Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 26 to 35 of 35
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    16,144
    It's not the same thing, but at Kirkwood their control boundaries are greater than the resort boundaries and include sidecountry terrain because they are also responsible for controlling the area above the homes in the valley. It's not part of their daily routes though.
    powdork.com - new and improved, with 20% more dork.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Park City
    Posts
    1,867
    I don’t want it closed. My family calls High Dutch the orphanage. I’ve told my kids if I ever see or hear about them there or on square top, I never pay for them to ski again. It’s frustrating it took another life. It’s just so attractive sitting there in clear site line.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Wasatch Back: 7000'
    Posts
    12,987
    Here are my 9990 gate rules.

    1: never before MLK day
    2: Never between soul patch and movie line
    3: never directly under soul patch
    4: never when uac tells me not too
    5: only shoulder, south face or north tree line of square top
    6: never without full pack
    “How does it feel to be the greatest guitarist in the world? I don’t know, go ask Rory Gallagher”. — Jimi Hendrix

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    40°39'32.94"N 111°35'45.68"W
    Posts
    740
    Interesting to see all the Vail vitriol...I’m no fan of the corporate mothership...and am 🤏 this close to swearing off the Epic Local next year...BUT...one must point out that 9990 was put in well before Vail ever swooped in and stole PCMR...and the deaths on that ridge line well predate Vail (and the Colony)....
    And S-piste’s rules rule! Follow them and live to skin another day


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    16,144
    Quote Originally Posted by Coño Frío View Post
    Interesting to see all the Vail vitriol...I’m no fan of the corporate mothership...and am �� this close to swearing off the Epic Local next year...BUT...one must point out that 9990 was put in well before Vail ever swooped in and stole PCMR...and the deaths on that ridge line well predate Vail (and the Colony)....
    And S-piste’s rules rule! Follow them and live to skin another day
    Where are you seeing the Vail vitriol? Not in this thread. At least certainly not as it pertains to the gate at 9990.
    powdork.com - new and improved, with 20% more dork.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SLC, Utah
    Posts
    4,314
    Quote Originally Posted by schindlerpiste View Post
    Here are my 9990 gate rules.

    1: never before MLK day
    2: Never between soul patch and movie line
    3: never directly under soul patch
    4: never when uac tells me not too
    5: only shoulder, south face or north tree line of square top
    6: never without full pack
    i think those are very sensible rules. i just don't think it is possible to convey that level of personal responsibility through any amount of signage at a gate. problem with signs is, they only work if you read them.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Park City
    Posts
    1,867
    Quote Originally Posted by tgapp View Post
    i think those are very sensible rules. i just don't think it is possible to convey that level of personal responsibility through any amount of signage at a gate. problem with signs is, they only work if you read them.
    On Saturday the only exit from 9990 were the red pine chutes. Sinage at the top clearly stated that. People were getting stranded their all morning tell I left. Instructors were brining down classes, and being shocked the lower exits were closed. So yeah, people don't read the signs.

    This is not a Vail issue. It's a human nature issue exacerbated by proximity. Most of the people laying tracks down wouldn't ever be there if they had to walk from the bottom.

    Vail can't blast up there. If they started that, some lawyer would immediately attempt to hold them responsible, regardless of what any agreement says. Every person that enters that area legally does so past the You Can Die Here sign. How many times do you see people taking pictures by that sign?

    Unfortunately, I think the answer is, this will continue, so Follow Schindler's rules. If your really making the list, I would probably say Square top never. Yes I've skied it, but even under a stable snow pack, would it surprise you if it went? There is just not a good surface for the snow to adhere to on that slick rock face.

    Peace to the guys family and girlfriend.

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    16,144
    Quote Originally Posted by Canada1 View Post
    Unfortunately, I think the answer is, this will continue, so Follow Schindler's rules.
    Is no one going to call it Schindler's list??


    It wouldn't be hard to design gates that won't open unless you're beeping.
    powdork.com - new and improved, with 20% more dork.

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    5,224
    Turning a bunch of frequently wind loaded, back country alpine slopes into in-bounds terrain that would need constant mitigation efforts would be very expensive.

    Maybe it's a dangerous sport and people die sometimes. Maybe there isn't a internet forum that can come up with a solution.
    dirtbag, not a dentist

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    16,144
    powdork.com - new and improved, with 20% more dork.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •