Results 451 to 475 of 554
-
10-14-2020, 12:54 PM #451
-
10-14-2020, 12:59 PM #452
Hey Lee, you might know this. My understanding on the high alpine trails, IE Into the Mystic etc, that one of the reasons that those trails were able to be built was because the effort to access them, would restrict the number of people getting into the alpine to a level that managers agreed was reasonable and didn’t poise a threat to the environment. If ebike use explodes and people insist that they should be able to ride those trails, and start ignoring the closure in significant numbers, I can see them being closed and deactivated as the easiest way to stop access. You think this is a possibility?
-
10-14-2020, 01:07 PM #453Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Rossland BC
- Posts
- 1,880
Seven Summits was one of three (out of 70) mtb trails for which we successfully argued for and implemented an EBike restriction, based on trail fragility and potential overuse, potential impacts on wildlife, compatibility with bikers on a long narrow Single-track climb, and compatibility with hikers. I still think it’s a good idea to maintain this conservative approach, as there are still many unknowns, but my gut feel is that the restriction won’t be permanent.
Blogging at www.kootenayskier.wordpress.com
-
10-14-2020, 01:29 PM #454
Do u have a rough idea how many riders/day on vancouver trails? I seem to remember a figure of 4000/day but that was atleast 10 years ago. I wouldn't be surprised if its in excess of 6k/day now and with the covid
Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app
-
10-14-2020, 01:31 PM #455Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Rossland BC
- Posts
- 1,880
USFS proposed rule to revamp eMTB access (Sept. 2020)
“Question for the Canadians who are border adjacent: have you ever attempted to provide input to a US agency on policy decisions? If so, what was the response, if any?”
From my limited experience with US agencies in northern Washington (where I could and would make a contribution) individuals I can access are approachable, but without decision making authority in a top down, command and control hierarchy. I wouldn’t know where to start in engaging with the politics of wherever it could make a difference.Blogging at www.kootenayskier.wordpress.com
-
10-14-2020, 01:40 PM #456
Kootneyski probably already knows this, but the land immediately south of Rossland to Northport, WA is all private land. So unlikely there will ever be any trail development on the Washington side of the border. You have to go farther West, and East, to get to Colville National Forest. Appears most trails on Colville National Forest are open to mountain bikes (like Kettle Crest). Have to go even farther East to Salmo-Priest Wilderness where they are off limits. I hope to retire in this zone someday.
-
10-14-2020, 01:41 PM #457
I can't even load metric man's usfs link, just the bike mag article. Geo block on gov't docs?
Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app
-
10-14-2020, 01:53 PM #458
-
10-14-2020, 02:00 PM #459
As part of a larger project, Tahoe National Forest just approved 35 miles of existing trail for eMTB use. Here's the environmental assessment: https://www.fs.usda.gov/nfs/11558/ww...T3_5347056.pdf The approval also includes 71 miles of motorized use trails, some of which will be appropriate for biking and some will be appropriate for swimming in bottomless decomposed granite.
Here's the project page: https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57704
TNF's analysis is quite solid, and reflects lots of the reasonable responses in this thread. Good to see. Pages 37-40 of the EA addressing Recreation are particularly good.
This comes after TNF tried to approve six trails for eMTB usage a couple years ago, the horsie orgs sued them, and USFS settled the litigation.
Ah, gotcha. Thanks, Lee. That's incredible...that you have trailcounters!! Just kidding, the usage explosion is crazy. But I'm also imagining the world-class meltdowns if every mouth-breathing 'Merrrikan got "scanned" at the trailhead.Last edited by meter-man; 10-14-2020 at 03:35 PM.
sproing!
-
10-14-2020, 02:30 PM #460
-
10-14-2020, 02:41 PM #461
The counters in Seattle are just wires within rubber tubes strung across the bike path. Imagine that is what they are using in Canada.
https://www.seattle.gov/transportati.../bike-counters
Data for Freemont bridge:
https://data.seattle.gov/Transportat...nter/65db-xm6kLast edited by altasnob; 10-14-2020 at 03:14 PM.
-
10-14-2020, 03:22 PM #462
Check. Its huge but a lot of trails too
Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app
-
10-14-2020, 03:47 PM #463
point of order...Crown land within municipal boundaries. the wildlife/alpine impacts/volume was a consideration, but the fact most people don't know is that the project almost did not happen and was nearly derailed by the hiking lobby (ACC Whistler board of the time). The hiking group had done a hiking trail report/proposed expansion while a few of us on the WORCA side were working through our concept/proposal unbeknownst to each other, the ideas overlapped on Sproatt so WORCA suggested a combined approach to the RMOW. Part of the rational was controlling unmanaged use which was taking off in the alpine (UUAA) and causing vegetation trampling due to an unestablished route/trail. We had to commit to a non shuttle, backcountry style, cross country, human powered approach to get the project approved, and part of that was no motors, it really was a very contentious issue and highlighted again that while we've gained a lot of respect for our work, there are still a lot of folks whom aren't keen to share the alpine and still hold very negative perceptions of mountain bikers.
The authorization and establishment of the trails explicitly said it would be fully non motorized. The Provincial policy allows for restricting ebikes on established trails if the partnership agreement holder so desires. The RMOW ebike policy essentially confirmed this for the Sproatt network although by then the grizzly bear and heavy use issues had become more prominent and mostly affirmed those prior decisions.
-
10-14-2020, 03:48 PM #464
-
10-14-2020, 04:00 PM #465
Funny, I just spent the last two weeks in Whistler, riding almost every day and hardly saw anyone, even when we did the Lost Lake trails, and then there were more hikers than bikers. Anything further out, IE Flank was as empty as I have ever seen it. Guess it might just be a late in the season thing as I know our trails near Calgary have been way busier as well.
-
10-14-2020, 04:04 PM #466
-
10-14-2020, 06:30 PM #467
T.odd thx for clarification. Just wanted to get ahead of the fake news that WORCA banned ebikes and establish that it was the land manager's decision
-
10-14-2020, 07:14 PM #468Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Rossland BC
- Posts
- 1,880
Blogging at www.kootenayskier.wordpress.com
-
10-14-2020, 07:36 PM #469
-
10-15-2020, 09:06 AM #470
That's crazy. That one part of Flume freaks me out and even though it's plenty wide to ride safely, I'm more concerned about someone coming too quickly in the other direction and doing something stupid (this happened to me on there once), so I'll often get off my bike and walk.
-
10-15-2020, 12:28 PM #471Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Washoe Valley
- Posts
- 361
I would say that the Tahoe Flume trail has had more MTB traffic over the decades than maybe any trail system in the US or worldwide? I have ridden that trail many times since the 80's and one thing that stands out is that bikes have not caused deterioration of the trail itself and it is now better than before. Sure there has been maintenance but overall with all the use, Ebikes as well MTB has not damaged or caused permanent harm. So it can be used as a example when others try to say MTB, Ebikes destroy the environment and soil.
-
10-15-2020, 12:49 PM #472
-
10-15-2020, 01:27 PM #473
Not saying that ebikes cause any particularly egregious amount of erosion, but this sort of thing is going to vary dramatically from location to location. Just because the soil in one area can handle increased traffic doesn't mean that applies to other areas.
Hell, even in one specific location it'll vary. There are local trails around me that could handle a considerable increase in use and be fine. There are others that, for various reasons, won't hold up to increased use very well at all.
-
10-15-2020, 01:50 PM #474
I guess if a person was really good at ebiking they'd only need 5 days on one to figure that out......
Pro tip- do you know what surface is immune to erosion?
Wet
Roots
Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app
-
10-15-2020, 02:14 PM #475
I rode the Flume exactly 1 time while I was in Tahoe for a conference.
Nice trail, great views but I don't really recall much up and down.I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.
"Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"
Bookmarks