Page 11 of 57 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... LastLast
Results 251 to 275 of 1425
  1. #251
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Cuntecticut
    Posts
    1,814
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    Altachic got a new knee and turned 40, so new bike is happening. Considering the following non-dentist new school 29ers:

    -Meta TR 29
    -Trance X 29
    -Ripmo AF

    Thoughts? Anything else in the $4k and under price point I should consider.
    If I were living out west again, the Meta for sure. I love mine out here in the east, and it's the 2019 model - not even the new 2020 version.
    Florence Nightingale's Stormtrooper

  2. #252
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    13,845
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    Altachic got a new knee and turned 40, so new bike is happening. Considering the following non-dentist new school 29ers:

    -Meta TR 29
    -Trance X 29
    -Ripmo AF

    Thoughts? Anything else in the $4k and under price point I should consider.
    You can do a guerrilla gravity smash for around $4k with their lower end build.

  3. #253
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Mid-tomahawk
    Posts
    1,712
    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post
    You can do a guerrilla gravity smash for around $4k with their lower end build.
    That's a really good bike, but the $4k build on the Meta TR is pretty crazy for the money. I'd have a hard time looking away from that.

  4. #254
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,126
    Quote Originally Posted by HAB View Post
    That's a really good bike, but the $4k build on the Meta TR is pretty crazy for the money. I'd have a hard time looking away from that.
    Just looking at parts to parts comparison (not the frame) - why do you like that Meta TR Race parts pkg more than the Ripmo AF SLX?
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  5. #255
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Mid-tomahawk
    Posts
    1,712
    Quote Originally Posted by El Chupacabra View Post
    Just looking at parts to parts comparison (not the frame) - why do you like that Meta TR Race parts pkg more than the Ripmo AF SLX?
    Well, I was talking about the Smash in my last post. Which is a great bike, but the the $4000 build isn't as nice as the other stuff we're talking about. The Ripmo AF sounds good on paper too. A lot of it comes down to the suspension though. I *know* the RS stuff on the Meta is really good. I haven't ridden anything recent from DVO, so I'm not saying it definitely is not good, but it's an unknown (to me), making the Commencal a much safer bet.

  6. #256
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    13,845
    Quote Originally Posted by HAB View Post
    That's a really good bike, but the $4k build on the Meta TR is pretty crazy for the money. I'd have a hard time looking away from that.
    Yeah, I hadn't actually looked at the spec on the meta. That's a pretty sick build for $4k. And actually, the ripmo slx build is really good too. Tough to say which is a better call (although I'd probably lean commencal, as long as she's good with the coil shock / 35 lb bike).

  7. #257
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Eugenio Oregón
    Posts
    8,382
    Quote Originally Posted by HAB View Post
    That's a really good bike, but the $4k build on the Meta TR is pretty crazy for the money. I'd have a hard time looking away from that.
    Pretty crazy for the money ...

    But does AC want a 35 lbs bike?
    _______________________________________________
    "Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.

    I'll be there."
    ... Andy Campbell

  8. #258
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    13,654
    Quote Originally Posted by SchralphMacchio View Post
    Pretty crazy for the money ...

    But does AC want a 35 lbs bike?
    Yeah - porky bikes are one thing for us fat fuckers... but isn't she a tiny person? I'd go full bling to celebrate the new knee.

  9. #259
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    17,895
    Quote Originally Posted by dfinn View Post
    The Meta would win easily for me out of those. It looks like it wants to party. Might not be the best daily driver around these parts though, depends on what she’s into riding.
    Yeah, the PB review makes me want one. It's not an accident I put it at the top of the list. She rides the usual--CC, Quarry, PC, Crest, So. Utah, so all buff to all rock and everything in between. Generally prefers a long up to a long down. She doesn't send jumps or drift corners but she's a solid descender.

    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post
    You can do a guerrilla gravity smash for around $4k with their lower end build.
    I'd love to get her a Revved GG, but the NX Eagle drivetrain on the base build makes me throw up in my mouth a little bit. I think she'd prefer Shimano 12 sp to SRAM anyway and all those bikes have it. I also have a spare set Dominions in the parts bin.

  10. #260
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,126
    Quote Originally Posted by HAB View Post
    Well, I was talking about the Smash in my last post. Which is a great bike, but the the $4000 build isn't as nice as the other stuff we're talking about. The Ripmo AF sounds good on paper too. A lot of it comes down to the suspension though. I *know* the RS stuff on the Meta is really good. I haven't ridden anything recent from DVO, so I'm not saying it definitely is not good, but it's an unknown (to me), making the Commencal a much safer bet.
    Got it. Thanks.
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  11. #261
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    17,895
    Quote Originally Posted by SchralphMacchio View Post
    Pretty crazy for the money ...

    But does AC want a 35 lbs bike?
    I'm looking at the Essential build, which is listed at 33 lbs. The Race build with the coil shock and 160 Lyrik is definitely way overkill. Her current bike weighs over 32 lbs.

    Quote Originally Posted by skaredshtles View Post
    Yeah - porky bikes are one thing for us fat fuckers... but isn't she a tiny person? I'd go full bling to celebrate the new knee.
    Short, but not tiny. Girl would make short work of the watermelon challenge. We aren't poor by any means, but a dentist bike isn't happening unless a crazy good used deal falls out of the sky and COVID seems to have made those disappear.

  12. #262
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Eugenio Oregón
    Posts
    8,382
    Sounds like you’d rather have a porky frame and better drivetrain - vs a nicer frame with NX build that can be replaced with GX stuff over time?

    At $4k complete you are looking at one vs the other.

    Two bikes in that price range I think about are the Marin Rift Zone Carbon 2 (SLX build, DPX2, 34 fork) and the Intense Primer 29 (NX build, DPX2/36 Performance).

    Intense frames are very stiff and very fun to ride, although a bit too progressive for my taste. Hard to use the full travel stroke but it does catch you very nicely on flow trails and big drops.

    I never tried that Marin Multitrac system but the geometry is dialed and the parts spec seem very intelligently chosen.
    _______________________________________________
    "Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.

    I'll be there."
    ... Andy Campbell

  13. #263
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Eugenio Oregón
    Posts
    8,382
    Ok, I just looked at that RipMo AF spec-
    Didn’t realize what you are getting for $4k. That’s such a solid all around build I dunno how you can beat it.

    Yeah it’s $800 more than the Commencal Essential or Trance X 2, but it’s a dialed ride-ready spec with nothing to complain about and probably nothing you’d ever desire to upgrade. Even for lightweights, in-line shocks won’t feel nearly as good as a reservoir shock on descents longer than 500’ of vert.

    You can forget I ever said anything about Marin now. That frame is probably not gonna be any lighter than the Ripmo AF frame, and I’d rather have the wider fork over the slightly better derailleur. Not to mention it’s supposed to be a so-so climber compared to the RipMo AF.

    Now the only question is, can you wait until March/April? because that’s how backed up Ibis and Shimano are ...
    _______________________________________________
    "Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.

    I'll be there."
    ... Andy Campbell

  14. #264
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    17,895
    Quote Originally Posted by SchralphMacchio View Post
    Sounds like you’d rather have a porky frame and better drivetrain - vs a nicer frame with NX build that can be replaced with GX stuff over time?
    The base GG build only saves maybe one pound over the alloy bikes and they seem like a way better deal straight out of the box. The guy with the black Pistola on PB has dropped his price a few hundo and it looks more tempting.

    Quote Originally Posted by SchralphMacchio View Post
    Now the only question is, can you wait until March/April? because that’s how backed up Ibis and Shimano are ...
    Jenson seems to be showing the Ripmo AF as in stock right now: https://www.jensonusa.com/Ibis-Ripmo-AF-SLX-Bike-2021

    Commencal is also saying March. Waiting isn't too big of a deal, she has a perfectly functional bike right now and there's only ~6 weeks of riding left.

  15. #265
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    13,845
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    Commencal is also saying March. Waiting isn't too big of a deal, she has a perfectly functional bike right now and there's only ~6 weeks of riding left.
    This is obviously speculation, but I wouldn't be at all surprised if companies that are currently saying March don't actually deliver until much later than that. It sounds like there are massive delays on quite a few components, and it only takes one piece of the puzzle to delay the whole bike.

    Not sure if that affects your decision, but there might be some value in going with something that's actually available.

  16. #266
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Mid-tomahawk
    Posts
    1,712
    On a different note, lord help me but I want the new Stumpjumper Evo.


  17. #267
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    17,895
    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post
    This is obviously speculation, but I wouldn't be at all surprised if companies that are currently saying March don't actually deliver until much later than that. It sounds like there are massive delays on quite a few components, and it only takes one piece of the puzzle to delay the whole bike.

    Not sure if that affects your decision, but there might be some value in going with something that's actually available.
    I'm not unconcerned about this scenario. I don't like rushing into big purchases in general so waiting has some inherent attraction, maybe a killer used deal might pop up over the winter, and it gives me time to maybe save some more money and get her more bike. But, it would suck to be deep into spring and still be waiting.

    Quote Originally Posted by HAB View Post
    On a different note, lord help me but I want the new Stumpjumper Evo.
    Damn, the EVO Comp build is whole lot of bike for the money. Do you have any idea when they're shooting for them to be available?

  18. #268
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ogden
    Posts
    937
    early november.
    bumps are for poor people

  19. #269
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    13,845
    Quote Originally Posted by HAB View Post
    On a different note, lord help me but I want the new Stumpjumper Evo.
    Seriously. Evil empire status notwithstanding, Specialized has some nice bikes in the lineup.

  20. #270
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    17,895
    Quote Originally Posted by westoxified View Post
    early november.
    I may have to embrace the dark side.

  21. #271
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ogden
    Posts
    937
    im on that side with a comp S5 on order. bagged the devinci troy idea when I found out this wasn't going superboost.
    bumps are for poor people

  22. #272
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Eugenio Oregón
    Posts
    8,382
    Quote Originally Posted by HAB View Post
    On a different note, lord help me but I want the new Stumpjumper Evo.


    About goddamn time! Hah!
    _______________________________________________
    "Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.

    I'll be there."
    ... Andy Campbell

  23. #273
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Eugenio Oregón
    Posts
    8,382
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    there's only ~6 weeks of riding left.
    There’s a lot more left than that if you scuttle local holiday plans and get down to Southern U for Turkey day or Christmas!
    _______________________________________________
    "Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.

    I'll be there."
    ... Andy Campbell

  24. #274
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    17,895
    Quote Originally Posted by westoxified View Post
    im on that side with a comp S5 on order. bagged the devinci troy idea when I found out this wasn't going superboost.
    What the hell is the difference between "carbon chassis and rear-end" and "full carbon frame"? Are weights for these published anywhere?

  25. #275
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Mid-tomahawk
    Posts
    1,712
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    What the hell is the difference between "carbon chassis and rear-end" and "full carbon frame"? Are weights for these published anywhere?
    I haven't checked this so I might be super wrong, but it's probably aluminum vs. carbon links.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •