Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 79
  1. #51
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    16,145
    Quote Originally Posted by Core Shot View Post
    That link doesn't go where you think it does
    powdork.com - new and improved, with 20% more dork.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    208 State
    Posts
    2,594
    Quote Originally Posted by CnRzG View Post
    Isn't Maroon a Bugs Bunny reference?
    It's ultra maroon.

    Sincerely, Mel Blanc.

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    208 State
    Posts
    2,594
    Quote Originally Posted by funkendrenchman View Post
    Sooooooo.... does this apply to ski areas and backcountry?

    Biden's first executive order will require masks on federal property

    https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/20/healt...ive/index.html
    Well, if someone is close enough to me to bug me about putting my mask up then they are too close and I'll tell you and your drooling dog to get the fuck out of my 6' bubble.
    Yeah, no, I will not be masking up in the backcountry where I go to seek refuge and solitude from people.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    At Work
    Posts
    2,972
    Here's a lab study measuring a variety of physiology variables in exercise to exhausation among participants wearing cloth masks, surgical masks, or no masks:
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662944/

    The latest narrative update review on mask wearing has a specific section on physiology effects (there are none at rest, at exercise results are mixed but "clinically minor physiologic changes have sometimes been shown when healthy volunteers do intensive exercise while wearing tightly fitting [medical] respirators (68, 92–94), those wearing medical (94, 95) and cloth (96) masks showed no physiologic changes during moderate or intensive exercise."):
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/art.../#__sec11title

    Lest you believe the hyperbolic WaPo article cited earlier that used a bad model to say that polyester masks are bad, here's some actual evidence (pdf link) showing that synthetic masks are definitely superior to no mask, though they're the worst kind of mask overall (but, crucially, still better than nothing): https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsnano.0c05025; the figures in the pdf are easy enough to understand, but the article was written up and described in less technical language by NPR here: https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsan...s-and-yourself

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    8,349
    Quote Originally Posted by zion zig zag View Post
    Buffs for appearances only. Keeps the Karen's at bay I guess?

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifes...9a6_story.html
    Bullshit Duke study was bullshit. Still is. If you run out of maroons here and get your sarcasm meter in good calibration and still need something to irritate you, go ahead and read the actual report. It's horrifyingly stupid that anyone would publish something using data with a CI that big and claim it meant something. Ultimately they walked it back a bit, but the WaPo horse is miles from the barn.

    Buffs can't be the best thing, but they help slow things down and reduce distance traveled. Definitely better than nothing if you're outside and not too close anyway.

    Of course, if they were really good we'd all die from too much lung exercise--or be in the best shape of our lives. So take it all with a grain of salt.

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,060
    IME nordic was a good place to meet fit women
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    At Work
    Posts
    2,972
    Quote Originally Posted by mtnjam View Post
    Well, if someone is close enough to me to bug me about putting my mask up then they are too close and I'll tell you and your drooling dog to get the fuck out of my 6' bubble.

    Yeah, no, I will not be masking up in the backcountry where I go to seek refuge and solitude from people.
    This is a totally reasonable course of action! There's no reason to mask up when you're not around other people, or you're only close by people with whom you are already sharing a bunch of air (whether in the car or in a house or whatever). Being outdoors, especially with even a light breeze, does far more to reduce transmissibility of aerosols and droplets than anything else. If you're close by strangers in parking lots, bathrooms, lines, etc, masking up is good for you and for everyone else.

    In the year that COVID has been circulating in the world there are uncountable super spreader events, but they all share one thing in common: indoor ventilation. There are zero outbreaks (which is different than zero transmissions, which there have been) that are associated with activity outdoors. Though there are lots of outbreaks associated with people gathering indoors before or after outdoor activity, so don't let your guard down.

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    16,145
    Quote Originally Posted by mtnjam View Post
    Yeah, no, I will not be masking up in the backcountry where I go to seek refuge and solitude from people.
    nor do you have to. that's not what the order refers to.
    powdork.com - new and improved, with 20% more dork.

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    208 State
    Posts
    2,594
    Quote Originally Posted by plugboots View Post
    Jessie approves paying to skate ski:
    Attachment 359100
    Clearly a need for a mask in this circumstance

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Shuswap Highlands
    Posts
    4,356
    Just here to emphasis the pleasure of a great stride or skate along groomed trail. And for old Goat, best way to get the gears figured out is on flat ground following a little person, in either dicipline. Can't go fast with the kids, so slow deliberate strides working on technique does wonders. Then it's just a matter of matching that skill with the lungs.
    I'm on the skinny sticks almost every day there is enough snowpack on the ground to permit. A thin year this year below 1200m, where our groomed trails are, but for a $100 season's pass (includes bike trails in summer) and only a 10min drive from the door, I m not complaining. In contrast, the closest real ski hill is >1.5hrs away with >$110/day pass, or at the least the backcountry is a 20min sled ride in from the parking lot. So sad there is no Birki festival this year locally (or elsewhere I suspect).

    Oh, and there isn't enough people here to be close enough to care about masking up on any of the trails. After 6pm, I have yet to even run into anyone in the parking lot let alone on the trails. The clear skies and moon of the past week has been glorious. All the issues of this past year in the woods down south sure makes me appreciate living in the asscrack of the northern Columbias.

  11. #61
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    2,646
    My 300 buck nordic pass is consistently the best purchase of the winter. Its phenomenal to get out for an hour or two while the sun is shining. Plus it gives me justification to drink more beer and eat ice cream.

  12. #62
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dystopia
    Posts
    21,108
    Quote Originally Posted by powdork View Post
    That link doesn't go where you think it does
    Sorry.
    It was supposed to be the image from the pull quote.
    https://www.who.int/emergencies/dise...zT8#exercising
    . . .

  13. #63
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Not in the PRB
    Posts
    32,990
    Quote Originally Posted by zion zig zag View Post
    Buffs for appearances only. Keeps the Karen's at bay I guess?

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifes...9a6_story.html
    That study was debunked a long time ago.
    "fuck off you asshat gaper shit for brains fucktard wanker." - Jesus Christ
    "She was tossing her bean salad with the vigor of a Drunken Pop princess so I walked out of the corner and said.... "need a hand?"" - Odin
    "everybody's got their hooks into you, fuck em....forge on motherfuckers, drag all those bitches across the goal line with you." - (not so) ill-advised strategy

  14. #64
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    none
    Posts
    8,368
    Quote Originally Posted by dtown View Post
    Skate skiing on a great groomed trail is one of my favorite things to do. The Aspen —> Snowmass trail system is a joy...even with a mask.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Especially since it’s free!
    It was nice out there today.

  15. #65
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    8,998
    Quote Originally Posted by Danno View Post
    That study was debunked a long time ago.
    I wanted to share a simple debunking of this study and couldn’t find something other than the discussion in this forum. The Duke study has been amplified and echoed a lot.

    The google doc/Linsey Marr team describe using the Bill Nye candle blow out approach to determine effectiveness.

    For me free pass/side hussle, I get to tell people to wear their mask over their mouth and nose in lift lines and congregating base areas at the ski hill. Most people are compliant, but a few have been shits.

    I’m glad this new rule is in effect. The post office has been a shitty superspreader situation.

  16. #66
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    23,273
    Right now I have a nordic pass at Royal Gorge as an add on to my midweek Sugar Bowl Pass. I think next year I may go for a less restricted pass so I can XC on the weekends--15 minutes up the road.
    My skate technique is actually ok, I've been skating on ice skates and Alpine skis since I was a kid and I have skated XC though not nearly as much as classic. Still at 70 V1 for me is high gear, V2 and V2 alternate are overdrive. But I think I'll give it another try. You guys have talked me into it.

  17. #67
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Not in the PRB
    Posts
    32,990
    Quote Originally Posted by bodywhomper View Post
    I wanted to share a simple debunking of this study and couldn’t find something other than the discussion in this forum. The Duke study has been amplified and echoed a lot.

    The google doc/Linsey Marr team describe using the Bill Nye candle blow out approach to determine effectiveness.

    For me free pass/side hussle, I get to tell people to wear their mask over their mouth and nose in lift lines and congregating base areas at the ski hill. Most people are compliant, but a few have been shits.

    I’m glad this new rule is in effect. The post office has been a shitty superspreader situation.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/17/w...ers-masks.html

    Mask testing has consistently shown that any face covering will block at least a small percentage of droplets generated when we speak or cough. The notion that a fabric gaiter will instead create more particles by splicing big droplets into smaller droplets is unlikely, experts say.

    “The fabrics are not acting as a sharp sieve,” said Linsey Marr, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Virginia Tech who is one of the world’s leading authorities on aerosols. “That’s not how filtration works.”

    But rather than speculate, Dr. Marr worked with Jin Pan, a Virginia Tech graduate student who studies biological particles, to test two types of gaiters using methods similar to those required by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health for testing masks.

    They decided to use foam heads to test gaiters as they are worn in real life, rather than tearing up a gaiter and testing just a small piece of fabric. One gaiter was a single-layer fabric made of 100 percent polyester. The other was a two-layer gaiter, made with 87 percent polyester and 13 percent elastane, a material often called spandex or Lycra.

    The researchers used a liquid salt solution and a medical nebulizer to simulate saliva and to direct the particles through a tube in the foam head with a gaiter placed over the nose and the mouth. Special instruments measured the quantity and the size of droplets that were able to sneak through the mask.

    Both gaiters prevented 100 percent of very large, 20-micron droplets from splattering another foam head just 30 centimeters away. Both masks blocked 50 percent or more of one-micron aerosols. The single layer gaiter blocked only 10 percent of 0.5-micron particles, while the two-layer gaiter blocked 20 percent. Notably, when the single-layer gaiter was doubled, it blocked more than 90 percent of all particles measured. By comparison, a homemade cotton T-shirt mask, recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, blocked about 40 percent of the smallest particles.
    https://www.runnersworld.com/news/a3...effectiveness/

    And that’s important to remember—the study performed by Duke researchers was designed to evaluate a simple method to test how well masks worked, said Brian Labus, Ph.D., MPH, assistant professor in the School of Public Health at the University of Nevada Las Vegas. “People have really gone overboard with their interpretation of this study. The goal of the study was not actually to evaluate masks,” Labus says.

    As part of that evaluation, they conducted a rough test of a few masks, and now that they have a method that works, they can move on to rigorous testing of different masks.

    Which is what researchers at the University of Georgia recently did. They used a version of the testing method performed in the first study out of Duke University to test the effectiveness of gaiters at slowing droplet spread. Researchers compared the effectiveness of gaiters against no mask at all as well as a variety of two-layer, washable, breathable cloth masks. The results showed that single-layer gaiters provided a 77-percent average reduction in respiratory droplets compared to wearing no face covering at all and multi-layer gaiters provided a 96-percent average reduction in respiratory droplets compared to wearing no face covering at all. Additionally, researchers observed that two-layer masks provided an 81-percent average reduction in respiratory droplets compared to wearing no face covering at all.
    "fuck off you asshat gaper shit for brains fucktard wanker." - Jesus Christ
    "She was tossing her bean salad with the vigor of a Drunken Pop princess so I walked out of the corner and said.... "need a hand?"" - Odin
    "everybody's got their hooks into you, fuck em....forge on motherfuckers, drag all those bitches across the goal line with you." - (not so) ill-advised strategy

  18. #68
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    15' from MT
    Posts
    405
    Royal Gorge is the coolest place I have ever skated. I was trippin' looking at the trail map when I saw lifts. Did 2 days there and stayed in Truckee. You got it made!

  19. #69
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    97
    It's really how you wear the neck gaiters. If it's touching your lips, it will be much less effective, than letting it hang with a gap between your mouth and the fabric. The polyester ones don't filter as well as the cotton blend ones. Put one on and put your hand in front of your face and blow, to test them out.

  20. #70
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    8,998

  21. #71
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,332
    Quote Originally Posted by JerkPorkins View Post
    It's really how you wear the neck gaiters. If it's touching your lips, it will be much less effective, than letting it hang with a gap between your mouth and the fabric. The polyester ones don't filter as well as the cotton blend ones. Put one on and put your hand in front of your face and blow, to test them out.
    Seems like a pretty bulletproof scientific analysis, haha!

    I wear a buff when mtb-ing or trail running, and only pull it up when passing folks - cuz I assume it does better than nothing, allows me to breath 1/2-decently, and puts peoples minds at ease. Definitely not appropriate for any indoor visits (grocery store etc) though, and it pisses me off seeing people wearing those or bandanas in those situations - fucking deadly pandemic nearly a year on now...find a decent fucking mask already!

  22. #72
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    23,273
    I like the guy who was wearing a small bandana that only covered the left side of his mouth. He wanted to get on the chair with me. I wasn't having it, neither were the other people he asked. And there was zero line. And he was skiing in jeans. Weird.

  23. #73
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    97
    Quote Originally Posted by skizix View Post
    Seems like a pretty bulletproof scientific analysis, haha!

    I wear a buff when mtb-ing or trail running, and only pull it up when passing folks - cuz I assume it does better than nothing, allows me to breath 1/2-decently, and puts peoples minds at ease. Definitely not appropriate for any indoor visits (grocery store etc) though, and it pisses me off seeing people wearing those or bandanas in those situations - fucking deadly pandemic nearly a year on now...find a decent fucking mask already!
    Well, I am a scientist, bro.

  24. #74
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    9,930
    Back off, man ..... I'm a pseudo-scientist.

  25. #75
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    8,998
    I have 5 masks. I just did the bill nye candle blow-out test. Only one failure: double-upped lightweight buff-brand merino tube.

    Passing the test: icebreaker mask, v-sixtyfour mask, livinguard 3-layer mask, primal mask w/o the n95 insert.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •