Page 8 of 12 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 LastLast
Results 176 to 200 of 285
  1. #176
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    10,905
    So minivans aren’t for the gays anymore I guess.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  2. #177
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bottom feeding
    Posts
    10,828
    Quote Originally Posted by gaijin View Post
    It’s only been one winter and six months of duty but this Honda AWD Turbo is pulling me away from SUVs.

    Clearance. That’s the only deciding factor in 2021 as far as I can tell. Maybe towing heavy rigs is also a factor.


    A tunable turbo adding 30% HP & Torque over factory. A paddle-shifting CVT on AWD. 35 mpg. Massive interior space and malleable second and third row seating.

    Attachment 376723
    Attachment 376724

    Shit shreds, yo.
    I'd love one, ship it over.
    Well maybe I'm the faggot America
    I'm not a part of a redneck agenda

  3. #178
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    30,881
    Quote Originally Posted by AK47bp View Post
    So minivans aren’t for the gays anymore I guess.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    its really all about what the mrs is driving when she drops Bree & Chipper off at that toney private school

    she must not forget to pickup Bree at ballet,

    or was it pickup the brie and a case of proseco for the cocktail party or wtf ?

    life is so uncertain with a head full of mother's little helper but the burning question is

    which SUV is better for navigating strip malls
    Last edited by XXX-er; 06-09-2021 at 09:21 PM.
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  4. #179
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,664

    Another What Car Thread: Big-ish SUV's (or Minivan?)

    Wait— what’s ghey again? Is it Minivans or SUVs that equate to tiny penises? I have a tiny penis and a minivan and three gorgeous kids.

    Regardless— I’m so happy to no longer be muscling a big rig around. That said— I live in Japan. Roads are smaller, slower.

    I don’t know if this class of vehicle would win in my Tahoe life. I’m pretty sure that a Tesla model Y or Cybertruck would be my next Tahoe vehicle.

    I guess I’m just confused as to why people even buy Land Cruisers if they don’t drive on ocean beaches, logging roads, or tow things and have disposable income to pay for such shitty mileage. .

    I just don’t get it. Aside from hobby. The hobby I get. 25 years ago I built a ‘72 K5 Blazer. That was a hobby. That made sense. That got even worse mileage than anything else on the road today. No fucking way in hell would my hobby be my daily in 2021. You could have two vehicles for the price of one.
    Last edited by gaijin; 06-10-2021 at 07:00 AM.

  5. #180
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the ham
    Posts
    13,370
    Quote Originally Posted by AK47bp View Post
    Passport...

    There is a button for snow driving, so you’re good.
    Does it actually do anything? (other than illuminate a light on the dash)

    And is that light rainbow, or is that just in the minivans?

  6. #181
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    10,905
    Quote Originally Posted by Ted Striker View Post
    Does it actually do anything? (other than illuminate a light on the dash)

    And is that light rainbow, or is that just in the minivans?
    For people who don’t adapt their driving to snow and ice and continue to drive as normal, the button helps slow down acceleration preventing tire spins, may do other stuff too but not sure.

    If you press the rainbow button it just opens the trunk really wide for some reason.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  7. #182
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the ham
    Posts
    13,370
    Well, people like to put big packages back there.

  8. #183
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    3,711
    Minivans can be great, particularly if you find yourself hauling 4+ people around often. And many people who have SUVs or CUVs would probably be better off with a minivan. If I had 3 kids instead of two, an older Sienna would be high on my list. And, to be fair, I think that Toast's situation, and so the minivan talk is very relevant to 5+ person families. That said, I think their utility is being a little over-trumpeted here.

    There are currently two AWD minivans offered in the American market, and they both have low ground clearances, which matters for those who need it. I'm sure the Toyota will last forever, but it starts around $45k, looks like a Decepticon disguised as a loaf of bread, and, most importantly, you can't remove the second row, which is an automatic deal breaker for me. The other is a somewhat hard-to-find $40k+ Chrysler, which may or may not send shivers down your spine.

    The Cybertruck and Electric F-150 look pretty great on paper. I'm also curious as to what Toyota is going to do with the new 4Runner in 2023, especially given that the super old-school 4Runners are still selling like crazy.

    If I were in Japan, I'd get a used Skyline R34 with a roof box. The kids would be uncomfortable, but dad would enjoy himself and travel times would be cut in half.

    I don't think many cars' "snow modes" are helpful to anyone who drives in snow regularly. I hate Honda and Subaru's nanny-controls in deep or slushy snow. I find myself turning off the traction control, which hinders much more than it helps. In certain kinds of snow you need to drive as if you were in a boat, where the ability to turn is aided, not hindered, by using the throttle.

  9. #184
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    10,905
    Quote Originally Posted by Ted Striker View Post
    Well, people like to put big packages back there.
    Oh it’s great for wood.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  10. #185
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,248
    Quote Originally Posted by AKbruin View Post
    Minivans can be great, particularly if you find yourself hauling 4+ people around often. And many people who have SUVs or CUVs would probably be better off with a minivan. If I had 3 kids instead of two, an older Sienna would be high on my list. And, to be fair, I think that Toast's situation, and so the minivan talk is very relevant to 5+ person families. That said, I think their utility is being a little over-trumpeted here.

    There are currently two AWD minivans offered in the American market, and they both have low ground clearances, which matters for those who need it. I'm sure the Toyota will last forever, but it starts around $45k, looks like a Decepticon disguised as a loaf of bread, and, most importantly, you can't remove the second row, which is an automatic deal breaker for me. The other is a somewhat hard-to-find $40k+ Chrysler, which may or may not send shivers down your spine.

    The Cybertruck and Electric F-150 look pretty great on paper. I'm also curious as to what Toyota is going to do with the new 4Runner in 2023, especially given that the super old-school 4Runners are still selling like crazy.

    If I were in Japan, I'd get a used Skyline R34 with a roof box. The kids would be uncomfortable, but dad would enjoy himself and travel times would be cut in half.

    I don't think many cars' "snow modes" are helpful to anyone who drives in snow regularly. I hate Honda and Subaru's nanny-controls in deep or slushy snow. I find myself turning off the traction control, which hinders much more than it helps. In certain kinds of snow you need to drive as if you were in a boat, where the ability to turn is aided, not hindered, by using the throttle.
    The Sienna starts at 35k.

    Also I'm not sure ground clearance is THAT big a deal for most people. I spent a lot of grad school driving a lower clearance car to the ski hill and in the last week I drove my similarly clearance Transit Connect up to Hoodoo pass via about 3 hours of Idaho's finest first roads. Then I found out it was closed and drove a similar time back down and went to Missoula a different way. I'm not sure a lot of people ask more of their vehicle.

    That being said, if I got a Sienna or Pacifica, I'd seriously consider putting a very small lift on it.

    Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk

  11. #186
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the ham
    Posts
    13,370
    Quote Originally Posted by AKbruin View Post
    I don't think many cars' "snow modes" are helpful to anyone who drives in snow regularly. I hate Honda and Subaru's nanny-controls in deep or slushy snow. I find myself turning off the traction control, which hinders much more than it helps. In certain kinds of snow you need to drive as if you were in a boat, where the ability to turn is aided, not hindered, by using the throttle.
    Same here. I even turn that stuff on in my tacoma. But I run real snow tires.

    I think the majority of people buying swiss army knife suvs with "safety" systems, and oem all seasons are just using them as cars anyway, and have no actual clue beyond the marketing copy.

  12. #187
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    10,905

    Another What Car Thread: Big-ish SUV's (or Minivan?)

    The snow mode on the Honda is good for my wife. Grew up in AZ and might drive 1 time in the snow per year so no matter how much I try to teach her it doesn’t matter because she gets no real life practice, she just freaks out.

    The physics of winter driving inertia go in one ear and out the other……


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  13. #188
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    3,711
    Quote Originally Posted by MarcusBrody View Post
    The Sienna starts at 35k.

    Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk
    That's the base FWD Sienna. The AWD Sienna is much more expensive, at least within a 200 mile radius of Tahoe.

    This isn't an indictment against you, but a rant about crappy automotive reporting, but comparing cars by the their lowest MSRP is often misleading. Take the 4Runner for example. It's starting MSRP is under $37k. But that's for a RWD model with very few amenities. It's basically for a version of a 4Runner that no one sells because an RWD 4Runner is pretty dumb. Also, some manufacturers offer an overly low MSRP to curry flattering reviews and comparisons. 4Runners, for example, often sell for well above MSRP. And so do Kia Tellurides. So comparing a Kia Telluride with a $42k MSRP to, say, a Mazda CX-9 with a $42k MSRP isn't comparing apples to apples. The Tellurides go for like $5k above MSRP, and very few dealers are offering the lower-trim versions anyway.

  14. #189
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Gaperville, CO
    Posts
    5,845
    I lifted my FWD Sienna (which runs snows in winter and AT in summer) because clearance is more regularly an issue for me than traction of a heavy van with snow tires. If I lived in a massively snowy environment (i.e. not Colorado) or lived in a rural spot where road maintenance was less or my own, or lived in CA, my calculus would've been different.

    The clearance certainly helps in parking lots on big snow days. And it is especially helpful in accessing trailheads and dispersed camping in summer. I also carry a set of chains that I've never used for truly heinous conditions -- and a set of traction boards which mostly serve as leveling devices at camp.

  15. #190
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the ham
    Posts
    13,370
    Quote Originally Posted by AK47bp View Post
    ...no matter how much I try to teach her it doesn’t matter because she gets no real life practice, she just freaks out.

    The physics of winter driving inertia go in one ear and out the other……
    Literally everything I say to my wife goes in one ear and out the other.

    The passport and highlander are basically the short list to replace my wife's outback. What she wants is easy to drive, good visibility, and cargo space for two 55 lb dogs, and other assorted junk. (no kids)

    What I want is to be able to drive the thing for more than an hour without wanting to blow my brains out (my chief complaint with that whole segment is the tin can effect). Both the outback and our old crosstrek are solidly in that category.

    Beyond that, mileage in the 20s and comfortable seats would be nice.

  16. #191
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    8,965
    I believe Toyota sells more rwd sequoias than 4wd versions. I’m not sure about the 4Runner.

    I regularly see non-lifted awd sienna’s at the end of rough roads in the tahoe NF and Plumas NF. I know one of those specific siennas because it belongs to friends. They use all season tires in the summer and don’t have a spare. I am not totally clear if they fully get the risk they’re running with that scenario, but they have never had an issue with a tire blowout after regularly doing it for over a decade. Having driven those same roads in a fwd sienna (same clearance) and a land cruiser, I can’t stomach the thought of driving a brand new minivan on those roads because you’re gonna scrape the bottom on rocks, it’s inevitable. There’s no way around it. That family also runs snows in the winter and gets after it in the general tahoe area. One of the parents works part time at a ski hill and loads the van full with people and gear for a job-required 8am arrival.

  17. #192
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    3,711
    Quote Originally Posted by Ted Striker View Post
    The passport and highlander are basically the short list to replace my wife's outback. What she wants is easy to drive, good visibility, and cargo space for two 55 lb dogs, and other assorted junk. (no kids)

    What I want is to be able to drive the thing for more than an hour without wanting to blow my brains out (my chief complaint with that whole segment is the tin can effect). Both the outback and our old crosstrek are solidly in that category.

    Beyond that, mileage in the 20s and comfortable seats would be nice.
    From my limited experience, both the Passport and Highlander are comfortable to drive. Neither is going to drive like a sports car, but they are perfectly cromulent on the road. My issue with the Outback and the Crosstrek is their underwhelming engines. Driving uphill at elevation, as I do everyday, in a naturally aspirated 4-cylinder is fairly painful. I think either the Passport or Highlander will be fine. The Passport has fairly nifty acceleration. The Highlander Hybrid that we tried didn't vibe with any of us, but the 35 mpg is pretty outstanding. You might check out the CX-9 too. It has less cargo capacity but the nicest interior of those three.

  18. #193
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    13,844
    Our Sienna (AWD, XLE trim, a couple add ons here and there) was about $41k. Not cheap, but quite a bit cheaper than I expected. Especially since used AWD Siennas were going for ~$33k with 50,000 miles on them.

    And I'm entirely skeptical that all of you are regularly driving roads that require substantial clearance. I drive on forest service roads a few times a week and the Sienna would get up all of them without issue. The paint would get scratched up from brush on the sides, but the undercarriage would be just fine.

    Sure, if you're looking to have a daily driver that's also capable of going 4 wheeling in Moab, the Sienna isn't it. But pretty much any vehicle that's capable of 4 wheeling in Moab is gonna suck as a daily driver.

  19. #194
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    10,905
    Quote Originally Posted by Ted Striker View Post
    Literally everything I say to my wife goes in one ear and out the other.

    The passport and highlander are basically the short list to replace my wife's outback. What she wants is easy to drive, good visibility, and cargo space for two 55 lb dogs, and other assorted junk. (no kids)

    What I want is to be able to drive the thing for more than an hour without wanting to blow my brains out (my chief complaint with that whole segment is the tin can effect). Both the outback and our old crosstrek are solidly in that category.

    Beyond that, mileage in the 20s and comfortable seats would be nice.
    Well I’ve had both those vehicles (older Highlander) and both meet those criteria. Probably down to test driving each to determine.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  20. #195
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,126
    New car shopping based on MSRP or dealer asking prices greater than MSRP is a good way to pay too much.

    Invoice is a better comparison tool. Today's market, probably going to have to pay more than invoice, but I'd expect negotiated prices to return to normal by fall.

    And AKB - so why not another Tundra or a Sequoia?
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  21. #196
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,248
    Quote Originally Posted by AKbruin View Post
    That's the base FWD Sienna. The AWD Sienna is much more expensive, at least within a 200 mile radius of Tahoe.

    This isn't an indictment against you, but a rant about crappy automotive reporting, but comparing cars by the their lowest MSRP is often misleading. Take the 4Runner for example. It's starting MSRP is under $37k. But that's for a RWD model with very few amenities. It's basically for a version of a 4Runner that no one sells because an RWD 4Runner is pretty dumb. Also, some manufacturers offer an overly low MSRP to curry flattering reviews and comparisons. 4Runners, for example, often sell for well above MSRP. And so do Kia Tellurides. So comparing a Kia Telluride with a $42k MSRP to, say, a Mazda CX-9 with a $42k MSRP isn't comparing apples to apples. The Tellurides go for like $5k above MSRP, and very few dealers are offering the lower-trim versions anyway.
    You can get the base with AWD. It's 36400 MSRP (probably plus destination). I don't know what the stock is like around Tahoe, but I'm sure you could order one or track one down via Costco or similar. I almost took a look at one in the Vegas area recently that was advertised around 37 I think, but it sold quickly .

    Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk

  22. #197
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Not Brooklyn
    Posts
    8,319
    Lifted AWD Sienna will probably be my next car, maybe a hybrid. Our XC70 is feeling small these days with 2 kids and a dog, plus friends, grandparents, etc. The 3 row CUV's aren't much bigger, they just cram more seats in, and most have less ground clearance than my Volvo. I don't want a 15 mpg Suburban or Sequoia. And, yes, I need the lift as I frequently drive on dirt roads before they are plowed in the winter and shitty, rutted dirt roads in the spring. I've tried doing with an AWD Volvo V50. It didn't work. I need to be able to drive on fucked up roads and 8" of fresh but a truck-based SUV is overkill.

  23. #198
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    3,711
    There's a lot of softroading stuff that you can get away with in a lower-clearance AWD, but to bodywhomper's point, it can be super sketchy. I feel like I've pushed my CR-V and wife's Forester to their near limits, and it's kind of an anxiety ridden experience. Every time something tags the undercarriage, you're worried that it's gonna be a $1k mechanic bill. And I'm also always concerned I'm gonna get stuck several miles up a remote dirt road, which would be a nightmare and a hefty tow bill. And there are a good number of trailheads that I can't do unless I recruit a friend with a better 4x4. If we're just talking washboard dirt or gravel, which is what a lot of people consider "off road," then clearance is less important (although firm suspensions and low-profile tires still suck).

    And clearance helps in deep snow. It can make the difference between skiing 18" powder before 7 a.m. or sitting in my house until 11 a.m. waiting for the plow to come clear my street while lower-elevation denizens track-out my shit. It's also helpful when Caltrans/NVTrans hasn't plowed the turnout to a backcountry trailhead. I can't speak for others, but these things are pretty important to me.

    FWIW, there are 34 AWD Siennas within 200 miles of me, which includes the Bay Area, and the MSRP on the three cheapest are all over $43k, and it looks like most people are buying them for a little over MSRP. I read that with the microchip issue, there's high demand and little supply, so manufacturers and dealers are trying to stock higher trim versions in any remotely popular model these days, which might explain it. Anyhow, the bigger point I was trying to make was that there are few options for AWD minivans stateside.

  24. #199
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,248
    Quote Originally Posted by AKbruin View Post
    There's a lot of softroading stuff that you can get away with in a lower-clearance AWD, but to bodywhomper's point, it can be super sketchy. I feel like I've pushed my CR-V and wife's Forester to their near limits, and it's kind of an anxiety ridden experience. Every time something tags the undercarriage, you're worried that it's gonna be a $1k mechanic bill. And I'm also always concerned I'm gonna get stuck several miles up a remote dirt road, which would be a nightmare and a hefty tow bill. And there are a good number of trailheads that I can't do unless I recruit a friend with a better 4x4. If were just talking washboard dirt or gravel, which is what a lot of people consider "off road," then clearance is less important (although firm suspensions and low-profile tires still suck).

    And clearance helps in deep snow. It can make the difference between skiing 18" powder before 7 a.m. or sitting in my house until 11 a.m. waiting for the plow to come clear my street while lower-elevation denizens track-out my shit. It's also helpful when Caltrans/NVTrans hasn't plowed the turnout to a backcountry trailhead. I can't speak for others, but these things are pretty important to me.

    FWIW, there are 34 AWD Siennas within 200 miles of me, which includes the Bay Area, and the MSRP on the three cheapest are all over $43k, and it looks like most people are buying them for a little over MSRP. I read that with the microchip issue, there's high demand and little supply, so manufacturers and dealers are trying to stock higher trim versions in any remotely popular model these days, which might explain it. Anyhow, the bigger point I was trying to make was that there are few options for AWD minivans stateside.
    I definitely agree with the anxiety part. I'm very careful when driving my low clearance vehicle on bad roads and have turned back multiple times that I wouldn't with higher clearance vehicle.

    I suspect that you're right with the stocking higher profit, higher trim models when there is limited demand. If you need a new car today it's definitely an issue but if you can wait a few months (like I plan too unless my old commuter dies), I don't think it will be a big issue getting a lower trim AWD.

    Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk

  25. #200
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the ham
    Posts
    13,370
    Quote Originally Posted by AKbruin View Post
    From my limited experience, both the Passport and Highlander are comfortable to drive. Neither is going to drive like a sports car, but they are perfectly cromulent on the road. My issue with the Outback and the Crosstrek is their underwhelming engines.
    I hear you on that, and IMO Subaru has been going in the wrong direction for some time now. I like the CX9, but my wife isn't enamored with it. The slope of the rear roofline goes against what she's looking for, which is more of a box shaped back.

    High-hybrid would great for all the around town stuff my wife does. Be curious what the droning factor would be driving up the mountain road (I have some experience with previous Toyota hybrids).

    Quote Originally Posted by AK47bp View Post
    Well I’ve had both those vehicles (older Highlander) and both meet those criteria. Probably down to test driving each to determine.
    Or it'll come down to which will take a bigger load in the rear.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •