Results 501 to 525 of 682
Thread: Small Biz Support 2020
-
05-03-2020, 10:55 AM #501Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 1,705
I should post under an alias, but are you guys stating that you need to hire staff in order to turn the cash into a grant? If so, I'm sure that Mrs Griz is available for hire (and not show up). What am I missing? Do they have to be re-hires and not new hires?
-
05-03-2020, 11:44 AM #502
-
05-03-2020, 02:19 PM #503
Anyone in OR having issues with the loan? I have a contact at WaFed who is doing loans; as of Friday she was all caught up, and looking for more applicants. PM me.
-
05-03-2020, 05:32 PM #504I drink it up
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Location
- my own little world
- Posts
- 5,875
-
05-03-2020, 06:21 PM #505
My PPP just got approved and I have little info as I haven’t seen paperwork. Can someone answer- if you’re an independent contractor 1099 how do you handle the funds and forgiveness? No employees, just me. In my mind it’s income / payroll to me. Am I bulletproof - or missing something?
-
05-03-2020, 06:48 PM #506
The advice given to me is to put in in the bank and make draws over the next 8 weeks. Keep a record of them and anything else you spend $$$ on, cell service/internet/utilities and Health Insurance (ACA is acceptable). Burn up the total, you should at least achieve 75% forgiveness.
I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.
"Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"
-
05-03-2020, 06:52 PM #507
Are cell phone bills/ phone bills forgivable? I’ve seen conflicting info.
-
05-03-2020, 07:02 PM #508
-
05-03-2020, 09:21 PM #509
Awesome; thanks.
-
05-03-2020, 10:48 PM #510
-
05-04-2020, 08:52 AM #511Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2019
- Location
- MA
- Posts
- 121
FYI all, from the latest update to Treasury's PPP FAQs:
40. Question: Will a borrower’s PPP loan forgiveness amount (pursuant to section 1106 of the CARES Act and SBA’s implementing rules and guidance) be reduced if the borrower laid off an employee, offered to rehire the same employee, but the employee declined the offer?
Answer: No. As an exercise of the Administrator’s and the Secretary’s authority under Section 1106(d)(6) of the CARES Act to prescribe regulations granting de minimis exemptions from the Act’s limits on loan forgiveness, SBA and Treasury intend to issue an interim final rule excluding laid-off employees whom the borrower offered to rehire (for the same salary/wages and same number of hours) from the CARES Act’s loan forgiveness reduction calculation. The interim final rule will specify that, to qualify for this exception, the borrower must have made a good faith, written offer of rehire, and the employee’s rejection of that offer must be documented by the borrower. Employees and employers should be aware that employees who reject offers of re-employment may forfeit eligibility for continued unemployment compensation.
-
05-04-2020, 09:27 AM #512
Can you post a link?
All I see is the April 3 interim final rule.. . .
-
05-04-2020, 09:50 AM #513Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2019
- Location
- MA
- Posts
- 121
https://home.treasury.gov/policy-iss...all-businesses
Scroll down to "Program Rules" and this is were the most recent releases appear. FAQ's were just updated yesterday. There have also been several updates to the interim final rules since April 3rd. Many of the rule updates have been highly specific/technical in nature and not of interest to most borrowers but the updates on liquidity and the borrower certifications and the new safe harbor are important. However, most all of the rule updates so far have been covered (and tend to appear first) in the FAQs so you can probably just stick to that and leave the actual rule text to your lawyer and/or accountant if you have them.
-
05-04-2020, 09:57 AM #514Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2019
- Location
- MA
- Posts
- 121
I would say my big concern right now is how are they going to assess liquidity for smbs since they seem to be interested in taking a harder look at eligibility now. The updated guidance states qualification requires the lack of "other sources of liquidity sufficient to support their ongoing operations in a manner that is not significantly detrimental to the business." That's pretty vague.
-
05-04-2020, 10:40 AM #515
coming back to this
has anyone confirmed from another source the paragraph saying K1 is not allowed? [maybe direct from SBA...?]
from the link:
Conspicuously absent from this guidance is any instruction for S Corporation owners who pay themselves from owner’s draw or distributions. The SBA Administrator and Treasury have not released official guidance on whether owner’s draw counts toward the payroll calculation for purposes of qualifying for PPP. But an email from the SBA dated April 6, 2020 states, “Only payroll costs in the form of salary, wages, tips, etc. are eligible for the PPP program. Owner draws, distributions, amounts recorded on a K-1 are not eligible for the PPP program.” An SBA webinar I recently attended stated the same information so it appears to be an official position of the SBA.
https://home.treasury.gov/system/fil...an-Amounts.pdf
Our bank says our distributions ARE income and are not a problem at all & that we should move forward as we had submitted. They also suggested setting up a secondary checking account to use for the sole purpose of the PPP funds for clarity of how they are used.
My understanding of legislation being silent on an issue was that it meant no barrier was indicated. Obviously, a clarification direct from SBA would be notable (& presumbably would be publicly published?). But the article above does not provide that link...wondered if someone found that info separately?
-
05-04-2020, 10:51 AM #516Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2019
- Location
- MA
- Posts
- 121
I doubt K-1 distributions qualify. If you are an S Corp owner, you shouldn't be "paying yourself" via K-1 distributions anyways. Salary/wages for your work (i.e. payroll costs) are already required to be paid via payroll by current regulations which require a "reasonable salary". Distributions aren't supposed to be compensation for your work but distributions of profit.
-
05-04-2020, 10:55 AM #517Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2019
- Location
- MA
- Posts
- 121
Also, you should not rely on what your bank tells you exclusively as the regs establish that banks have essentially no liability if your loans are deemed out of compliance or fraudulent.
-
05-04-2020, 11:14 AM #518Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2018
- Posts
- 29
In my opinion they are going to have to or it opens a bit of a mess.
2 scenarios; 2 businesses, one is an s corp, one is a single member llc (sole prop) both owners are paid 100,000. the s corp owner as wages, the llc member as a draw.
Assuming both received $20,833 in PPP since no other employees. Both use 75% for 'payroll'. S corp owner will have to pay income tax on $20,833 since that portion of their expenses are not tax deductible from their 1120s. LLC member only has 5,208 in non deductible expenses since they aren't deducting officer payroll (its just part of net income) and only pay tax on $5,208.
Not equitable treatment under the tax code. Extrapolate out to multi owner s corps and LLC's and it becomes a bigger problem
-
05-04-2020, 11:15 AM #519
This article may shed some light on the attitude at the IRS regarding salary versus distributions in a small business/S Corp. In general, the ruling is that small companies must pay a reasonable salary for the work performed by an owner. The purpose is so that the owner isn't ducking payroll taxes by taking money solely through distributions. Therefore, I believe the rule to only include salary and wages is in line with prior rulings related to the choices made.
https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclope...ton-issue.html
-
05-04-2020, 11:21 AM #520Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2018
- Posts
- 29
-
05-04-2020, 11:22 AM #521Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2019
- Location
- MA
- Posts
- 121
-
05-04-2020, 11:37 AM #522Hucked to flat once
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Idaho
- Posts
- 11,001
Any thoughts on prepaying employee health insurance premiums for future months past the eight weeks to hit the 75%? I've received mixed signals-banker is saying no. CPA is saying it works.
-
05-04-2020, 11:47 AM #523Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2019
- Location
- MA
- Posts
- 121
There hasn't been a lot of guidance on the "incurred and paid" rule about the 8 week period. For example, we still don't know the answer to this for certain:
PPP loan funds received 05/01.
Payroll 05/06 for pay period 04/16-04/30. This was paid, but not incurred during the 8 weeks -- does it qualify?
I would be pretty wary of using it for anything that is not either incurred (i.e. covers the period during the 8 weeks) or paid out during the 8 weeks or that will smell of "gaming" the program.
Better off using bonuses to worthy ees who are under $100K (i.e. under $15,385 in pay over the 8 weeks) if you need to get to 75%.
-
05-04-2020, 12:08 PM #524
We got funded this morning; huge relief.
-
05-04-2020, 12:12 PM #525
Bookmarks