Results 14,576 to 14,600 of 23206
-
09-30-2021, 10:30 AM #14576
That quote says being vaccinated is at LEAST as good as infection antibodies. It also says getting a mRNA vaccine after having Covid gives greater protection. So at least as good probably means as good or better. I’m not sure what your point is, the article still says being vaccinated after having Covid is recommended.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
-
09-30-2021, 10:31 AM #14577
Yep, seems like just more evidence that vaccines make sense for everyone, not just for those who haven't had Covid.
-
09-30-2021, 10:38 AM #14578
Skidog's article dates back to August. The article links to the much discussed REACT-1 study conducted by Imperial College London so it's a mystery why he would suggest it's being ignored. It's anybody's guess if he's purposely searching out healthline.com or medicalnewstoday.com articles to stir shit up or just to troll but if anyone wants to see for themselves the study in skidog's article is the same as the one linked below:
In an ongoing randomized trial with over 300K people involving regular testing to determine both vaccine immunity and natural immunity during Delta, mRNA vaccine immunity performs better than natural immunity.
The blue column contains mRNA vaccinated numbers, the yellow AZ, the green column contains unvaccinated but tested positive in the past:
Attachment 386886
The chart shows mRNA > previous infection > AZ against a low viral burden. Whereas against a high viral burden all vaccinated people had fewer symptoms when a breakthrough infection occurred compared with previous infection.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1...237v1.full.pdf
-
09-30-2021, 10:41 AM #14579
-
09-30-2021, 10:43 AM #14580Banned
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Sandy, Utah
- Posts
- 14,410
but we should ignore prior infection altogether? Thats my point...address that...
you can't, i believe honestly, say that prior infection isnt "enough". We all still can get sick vaxxed or not, we still seem to shed same viral loads (close depending on study). Still unknown, or I havent seen, data on viral loads with prior+vax are any different.
Never sick = get vaccinated no question your odds are better
Vaccinated = safe, but still can get sick and make others sick, even if they are vaccinated
Prior Covid = studies seem to point to it being = to or maybe possibly better than 2x vaccine in protection terms. Still can get sick and get other sick
Prior Covid + Vax = Studies seem to point to lesser symptoms/little to no hospitalization. Can still get sick, can still make others sick.
Drop unvaccinated/never sick, and tell me how any of those are vastly different?
We simply need a test that proves you have the necessary protection, its not immunity for any of us.
-
09-30-2021, 10:46 AM #14581Banned
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Sandy, Utah
- Posts
- 14,410
-
09-30-2021, 10:46 AM #14582
Mofro and others have posted many times evidence that this is false.
Aside from this, not sure what your point is? The evidence shows that previously infected individuals who are then vaccinated are better protected. I don't think anyone thinks that prior infection is useless.
-
09-30-2021, 10:46 AM #14583
-
09-30-2021, 10:48 AM #14584Banned
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Sandy, Utah
- Posts
- 14,410
huh yeah...that ONE part of the article used REACT-1...but the beginning of the article, which you so easily skimmed over...which is the OVERALL basis is from here
The researchers drew on data from the COVID-19 Infection Survey, a study led by the Office for National Statistics, the Department for Health and Social Care, and the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom.
-
09-30-2021, 10:50 AM #14585
-
09-30-2021, 10:51 AM #14586
-
09-30-2021, 10:53 AM #14587Banned
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Sandy, Utah
- Posts
- 14,410
yes, BETTER, not UNPROTECTED ....
Define Better now...if the difference ENOUGH?
y'all just dont want to admit that prior infections can actually be enough protection...never argued prior + vax was worse/better, never argued against vaccines...
I argue mandates that don't take all information into account. Simple as that...you all think its well and good..I dont...
-
09-30-2021, 10:55 AM #14588
but it might be close to being useless if the prior infection resulted in virtually no immune response. That's what others have been posting here, that there is a large amount of variability between one natural infection and another...ranging from asymptomatic to recovering after being on a vent, for example. As others have said and we keep on telling the contrarians, we know what happens when you vaccinate people, so it provides a baseline of protection for those who were naturally infected or not.
What some here are saying is that if you had a positive COVID-19 test and are not vaccinated, that merely showing that they at some point had a positive COVID-19 test that they shouldn't need to get vaccinated because they're already protected. The problem is that we don't know how much protection a really mild reaction to COVID-19 gives people...and the idea is to vaccinate so we all have a similar baseline level of protection which helps the immunocompromised by reducing the likelihood of it festering.Damn shame, throwing away a perfectly good white boy like that
-
09-30-2021, 10:55 AM #14589
-
09-30-2021, 10:57 AM #14590
-
09-30-2021, 10:57 AM #14591Banned
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Sandy, Utah
- Posts
- 14,410
so I see...your non peer reviewed study that shows different data is better than the other study cause it fits your argument...
Seems we are doing the same thing...and seems we have been here before and thats my point..you refuse to see any side but the one you wish to see...
What I see is data that shows, in reality, that prior infection does provide some, if not possibly as good as vaccination, but yes, those people should get "EXTRA" protection just cause the government mandates it. They can still get sick, they can still get other sick, but they should jump in for the extra or they are vile slime... Oh the hypocrisy.
-
09-30-2021, 10:58 AM #14592
For fuck's sake...
-
09-30-2021, 10:58 AM #14593
-
09-30-2021, 10:59 AM #14594Banned
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Sandy, Utah
- Posts
- 14,410
-
09-30-2021, 11:00 AM #14595
-
09-30-2021, 11:00 AM #14596Banned
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Sandy, Utah
- Posts
- 14,410
-
09-30-2021, 11:01 AM #14597Banned
- Join Date
- Jun 2021
- Posts
- 221
-
09-30-2021, 11:01 AM #14598
-
09-30-2021, 11:05 AM #14599Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2019
- Posts
- 330
-
09-30-2021, 11:05 AM #14600
Bookmarks