Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 88
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    59715
    Posts
    7,485
    LX FTW

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,173
    The 4Runner/GX third row is tiny, like for toddlers only.

    The VW Atlas looks like it's almost identical in size to the Honda Pilot/ Acura MDX. Third row isn't gigantic. Sequoia seems about the same size as a Tahoe/Yukon with 3rd row.

    If I intended to use the third row in an SUV regularly, I'd be looking at Suburbans or Expeditions.
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Upstate
    Posts
    9,690
    Quote Originally Posted by El Chupacabra View Post
    The 4Runner/GX third row is tiny, like for toddlers only.

    The VW Atlas looks like it's almost identical in size to the Honda Pilot/ Acura MDX. Third row isn't gigantic. Sequoia seems about the same size as a Tahoe/Yukon with 3rd row.

    If I intended to use the third row in an SUV regularly, I'd be looking at Suburbans or Expeditions.
    Atlas second row seats are slide adjustable which can make for a LOT of leg room in the third row.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The Mayonnaisium
    Posts
    10,498
    The 5.7L Suburban hasn't been made since 1999 and I'm guessing Marshall's self-professed status as a tightwad means the 21+ year old vehicle had a few hundred thousand miles and received minimum maintenance. So, Suburbans that 'keep blowing engines' may not paint the whole picture. No offense, Marshall. If you do end up with another used Suburban, 2007+ do have issues with displacement on demand. Get the engine fixed early if it starts making noise.

    I just shopped a bunch of new vehicles including the Land Cruiser, Sequoia, 4Runner, GX, and Suburban. The Suburban had the most spacious, easiest to access third row, hands down. Third rows in the 4Runner and GX have almost no leg room. Headroom in the Sequoia was way short given the size of the vehicle. I did not shop the Expedition but it is supposed to have a spacious third row. Relative to Suburban and Expedition, you'd have to go van to get a more spacious third row


    From US News:

    11 SUVs With the Best Third-Row Seats
    11) 2020 Hyundai Palisade: Third-Row Legroom: 31.4 in. | $31,775 | USN Interior Score: 7.8/10
    10) 2020 Kia Telluride: Third-Row Legroom: 31.4 in. | $31,890 | USN Interior Score: 8.1/10
    9) 2020 Dodge Durango: Third-Row Legroom: 31.5 in. | $31,590 | USN Interior Score: 8.3/10
    8) 2020 Kia Sorento: Third-Row Legroom: 31.7 in. | $26,990 | USN Interior Score: 7.0/10
    7) 2020 Subaru Ascent: Third-Row Legroom: 31.7 in. | $31,995 | USN Interior Score: 7.9/10
    6) 2020 Honda Pilot: Third-Row Legroom: 31.9 in. | $31,650 | USN Interior Score: 8.0/10
    5) 2020 Buick Enclave: Third-Row Legroom: 33.5 in. | $40,000 | USN Interior Score: 8.6/10
    4) 2020 Chevrolet Traverse: Third-Row Legroom: 33.5 in. | $29,800 | USN Interior Score: 9.0/10
    3) 2020 Volkswagen Atlas: Third-Row Legroom: 33.7 in. | $31,545 | USN Interior Score: 8.5/10
    2) 2020 Chevrolet Suburban: Third-Row Legroom: 34.5 in. | $51,700 | USN Interior Score: 8.0/10
    1) 2020 Ford Expedition: Third-Row Legroom: 36.1 in. | $52,810 | USN Interior Score: 8.5/10

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Not in the PRB
    Posts
    32,962
    Quote Originally Posted by Mazderati View Post
    Headroom in the Sequoia was way short given the size of the vehicle.
    This makes sense, because with the 3rd row removed, the back is completely flat (I sleep in it ), there is no "well" for feet/legs. Without the seat sitting lower and a well for the sitter's feet, the seat is gonna sit higher hurting the head room.
    "fuck off you asshat gaper shit for brains fucktard wanker." - Jesus Christ
    "She was tossing her bean salad with the vigor of a Drunken Pop princess so I walked out of the corner and said.... "need a hand?"" - Odin
    "everybody's got their hooks into you, fuck em....forge on motherfuckers, drag all those bitches across the goal line with you." - (not so) ill-advised strategy

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The Mayonnaisium
    Posts
    10,498
    ^ Even the front seats. Sequoia had the least headroom of the bunch.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Haxorland
    Posts
    7,103
    3 kids age 5-10 + dog, living in SE, USA?

    Welcome to the Sienna club brother. I got 2 kids, and two 60+ lb. dogs. The Mrs. will get weak in the knees when she realizes how amazing remote push button door opening is for dealing with kids and their BS, and the shear amount of crap a minivan can swallow combined with 2nd and 3rd row seats that can comfortably seat adult sized teenagers will make you trade ground clearance for real day to day utility. Minivans are made for this sole purpose, embrace it. SUV's trade vertical cabin space and ride comfort for ground clearance and that's it. You know who needs more cabin space? Everyone sitting in rows 2 and 3, especially growing kids that are going to be teenagers. Just get the living room on wheels.

    You know my first reaction to sitting in the middle row of a Excursion when they first came out? 'Damn, this floor is high and my knees are above my belly button. I thought this was supposed to be a big car. I'd rather sit in the family minivan.' I was 18 and 6'2" at the time and had a 6 hour ride in one on interstate highways the whole way. Someone tried to get me to trade out for the 3rd row for a couple hours and that was just impossible. I was curled into a ball to even try to sit there. Absolutely terrible car for hauling people and I haven't seen an SUV that has a 2nd or 3rd row that can hold a candle to a minivan for passenger comfort. The ground clearance is something you truly need every once in a while (and frankly you can likely work around it), but the daily sitting needs are needed every trip.

    Unless you live on a mountaintop at the end of 2 miles of mud road or you tow a powerboat or horse trailer everywhere you go, you don't need an SUV and any other reason you come up with is a lie or is <2% of your overall driving and you know it. In 13 years you can get a cool car again. You're in the middle of being a dad now, so just give up on being cool, put on your cargo shorts and white new balances and get in the van.

    If you do live at the top of a mountain and tow heavy trailers daily, just get this F-650 6 door: http://www.f650pickups.com/build/build-sixdoor.html
    I've concluded that DJSapp was never DJSapp, and Not DJSapp is also not DJSapp, so that means he's telling the truth now and he was lying before.

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Not in the PRB
    Posts
    32,962
    Quote Originally Posted by Mazderati View Post
    ^ Even the front seats. Sequoia had the least headroom of the bunch.
    ah, well, I'm not tall so no issue there for me.
    "fuck off you asshat gaper shit for brains fucktard wanker." - Jesus Christ
    "She was tossing her bean salad with the vigor of a Drunken Pop princess so I walked out of the corner and said.... "need a hand?"" - Odin
    "everybody's got their hooks into you, fuck em....forge on motherfuckers, drag all those bitches across the goal line with you." - (not so) ill-advised strategy

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    champlain valley
    Posts
    5,656

    Auto Third Row Seating

    We had the second generation fwd sienna

    Thing was bomber- I found the third row cramped but I am really large - it was great for kids

    It was ok in the snow - I drive escapes and that was the go to snow vehicle

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Gaperville, CO
    Posts
    5,851
    Sienna + 3.5" lift == more clearance than a suburban.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Kg50Vjk.jpg 
Views:	69 
Size:	979.2 KB 
ID:	331762

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Nhampshire
    Posts
    7,778
    Honestly the Pacifica is probably the best mini going right now, with the Odyssey 10spd right behind (apparently the other tranny is crap).
    Sienna hasn't had a new platform in 15+ years, which makes it ancient. If buying used, sienna or prior gen Odyssey are both bomber.

    Listen to DJ and look at interior dimensions for 3 rows vs vans. You get a few inches in every dimension in a smaller, less expensive vehicle. Also - vans are built for beating the absolute shit out of, and sliding doors are magic for parking lots.

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Haxorland
    Posts
    7,103
    Quote Originally Posted by doebedoe View Post
    Sienna + 3.5" lift == more clearance than a suburban.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Kg50Vjk.jpg 
Views:	69 
Size:	979.2 KB 
ID:	331762
    This is the way
    I've concluded that DJSapp was never DJSapp, and Not DJSapp is also not DJSapp, so that means he's telling the truth now and he was lying before.

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Not Brooklyn
    Posts
    8,353
    Quote Originally Posted by DJSapp View Post
    The ground clearance is something you truly need every once in a while (and frankly you can likely work around it), but the daily sitting needs are needed every trip.
    I'd buy a Sienna in a heartbeat if ground clearance wasn't an issue. Those things are great. But it is an issue. Total deal breaker for my use. I need something about as capable as an Outback about 50 or so times a year. Something more like a 4Runner would be better about 5-10 times a year. I can live without that.

    Can anyone compare 3-row crossovers (Highlander, Pilot, etc.) to lifted wagons (Outback, XC70) for driving unplowed or poorly maintained dirt roads? The latter have more ground clearance and a shorter wheelbase than most members of the former group.

    And how much variance in capability is there in the former group? Is an Ascent (8.7" clearance), for example, much better than a Pilot (7.3")?

    Edit: Sienna + lift is interesting

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Gaperville, CO
    Posts
    5,851
    Quote Originally Posted by schuss View Post
    Honestly the Pacifica is probably the best mini going right now, with the Odyssey 10spd right behind (apparently the other tranny is crap).
    Sienna hasn't had a new platform in 15+ years, which makes it ancient. If buying used, sienna or prior gen Odyssey are both bomber.

    Listen to DJ and look at interior dimensions for 3 rows vs vans. You get a few inches in every dimension in a smaller, less expensive vehicle. Also - vans are built for beating the absolute shit out of, and sliding doors are magic for parking lots.
    Sienna's platform was new as of 2011 model year, so yeah, not fresh. Next year is a new generation built on the Highlander platform.

    Mixed reviews on the 8spd tranny from a power delivery standpoint from 2017 onwards. Reliability seems fine. Also the only platform that AWD is an option.

    Pacifica certainly wins on features. Honda/Toyota for reliability.

    ISBD -- welcome to take it for a spin sometime. I don't know you get quite the same offroad performance due to wheelbase and suspension design as the an outback (and it certainly isn't as fun to drive as your XC70). But I got up/down some pretty exciting stuff in Lost Park area. EDIT: Fuck dude -- just saw I missed a text from you like...months ago. Apologies. Went through some shit this season/spring.

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Not Brooklyn
    Posts
    8,353
    Quote Originally Posted by doebedoe View Post
    ISBD -- welcome to take it for a spin sometime. I don't know you get quite the same offroad performance due to wheelbase and suspension design as the an outback (and it certainly isn't as fun to drive as your XC70). But I got up/down some pretty exciting stuff in Lost Park area. EDIT: Fuck dude -- just saw I missed a text from you like...months ago. Apologies. Went through some shit this season/spring.
    Cool. Now I want lifted Sienna. Will roll with the XC70 for another year or so. It's only occasionally too small now, but it's becoming more frequent.

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Haxorland
    Posts
    7,103
    Quote Originally Posted by doebedoe View Post
    Pacifica certainly wins on features. Honda/Toyota for reliability.
    Yeah, if you need all the bells and whistles, go sit in the Chrysler. Then sit in the Honda/Toyota and realize the Chrysler was put together by hacks. The fit and finish of the Chrysler feels like they were trying to check every single feature box while keeping cost at an absolute minimum and it shows. It felt super cheap when compared to honda/toyota (even for their high end) in 2012 when I was shopping for a van. At the same time, it's all going to be covered in dorito dust and boogers within a month, so maybe it doesn't matter.

    The Honda has no driver headroom either. I sat in the drivers seat and my hair was brushing the ceiling (I'm 6'3"). Seat was as far down as it went and I was done with it within 30 seconds.
    I've concluded that DJSapp was never DJSapp, and Not DJSapp is also not DJSapp, so that means he's telling the truth now and he was lying before.

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Wasatch
    Posts
    6,256
    Quote Originally Posted by Marshall Tucker View Post
    forward faacing. Heard great things from our local toyo shop about v8 4-runners through about 2008 (certian engine) with third row. I realize the five + dog means NO interior cargo space; cipher the roof or the platform thingy on the hitch; or our small 4/6 trailer can handle....
    4Runner third row won't fit adult size people comfortably for any length of time. I think it's the same as in my GX. My 5 year old loves it back there, but it's really just a fold-away jump seat.

    If you want a Toyota-branded Suburban replacement, you want the Sequoia. But I would go minivan unless you're wheeling it or towing something massive.

    Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    champlain valley
    Posts
    5,656
    Quote Originally Posted by doebedoe View Post
    Sienna's platform was new as of 2011 model year, so yeah, not fresh. Next year is a new generation built on the Highlander platform.

    Mixed reviews on the 8spd tranny from a power delivery standpoint from 2017 onwards. Reliability seems fine. Also the only platform that AWD is an option.
    the no spare in the awd was a deal killer for me

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    SE USA
    Posts
    3,421
    Quote Originally Posted by Mazderati View Post
    status as a tightwad
    Guilty as charged

    Quote Originally Posted by Mazderati View Post
    means the 21+ year old vehicle had a few hundred thousand miles and received minimum maintenance.
    negative ghostrider. I'm pretty religious about taking care of stuff and am a big believer in maintenance. First suburban died at 215; second I think 235 but need to check. both had regular 30k maintence, oil change, etc.
    "Can't you see..."

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Haxorland
    Posts
    7,103
    Quote Originally Posted by DBdude View Post
    the no spare in the awd was a deal killer for me
    They make swing away spare tire hitch mounts these days. This is a solvable problem.

    I've concluded that DJSapp was never DJSapp, and Not DJSapp is also not DJSapp, so that means he's telling the truth now and he was lying before.

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    SE USA
    Posts
    3,421
    Quote Originally Posted by DJSapp View Post
    Welcome to the Sienna club brother.
    nnnoooooooo!!!! (actually they are in college now). I see a 3-4k # boat in my future, which I will need to trailer regularly, though probably not farther than 50 miles or so. How would the seina do with that?

    (askin for a friend).
    "Can't you see..."

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The Mayonnaisium
    Posts
    10,498
    Quote Originally Posted by Marshall Tucker View Post
    negative ghostrider. I'm pretty religious about taking care of stuff and am a big believer in maintenance. First suburban died at 215; second I think 235 but need to check. both had regular 30k maintence, oil change, etc.
    I stand corrected re maintenance and revise a few hundred thousand miles to a couple hundred thousand miles.

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,282
    He should consider a transmission cooler and a external filter for insurance.

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Way East Tennessee
    Posts
    4,594
    What about one of those big Nissan Home Schooler vans? LOL

    Stick to a Suburban. Bette yet, get a GMC Denali with the 6.2L engine. I've had a couple and they make the standard Burb engine look like a 4 cylinder.
    In order to properly convert this thread to a polyasshat thread to more fully enrage the liberal left frequenting here...... (insert latest democratic blunder of your choice).

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Planning an exit
    Posts
    5,933
    Quote Originally Posted by Mazderati View Post
    ^ Even the front seats. Sequoia had the least headroom of the bunch.
    I'm 6'2" and I never noticed a headroom issue except in the third row.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •