Page 584 of 929 FirstFirst ... 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 ... LastLast
Results 14,576 to 14,600 of 23206
  1. #14576
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    14,615
    That quote says being vaccinated is at LEAST as good as infection antibodies. It also says getting a mRNA vaccine after having Covid gives greater protection. So at least as good probably means as good or better. I’m not sure what your point is, the article still says being vaccinated after having Covid is recommended.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  2. #14577
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    27,308
    Yep, seems like just more evidence that vaccines make sense for everyone, not just for those who haven't had Covid.

  3. #14578
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Edge of the Great Basin
    Posts
    5,539
    Skidog's article dates back to August. The article links to the much discussed REACT-1 study conducted by Imperial College London so it's a mystery why he would suggest it's being ignored. It's anybody's guess if he's purposely searching out healthline.com or medicalnewstoday.com articles to stir shit up or just to troll but if anyone wants to see for themselves the study in skidog's article is the same as the one linked below:


    In an ongoing randomized trial with over 300K people involving regular testing to determine both vaccine immunity and natural immunity during Delta, mRNA vaccine immunity performs better than natural immunity.

    The blue column contains mRNA vaccinated numbers, the yellow AZ, the green column contains unvaccinated but tested positive in the past:

    Attachment 386886

    The chart shows mRNA > previous infection > AZ against a low viral burden. Whereas against a high viral burden all vaccinated people had fewer symptoms when a breakthrough infection occurred compared with previous infection.

    https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1...237v1.full.pdf

  4. #14579
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Tejas
    Posts
    11,859
    Quote Originally Posted by nordekette View Post
    the streets were empty at night.... like, there was nothing to do and we were not allowed to met in private except a partner or sexpartner ( and not changing every day : D )

    there were talks of people getting checked and if your excuse was bad u were fined.

    i dont know anybody personally, but word of mouth stories went around.
    people followed in general
    Austrians being sooper compliant, eh? Ya don't say?.....


  5. #14580
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sandy, Utah
    Posts
    14,410
    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn View Post
    That quote says being vaccinated is at LEAST as good as infection antibodies. It also says getting a mRNA vaccine after having Covid gives greater protection. So at least as good probably means as good or better. I’m not sure what your point is, the article still says being vaccinated after having Covid is recommended.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    but we should ignore prior infection altogether? Thats my point...address that...

    you can't, i believe honestly, say that prior infection isnt "enough". We all still can get sick vaxxed or not, we still seem to shed same viral loads (close depending on study). Still unknown, or I havent seen, data on viral loads with prior+vax are any different.

    Never sick = get vaccinated no question your odds are better
    Vaccinated = safe, but still can get sick and make others sick, even if they are vaccinated
    Prior Covid = studies seem to point to it being = to or maybe possibly better than 2x vaccine in protection terms. Still can get sick and get other sick
    Prior Covid + Vax = Studies seem to point to lesser symptoms/little to no hospitalization. Can still get sick, can still make others sick.

    Drop unvaccinated/never sick, and tell me how any of those are vastly different?

    We simply need a test that proves you have the necessary protection, its not immunity for any of us.

  6. #14581
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sandy, Utah
    Posts
    14,410
    Quote Originally Posted by MultiVerse View Post
    Skidog's article dates back to August. The article links to the much discussed REACT-1 study conducted by Imperial College London so it's a mystery why he would say it's being ignored.
    Wow yeah...refute it with a later study please???? its a fucking MONTH old....Or just keep slinging shit and ignoring other sides.

    you believe prior covid infection is useless? many would disagree, not just REACT-1

  7. #14582
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    27,308
    Quote Originally Posted by Skidog View Post
    Prior Covid = studies seem to point to it being = to or maybe possibly better than 2x vaccine in protection terms.
    Mofro and others have posted many times evidence that this is false.

    Aside from this, not sure what your point is? The evidence shows that previously infected individuals who are then vaccinated are better protected. I don't think anyone thinks that prior infection is useless.

  8. #14583
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    8,318
    Quote Originally Posted by ::: ::: View Post
    Can’t just not link it, tho…

    Alta 2/27/08
    https://www.tetongravity.com/forums/...d.php?t=114683
    Thanks. It's really good to recognize the subtlety required for a genuine quality troll.

  9. #14584
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sandy, Utah
    Posts
    14,410
    Quote Originally Posted by MultiVerse View Post
    Skidog's article dates back to August. The article links to the much discussed REACT-1 study conducted by Imperial College London so it's a mystery why he would say it's being ignored. It's anybody's guess if he's purposely searching out healthline.com or medicalnewstoday.com articles to stir shit up or just to troll but if anyone wants to see for themselves the study in skidog's article is the same as the one below:


    In an ongoing randomized trial with over 300K people involving regular testing to determine both vaccine immunity and natural immunity during Delta, mRNA vaccine immunity performs better than natural immunity.

    The blue column contains mRNA vaccinated numbers, the yellow AZ, the green column contains unvaccinated but tested positive in the past:

    Attachment 386886

    The chart shows mRNA > previous infection > AZ against a low viral burden. Whereas against a high viral burden all vaccinated people had fewer symptoms when a breakthrough infection occurred compared with previous infection.

    https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1...237v1.full.pdf
    huh yeah...that ONE part of the article used REACT-1...but the beginning of the article, which you so easily skimmed over...which is the OVERALL basis is from here

    The researchers drew on data from the COVID-19 Infection Survey, a study led by the Office for National Statistics, the Department for Health and Social Care, and the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom.

  10. #14585
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Edge of the Great Basin
    Posts
    5,539
    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn View Post
    That quote says being vaccinated is at LEAST as good as infection antibodies. It also says getting a mRNA vaccine after having Covid gives greater protection. So at least as good probably means as good or better. I’m not sure what your point is, the article still says being vaccinated after having Covid is recommended.
    The study says getting an mRNA vaccine after having Covid cuts the risk of infection in half.

  11. #14586
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Edge of the Great Basin
    Posts
    5,539
    Quote Originally Posted by Skidog View Post
    huh yeah...that ONE part of the article used REACT-1...but the beginning of the article, which you so easily skimmed over...which is the OVERALL basis is from here

    The researchers drew on data from the COVID-19 Infection Survey, a study led by the Office for National Statistics, the Department for Health and Social Care, and the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom.
    Try clicking on the link in your article. Then click on the link in my post. Then compare the two. If you do that, you'll find I didn't skim over anything.

  12. #14587
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sandy, Utah
    Posts
    14,410
    Quote Originally Posted by The AD View Post
    Mofro and others have posted many times evidence that this is false.

    Aside from this, not sure what your point is? The evidence shows that previously infected individuals who are then vaccinated are better protected. I don't think anyone thinks that prior infection is useless.
    yes, BETTER, not UNPROTECTED ....

    Define Better now...if the difference ENOUGH?

    y'all just dont want to admit that prior infections can actually be enough protection...never argued prior + vax was worse/better, never argued against vaccines...

    I argue mandates that don't take all information into account. Simple as that...you all think its well and good..I dont...

  13. #14588
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    17,475
    Quote Originally Posted by The AD View Post
    I don't think anyone thinks that prior infection is useless.
    but it might be close to being useless if the prior infection resulted in virtually no immune response. That's what others have been posting here, that there is a large amount of variability between one natural infection and another...ranging from asymptomatic to recovering after being on a vent, for example. As others have said and we keep on telling the contrarians, we know what happens when you vaccinate people, so it provides a baseline of protection for those who were naturally infected or not.

    What some here are saying is that if you had a positive COVID-19 test and are not vaccinated, that merely showing that they at some point had a positive COVID-19 test that they shouldn't need to get vaccinated because they're already protected. The problem is that we don't know how much protection a really mild reaction to COVID-19 gives people...and the idea is to vaccinate so we all have a similar baseline level of protection which helps the immunocompromised by reducing the likelihood of it festering.
    Damn shame, throwing away a perfectly good white boy like that

  14. #14589
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    27,308
    Quote Originally Posted by Skidog View Post
    y'all just dont want to admit that prior infections can actually be enough protection
    The key word here is "can." The problem is they often are not. That's why it makes sense to mandate vaccines for everyone. There has been data posted in this thread that makes that conclusion very clear.

  15. #14590
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    17,475
    Quote Originally Posted by The AD View Post
    The key word here is "can." The problem is they often are not. That's why it makes sense to mandate vaccines for everyone.
    why is this such a difficult thing for some people to understand?
    Damn shame, throwing away a perfectly good white boy like that

  16. #14591
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sandy, Utah
    Posts
    14,410
    Quote Originally Posted by MultiVerse View Post
    Try clicking on the link in your article. Then click on the link in my post. Then compare the two.

    If you do that, you'll find I didn't skim over anything. The researchers use the COVID-19 infection survey for the study.
    so I see...your non peer reviewed study that shows different data is better than the other study cause it fits your argument...

    Seems we are doing the same thing...and seems we have been here before and thats my point..you refuse to see any side but the one you wish to see...

    What I see is data that shows, in reality, that prior infection does provide some, if not possibly as good as vaccination, but yes, those people should get "EXTRA" protection just cause the government mandates it. They can still get sick, they can still get other sick, but they should jump in for the extra or they are vile slime... Oh the hypocrisy.

  17. #14592
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    27,308
    For fuck's sake...

  18. #14593
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    8,318
    Quote Originally Posted by Skidog View Post

    Define Better now...if the difference ENOUGH?
    Define ENOUGH vs. delta and/or delta+.

  19. #14594
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sandy, Utah
    Posts
    14,410
    Quote Originally Posted by The AD View Post
    The key word here is "can." The problem is they often are not. That's why it makes sense to mandate vaccines for everyone. There has been data posted in this thread that makes that conclusion very clear.
    what conclusion? its still not been addressed at all that vaccinated or prior infection can still get sick, and can still get others sick...unvaccinated arent even in the discussion in my mind.

  20. #14595
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Edge of the Great Basin
    Posts
    5,539
    Quote Originally Posted by Skidog View Post
    so I see...your non peer reviewed study that shows different data is better than the other study cause it fits your argument...
    Quote Originally Posted by Skidog View Post
    what conclusion? its still not been addressed at all that vaccinated or prior infection can still get sick, and can still get others sick...unvaccinated arent even in the discussion in my mind.
    It's the same study. Why is this so hard for you? Why do you keep lying about people not addressing these issues when it's been discussed everyday for months? Nobody is ignoring anything, your questions are answered every, single, day....

  21. #14596
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sandy, Utah
    Posts
    14,410
    Quote Originally Posted by The AD View Post
    For fuck's sake...
    yes for fucks sake you all ignore anything you dont want to answer.

  22. #14597
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Posts
    221
    Quote Originally Posted by Adolf Allerbush View Post
    why is this such a difficult thing for some people to understand?
    Because people don't want to be told what to do.

    Also because a little bit of knowledge is dangerous.. ever heard that expression? Well the internet is proving that over and over.

  23. #14598
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    17,475
    Quote Originally Posted by jono View Post
    Thanks. It's really good to recognize the subtlety required for a genuine quality troll.
    That was an entertaining trip down memory lane. What a fucking douche.
    Damn shame, throwing away a perfectly good white boy like that

  24. #14599
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    330
    Quote Originally Posted by Adolf Allerbush View Post
    but it might be close to being useless if the prior infection resulted in virtually no immune response. That's what others have been posting here, that there is a large amount of variability between one natural infection and another...ranging from asymptomatic to recovering after being on a vent, for example. As others have said and we keep on telling the contrarians, we know what happens when you vaccinate people, so it provides a baseline of protection for those who were naturally infected or not.

    What some here are saying is that if you had a positive COVID-19 test and are not vaccinated, that merely showing that they at some point had a positive COVID-19 test that they shouldn't need to get vaccinated because they're already protected. The problem is that we don't know how much protection a really mild reaction to COVID-19 gives people...and the idea is to vaccinate so we all have a similar baseline level of protection which helps the immunocompromised by reducing the likelihood of it festering.
    and it’s been shown that some people who get the vaccine don’t even develop antibodies! But we don’t need to test those people too! They’re immune because they got the vaccine!! Fuck testing everyone equally; we just want to be right!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	3E7D1C09-00B8-406A-A1BB-E4C4C654DF62.jpeg 
Views:	39 
Size:	1.01 MB 
ID:	387385  

  25. #14600
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    27,308
    Quote Originally Posted by Skidog View Post
    yes for fucks sake you all ignore anything you dont want to answer.
    We've been trying to answer you over and over. You won't listen.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •