++ to all affected.
-
02-04-2021, 06:37 PM #121
Excellent posts from a bunch of you, ISBD and Bunion especially.
You can't learn anything from avalanche accidents if you don't put yourself in the victim's shoes and have some serious self-reflection about what could cause you to make the same mistakes.
A couple things to add:
-I've noticed that underestimating the potential for remote triggers from below or adjacent slopes is a common mistake for experienced parties, which is understandable, because remote triggers are really tough to predict how far away or how easily you can trigger something
-experienced parties also often underestimate the true spacing and distance needed to really move one at a time from island of safety to island of safety. I've made this mistake many times when I reflect on it. We have no idea what exactly this group was doing at the time of the accident and whether this was a factor, but it definitely was at Sheep Creek
-think about some of the human factors that could have been in play here: all the COVID stuff ISBD mentions, large group, pre-planned trip (I assume, since it was a hut trip), terrain that you stare at when having coffee each morning, etc.
RIP to all the skiers and vibes to the friends, families, survivors, and rescuers. It's been a tough week
-
02-04-2021, 07:20 PM #122
This is one of the best pieces of writing that I have seen on TGR. Thanks for your empathy. Case studies can pull out the most righteous among us. But seeing yourself making those calls in those spots takes a big heart and a huge dose of self-knowledge and human nature.
-
02-04-2021, 07:56 PM #123Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- In Your Wife
- Posts
- 8,291
This. We all get away with far more than we will ever know. We should all (I know I do, and have been for decades) be asking ourselves before EVERY ski day, "am I comfortable with the potential of not coming home today?" That's the reality of the endeavor.
RIP and sincere condolences to all.
-
02-04-2021, 09:06 PM #124
-
02-04-2021, 09:26 PM #125
Bookmarks