Results 1 to 25 of 29
Thread: Knolly sues Intense
-
12-15-2020, 02:05 PM #1
Knolly sues Intense
The suit was filed on Monday as 'Knolly Bikes Inc. v. Intense Cycles, Inc.' at California Central District Court with case number '5:20-cv-02571'. Knolly is alleging that Intense has infringed on the patent US 10,363,988 granted to Knolly CEO Noel Buckley that was filed in 2014 and granted in 2019.
This patent describes a rear suspension system with at least four inches of travel and a seat tube that can accommodate a dropper seat post with at least four inches of travel. The patent also states that the seat tube intersects the downtube above the bottom bracket at an angle between 50° and 75° relative to the horizontal.
The suit claims that six of Intense's models infringe on this patent - the Tracer, the Carbine, the Tazer e-bike, the Primer 29, Primer S and Primer 27.5 - and that Knolly believes and has information that Intense has examined Knolly's bikes that use the technology.
-
12-15-2020, 02:29 PM #2
Seems like a colossal waste of time and some $$$
I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.
"Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"
-
12-15-2020, 03:10 PM #3
Aluminum bike war huh?
-
12-15-2020, 03:18 PM #4
Lawyers gotta lawyer.
www.apriliaforum.com
"If the road You followed brought you to this,of what use was the road"?
"I have no idea what I am talking about but would be happy to share my biased opinions as fact on the matter. "
Ottime
-
12-15-2020, 03:36 PM #5
as much as it seems like a pretty ridiculous patent, can't say I care that much about either of these companies.
-
12-15-2020, 09:42 PM #6mental projection
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Location
- 208 State
- Posts
- 2,577
Hmmm, yeah as an owner of an Endorphin before my drive side chainstay cracked behind the pivot not sure what this is going to accomplish for Noel. Seems a far stretch to compete with a suspension design that was already being bought by Noel anyways, not really even invented by the guy.
-
12-15-2020, 10:37 PM #7
The bike industry's habit of patenting minor, fairly obvious variations on the same shit that everyone's been doing for decades is fucking dumb.
-
12-15-2020, 10:55 PM #8Hucked to flat once
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Idaho
- Posts
- 10,953
It’s almost like innovation doesn’t bring a better product at lower cost to the consumer.
-
12-15-2020, 11:58 PM #9
This has got to be the stupidest fucking patent dispute of all time, at least in terms of bicycles. The whole thing presupposes that it's valuable to have an uninterrupted tube from seat collar to BB, so you can lower your saddle all the way. Which was useful, until fucking dropper posts became a thing like a decade ago and this whole concept was made irrelevant. Intense could have put a tiny dogleg in the seat tube, avoid the patent, and suffer zero change in performance, maybe even a better/steeper STA. Bummer for them, but fuck knolly.
-
12-16-2020, 09:22 AM #10
-
12-16-2020, 02:46 PM #11
-
12-16-2020, 03:45 PM #12
-
12-16-2020, 03:46 PM #13
-
12-16-2020, 09:06 PM #14
It's a wonder they didn't see any backlash before venturing into this.
Two best reasons I've heard for this were:
1. Knolly was tired of having such a good guy reputation and decided it was time to get into the "Specialized Game"
2. At the rate they come out with new bikes, this is a much faster source of income for them.However many are in a shit ton.
-
12-16-2020, 10:30 PM #15
3. They're trying to cut their losses. Six years ago when the company was doing a bit better, they decided to file for a largely unnecessary and poorly conceived patent. They spent a lot of time and money pursuing that patent, and now they feel like they have to enforce it because they want to make their sunk cost feel worthwhile. But they were so blinded by their pursuit of enforcement that they didn't stop to consider the collateral damage their brand would take in the process, which could very easily exceed the nominal (and questionable) gains they'll achieve in their enforcement action.
-
12-17-2020, 12:34 AM #16
-
12-17-2020, 07:58 AM #17Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Posts
- 536
I’m bummed to hear this, i ride a knolly.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
-
12-17-2020, 02:49 PM #18
How could a bike company not be doing well right now? If they are litigating to survive in 2020, they deserve to be bankrupt.
-
12-17-2020, 03:16 PM #19mental projection
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Location
- 208 State
- Posts
- 2,577
-
12-17-2020, 03:55 PM #20
Except that Intense hasn't had any aluminum bikes in their lineup in over five years.
Ding ding ding. Knolly's dead in the water and that's hard for a bike company to do right now. I'd be willing to bet that most mountain bikes on the market fit into this category right now. They're just going after the weakest member of the herd. Bummer all around.There's nothing better than sliding down snow, and flying through the air
-
12-17-2020, 04:33 PM #21
That's a pretty big gamble to take for a company that is assumed to be short on cash. Unless the lawyers are promising no fee without a win.
-
12-17-2020, 05:58 PM #22
All of this is not very Canadian, eh?
Forum Cross Pollinator, gratuitously strident
-
12-18-2020, 05:56 AM #23yelgatgab
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Location
- Shadynasty's Jazz Club
- Posts
- 10,248
Their next model should be called Death Rattle.
Remind me. We'll send him a red cap and a Speedo.
-
12-18-2020, 06:58 AM #24
Knolly sues Intense
Someone once told me that I ski like a Scandinavian angel.
-
12-18-2020, 06:24 PM #25
ahora quiero alfajores de postre está noche...
Forum Cross Pollinator, gratuitously strident
Bookmarks