Page 20 of 121 FirstFirst ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... LastLast
Results 476 to 500 of 3002
  1. #476
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    3,767
    Quote Originally Posted by SirVicSmasher View Post
    I'm almost pm'd you to say to bring your chop skis when you said you were headed up for turn 2 . Pillaged was certainly the right verb to use.

    Sent from my SM-G981U using Tapatalk
    Yeah, my Billy Goats or QLabs would have been a better choice than my MFree 108s. Still, in the wise words of Slackey, skiing is fun.

  2. #477
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    No longer Alexandria, VA
    Posts
    2,654
    Quote Originally Posted by phatty View Post
    skiing is fun.
    Correct.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0600.JPG 
Views:	90 
Size:	237.5 KB 
ID:	362159
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0602.JPG 
Views:	86 
Size:	244.6 KB 
ID:	362160Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0601.JPG 
Views:	89 
Size:	226.9 KB 
ID:	362161

  3. #478
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    621
    Crazy morning up there. 3 hours, 2 runs. Was still worth it though. Pretty perfect day for the OG Protests.






    Also, check out this dude from Sunday at Hyak.



    Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

  4. #479
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    closer
    Posts
    5,749
    Quote Originally Posted by lrn2swim View Post
    Crazy morning up there. 3 hours, 2 runs. Was still worth it though. Pretty perfect day for the OG Protests.






    Also, check out this dude from Sunday at Hyak.



    Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
    So I've been lurking here for the pics...

    Sorry if I intrude from my euro perspective, but 3 hours for 2 runs? With skins off and on that is about 400m /1200feet vert per run in touring....

    I would have just toured? Because the two runs were probably not 4000foot tram laps?
    It's a war of the mind and we're armed to the teeth.

  5. #480
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    7,915
    - within 1 hour of 4 million people
    - the only hill in the region not requiring reservations
    - huge dump of new snow
    - heavy morning avy control work
    - pow-starved covidians all "working from home"
    - 2 chairs

  6. #481
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    3,940
    Quote Originally Posted by subtle plague View Post
    So I've been lurking here for the pics...

    Sorry if I intrude from my euro perspective, but 3 hours for 2 runs? With skins off and on that is about 400m /1200feet vert per run in touring....

    I would have just toured? Because the two runs were probably not 4000foot tram laps?
    It was likely 2200ft/lap, so 4400ft of vert in 3 hours. You also should factor in having fresh legs each time for the descent, avalanche mitigated slopes, able to ski much steeper gnarlier lines that you (I) would under similar conditions in the BC, and free/quick carcass transport to a waiting amberlance should something go wrong.

    Everytime im in one of those lines having a 2 runs in 3 hours kind of day i try and just remind myself of that. Otherwise I end up in a positive feedback loop of anxiety and bitterness and that is good for no one. But, yes. Please spread the word far and wide- remind everyone you know that Alpental is a total clusterfuck on anything resembling a powder day and it should be avoided.


    All that is to say, that i certainly understand, and to an extent share your perspective.

  7. #482
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    880
    Quote Originally Posted by californiagrown View Post

    But, yes. Please spread the word far and wide- remind everyone you know that Alpental is a total clusterfuck [anytime they get more snow than Crystal] and it should be avoided.


    .
    ftfy

  8. #483
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    10,959
    Alpy fucking sucks. I’m done with that place.


    Who’s with me??

    Guys?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  9. #484
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    612
    Quote Originally Posted by subtle plague View Post
    So I've been lurking here for the pics...

    Sorry if I intrude from my euro perspective, but 3 hours for 2 runs? With skins off and on that is about 400m /1200feet vert per run in touring....

    I would have just toured? Because the two runs were probably not 4000foot tram laps?
    I've been guilty of standing in those kind of lines in the past but I totally agree that it makes more sense to just tour. Especially when this is what was on offer in the general vicinity.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PXL_20210208_172633690_exported_6126_1612977273778.jpg 
Views:	74 
Size:	340.3 KB 
ID:	362192

    Norseman lines out exactly the reason for the cluster though.

    I'm a big fan of leaving the natural environment natural and working within the existing developed area but it sure seems like there could be some room for expanding lift served terrain considering the huge population growth and the growth of the sport in general. More high capacity chairlifts isn't going to do it though. They need a bigger footprint, not just more people trying to ski in the same spot. I wonder, given the large population, and the fact that so many more people are skiing these days, why doesn't alpental expand further out the valley? If I understand correctly, they basically own the whole valley out past source lake and a good portion of the Denny Creek Drainage too. I realize that the terrain is complicated and lots more advanced ski terrain probably isn't the best thing for their bottom line. I also realize that it would probably take 40 years of litigation with the environmentalists to work out a solution but given how much traffic that little valley gets, it's really not pristine wilderness anyway. Seems like the day hikers and snowshoers could easily find an alternative venue a few miles east of the pass and the ski area could triple their terrain options. I realize that there are probably all kinds of reasons why that's not an option but I for one am not planning on spending endless hours in line just to get a couple runs in skied out powder. Given the general cluster that we've experienced in other areas of the resort this winter I'm inclined to experiment with other resorts next winter (although I guess Stevens has similar issues, if not worse).

  10. #485
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    3,767
    Quote Originally Posted by Buke View Post
    I've been guilty of standing in those kind of lines in the past but I totally agree that it makes more sense to just tour. Especially when this is what was on offer in the general vicinity.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PXL_20210208_172633690_exported_6126_1612977273778.jpg 
Views:	74 
Size:	340.3 KB 
ID:	362192

    Norseman lines out exactly the reason for the cluster though.

    I'm a big fan of leaving the natural environment natural and working within the existing developed area but it sure seems like there could be some room for expanding lift served terrain considering the huge population growth and the growth of the sport in general. More high capacity chairlifts isn't going to do it though. They need a bigger footprint, not just more people trying to ski in the same spot. I wonder, given the large population, and the fact that so many more people are skiing these days, why doesn't alpental expand further out the valley? If I understand correctly, they basically own the whole valley out past source lake and a good portion of the Denny Creek Drainage too. I realize that the terrain is complicated and lots more advanced ski terrain probably isn't the best thing for their bottom line. I also realize that it would probably take 40 years of litigation with the environmentalists to work out a solution but given how much traffic that little valley gets, it's really not pristine wilderness anyway. Seems like the day hikers and snowshoers could easily find an alternative venue a few miles east of the pass and the ski area could triple their terrain options. I realize that there are probably all kinds of reasons why that's not an option but I for one am not planning on spending endless hours in line just to get a couple runs in skied out powder. Given the general cluster that we've experienced in other areas of the resort this winter I'm inclined to experiment with other resorts next winter (although I guess Stevens has similar issues, if not worse).
    All of Seattle ski area have the same issues. We had an interesting thread exploring options last year. Bottom line is there's not a lot of options due to Wilderness designations and elevations.

  11. #486
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    880
    Quote Originally Posted by Buke View Post
    I've been guilty of standing in those kind of lines in the past but I totally agree that it makes more sense to just tour. Especially when this is what was on offer in the general vicinity.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PXL_20210208_172633690_exported_6126_1612977273778.jpg 
Views:	74 
Size:	340.3 KB 
ID:	362192

    Norseman lines out exactly the reason for the cluster though.

    I'm a big fan of leaving the natural environment natural and working within the existing developed area but it sure seems like there could be some room for expanding lift served terrain considering the huge population growth and the growth of the sport in general. More high capacity chairlifts isn't going to do it though. They need a bigger footprint, not just more people trying to ski in the same spot. I wonder, given the large population, and the fact that so many more people are skiing these days, why doesn't alpental expand further out the valley? If I understand correctly, they basically own the whole valley out past source lake and a good portion of the Denny Creek Drainage too. I realize that the terrain is complicated and lots more advanced ski terrain probably isn't the best thing for their bottom line. I also realize that it would probably take 40 years of litigation with the environmentalists to work out a solution but given how much traffic that little valley gets, it's really not pristine wilderness anyway. Seems like the day hikers and snowshoers could easily find an alternative venue a few miles east of the pass and the ski area could triple their terrain options. I realize that there are probably all kinds of reasons why that's not an option but I for one am not planning on spending endless hours in line just to get a couple runs in skied out powder. Given the general cluster that we've experienced in other areas of the resort this winter I'm inclined to experiment with other resorts next winter (although I guess Stevens has similar issues, if not worse).
    Incorrect on "owning the valley, etc". Alpine Lakes Wilderness nearly completely surrounds the permitted area and our opinion on whether or not that is actually wilderness is mum. I posted a link a page or two back to the approved master plan to expand lifts and parking within the permitted area I'm guessing that got put on hold after a few bad snow years. But it would help having lift access to more higher elevation terrain for the future as well.

  12. #487
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    3,767
    Quote Originally Posted by ridinshockgun View Post
    Incorrect on "owning the valley, etc". Alpine Lakes Wilderness nearly completely surrounds the permitted area and our opinion on whether or not that is actually wilderness is mum. I posted a link a page or two back to the approved master plan to expand lifts and parking within the permitted area I'm guessing that got put on hold after a few bad snow years. But it would help having lift access to more higher elevation terrain for the future as well.
    The International lift would be awesome. Would it change some of the character of Alpental that we all love? Yes. Are those changes coming anyway due to the changing character of the Seattle area? Yep. We won't be able to keep the funky, small hill vibe forever. Yesterday put that on full display.

  13. #488
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    closer
    Posts
    5,749
    I understand the cause of the queue just not the reasons for joining it
    It's a war of the mind and we're armed to the teeth.

  14. #489
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    880
    Quote Originally Posted by subtle plague View Post
    I understand the cause of the queue just not the reasons for joining it
    I also imagine some were on their 3rd or 4th day of meadow skipping and wanted to ski some steep terrain with avy mitigation with the current snowpack.

  15. #490
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    612
    Quote Originally Posted by ridinshockgun View Post
    Incorrect on "owning the valley, etc". Alpine Lakes Wilderness nearly completely surrounds the permitted area and our opinion on whether or not that is actually wilderness is mum. I posted a link a page or two back to the approved master plan to expand lifts and parking within the permitted area I'm guessing that got put on hold after a few bad snow years. But it would help having lift access to more higher elevation terrain for the future as well.
    Right, I forgot about the Alpine Lakes Wilderness boundary, although it looks like the boundary does skirt around a big chunk of the valley that we regularly ski. I lift from the base to Piss Pass and then another lift from down near Source Lake up to Piss Pass would be sweet. Maybe it would be too risky due to avalanche terrain issues? I don't know, I'm just day dreaming.

    As far as ownership of the land, according to King County Records, Ski Lifts Inc does own quite a bit of land beyond the current ski area boundary and a lot of that land is within the Alpine lakes Wilderness, including over 500 acres on the west side of the ridge encompassing a big chunk of Denny Creek.

    I realize that it's a total pipe dream but I do think that there's a reasonable argument for giving up some of that "wilderness" area in exchange for a better lift served ski resort experience. I wouldn't want rampant development with a tram in every valley. But in the areas where there's already lots of activity, an expansion of that activity seems reasonable considering that the region has had something like 50% population growth over the last 30 years.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PXL_20210208_172633690_exported_6126_1612977273778.jpg 
Views:	70 
Size:	340.3 KB 
ID:	362206  

  16. #491
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    612
    Oops, I meant to attach this map clip.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Alpine Lakes Boundary.jpg 
Views:	88 
Size:	442.0 KB 
ID:	362246

  17. #492
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    8,296
    Quote Originally Posted by Norseman View Post
    - within 1 hour of 4 million people
    - the only hill in the region not requiring reservations
    - huge dump of new snow
    - heavy morning avy control work
    - pow-starved covidians all "working from home"
    - 2 chairs
    Sounds like Seatown needs another ski area development. Or, at least put in a tram on at least one of the ski hills from what I'm hearing.
    "We don't beat the reaper by living longer, we beat the reaper by living well and living fully." - Randy Pausch

  18. #493
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    880
    A tram from I90 to the top of Granite just for BC access would be amazing.

  19. #494
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    10,959

    Edelweiss Chair and beyond... Alpental , The valley and the rest of snocrummy

    They should make Armstrong a double. A tram from the peak of West across i90 to the base of chair 2 would be dope. Ban snowboarding.

    MAGA!!!

    Make Alpy Great Again.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  20. #495
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    8,296
    Quote Originally Posted by AK47bp View Post
    They should make Armstrong a double. A tram from the peak of West across i90 to the base of chair 2 would be dope. Ban snowboarding.

    MAGA!!!

    Make Alpy Great Again.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

    Why not just have the Tram go to the top of Alpy? Avoid the chair 2 fiasco all together. Sell it as environmentally friendly way to get from Summit Central to Alpy.
    "We don't beat the reaper by living longer, we beat the reaper by living well and living fully." - Randy Pausch

  21. #496
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    10,959
    Quote Originally Posted by Toadman View Post
    Why not just have the Tram go to the top of Alpy? Avoid the chair 2 fiasco all together. Sell it as environmentally friendly way to get from Summit Central to Alpy.
    Sold.

    They’ll have to carve out a blue cat track to meander down Edelweiss so the Summit gapers can get out.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  22. #497
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Aspen
    Posts
    3,085
    Quote Originally Posted by Toadman View Post
    Why not just have the Tram go to the top of Alpy? Avoid the chair 2 fiasco all together. Sell it as environmentally friendly way to get from Summit Central to Alpy.
    Circling back to Alternative 2 https://www.fs.usda.gov/nfs/11558/ww...LT1_018134.pdf

    https://www.fs.usda.gov/nfs/11558/ww...LT1_018087.pdf

  23. #498
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sea Level
    Posts
    3,709
    Quote Originally Posted by Buke View Post

    As far as ownership of the land, according to King County Records, Ski Lifts Inc does own quite a bit of land beyond the current ski area boundary and a lot of that land is within the Alpine lakes Wilderness, including over 500 acres on the west side of the ridge encompassing a big chunk of Denny Creek.
    I see Ski Lifts Inc having 170 acres on rhe south side of Cave Ridge, which includes the lodge, parking lot and condos. Not ideal ski terrain, but the wilderness boundary is drawn around their property.

    I don't see the Denny Creek inholdings.
    The trumpet scatters its awful sound Over the graves of all lands Summoning all before the throne

    Death and mankind shall be stunned When Nature arises To give account before the Judge

  24. #499
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Ski-attle
    Posts
    2,220
    Jumping in here to say Vibes to Norseman...I heard about your fall and hope you feel better soon!

    Also paging Abraham...let’s go paddle boarding.

    Also also...y’all dudes need to meet up again and make night skiing a regular thing. Legoskier came home all happy, was stoked for 2 days on skiing with mags. In short...this wife encourages it.

    PS we will be at Alpental on Sunday freezing our asses off. Anyone else?

  25. #500
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    On Vacation for the Duration
    Posts
    14,373
    PSA

    I90 WB closing 4:30 - 6:30? to remove old wrecks.
    A few people feel the rain. Most people just get wet.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •